Paper ID #46350Conducting an International Med-IoT Project under the Innovation-BasedLearning ModelMr. Victor Tsui, University of North Dakota Victor Tsui is a Professional Chemical Engineer and a multidisciplinary biomedical engineer by train for over 30 years in biotech companies in San Francisco Bay Area. Victor graduated from Hong Kong Polytechnics University and University of Wisconsin with a master’s degree in engineering. He obtained a bachelor’s degree in computer science and certificate in project management. Victor is a co-founder for ”Powder Pharmaceuticals” a needle-free drug delivery device manufacturing in
Paper ID #48722BOARD # 35: Work-in-progress: Approaching Bioimaging Challenge Projectsthrough Scaffolding and Improved Time ManagementDr. Travis Carrell, Texas A&M University Dr. Travis Carrell joined the Biomedical Engineering faculty at Texas A&M University as an Instructional Assistant Professor in Fall of 2022. He had the privilege of participating in the curriculum redesign process, which enabled him to co-develop two of the common courses. The integration of engineering education projects within these courses has been a source of evaluation and improvement for the courses, as he and the other faculty within the
Paper ID #49417BOARD # 34: Work-in-Progress: A Novel Project-Based Molecular BiologyExperimentation and Design Laboratory Course Using Participatory Designto Promote Student EngagementDianne Grayce Hendricks, University of California, Santa Cruz Dr. Dianne Hendricks is an Associate Teaching Professor in the Biomolecular Engineering Department at the University of California at Santa Cruz. She teaches molecular biology labs, biotechnology, universal design, and technical communication courses. Prior to UC Santa Cruz, Dianne was an Associate Teaching Professor in the Department of Human Centered Design and Engineering (HCDE), the
developed a three-course medical device designseries (Course 1, Course 2, & Course 3). In this course sequence, biomedical engineeringstudents are taught how to develop medical devices through progressively more complex projectsrelated to unmet needs in physical therapy.COURSE SEQUENCE STRUCTUREWhen developing these three courses the educational concept of scaffolding was implemented(Appendix 1) [4]. The idea was to provide the most guidance to students in the Course 1 courseand gradually transfer responsibility to the student as the student progresses through Course 2and Course 3. The goal of this research is to determine the effectiveness of project-basedlearning taught using scaffolding, particularly with projects related to physical
Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS). He is a faculty co-advisor for the K-State IEEE EMBS student chapter. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Work in Progress: A Formal Medical Device Teardown as a Biomedical Engineering Learning ExperienceAbstractThis manuscript describes a course project that guides each biomedical engineering (BME)student through the scripted teardown of an inexpensive medical device: a fingerclip pulseoximeter. Supporting objectives are to increase a student’s experience with the physicalresources required to complete such a task, coupled with an improved awareness of thedocumentation needed to properly archive the process. The project addresses medical
course also involved a final project (with defined projectrequirements) incorporating data acquisition with LabVIEW and the option to perform analysiswith MATLAB. Junior Design II (2 credit hours) then aimed to give students more freedom andresponsibility in the design process. The hardware was provided to the student teams (NordicThingy52 [1]) but students had to define the project requirements and the testing/validationprocesses. See [2] for an overview of the BME curriculum.Although the above approach involved hands-on learning, one weakness was that studentsstruggled to see the benefit of learning these skillsets. They often lacked motivation and thenstruggled greatly close to the end of the semester, a common issue when students are
includes the following components: 1) in-lecture discussionsof specific healthcare disparities and inequities that exist that relate to the organ system beingdiscussed, 2) discussion questions designed to help students learn to socially contextualizetechnical problems in BME, 3) three equity and ethics assignments, and 4) two team projects: a)one asking teams to design a brain computer interface and address any potential disparities orsocietal impacts that may results and b) one asking teams to develop and engaging andinformative infographic about a specific healthcare disparity. A sequential mixed-methods pre-and post-semester approach employing quantitative and qualitative methods was used to assess teeffectiveness of this curriculum. Results
novel capstonedesign projects derived from a summer clinical immersion experience [2], [3]. Przestrzelski, B.,et al., paired a clinical needs-finding immersion rotation with an internship at a technologytransfer office [4]. Pal, S., et al., reported on a program focused on Rehabilitation Engineeringand incorporated a Summer Immersion term for students between their 3rd and 4th years [5]. Byfar the most common method of connecting to engineering practice was the exercise of “needsfinding.” This function is an essential part of the Biodesign and innovation cycle, and we electedto focus our program development here, as well.In an effort to improve the impact of the “needs finding” exercise during clinical immersion,programs take a variety of
help students understand the careertrajectories, challenges, efforts of the researchers behind the journal articles and technicalconcepts presented in class. Next, we collaborated with staff from a medical simulation centerwho helped students understand their needs in physiologically and anatomically relevant models.This led to an ideation assignment and an application-focused design project intended to helpmeet the needs of the simulation partners. Altogether with these course updates, we sought tounderstand how students engaged with these new elements designed to break down studentperceptions of what it takes to be an innovator and researcher in a relatively new field.Course Learning Objectives:In this course students will: • Apply
Foundations of Medical Imaging 3 Biomedical Statistics 3 Biomaterials 3 General Biology 4 Fundamentals of Biomechanics 3 General Biology Laboratory 1 Biomedical Design 3 Medical Systems Physiology 3 Senior Project I 2 Human Physiology Laboratory 1 Senior Project II 1 Principles of Chemistry 4 Biomedical Measurements 4 Principles of Chemistry Laboratory 1 Biomedical Transport Phenomena
understanding of human-centered design concepts.Results displayed high levels of agreement with statements regarding the module's impact on students'understanding of user needs and their unique perspectives (Mean=3.62, based on a five-point Likertscale). Survey feedback also indicated that students felt this module provided practical tools andtechniques for conducting user research and gathering insights (Mean=3.66), and 62% reported theyplanned to incorporate human-centered design into future biomedical engineering projects. Continuingresearch will assess and refine these results through larger sample sizes and qualitative responses.IntroductionA number of undergraduate biomedical engineering programs have implemented clinical immersioncourses into
needwith considerations of regulatory, IP, and entrepreneurship [21]. Novel to this program, medicalstudents were added to each team to act as near-peer team members under the guidance of thephysician, engineering faculty, and industry mentors. They assisted in all aspects of the project,including the understanding of the current standard of care, their gaps, how to develop a physicaldesign, testing their solution with consideration of regulatory affairs, and a how to complete abusiness model canvas. This addition of the medical students, based on feedback from priorcapstone offerings, has provided individual projects significant advancement through routineclinical input on various stages of the project during daily and weekly meetings.Future
allowed the incorporation ofmultiple design experiences, including authentic problems posed by real clients, across allsections of the course, ensuring that all students have a deep design experience in their first year.[1]This curricular shift had ripple effects. Some technical content previously covered in a second-year biomedical engineering (BME) design course [2] was moved to the first year design course.Consequently, the second-year BME design course was restructured for the 2025 academic year.Key changes include the addition of a client-driven design project, beginning CAD training at ahigher level, and adjustments in hands-on fabrication that reflected students’ prior experiencewith 3D printing and soldering.We wished to understand how
in Durham, NC. He oversees the data collection and program evaluation of informal education programs at the Museum and science communication of grant-funded projects. He also works with Duke University as a community partner for the Ignite Program to offer informal education expertise to the program.Dr. Nirmala Ramanujam Ph.D., Duke University Nirmala (Nimmi) Ramanujam is the Robert W. Carr Professor of Biomedical Engineering, Professor of Cancer Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, and Global Health at Duke University. She founded the Center for Global Women’s Health Technologies (GWHT) in 2013 to reshape women’s health through technology innovation. Her translation program in cervical and breast cancer has brought
interactions, and empathy in engineering education. Her technical research focuses on naturalistic driving and older driver fitness assessment.Sean Rose, University of Waterloo ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Biomedical Stakeholder Café – Continual Improvement & Integration of a Novel Adapted RADAR Framework for StakeholdersAbstractHuman-centered design processes, recommended for many healthcare-focused engineeringdesign projects, require engaging and involving multiple, diverse stakeholders. Health carestakeholders can be particularly diverse and challenging to successfully integrate into a designprocess, especially for students. Facilitating opportunities for engineering
-onecoaches or as project mentors. The learning coaches serve as a bridge between faculty andstudents, offering practical advice, facilitating teamwork, and encouraging intrinsic motivation. Aone-on-one coach is a peer graduate student who provides academic, professional, and personalmentorship to undergraduate students. Project mentors offer similar guidance in the context ofvertically integrated research teams, guiding students through practical aspects of conductingengineering projects. Much of the research on the topic of graduate student mentors focuses onthe role of generic mentoring, coaching techniques, or ethical considerations. There is a need toevaluate the specific impacts on collaborative, academic, and professional culture that
an Innovation-Based Learning (IBL) biomedical engineeringprogram (BME). By exploring this relationship, this research aims to show how CD can beleveraged to enhance innovation skills in engineering education. IBL emphasizes applyingengineering principles to solve real-world problems. IBL fosters creativity, critical thinking, andproblem-solving skills through complex, open-ended projects that promote collaboration,iteration, and real-world application. This approach cultivates an innovation-driven mindset andleadership skills, essential for success in STEM fields, such as biomedical engineering. CD, the psychological discomfort from encountering conflicting ideas or challenges thatcontradict one’s knowledge, is common in IBL since
Pediatrics and American Chest Society.LaDeidra Monet Roberts, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityDr. Christopher Arena, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Chris is a Collegiate Associate Professor at Virginia Tech in the Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics (BEAM) Department. He received his B.S. degree from the University of Virginia and Ph.D. degree from Virginia Tech, both in Biomedical Engineering. He teaches senior design, clinical needs assessment, and biodesign fundamentals. Chris is passionate about collaborations that facilitate student experiential learning opportunities and his research is focused on medical devices, with ongoing projects in the areas of lymphedema treatment
or that are supplied directly by the course instructor. The goal ofour IRB-approved study (IRB # 18018) is to identify BME students’ current use of online resourcesand AI by surveying both BME students and instructors about how online resources and AI arebeing used by BME students and instructors to support learning in BME courses.MethodsWe emailed a Qualtrics survey to undergraduate students and instructors enrolled in or instructingeleven different BME undergraduate courses offered during the Fall 2024 (FA24) semester(Appendix A). All invited participants were members of the Stephenson School of BiomedicalEngineering at the University of Oklahoma. Courses included eight lecture-based courses, two lab-based courses, and one project-based
. Overall, industry has reported interest in graduates whohave desired general competencies such as problem solving, communications, teamwork, design,and project management[5], [6]. Additionally, there are more specialized competencies that arerequested by particular sub-fields of biomedical engineering such as mechanical design, wet-labskills, and manufacturing. The majority of studies discussing industry needs have asked industry representatives tocomplete surveys with pre-defined skills for responders to choose from. For example, Stukes etal. reported specific skills and knowledge needed for BME-related jobs from an employer’sperspective by surveying alumni of 9 BME master’s programs using a list of 30 skills andknowledge terms from a labor
Boston University. As a Lecturer in BME, Kavon teaches and mentors students in courses on biomedical measurements, analysis, and instrumentation. As Manager of BTEC, Kavon provides guidance, training, and mentorship of student projects that use BTEC ranging from student-initiated projects to senior design projects in the areas of biosensors and instrumentation, molecular/cellular/tissue engineering, and digital and predicative medicine. Kavon received his PhD in Biomedical Engineering with focus in biomedical optics from Boston University under the mentorship of Darren Roblyer. In addition to his research activities in biomedical optics, Kavon is working on collaborative research efforts at the intersection of
the Massachusetts Health Information Exchange. At Wentworth, Dr. Feldman is focused on project-based instruction, hands-on simulations, experiential learning approaches, and first year curriculum. Dr. Feldman is one of the lead instructors for Introduction to Engineering courses, with enrollments in the hundreds each fall. His research and teaching interests, in addition to first year engineering, include telemedicine, health informatics, rehabilitation engineering, and medical robotics. Dr. Feldman has collaborated with researchers and engineers from organizations including Tufts School of Veterinary Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Vecnacares, and Restoreskills.Dr. George D. Ricco, Miami University
improvehealth equity in rural Appalachia by catalyzing development of health technologies throughexpanded community engagement with rural healthcare providers in Appalachia. As part of thislarger initiative, we launched a 5-day design sprint before the 2024 Fall semester, aiming toboost the capstone projects' impact through team building, immersion in the Stanford Biodesignprocess, and enhanced customer discovery. Students (n = 4) tackled a problem statement from alocal client with foot drop in the Appalachian region. The design sprint was facilitated by twoBiodesign Fellows (graduate students with Bachelor’s degrees in BME) and two BME facultymembers, guiding students through workshops on social determinants of health (SDOH), userneeds, stakeholder
Society chapter at UCD, where she serves as the graphics designer and actively contributes to the Outreach and Fundraising committees. Alongside her involvement in BMES, Angelika is an enthusiastic member of B-Hours, a student-run organization dedicated to projects benefiting clinics in Sacramento. Focusing her course studies in cell and tissue engineering, Angelika is currently seeking research opportunities to further explore her passion in bioprinting and regenerative medicine. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Work in progress: Preparing Biomedical Engineers to Tackle Biases in Machine LearningIntroductionFrom just 21 FDA-authorized (including
NIH proposal on a new project. Thisassignment serves a different goal with the student’s clinical mentors taking on the role of keyopinion leaders in the field. While this guidance is one source of data for the assignment, thestudents also make their own observations bringing their own expertise; and additionally, otherinfluences from the scientific community are also consulted. The course is completed with thelast assignment with students authoring a mock R21 grant proposal, including project summary,biosketch for the student, budget, specific aims, research strategy, and references. This serves asa culmination point for the program with the student really bringing together all components oftheir immersion into a high impact exploratory
real-world bioengineering projects related to their curriculum. field of bioengineering to the ● Students built a model of a DNA double helix using edible students; teach students about materials (marshmallows and licorice), where each part of the the structure of DNA and its model represented different components of the DNA structure. components in an interactive This helped students visualize and understand the arrangement and engaging way of nucleotides and the importance of the helical structure. ● Students extracted DNA from
University Women (AAUW)San Juan Puerto Rico Branch, for providing a Community Project Grant to purchase materials andfor their overall support and encouragement.References[1] J. Ogbeba and V. O. Ajayi, “Effect of Hands-On Activities on Achievement and Retentionof Senior Secondary Chemistry Students in Stoichiometry,” Journal of the International Centre forScience Humanities and Education Research, Vol 2, No 2. Dec, 2016.[2] M. Hubbard, “Development of a biomedical engineering course for high school studentsusing a framework of student-centered pedagogy,” in ASEE Southeast Section ConferenceProceedings, Arlington, Virginia: ASEE Conferences, Mar. 2023, p. 44999.[3] S. Madihally and E. Maase, “Introducing Biomedical And Biochemical
BME 4901 intervention, students completed apost-test to reassess skills gained and retained over the entire training sequence. The assessmentinstrument, which includes both multiple-choice and open response questions, is available on theOpen Science Framework [10]. Student responses are collected via paper instruments and thensaved in a spreadsheet with response identifiers, course information, and answers. This protocolwas reviewed by the Vanderbilt University Institutional Review Board and was approved as aQuality Improvement project (IRB #232075).The first portion of the assessment consists of a series of multiple-choice questions (Q3-Q12).We used Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) to compare the proportion of correct answers from eachBME class
achievements [3]. Therefore, we focused our interview questions onlearning experiences and outcome expectations.MethodsThe participant pool for our study was comprised of students in University of Michigan’s newmedical product development Master’s program. The program instructors have experienceteaching traditional BME and product development courses and also have experience working inindustry. They introduced Quality Engineering principles to the students through their ownlectures as well as through guest lectures by invited industry professionals. The students applythe principles they learn in class to a team project that spans the length of the program.After our study was deemed exempt from further review by the University of Michigan IRB
on engineering identity development, career pathways, and integrating computational and AI-based methods in engineering education. He has been actively involved in developing and assessing engineering courses, including project-based learning initiatives.Chanyee HongHyeyeon Lim ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Work in Progress: Exploring Biomedical Engineering Students’ Perceptionsof Large Language Model in Academic SettingsIntroductionIn Work in Progress (WIP) study, we are particularly interested in how engineering studentsperceive utility value and self-efficacy in using LLM for their engineering studies. Previousresearch has shown that self-efficacy is closely linked to academic