Texas, ArlingtonProf. Stephen P Mattingly, University of Texas, ArlingtonZiaur Rahman, The University of Texas at Arlington Ziaur Rahman received his Bachelor of Science (B. Sc.) degree in Civil Engineering from Bangladesh University of Engineering & Technology, Dhaka, in June 2007. After completing his Bachelor degree, he started his graduate studies in Civil Engineering at The University of Texas at Arlington in August 2008. He completed his Masters of Engineering (M. Eng.) degree under the supervision of Dr. Siamak Ardekani. He continued his graduate studies as a Ph. D. student under the supervision of Dr. Stephen Mattingly in Fall 2010. The author’s research interests include Incident Management, Operations and
Brain Analysis Assistive Social Design Safety Sustainability Technologies Entrepreneurship Client Interactions Lab Documentation Engineering Relationships
industryprofessionals for entry-level engineers to possess do map to skills that industry-aspiring doctoralstudents think are important for future career success, especially “Solve problems,” “Be able toadapt and learn new technologies,” “Work in teams,” “Communicate orally,” “Possess stronganalytical ability,” “Communicate in writing,” “Give presentations,” “Use multiple tools to solvecomplex problems,” “Write technical reports,” and “Work across disciplines.” Some of the otherhighly ranked important KSAs identified in our study may be more applicable to Ph.D.-levelengineers, who would not be working in the same position as an engineer just out of her or hisundergraduate degree.As a final comparison with our results to previously-conducted studies, we return
Pennsylvania Governor’s School for the Sciences at Carnegie Mellon University.Stephanie AbbottSarah Mukui Mutunga, Robert Morris University Page 24.691.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Impact of a 5-Week Collegiate Level Residential STEM Summer Program on Secondary School Students (Research to Practice, K-12 Engineering Resources: Best Practices in Curriculum Design)Abstract The foundation of modern engineering curriculums is a strong background in science,mathematics, and technology. Engineering education begins with
Workforce Development and Life Long Learning division of the Univer- sity of the District of Columbia, Community College.Dr. Annie R Pearce, Virginia TechDr. Christine Marie Fiori P.E., Virginia TechDr. Tanyel Bulbul, Virginia Tech Dr. Bulbul is an Assistant Professor of Building Construction and Adjunct Professor of Civil and En- vironmental Engineering at the Virginia Tech. She has expertise in investigating information and com- munication technologies together with the development of formalized, model-based analysis approaches to deal with the complexities of the built environment. Her research areas include Building Information Modeling (BIM); product and process modeling in AEC/FM; ontology based approaches for design
forces students to utilize all the skills learned inthe corresponding unit, in the context of a practical application of the material covered whenapplicable.Overall, the integration of fourth year mathematics CCSS, historical components, writingassignments, classroom debates, vocabulary activities, technology lessons, and engaging hands-on projects along with a variety of refresher topics essential to engineering and scienceprofessions provides a holistic learning environment for students. These components coincidewith research that shows the method of curriculum implementation is just as important, if notmore important, than the base content [7]; hence, a STEM curriculum is made that includesintroductory and cumulative projects as well as cross
completing studies in the Science, Technology, Engineering, andMathematics (STEM) disciplines.1,2 There are two primary tasks that are needed for this Page 24.183.3goal to be accomplished. First, more students need to be attracted to pursue college-levelstudies in the STEM fields. Second, once those students are attracted to a STEM field,the colleges and universities must provide an attractive, nurturing environment designedto allow a wide range of students to succeed, while still providing a rigorous technicaleducation.The College of Engineering and Applied Science (CEAS) at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (UWM) has generally been able to attract as
Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Paper ID #9959Prof. James Louis Tangorra, Drexel University (Eng.) James Louis Tangorra received the B.S. and M.Eng. degrees in mechanical and aerospace engineering from Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, in 1989 and 1990, respectively, and the Ph.D. degree in mechanical engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA in 2003. He was a Surface Warfare Officer in the U.S. Navy from 1990 to 1996, and served in the U.S. Navy reserves from 1997 to 2007. He was a Postdoctoral Researcher at the Bioinstrumentation Laboratory, MIT, from 2004 to 2007. Currently, he is
supported by the National Science Foundation under awardnumber DUE - 1317238 and is supported in part by funds given to the National ScienceFoundation by the Intel Foundation and the GE Foundation. Any opinions, findings, andconclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not Page 24.736.5necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References 1. American Society for Engineering Education. 2012. Going the Distance: Best Practices and Strategies for Retaining Engineering. Engineering Technology, and Computing Students. http://www.asee.org/retention- project 2
Engineering and Technology at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL). He also serves as Director of the UNL Mid-America Transportation Center and as Director of the UNL Nebraska Transportation Center. He received his B.A.Sc. degree and his M.A.Sc. degree from the University of Waterloo and his Ph.D. de- gree from Queen’s University. He has held academic positions as an Assistant Professor and an Associate Professor at the University of Alberta and as an Assistant Professor, Associate Professor, and Professor at Texas A&M University (TAMU). Additionally, he is a Professional Engineer in the state of Texas. Over the past twenty years, Rilett has taught undergraduate courses and graduate courses in statistics, risk
. Results also indicate that improvedself-efficacy as it relates to research in an academic environment is related to the long-termcareer goals and academic aspirations of these students.AcknowledgementsThis work was supported by the Center for Energy Efficient Electronics Science, a NationalScience Foundation Science and Technology Center that is funded by NSF Award 0939514, andthe REU Site: A Partnership of NSF-funded Centers to Advance California Community CollegeStudents in Science and Engineering at UC Berkeley, a project funded by NSF Award 1157089.Additionally, the authors would like to extend a special thank-you to all of the TTE REUstudents for their hard work, their mentors for their time and patience, and the program staff fortheir
morphological changes to increase surface of an interface as well as using still higher fluence to induce shock waves for mechanical bonding. Steven has also been very interested in educational pedagogies since 1996 when he was the first person at UM to use clickers. He was also the first person at UM to reject clickers. Almost 20 years later, he has, once again, embraced clicker technology now that he has eliminated lectures and has time in class for peer instruction.Dr. Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan Page 24.469.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014
effective: positive interdependence amongteam members, individual accountability, face-to-face “promotive” interaction (encouragement,sharing resources), social skills evidenced, and group processing. Page 24.554.2Use of collaborative learning in undergraduate engineering programsProject-based, team-based collaborative learning has increased in undergraduate engineeringeducation worldwide.7 In fact, substantial use of collaborative learning is required forundergraduate engineering programs to be accredited by the Accreditation Board for Engineeringand Technology (ABET), the overseer of U.S. engineering programs.8 As mentioned,collaborative learning
Paper ID #9059Feedback in Complex, Authentic, Industrially Situated Engineering Projectsusing Episodes as a Discourse Analysis Framework – Year 2Dr. Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University Milo Koretsky is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Oregon State University. He received his B.S. and M.S. degrees from UC San Diego and his Ph.D. from UC Berkeley, all in Chemical Engineering. He currently has research activity in areas related engineering education and is interested in integrating technology into effective educational practices and in promoting the use of higher-level cognitive skills in engineering problem
Paper ID #9314Implementation and Assessment of a Failure Case Study in a Multi-DisciplineFreshman Introduction to Engineering CourseDr. James E. Lewis, University of Louisville James E. Lewis, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at the J. B. Speed School of Engineering at the University of Louisville. His research interests include paral- lel and distributed computer systems, cryptography, engineering education, undergraduate retention and technology (Tablet PCs) used in the classroom.Dr. Norb Delatte P.E., Cleveland State University Norb Delatte is Professor and Chair of the
live [3]. The Framework for K-12 Science Education formiddle and high school students (grades 6-12) addresses topics such as • Definitions of energy • Conservation of energy and energy transfer • Energy and matter • Natural resources • The influence of science, engineering, and technology on society and the natural world • Defining and delimiting engineering problems and developing possible solutions [4] .The NGSS sets student performance outcomes based on these topics. One of the fiveEnergy performance outcomes for high school students states that the students should beable to “design, build, and refine a device that works within given constraints to convertone form of energy into another form of
Paper ID #9475Probing the Inverted Classroom: A Controlled Study of Teaching and Learn-ing Outcomes in Undergraduate Engineering and MathematicsDr. Nancy K Lape, Harvey Mudd CollegeDr. Rachel Levy, Harvey Mudd College Rachel Levy is an associate Professor of Mathematics at Harvey Mudd College. She has an MA in Instructional Design from UNC-CH and a MA/PhD in Applied Mathematics from NCSU. In addition to mathematics, she regularly teaches first-year writing. She serves on the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM) Education Committee, as Editor-in-chief of SIURO, SIAM Undergraduate Research Online, and
article in: Construction Safety Education and Training - A Global Perspective, pp 1-15.13. ABET (2012). 2013-2014 Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs. The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. Engineering Accreditation Commission EAC, Baltimore, MD.14. Al-Mufti M.A. (1999). Continuous enhancement of health and safety awareness in undergraduate civil engineering courses, in proceedings of the Second International Conference of CIB W99, Implementation of Safety and Health on Construction Sites, (Eds., Singh, Hinze and Coble), Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 277-282.15. Pellicer E., Seron J., Catala J., and Jorda L. (2003). Proposal of a new academic frame for the civil engineering education in construction
byconvergent thinking and both types of thinking have been explored for an appropriate amount oftime. The act of developing an engineering design process, which is a balance of divergent andconvergent thinking strategies, can be an obstacle to problem solving and is not intuitive. It is forthis reason that teaching the engineering design process and helping students overcome thisobstacle is necessary in engineering education.Using Video as DataVideo recording technology is a data collection instrument which allows researchers to collectboth auditory and visual information and re-enter the study environment even after the study isdone [1, 18]. Data can be extracted and carefully selected from the video recording for a more in-depth analysis of specific
Paper ID #9790Improving Conceptual Understanding of Signals and Systems in Undergrad-uate Engineering Students Using Collaborative In-Class Laboratory Exer-cisesDr. Anusha Sathyanarayanan Rao, Vanderbilt University Anusha Sathyanarayanan Rao is a post-doctoral research scholar in Psychology and Human Development at Peabody College in Vanderbilt University. Her research interests includes studying neural correlates of mathematics and reading development in children and applying neurocognitive theories to understand undergraduate student learning in engineering. She received her Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from
Paper ID #9508Using Natural Language Processing Tools to Classify Student Responses toOpen-Ended Engineering Problems in Large ClassesDr. Matthew A Verleger, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach Matthew Verleger is Assistant Professor in Freshman Engineering at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univer- sity. He has a BS in Computer Engineering, an MS in Agricultural & Biological Engineering, and a PhD in Engineering Education, all from Purdue University. Prior to joining the Embry-Riddle faculty, he spent two years as an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Utah State University. His research inter
given purpose (i.e.,evaluation)2. Within the context of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET),the lowest levels in any learning hierarchy model are incompatible with required ABET programoutcomes. According to ABET1, three of the required 11 ABET student outcomes include 1) theability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering (i.e., ABET studentoutcome [a]), 2) the ability to design and conduct experiments (i.e., ABET student outcome [b]),and 3) the ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems (i.e., ABET studentoutcome [e]). It is important that engineering faculty of all disciplines continuously push theenvelope and work to elevate student learning and comprehension so that
Paper ID #9083Introducing an Instructional Model for ”Flipped Engineering Classrooms”-Part (II): How Do Group Discussions Foster Meaningful Learning?Dr. Jia-Ling Lin, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities Dr. Jia-Ling Lin is a research scientist in the STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathemat- ics) Education Center at the University of Minnesota Twin Cities. Her research is centered in areas of teaching and learning in engineering and physics. In particular, she focuses on establishing and examin- ing instructional models that facilitate problem solving and deep learning in physics and engineering for
availability of financialsupport to develop and disseminate engineering-based outreach activities. This combined effectseverely hinders the quality and number of domestic scientists and engineers produced by theU.S., thus inhibiting the country’s competitiveness in the global economy’s technology sector. Inorder to address this issue, the concept and a functional prototype of a tunable educationalmodule has been developed. The uniqueness of this approach follows from the module’scapability of modifying a single engineering activity to meet time and student skill-levelrestraints as well as the mentors’ or teachers’ time and effort constraints; i.e., tunability.A module was developed in order to implement and test the concept of tunability. In
learning approaches in STEM instruction. He has also worked on research and evaluation of technology integration in instructional settings in both secondary and post-secondary education. Dr. Wiebe has been a member of ASEE since 1989.Dr. Pam Van Dyk, Evaluation Resources Pam Van Dyk is the principal evaluator at Evaluation Resources in Raleigh, North Carolina. She has been providing external evaluation and education research services since 1996. Page 24.908.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 MISO (Maximizing the Impact of STEM Outreach Through Data
Paper ID #8726Enhancing STEM Awareness for Pre-Service Teachers: A Recruitment Ini-tiativeDr. Rafic Bachnak, Penn State Harrisburg Rafic A. Bachnak is Professor of Electrical Engineering and Director of the School of Science, Engi- neering, and Technology at Penn State Harrisburg. Previously, Dr. Bachnak was on the faculty of Texas A&M International University, Texas A&M-Corpus Christi, Northwestern State University, and Franklin University. Dr. Bachnak received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering from Ohio University. His experience includes several fellowships with NASA and the US Navy
completed her Ph.D. studies in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis in 1993. She holds a B.S. degree in civil engineering from the Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology and an M.S.C.E. from the University of Arkansas, Fayetteville. After completion of her graduate studies, she worked as an environmental engineer for the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP). Her research interests include bioremediation of contaminated groundwater and soils; the fate and transport of pollutants in the envi- ronment;biodegradation of industrial and municipal wastewaters; physicochemical treatment of water and wastewater treatment; applied microbiology
, surveillance, bullet tracking and RF exploitation. She has received numerous Navy awards for her efforts in research. Ms. Deckard is also an instructor in physics and math at local colleges and universities. Currently, Ms. Deckard is active in creating a culture of STEM excitement through enabling Department of Defense scientists and engineers to reach out to the local K-12 community. Ms. Deckard also works closely with colleges and universities to promote more science and technology advancement. Ms. Deckard is a strong advocate for inspiring females to pursue science and engineering degrees and is active in the local Society of Women Engineers section.Mr. David Quarfoot, SDSU/UCSD David Quarfoot is currently a doctoral
, MindWare Technologies Craig Morin is the Engineering Manager at MindWare Technologies in Gahanna, Ohio where he has worked since 2008. He received a BS in Electrical and Computer Engineering and a MS in Biomedical Engineering at The Ohio State University in Columbus, Ohio. Prior to his current role, he was a Design Engineer with MindWare Technologies and a Graduate Teaching Associate with the Fundamentals of Engineering for Honors program at The Ohio State University. Beyond product design with an emphasis on electrical hardware, his interests include home automation, 3D printing, and ceramics.Andrew Phillips, Ohio State University Andrew H. Phillips is an Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) student at The Ohio
recipient of three NSF awards for research in engineering education and a research associate at Purdue University. Prior to coming to Purdue he was Assistant Professor of En- trepreneurship at Ohio Northern University. Before assuming that position he was Associate Director of the Inter-professional Studies Program and Senior Lecturer at Illinois Institute of Technology and involved in research in service learning, assessment processes and interventions aimed at improving learning ob- jective attainment. Prior to his University assignments he was the Founder and CEO of The EDI Group, Ltd. and The EDI Group Canada, Ltd, independent professional services companies specializing in B2B electronic commerce and electronic data