- Conference Session
- New Engineering Educators (NEE) Technical Session 3 - Professional and Faculty Development
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Steven B. Warth, Austin Peay State University; Bobette Bouton; Emmabeth Parrish Vaughn, Austin Peay State University; Lily Skau, Austin Peay State University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)
space for all and uses writing, speaking, and research to address each of these important aspects of her academic career.Dr. Emmabeth Parrish Vaughn, Austin Peay State University Dr. Emmabeth Vaughn is an Assistant Professor in the Physics, Engineering, and Astronomy Department at Austin Peay State University. Before join faculty at Austin Peay, she worked in industry as a Product Development Engineer for a commercial roofing manufacturer. She holds a bachelors degree from the University of Tennessee in Materials Science and Engineering. She earned her PhD from the University of Pennsylvania, where her thesis topic was Nanoparticle Diffusion in Polymer Networks. Her research interests include polymer physics
- Conference Session
- New Engineering Educators (NEE) Technical Session 3 - Professional and Faculty Development
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Jiawei Gong, Pennsylvania State University, Behrend College; Debalina Maitra, Kennesaw State University
- Tagged Divisions
-
New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)
, and quality, prioritizing peer-reviewed papers andreputable journals. Then, organize and categorize the literature by grouping studies with similarthemes, methodologies, or theoretical approaches, using an outline to visualize connections. Next,analyze and synthesize the information by comparing findings, identifying trends, gaps, orinconsistencies, and determining their relevance to the research question. Finally, revise and editthe review for coherence, clarity, and logical flow. Ensure proper citation and formatting and seekfeedback from peers or mentors to refine the final product.Figure 1: Seven steps of the literature review process: A cyclic process starting with identifyingyour question, reviewing discipline styles, searching the
- Conference Session
- New Engineering Educators (NEE) Technical Session 4 - Undergraduate Student Learning
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
H. Schwab, The Ohio State University; Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Anu Singh, The Ohio State University; Euclides Maluf, University of Nebraska - Lincoln
- Tagged Divisions
-
New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)
design activities with authentic engineering contexts; the design and implementation of learning objective-based grading for transparent and fair assessment; and the integration of reflection to develop self-directed learners.Anu Singh, The Ohio State University Anu Singh is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education Research at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. She completed her M.Tech in Digital Communication and her B.Tech in Electronics and Communication Engineering in India. Her research interests include self-regulation, metacognition, reflection, and argumentative writing in engineering.Euclides Maluf, University of Nebraska - Lincoln The author is an experienced Industrial Engineer with a minor in Occupational
- Conference Session
- New Engineering Educators (NEE) Technical Session 3 - Professional and Faculty Development
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Katherine Ansell, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Jessica R TerBush, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Caroline Cvetkovic, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Elaine C. Schulte, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Christopher D. Schmitz, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Chandrasekhar Radhakrishnan; Rebecca Marie Reck, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)
from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. After graduation, she worked as a post-doc for approximately three years at Monash University in Clayton, Victoria, Australia. She then spent three years working as a Senior Research Specialist at the Missouri University of Science and Technology in Rolla, Missouri, where she trained users on the focused ion beam (FIB), scanning electron microscope (SEM), and transmission electron microscope (TEM). In 2016, she moved to the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, to serve as a lecturer in the department of Materials Science and Engineering. Here, she is responsible for teaching the junior labs as well as providing instruction on writing in engineering.Dr. Caroline
- Conference Session
- New Engineering Educators (NEE) Technical Session 3 - Professional and Faculty Development
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Allie DeLeo-Allen, DKB Solutions, LLC; Alicia Boudreaux Kiremire MS, PE, PMP, FlowStream Management LLC; Katie Evans, Houston Christian University; Anne Case Hanks, University of Louisiana Monroe; Krystal Corbett Cruse, Louisiana Tech University
- Tagged Divisions
-
New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)
framework was usedas an example of the processes of capacity development, and the other as an example of itsoutcomes.The example framework for the process of capacity development was Pact’s framework [16],[17]. Pact’s definition of capacity development is: “a continuous process that fosters the abilitiesand agency of individuals, institutions, and communities to overcome challenges and contributetowards local solutions... Though often developed in response to an immediate and specificissue, capacities are adaptable to future opportunities and challenges.” According to Pact, thefollowing activities can be used to build participants’ capacity: consultancy services, training,mentoring/coaching, information/resources, and peer exchange and learning.The
- Conference Session
- New Engineering Educators (NEE) Technical Session 3 - Professional and Faculty Development
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Gracie Kerr, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Hayden J Wulf, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Grace Panther, University of Nebraska - Lincoln
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)
resources for student learning, such as availability of tutoringsessions, writing centers, or student disability services [6]. Syllabi also provide an opportunityfor instructors to exhibit empathy or provide motivation to students through the communicationof course policies. Demonstrations of empathy have the potential to provide additional support tostudents within the classroom and influence student success [8], [9]. Furthermore, past studieshave demonstrated that fundamental information about a course can be deduced from coursesyllabi [10], [11], [12]. However, there has been a lack of research exploring the ways in whichcourse syllabi can be used to examine transparency and support systems provided to students inengineering courses. The purpose