. Therefore, in the end, the project was generally following the ME requirements.Due to fact that both schools are under the College of Engineering, this simple solution wassurprisingly effective and saved a lot of potential confusion.Case StudyThere is a current shift in the automobile market toward electric vehicles. However, the currentlymost popular electric vehicle, the Tesla Model S, still has a structure similar to that of aconventional vehicle. This design cannot fully utilize the potential of an electric vehicle. Instead,it makes the vehicle even more complex by adding electric modules onto a mechanical systemwhile minimally reducing the number of mechanical components. A fully digitized electricalcontrol system could unleash a higher
. (2013, June). A female-only camp for STEM disciplines. 2013 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition - Outreach to K-12 Females, Atlanta, GA.4 Scutt, H. I., Gilmartin, S. K., Sheppard, S., & Brunhaver, S. (2013). Research-informed practices for inclusive science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) classrooms: Strategies for educators to close the gender gap. 2013 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition – Research Initiatives, Atlanta, GA.5 Governor's school FAQs. (2012, October 5). Retrieved from http://www.ncogs.org/index.php/faqs/governor-s- school-faqs6 Healy, N. Berenstein, A. (2012). Using Summer Programs to Excite Secondary Students about Nanoscale Science and Engineering.2012 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition
for professional development: Page 24.751.15 Investigations into effective collaboration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(5), 499-514.6. Clarke, D.J. & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 947-967.7. Loucks-Horsley, S., Love, N., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., & Hewson, P. W. (2003). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.8. Custer, R. L., Daugherty, J. L., Meyer, J. P. (2010). Formulating a concept base for secondary level engineering: A review and synthesis
firstorganizations to report on their own failures in their annual Failure Report6, and they have alsomaintained a web site (Admitting Failure, http://www.admittingfailure.com/) that encouragesdevelopment-oriented workers and organizations to document and discuss failure cases. On thisweb site, the failure stories include two main sections: a description of the failure and thelearning that resulted. Similarly, texts such as Lucena et al.’s Engineering and SustainableCommunity Development features many insightful examples of engineering projects that did notsucceed.2 Many other cases are available on the Internet, in databases, and in other publishedliterature. Yet, no one has attempted to systematically analyze and categorize these failures tocreate a
Knowledge for the 21 st Century: Preparing the Civil Engineer for the Future. ASCE: 2nd edition. 2. ASME. (2010). Creating the Future of Mechanical Engineering Education: Phase 1 Report. ASME Center for Education Task Force: December 15. 3. Besterfield-Sacre M., Ozaltin N. O., Shartrand A., Shuman L. J. (2011). Understanding the technical entrepreneurship landscape in engineering education. Annual Conference and Exposition of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). 4. Brush, C. (2013). Does Entrepreneurship Education Matter? Forbes. June 24, 2013. 5. Byers, T., Seelig, T., Sheppard, S., and Weilerstein, P. (2013). Entrepreneurship: Its Role in Engineering Education. The Bridge on Undergraduate
Technology Doug Carroll is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Missouri S&T and is the Director for the Cooperative Engineering Program, a cooperative effort with Missouri S&T and Missouri State University. Dr. Carroll founded the student design center at Missouri S&T and served as its first director. He also served as the advisor for the solar car project for 12 years, including two national champion teams. He has worked with many students on design projects in his career. Page 24.964.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014
reviewer for several other technical journals. She has received a number of awards, including ASEE Fellow, the McGraw Award, and, most recently, the Berger Award. In addition to activity in the ethics division, she is also a member of the Engineering Technology Division’s executive board. She serves on several national committees. Marilyn is also active in the Association for Practical and Professional Ethics, serving as a moderator for the Ethics Bowl and proceedings editor, and the Association for Business Communication; she s a regional vice-president and a section editor for ABC’s pedagogical journal
Biomedical Engineering and Electrical Engineering, respectively.Miss Xi Zhan, Department of Educational Studies, The Ohio State University Xi Zhan is a doctoral student of Educational Administration at The Ohio State University. She holds an M. A. in Educational Administration from The Ohio State University, U. S. A. and a B. A. in Teaching Chinese as a Second Language from Southwest University, China. She has experience in teaching Chinese language in a vocational school in Thailand and teaching children who have intellectual disability and challenging behavior in China and U.S.A. She also assisted with an instructional design of multimedia case studies on technology integration for teachers and school leaders during her
-mail: lrilett2@unl.eduBibliography1 Anderson-Rowland, M.R., Reyes, M. A., Jordan, C., & McCartney, M. A. (1999). A Model for Academia, Industry, and Government Collaboration for K-12 Outreach. 29th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference 13a7-2. San Juan, PR: ASEE/IEEE.2 Committee on Future Surface Transportation Agency Human Resource Needs. (2003). The workforce challenge: Recruiting, training, and retaining qualified workers or transportation and transit agencies (Special Report No. 275). Washington DC: Transportation Research Board.3 Institute of Education Science. (2009). National Assessment of Educational Progress. Retrieved from http://nationsreportcard.gov/.4 Ivey, S
).Retrieved January 1, 2014, from http://ecee.colorado.edu/~mathys/ecen2250/abet/criterion3.html2. CubeSat Design Specification. (n.d.). CubeSat. Retrieved January 1, 2014, fromhttp://www.cubesat.org/images/developers/cds_rev12.pdf3. Factsheets : AFOSR: University Nanosat Program (UNP). (2012, August 7). Factsheets : AFOSR: UniversityNanosat Program (UNP). Retrieved January 1, 2014, fromhttp://www.wpafb.af.mil/library/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=198014. Ford, R. M., & Coulston, C. S. (2008). Design for electrical and computer engineers: theory, concepts, andpractice. Boston: McGraw-Hill.5. Gilliland, S., Williams, B., Akard, C., and Geisler, J. (2014, March). Learning Through Efficient ProcessorSystems for a Nanosatellite. Paper presented at ASEE
[Internet]. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2004 [cited 2012 Feb 14]. p. 135–42. Available from: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/985692.98571014. McGilly K. Cognitive science and educational practice: An introduction. Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice [Internet]. MIT Press; 1996 [cited 2014 Jan 4]. Available from: http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=YyiywUE- M0YC&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&dq=%E2%80%9CCognitive+science+and+educational+practice:+An+introduction, %E2%80%9D+mcgilly&ots=hsx7tDRdU7&sig=FZDyQ2fop4CST7tDfGlULVprYYo15. Olson S, Loucks-Horsley S. Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A guide for teaching and learning [Internet]. National Academies Press; 2000
Page 24.1124.1423. Golde, C. & Dore, T. At cross purposes: What the experiences of today’s doctoral students reveal about doctoral education. 1–58 (2001).24. Nerad, M., Aanerud, R. & Cerny, J. in Paths to Profr. Strateg. Enrich. Prep. Futur. Fac. (Wulff, D. H. & Austin, A.) 137–58 (Jossey-Bass, 2004).25. Dees, J. G. The meaning of social entrepreneurship. Duke Univ. Fuqua Sch. Business, Cent. Adv. Soc. Entrep. 1–5 (2001). at 26. Magner, D. Critics urge overhaul of Ph.D. training, but disagree sharply on how to do so: How graduate school alters students’ career plans. Chron. High. Educ. 46, 19 (2000).27. Carnevale, A., Rose, S. & Cheah, B. The college payoff: Education, occupations, lifetime
the authors and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography1. Sherin M, van Es E. Using Video to Support Teachers’ Ability to Notice Classroom Interactions. J Technol Teach Educ. 2005;13(3):475–491.2. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York, New York, USA: Aldine de Gruyter; 1967:1–10.3. Strauss A, Corbin J. Grounded Theory Designs. In: Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory.; 1998.4. National Research Council. Next Generation Science Standards. Washington, D.C.: The National Academics Press; 2013.5. Ahmed S, Wallace KM, Blessing LTM. Understanding
that enters the system. The liquid stream from the heater is recycled and is mixed with the fresh water to form the water feed entering the scrubber. Find the unknown values for all streams?The solution contained a number of intentional errors. Attached to the solution was a smallpacket of Post-it®’s in one of four different colors. The students were given ten minutes toexamine the solution, find areas where they disagreed with the solution, write on a Post-it®where they disagreed with solution, what the disagreement was, and how to change the solutionto resolve the disagreement. Each place where they found a disagreement was to be noted on aseparate Post-it
. It will be particularly important to examine whetherthere is a correlation between effective or successful design and development of products and theorientation of the program and student.AcknowledgementsThis work was made possible by a grant from the National Science Foundation (DUE-112374). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] Atman, C. J., Adams, R. S., Cardella, M. E., Turns, J., Mosborg, S., & Saleem, J. J. (2007). Engineering design processes: A comparison of students and expert practitioners. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(4), 359 -379.[2] Bennett
subgroups can be observed around the genderversus sex literature this can show how the literature speaks to different groups of scholars in thefield and can validate our research observation on gender, and sex groups. Page 24.1249.9Bibliography1. Beauvoir, S. de. The Second Sex. (New York, Vintage Books, 1952).2. Jackson, S. & Scott, S. Feminism and Sexuality: A Reader. (Columbia University Press, 1996).3. Moi, T. Sex, Gender, and the Body: The Student Edition of What is a Woman? (Oxford University Press, 2005).4. Mikkola, M. in Fem. Metaphys. (Witt, C.) 67–83 (Springer Netherlands, 2011). at 5. Butler, J. Gender Trouble
. Page 24.1264.10 30/5/13. Available from: http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/environment-in-crisis-we-are- past-the-point-of-no-return-523192.html Accessed: 12/3/2014. 4. Collins, M., An S., Cai, W., Ganachaud, A., Guilyardi, E., Jin, F., Jochum, M., Lengaigne, M., Power, S., Timmermann, A., Vecchi, G. & Wittenberg A. (2010) ‘The impact of global warming on the tropical Pacific Ocean and El Niño’. Nature Geoscience . 3. pp. 391-3975. Nordhaus, W.D. (2010). ‘Economic aspects of global warming in a post-Copenhagen environment’. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States. June 2010. 107. 226. pp 11721– 11726 . Available from: http://www.pnas.org/content/107/26/11721
trained in thehumanities and social sciences, and most are familiar with Western culture and values. It maybring an impression to ethics instructors that the government has “endorsed” the instruction ofWestern professionalism, and this type of professionalism is acceptable to include in engineeringcurricula – although it is worth noting that there is not yet an accepted national ethics curricula inChina. Further, most Western engineering ethics textbooks that have been translated into Chinesereflect a strong professional tradition (e.g., Charles E. Harris et al.’s Engineering Ethics:Concepts and Cases29 and Mike W. Martin and Ronald Schinzinger’s Ethics in Engineering30).Yet these same ethics instructors must also often teach ideological courses
involved in that project. Also, generally, one or more faculty adviser(s)from each department that is participating on a given project will be appointed to help advise thestudent team on matters relating to that department’s engineering discipline, although levels ofinvolvement in project advising tend to vary greatly between different faculty members. Mostprojects have a single main faculty advisor from the project’s lead department, who is largelyresponsible (albeit with help from course coordinators) for spearheading the project and steering Page 24.566.7it to best meet the needs of the particular sponsor/client (or competition effort); although
initiated in 2009 by the Viterbi School of Engineering at University ofSouthern California. The goal is to leverage the emerging pedagogical and technologicalinnovations to enable students around the world to engage in collaborative and interactiveengineering learning across disciplinary, physical, institutional, and cultural boundaries. Usingmodern eLearning technologies enhanced by Telepresence capability over the Internet, studentsfrom different universities attend the same class in person at networked iPodia classrooms ontheir home campuses to learn with their classmates around the globe. iPodia students learntogether from the same teacher(s) with similar course syllabus and content materials, and theymust follow identical academic requirements
-Couetil, N., Reed-Rhoads, T., & Haghighi, S. (2012). Engineering students and entrepreneurship education: Involvement, attitudes, and outcomes. International Journal of Engineering Education, 28, 425-435. 11. Duval-Couetil, N., Reed-Rhoads, T. & Haghighi, S. (2011). Investigating the impact of entrepreneurship education on engineering students. Paper presented at the NCIAA Conference, Washington D.C. 12. Zimmerman, J. (2008). Refining the Definition of Entrepreneurship. (Doctoral Dissertation). UMI Dissertation Publishing 13. Martin, R.L. & Osbrg, S. (2007). Social Entrepreneurship: The Case Definition. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Social
the definition of isentropic efficiency(ߟ௦ ሻ since it relates the ideal rate of work൫ࢃሶ ௦ ൯, where you can find the state of the refrigerantat the outlet, to the actual rate of work ൫ࢃሶ ൯ as displayed in Equation 8. ࣁ࢙ ൌ ࢃሶ ࢙ ⁄ࢃሶ Equation 8 The ideal rate of work is the power required for the ideal compressor where no disorder Page 24.958.8or entropy (s) is created in the process. This can only occur in an isentropic process (s=constant)which is frictionless and without the transfer of heat (adiabatic). The isentropic efficiency wasspecified earlier when
Paper ID #10492The Effect of the Inverted Classroom Teaching Approach on Student/FacultyInteraction and Students’ Self-EfficacyDr. Micah Stickel, University of Toronto Dr. Micah Stickel (ECE) is Chair, First Year, in the Faculty of Applied Science & Engineering. He is also a Senior Lecturer in The Edward S. Rogers Sr. Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering. Dr. Stickel first came to the Faculty when he started as an undergraduate in 1993. Since that time, he has completed his BASc (1997), MASc (1999), and a PhD (2006) — all with a focus on electromagnetics and the development of novel devices for high
Education, 2014 Use of Microsoft Testing Tools to Teach Software Testing: An Experience ReportAbstractThis paper reports our experience using Microsoft testing tools in both graduate and under-graduate Software Testing courses for four semesters. In particular, we used Microsoft Visu-al Studio Ultimate 2010 (including Microsoft Test Manager 2010) and Microsoft TeamFoundation Server 2010, which together offer an integrated and comprehensive environmentfor the application lifecycle management, including test planning, authoring, automation,execution, tracking, monitoring and managing. We assessed our experience in using thetools from the student`s and the teacher’s points of view. Based on students’ feedback
Philip Weber (Qualcomm Institute) for program oversight, studyguidance and software development; Susan Metz and Sheryl Sorby (ENGAGE) for overallguidance in the study; and Christina Nilles, Daneesha Kenyon, Alvin Chak, and Kane McKinnis(UCSD Students) for providing assistance in the development of the SVT digital curriculum andfor serving as teaching assistants during the pilot studiesReferences:1. Smith, I.M. (1964). Spatial Ability: Its Educational and Social Significance, University of London Press.2. “Why so Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics”. Published by AAUW, ISBN: 978-1-879922-40-2, 2010.3. Sorby, S. A., & Veurink, N. (2010). Long-term Results from Spatial Skills Intervention among First-Year