Asee peer logo
Displaying all 3 results
Conference Session
Engineering and Public Policy Division (EPP) Poster Session
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Tammy Mackenzie, The Aula Fellowship; Animesh Paul, University of Georgia; Lilianny Virguez, University of Florida; Rubaina Khan, University of Toronto; Victoria Kuketz; Leslie Salgado, University of Calgary; Branislav Radeljić, Aula Fellowship for AI Science, Tech, and Policy; Peer Herholz, Northwestern University; Awa Samaké; Sylvie T. Leduc, York University; Sreyoshi Bhaduri, Private Corporation
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering and Public Policy Division (EPP)
progress, this is also in-tended as a call to action inviting collaboration, feedback, and shared learning among peers,researchers, and engineering educators who are similarly committed to driving meaningfulchange in this area. By fostering a network of engaged contributors, we hope to build astronger, more resilient foundation for long-term impact.References [1] The Aula Fellowship, “The aula fellowship,” 2025, accessed: 2025-05-01. [Online]. Available: https://theaulafellowship.org/ [2] D. C. North, “Institutions, institutional change and economic performance,” Cambridge University, 1990. [3] J. P. Olsen, “Institutional design in democratic contexts,” Journal of Political Philoso- phy, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 203–229, 1997. [4] C. R
Conference Session
Engineering and Public Policy Division (EPP) Technical Session 2
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Monika Tomar, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Mario Ventresca, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering and Public Policy Division (EPP)
developing and assessing Professional Development programs for these students.Mario Ventresca, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Game Theoretic Course Policy Design for Fair Grading in Team-Based Collaborative AssignmentsAbstractTeam-based projects are widely adopted because collaborative learning improves teamwork andprofessional skills while enhancing student engagement and academic achievement. However,free-riding, uneven effort distribution and misreporting remain endemic in group assignments,undermining fairness in grading and learning outcomes. Traditional peer-evaluation andcalibration meetings are vulnerable to bias
Conference Session
Engineering and Public Policy Division (EPP) Technical Session 2
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Fadhla Binti Junus, Purdue Engineering Education; Alfa Satya Putra, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)
Tagged Divisions
Engineering and Public Policy Division (EPP)
centers around developing personalized learning environments for higher education students studying computer programming. She is particularly interested in investigating students’ programming learning processes, exploring methods to simplify programming instruction, examining theoretical foundations for effective instructional design, and integrating artificial intelligence technologies to facilitate peer-like knowledge construction.Alfa Satya Putra, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Alfa Satya Putra is a 3rd year PhD student at School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He has Bachelor’s and Master’s degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Purdue University. Before joining the PhD program