Paper ID #47462CASE STUDY: Project-based integration of societal context with engineeringcommunication and computational thinking in an upper-level civil and environmentalengineering courseDr. Megan L. Matthews, University of Illinois Urbana - Champaign Dr. Megan L. Matthews is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Her work involves developing multiscale computational models to explore plant engineering strategies for sustainably improving the security and equity of global food, water, and environmental systems. Megan earned her
potential areas of tension in the RED initiative, and introduced us to the Polarity ThinkingFramework to manage these tensions [11]. Examples of areas of tension that surfaced in theearly period of the initiative included concerns that (1) the proposed change(s) would lead toundesirable changes in breadth versus depth of curriculum content, and (2) stressing ofprofessional skills versus engineering skills would lead to less (rather than more) rigor in thecurriculum. The perception that including professional skills development as an integrated partof engineering courses would reduce the rigor of the curriculum was a notion that underlay andwould continue to underlie several discussions during the change process. Another area ofconcern was the
visualization ispart of an effort within our department to thread coding, computing and computational thinkingthroughout our CE curriculum. The departmental initiative and the scholarly framework for thiscase study are presented in [5]. The goal is to integrate high-level interpreted programminglanguages into problem solving in all courses, thus boosting student computational andcomputational thinking skills, all within the CE discipline. Our students are first introduced toPython and R in required 1st and 2nd year courses. The next important step is to continuepracticing and building upon these skills in upper-level courses so that students becomeconfident users of these tools in problem solving, data analysis and visualization.The case study course
develop an educational modulefor integrating SC concepts into civil engineering courses. The method of creating these moduleshas the following steps: • Finding needs: Find gaps between the current civil engineering curriculum and SC concepts • Module Design: Each module must fulfill the following items: - Introduction to theory: Develop basic knowledge of SC for students - Hands-on activities: Introduce software and tools for hands-on activities related to SC concepts - Real-world case studies: Define projects for students to involve them in modeling and simulating SC challenges such as urban planning and smart traffic design. - Integration with existing curriculum3- Implementation of
Paper ID #47994Visualizing and Modeling a Growth Mindset in an STEM design courseDr. Sarah Rajkumari Jayasekaran, University of Florida Sarah Jayasekaran is an Instructional Assistant Professor at the Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering. Her work focuses on integrating smart technology to enhance engineering education and student engagement. She serves as Director-at-Large for ASEE-WIED and is actively involved in mentoring and student success initiatives. Her research centers on designing and evaluating educational tools that drive meaningful learning outcomes.Idalis Villanueva Alarc´on, University of Florida
, connectivity and provide input on funding in advance of the latest transportation bill. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Professional Preparation of Students for the Integration of AI into the Practice of Civil and Environmental EngineeringAbstractThe Center for Infrastructure Transformation and Education (CIT-E) held an online workshop onAugust 21, 2024 titled “Professional Preparation of CEE Students for the Realities of AI in theWorkplace.” Sixty-eight participants attended, mostly faculty and staff from civil andenvironmental engineering departments in North America.The workshop included a facilitated conversation. Responses were collected using the onlinecollaboration tool
Paper ID #48093BOARD # 52: Integrating Material Focused on Climate Change into ExistingCourses in a Civil Engineering Degree ProgramProf. Andrew Paul Summerfield, Wentworth Institute of Technology Dr. Andrew Summerfield is an Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering at Wentworth Institute of Technology. He received his BSCE (2013) from Tufts University and his MS (2018) and PhD (2021) in structural engineering from Northeastern University. His graduate research focused on the structural dynamics of offshore wind turbines. He is interested in developing teaching materials that help engineering students understand the broader
, understanding and applying standards, codes, and specifications isessential for career success and closely aligns with ABET student outcomes, which support theprogram’s educational objectives to prepare graduates for professional engineering practice.However, a significant gap exists in how engineering faculty systematically integrate theteaching of these concepts into the curriculum. This pilot study at the University of SouthAlabama aims to address this gap by utilizing Bloom’s learning framework to design learningmodules that can be incorporated into existing civil engineering courses. These modules spanvarious levels, including an introductory freshman course, sophomore-level mechanics ofmaterials, junior-level civil engineering materials, and
sustainability education has often been insufficiently integrated into traditionalengineering programs [10]. This gap is especially significant in Historically Black Colleges andUniversities (HBCUs), where culturally responsive approaches to sustainability education areessential for addressing the unique infrastructure needs of underrepresented communities.This study aims to assess civil engineering graduate students' knowledge and perceptions ofsustainable infrastructure development at an HBCU. The research will present the findings of theEvaluation in which sustainability principles are embedded in the institution’s curriculum andfaculty initiatives, and it will explore the barriers and motivators influencing students' engagementwith sustainable
Paper ID #47355Social Equity Perspectives in Transportation EducationMs. Binita Acharya, Colorado State University Binita Acharya is a Graduate Research Assistant and Master’s student in Construction Management at Colorado State University. She holds an undergraduate degree in Architecture and has professional experience in both the design and construction sectors. Her research focuses on integrating social equity and sustainability into construction and engineering educationDr. Rebecca A Atadero P.E., Colorado State University Rebecca Atadero is a professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at
Civil Engineer education. Students are prepared for leadershipchallenges by developing them in a curriculum incorporating leadership challenges throughoutthe program. Leadership levels and types of leadership learning vary from learning interpersonalskills to leading small and large teams. Delivery methods include guest speakers, hands-onlearning, capstone, and full-scale events with specific objectives. Multiple opportunities areprovided for personal leadership, group leadership, and team leadership. Leadershipresponsibilities and expectations are increased over time.Learning leadership is an iterative approach requiring multiple experiences at different levels[15]. This work explores leadership theory and practice in civil engineering
–157, Apr. 2010, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01051.x.[11] E. Buckley et al., “An interdisciplinary approach to high school curriculum development: Swarming Powered by Neuroscience,” in 2022 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC), Princeton, NJ, USA: IEEE, Mar. 2022, pp. 1–8. doi: 10.1109/ISEC54952.2022.10025252.[12] A. L. Beck and E. J. Cha, “Board 44: Work-In-Progress: What Goes into an Engineering Decision: An Infrastructure Decision-Making Game for Exploratory Equity Learning,” presented at the 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2023. Accessed: Jan. 07, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/board-44-work-in-progress-what-goes- into-an-engineering-decision-an
common misconceptions. Thisway, complex technical content is adapted into a more engaging and immersive narrative format.Anticipated ResultsExposure to an experimental curriculum that integrates AI and transmedia storytelling isanticipated to increase student engagement, content retention, and deep learning. It is expectedthat female students, in particular, will report higher engagement and a stronger sense ofbelonging in the course due to the inclusion of diverse role models and narratives. Qualitativedata from student surveys and course feedback reports are expected to show that students feelmore interested in the course content and that they have learned more deeply and meaningfullycompared to a traditional curriculum. Quantitative data
zone traffic control, and smart cities and connected and autonomous vehicles. Dr. Kianfar work has been supported by Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT), Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), among others. Dr. Kianfar also has an interest in engineering education research including blended learning environments, active and collaborative learning, and STEM outreach. Dr. Kianfar is a member of Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), and American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). Dr. Kianfar is a certified Professional Traffic Operations Engineer (PTOE) and Road Safety Professional (RSP I).Dr. Sridhar S. Condoor, Saint Louis University Professor
a competitive spirit, are highly motivatedto compete against other students and universities, and benefit from adding competitions as partof their education [13, 20, 12].Because of the open-ended problem statements in competitions, these projects may be used inclasses or as part of an engineering curriculum. The student learning objectives, and morespecifically CE program criteria for ABET, may be connected to student competitions. Someuniversities even implement student competitions in capstone-style or independent study coursesto expose students to teamwork, communication skills, and application of design knowledge [10,21]. Many of these skills are desired by industry and help students become career-ready [22].Equipping graduates for the
trying to extrapolate or parallel to internal force diagrams, andthere’s not [a relationship] in the way they’re trying to see it.” - Participant DEducators can help by integrating software tools that dynamically generate influence lines andconnect them to practical examples, such as bridges with moving loads. Simplifying theintroduction of these diagrams and demonstrating their real-world applications can make theconcept more accessible.Spatial Design and ConstructabilityDesigning structures in three dimensions requires an understanding of spatial relationships andthe ability to visualize stress distributions within a system. Constructability—the practicalaspects of assembling a structure, such as tying rebar or pouring concrete—is
with social justice work. These studies provide valuable insights into the integration of socialjustice in engineering education, demonstrating its significance in developing engineers who are notonly technically proficient but also socially conscious and ethically responsible. This work aims to show that a hands-on real-world problem intervention at a specific time during astudent’s academic development could affect their interest in STEM subjects. We explore the effect ofan immersive STEM outreach program in civil engineering with a social justice aspect to it on a groupof 23 juniors in high school. The author designed an academically appropriate project based on a civilengineering core statics course application centering on one of the
]. These frameworks ensure that engineering graduates meet industryexpectations, adapt to technological advancements, and foster effective multidisciplinarycollaboration. Given these factors, embedding professionalism into engineering curricula is widelyrecognized as critical to career success and long-term professional development. [7]-[9]As an ABET-accredited institution, in our institution, professionalism is integrated into curricularand co-curricular activities including freshman design courses, senior capstone projects,professional seminars, and extracurricular activities such as ASCE student chapter events, mockinterviews, and competitions. Project-based learning pedagogy has also been incorporated intojunior-level design courses; however
Paper ID #48606Countering Systemic Racism in Infrastructure Education: A Group ConceptMapping Study on Priorities for Educating Future EngineersDr. Rodolfo Valdes-Vasquez, Colorado State University Dr. Rodolfo Valdes-Vasquez is an Associate Professor in the Department of Construction Management at Colorado State University. His research, teaching, and engagement align with sustainable design and construction topics. He has received grant funding from federal and state agencies and private organizations. Rodolfo has taught multiple courses at the undergraduate and graduate levels, and he is well-versed in the
moresalient within the context of civil engineering, a trade-heavy industry awash with physical andsocial demands associated with the design and construction of the built environment. However,civil engineering graduates may pursue a variety of positions, including those that are moreoffice-based (e.g., structural designer) and those that require significant time outdoors (e.g., fieldinspector, construction manager, etc.). For this reason, the civil engineering discipline offers aunique opportunity to integrate disabled perspectives into the profession, diversify theengineering workforce, and ultimately, promote the overall accessibility of the spaces in whichsociety functions.In this paper, we provide an overview of the work conducted in the first
competencies such as systemsthinking, environmental responsibility, and interdisciplinary problem-solving, aligning with theglobal emphasis on life cycle thinking and sustainable systems integration [3].This study applies the EOP framework to the Sustainable Building Practices course within theCivil Engineering Technology Department, addressing a critical sector responsible for nearly 40%of global carbon emissions and significant resource use [4]. The curriculum revision focuses onthree EOP competencies: Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), Materials Selection (MS), andSystems Thinking (ST). These areas were chosen to address gaps in sustainability education andequip students with practical tools for assessing life-cycle impacts, selecting
academic experience without compromising student learning,engineering rigor or academic integrity. This paper describes and assesses the incorporation ofAI into an existing computer laboratory course in an undergraduate structural engineeringprogram.ARCE 352 (Structural Computing I) is a one-unit computer laboratory that is a companioncourse to ARCE 302 (Structural Analysis) in the Architectural Engineering program at CaliforniaPolytechnic State University. The students learn the theory and by-hand methods for findingforces and deflections in indeterminate structures in ARCE 302. In ARCE 352, the students usecommercial software and Python programming to solve more complex problems of the sametype on a computer.After receiving classroom instruction
supplemental tool to alsobuild interest and improve learning outcomes in a specific field of engineering. Often, this hasbeen contextualized within the field of experiential learning. For example, Gadola and Chimdanodeveloped a design competition focused on motorbike design which allowed students to performthe design as well as actually test their design by building and driving the motorbikes [4]. Theirfindings indicated that student competitions were an ideal way to implement the experientiallearning concept. Other frameworks have integrated the concept into engineering curricula; forexample, De-Juan et al. [5], who introduced a student design competition into a mechanicalengineering course through involving design assignments in three courses across
participants that contribute to a better understanding ofeffective engineering education through the use of AI.BackgroundThe educational videos implemented in civil engineering undergraduate courses at ManhattanUniversity were developed as part of an NSF-funded project to expose students to emergingskillsets required to meet the needs of society and be a successful engineer in an evolving anddata-driven profession. Given the limitations of many institutions to add credits above the currentABET accreditation requirements, the research team set out to develop “plug and play”educational videos that could be integrated as supplemental material in existing required courses.As a team of engineering faculty, translating technical knowledge in systems-level
. IntroductionGenerative AI (GenAI) is reshaping education, challenging educators to reconsider what theyteach, how they teach, and how they engage and assess student learning in the classroom. Asstudents are already using these tools in their academic work at a higher rate than we expect [1],taking a proactive and forward-thinking approach to integrating GenAI into engineeringeducation is becoming increasingly important. Such an approach will not only equip studentswith the ability to critically evaluate AI-generated outputs but also encourage them to explore itslimitations and ethical and professional implications.In this case study, the authors explore the integration of two GenAI-based writing assignmentsinto a senior-level design course. The goals of this
ofinventory, outdated guidelines, and unused resources. These issues make the lab inaccessible andineffective for both faculty and students. Without an organized system, faculty often remainunaware of available materials or how to incorporate them effectively into their teaching, whichin turn limits students' opportunities for hands-on learning.Reorganizing and cataloging the lab’s resources will improve accessibility, clarify availableteaching tools, and support better curriculum integration. This project also involves updatingoutdated manuals and introducing new, interactive physical models to strengthen students’understanding of fundamental engineering concepts. The impact of these updates will beassessed through surveys, focus groups, and grade
.” and continues to suggest that this solution is not a favorable one [13]. While outsourcing instruction may reduce curriculum complexity and is one of the easiest to implement administratively, it still caters to the home discipline of the instructor, potentially limiting education of the architect. o Integrated Design Class: Offering an integrated design class in which students from several disciplines work on a building design project over the semester prompts cross disciplinary collaboration. There has been discussion of interdisciplinary design thinking in architectural education, with many case studies suggesting the benefits and barriers in
professional attitudes. • Integrity is firm adherence to a code of especially moral values • Dependability is defined as the quality of being able to be counted on or relied upon • Consideration of Others is thoughtful and sympathetic regard to the needs of others • Flexibility is the ability to change or be changed according to the situation and is critical for civil engineers working within a diverse group and in an ever-changing environment.Fostering Affective LearningCognitive learning. Across our curriculum, we naturally teach cognitive knowledge aboutprofessional attitudes in various course activities. This is mostly because our faculty have allworked in professional practice, so the technical “in
Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Surveying civil engineering student attitudes toward the use of computational tools Sotiria Koloutsou-Vakakis, Megan L. Matthews, Cheryl Cohen, Jacob Henschen, John S. Popovics, Ashlynn S. Stillwell Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana- Champaign, 205 N. Mathews, Urbana, IL 61801, sotiriak@illinois.eduAbstractThe discussion about integrating computing into curricula of non-computer science engineeringmajors remains open. Such integration is desirable, as computing is an essential tool forengineering practice. In addition, computing can enhance engineering education throughsimulation and
” [9]. A “three theme” approach provides aframework for developing student understanding: 1) an introduction to basic principles isfollowed by 2) experience with mathematical solutions before 3) expanded exploration viamodern software solutions [5]. Similarly, a knowledge integration model calls for introduction,exploration, and reflection [7]. In one case study, teaching activities were scaffolded to matcheach of the six Bloom’s Taxonomy levels [12]. Homework questions at three Bloom’s levels(Understand, Analyze, Evaluate) effectively engaged students in another study [13]. When itcomes to content instruction, three stages of teaching/learning appear frequently in the literature.At the program level, engineering educators have also noted a