Paper ID #46181Middle School Preservice Teachers’ Discussion Prompts to Help a StudentAvatar Overcome Idea Fixation during Brainstorming (Fundamental)Pamela S. Lottero-Perdue Ph.D., Towson University Pamela S. Lottero-Perdue, Ph.D., is Professor of Science and Engineering Education in the Department of Physics, Astronomy & Geosciences at Towson University. She has integrated engineering into courses for PreK-8 teacher candidates, developed and directed a graduate STEM program for PreK-6 teachers, and partnered with teachers to implement PreK-8 science-integrated engineering learning experiences. She has authored
Jialing Wu is a first-year PhD student in Engineering Education at the Ohio State University. She earned her M.Ed. in International Education Policy and Management at Vanderbilt University, Peabody College, and also holds a bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from China. Her research interests encompass computational social science, international engineering education, pre-college engineering in Engineering Education Research (EER).Dr. Stacy S Klein-Gardner, Vanderbilt University Dr. Stacy Klein-Gardner serves as an Adjunct Professor of Biomedical Engineering at Vanderbilt University. She is the co-PI and co-Director of the NSF-funded Engineering For Us All (e4usa) project and now the Executive Director of
Mason University, and her M.Ed. from Regent University. Her research interests include computer science and cybersecurity education, student and faculty motivation in STEM education, teamwork, and online learning design.Dr. Stacy S Klein-Gardner, Engineering for US All Dr. Stacy Klein-Gardner serves as an Adjunct Professor of Biomedical Engineering at Vanderbilt University. She is the co-PI and co-Director of the NSF-funded Engineering For Us All (e4usa) project and now the Executive Director of e4usa, the non-profit company. Dr. Klein-Gardner is a Fellow of ASEE. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Programming as an Engineering Tool in K-12: e4usa
Paper ID #48694Self-efficacy of high school students after an AI-focused pre-college program:A two year impact study (Fundamental)Dr. S. Shailja, Stanford University Shailja is a post-doctoral fellow at Stanford University. She completed her Ph.D. in the Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) Department with interdisciplinary emphasis on College and University teaching at the University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB) in 2024. She graduated with a bachelor’s degree from the Electrical Engineering Department at the Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur in 2016. Shailja received the Winifred and Louis
-impact applications in education and healthcare. His technical expertise includes machine learning, web development, and cloud technologies, with hands-on experience deploying tools using PyTorch, Hugging Face, PostgreSQL, and AWS. Meet has also contributed to award-winning projects such as Connections AI, a machine learning solution for puzzle solving, and has led data optimization efforts for large-scale industrial challengesDr. Michael S Rugh, Texas A&M University Dr. Michael S. Rugh is an Associate Research Scientist at the LIVE Lab at Texas A and M University and Director of STEM Education Research for the Aggie Research Program. He leads interdisciplinary research teams investigating game-based learning and
thinking into curricula to foster creativity, problem-solving skills.Dr. Corey T Schimpf, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Corey Schimpf is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Education at University at Buffalo. He is the Past Division Chair for the Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) for the American Society of Engineering Education. His research interests include engineering and human-centered design, advancing research methods, and technology innovations to support learning in complex domains. He has a PhD from Purdue University in Engineering Education.Dr. Carolyn S Giroux, Wentworth Institute of Technology Carolyn Giroux is an instructional designer at Wentworth
Director of Aspirations Evaluation at NCWIT for the past 9 years. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025TeachEngineering.orgLevel up on pre-collegeengineering educationand outreachTeachEngineering.org is a free digital library of over T H E T E AC H E N G I N E E R I N G C U R R I C U L U M I S :1900 classroom-tested, standards-aligned K-12 AC C E S S I B L E S TA N DA R D S - A L I G N E Dengineering resources created in collaboration with Free hands-on K-12 engineering resources that use low-cost, Most of our
of theNational Science Foundation.References[1] A. Sullivan and Z. Beers, "Early exposure to computational thinking concepts in K-12education," Journal of STEM Education, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 45-52, 2018[2] T. A. Signorella, R. Frieze, and J. Hershey, "Single-sex versus mixed-sex classes and genderschemata in children and adolescents: A longitudinal comparison," Journal of EducationalPsychology, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 386-394, 1993[3] S. Metz, "Attracting the engineering of 2020 today," Journal of Engineering Education, vol.96, no. 3, pp. 1-4, 2007[4] C. Steele, "A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance,"American Psychologist, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 613-629, 1997[5] P. Davies, J. Spencer, and C. Steele
enablecommunication between engineers and educational stakeholders who use these technologies with students. This framework will then support the transition of designing affordable robotics technology fromresearch to practice in K-12 education.References: Pedre, S., Nitsche, M., Pessagc, F., Caccavelli, J., & De Cristóforis, P. (2014). Design of a multi-purpose low-cost mobile robotAhmed, H., & La, H. M. (2019, March). Education-robotics symbiosis: An evaluation of challenges and proposed for research and education. In Advances in Autonomous Robotics Systems: 15th Annual Conference, TAROS 2014
-solving skills to prepare them for the challenges of this evolving world.Dr. Michael Helms, Georgia Institute of TechnologyDr. Meltem Alemdar, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Meltem Alemdar is s Associate Director and Principal Research Scientist at Georgia Institute of Technology Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics and Computing (CEISMC). Her research focuses on improving K-12 STEM education through research on curriculum development, teacher professional development, and student learning in integrated STEM environments. Dr. Alemdar currently serves as PI and co-PI for research on various NSF funded projects that focuses on engineering education, teacher networks and STEM learning environments. Her
= 104 n = 48 and Robotics education in formal and informal education Records centered around Records excluded for not being Robotics Education journal articles n = 56 n=7 Comparison: Traditional Records excluded for: curricula v/s AI, Robotics 1. Not being relevant or Eligibility enriched
feedback and suggestions. Every newacademic year, teachers had access to an improved version of the curriculum, materials and guideas compared to the prior year. As previously noted, the results focus on the latest teacher feedbackfrom 2023-24, offering the most current insights.CurriculumFig. 1 shows curriculum rating by the teachers. With the v5.0 in 2024 the largest percentage ofteachers rated the curriculum as “very good” (43.3% in 2024, 31.7% in 2023, and 38.2% in 2022).That same year the percentage of teachers who rated the curriculum “excellent” dropped slightlybut both 2024 and 2023 were significantly higher than 2022’s rating (33.3% in 2024 vs. 34.1% in2023 vs. 20.6% in 2022). While the percentage rating for “fair” remained fairly
Foundation (NSF) CAREERAward. Phase 1 featured qualitative interviews of selected high school teachers, which informeda statewide survey in Phase 2 targeting all high school science teachers in Nebraska.Findings from this statewide study [25] revealed key deficiencies in the infrastructure, with 57%of teachers feeling unprepared to teach energy STEM topics due to limited professionaldevelopment, resources, and hands-on activity guidance aligned with Nebraska College andCareer Ready Science Standards (NCCRS-S) and the Next Generation Science Standards(NGSS) [26],[27]. Financial and travel constraints further limited access to in-person training,particularly for remote schools, emphasizing the need for alternative engagement modes. Thisstudy
marginalizedcommunities. Through our four-year collaboration, we have demonstrated how creative, hands-on activities incorporating art and design can expand young students' perceptions of engineeringand help them envision themselves as future engineers. By leveraging the enthusiasm andexpertise of university faculty, undergraduate mentors, and elementary school teachers, we havedeveloped sustainable programming that integrates into the elementary classroom while inspiringboth students and educators alike. Through this relationship, we have documented key pragmaticlessons to help bring two educational communities together.References1. A. Master, S. Cheryan, A. Moscatelli, & A. N. Meltzoff, “Programming experience promotes higher stem motivation among
://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/ejed.12599. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ejed.12599 [3] J. G. Meyer, R. J. Urbanowicz, P. C. N. Martin, K. O’Connor, R. Li, P.-C. Peng, T. J. Bright, N. Tatonetti, K. J. Won, G. Gonzalez-Hernandez, and J. H. Moore, “ChatGPT and large language models in academia: opportunities and challenges,” vol. 16, no. 1, p. 20. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13040-023-00339-9 [4] W. F. Foundation, “ChatGPT used by teachers more than students, new survey from walton family foundation finds.” [Online]. Available: https://www.waltonfamilyfoundation.org/chatgpt-used-by-teachers-more-than-students- new-survey-from-walton-family-foundation-finds [5] S. Weiner
List[1] T. Swartz, A. Palermo, S. Masur, J. Aberg, “The Science and Value of Diversity: Closing the Gaps in Our Understanding of Inclusion and Diversity,” The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 220, Issue Supplement_2, pp. S33–S41, Sep 2019. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiz174[2] M. Haddad, T. Jenkins, B. Solivan, A. Williams, “Enhancing Diversity in STEMM,” in Frontiers in Education, Lincoln, Nebraska, vol. 6, 2021. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2021.755758 DOI=10.3389/feduc.2021.755758.[3] Whitehouse, “Best Practices for Diversity and Inclusion in STEM Education and Research: A Guide by and for Federal Agencies,” Biden White House Archives. Accessed: Mar. 22
Center for EducationResearch. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of these institutions. References[1] T. J. Moore, A. C. Johnston, and A. W. Glancy, “STEM Integration,” in Handbook of Research on STEM Education, 1st ed., C. C. Johnson, M. J. Mohr-Schroeder, T. J. Moore, and L. D. English, Eds., New York: Routledge, 2020, pp. 3–16. doi: 10.4324/9780429021381-2.[2] K. E. Dugan, E. A. Mosyjowski, S. R. Daly, and L. R. Lattuca, “Systems thinking assessments in engineering: A systematic literature review,” Syst Res Behav Sci, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 840–866, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1002/sres
- 9830.2012.tb01127.x.[6] National Research Council, “Engineering in K-12 Education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects.” Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2009. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/12635[7] Y.-H. Chien, C.-Y. Liu, S.-C. Chan, and Y.-S. Chang, “Engineering design learning for high school and college first-year students in a STEM battlebot design project,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 10, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1186/s40594-023-00403-0.[8] J. Watkins, K. Spencer, and D. Hammer, “Examining Young Students’ Problem Scoping in Engineering Design,” J. Pre-Coll. Eng. Educ. Res., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 43–53, 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1082.[9] N. Crilly and C
request funding for camp sponsorships and immersiveexperiences. We hope that by providing this model, detailed camp schedule, costs, and logistics,we can inspire camps across the county. In addition, we feel that as the idea grows, we willeventually have multiple summer camps at each of our institutions annually. Reference[1] M. Terzian, Ph.D., M.S.W., K. A. Moore, Ph.D., and K. Hamilton, M.A., Effective and promising summer learning programs and approaches for economically-disadvantaged children and youth, ERIC Document No. ED506969, 2009. [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED506969.[2] S. A. Phelan, S. M. Harding, and A. S. Harper-Leatherman, "BASE (broadening
-grade classes at two different schools in a small urban city in the Northeast United States,which we call Pepperville. Mr. J taught the course at school A and Mr. S taught the curriculum atSchool B. Mr. J and Mr. S, both white male teachers, have students from ethnically andlinguistically diverse backgrounds. Most of the students spoke English, and many spoke,understood, or were learning another language. At the end of the curriculum, learners made avideo journalism artifact for specific audiences about climate tech in Pepperville. Both siteshosted a screening day to view the students’ final journalism artifacts, which, for the Spring 2024implementation,were journalism videos. This paper focuses on data from two of Mr. J’s classes.In our
. 12, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www-scopus-com.proxy.lib.ohio-state.edu/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-851061909 29&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f&src=s&sot=b&sdt=b&s=%28TITLE%28transgender%29 +AND+ABS%28engineering%29%29&sessionSearchId=489192ebf1b727a0671573e86d5 969db&relpos=9[4] A. L. Pawley, C. Schimpf, and L. Nelson, “Gender in Engineering Education Research: A Content Analysis of Research in JEE, 1998-2012,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 508–528, Jul. 2016, doi: 10.1002/jee.20128.[5] “Education,” US Trans Survey. Accessed: Jan. 13, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://ustranssurvey.org/report/education/[6] “Course + Curriculum | Engineering For US All
#2300433 Design Challenge: Airborne Transport ANALYZING NATURAL INSPIRATIONS (SAMPLE ANSWERS) DESIGN CHALLENGE CONSTRAINTS MATERIALS: TOOLS: TIME: Construction paper, cardboard, Hole punchers, 30 minutes to tissue paper, tracing paper, paper scissors, hot glue build, test, and clips, craft sticks, pipe cleaners, guns, glue sticks, iterate florist wire, tape, balloons, rubber ruler, tape measurebands, foil, paper cups, thumb tack Share your prototypesSHARE-OUT Compare prototype(s) to the original inspiration from nature Tell what you learned about their strengths and
,” The Journal of rheumatology, vol. 21, no. 3, p. 454—461, 3 1994. [Online]. Available: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/8006888[2] T. Audino, A. Pautasso, V. Bellavia, V. Carta, A. Ferrari, F. Verna, C. Grattarola, B. Iulini, M. D. Pintore, M. Bardelli, and et al., “Ticks infesting humans and associated pathogens: A cross-sectional study in a 3-year period (2017–2019) in northwest italy,” Parasites & Vectors, vol. 14, no. 1, 3 2021.[3] Unity Technologies, “Unity real-time development platform — 3d, 2d vr &; ar engine,” [online]. [Online]. Available: https://unity.com/[4] D. S. D¨uzkaya, G. Bozkurt, S. Ulupınar, G. Uysal, S. Uc¸ar, and M. Uysalol, “The effect of a cartoon and an information video about intravenous
, and mathematics (STEM) identity before, during, andafter participation in the 2024 summer programs.This study aims to investigate the impacts of the GGEE summer program on the development ofSTEM identity in middle school student participants. To measure the impacts on the developmentof STEM identity, three validated survey tools were modified to fit the needs and perspectives ofthe summer programs: the single-item STEM Professional Identity Overlap (STEM-PIO-1)measure, Role Identity Surveys in STEM (RIS-STEM), and Student Attitudes toward STEM (S-STEM). These tools focused on different aspects of STEM identity formation: 1) overall STEMidentity formation by measuring how much students feel like they overlap with a scientist orengineer, 2
gratitude to the STEMcylist team and participating students, theSTEMcyclists mentors and community partners in Buffalo. We also are thankful for the supportof our main bike partners: GObike Buffalo, Slow Roll Buffalo, and the Buffalo United Front,Inc.’s East Side Bike Club-ESBC. Our gratitude goes to the community of the Institute forResearch on Learning and Instruction (IRLI) and the Center for Engineering Education andOutreach (CEEO) at Tufts University, particularly Dr. Caspari and Dr. Wendell for their valuablefeedback. We are thankful to the students who supported the graduate students working on thisproject - Geling, Oluwatoyin, Emmanuel, Ian, Sam, Sophia, Sarah, Nicolette, Anais, Lee,Javierand, Olha and Dr. Miel for their insightful comments
/0013189X033008003.[2] M. S. Garet et. al., "What makes professional development effective?: Results from a national sample of teachers," American educational research journal, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 915-945, 2001, doi: 10.3102/00028312038004915.[3] A. Kodey, J. Bedard, J. Nipper, N. Post, S. Lovett, and A. Negreros. "The US Needs More Engineers. What’s the Solution?" https://www.bcg.com/publications/2023/addressing-the-engineering-talent-shortage (accessed 1/14/25.[4] D. Collins, J. D. Olson, M. Kotche, E. Taylor, and J. Mendez, "Transforming Science Teacher Practice through an Intentional Summer Research Opportunity: A Case Study of two Urban Science Educators," presented at the American Educational Research
: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change:[PR Shukla, J. Skea, R. Slade, A. Al Khourdajie, R. van Diemen, D. McCollum, M. Pathak, S. Some, P. Vyas, R. Fradera, M. Belkacemi, A. Hasija, G. Lisboa, S. Luz, J. Malley,(eds.: Cambridge University Press, 2022, p. 503.[3] NSF, "STEM Education for the Future," 2020, Available: https://www.nsf.gov/edu/Materials/STEM%20Education%20for%20the%20Future%20- %202020%20Visioning%20Report.pdf.[4] NSF, "Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering " in "National Center for Science and Engineering
(1977): 191–215. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191[8] Palmer, D. H., “Sources of Self-efficacy in a Science Methods Course for Primary Teacher Education Students”, Research in Science Education, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 337–353, 2006. doi:10.1007/s11165-005-9007-0.[9] Guzey, S. S., Tank, K., Wang, H., Roehrig, G., and Moore, T. “A High-Quality Professional Development for Teachers of Grades 3 – 6 for Implementing Engineering into Classrooms” 114, no. 3 (2014): 139 – 149. doi:10.1111/ssm.12061[10] Lottero-Perdue, P. and Parry, E. A. “Elementary Teachers’ Reflections on Design Failures and Use of Fail Words after Teaching Engineering for Two Years” 7, no. 1 (2017): 1-College Engineering Education Research.[11
materialare those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of NASA.References[1] A. T. Jeffers, A. G. Safferman, and S. I. Safferman, “Understanding K–12 Engineering Outreach Programs,” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., vol. 130, no. 2, pp. 95–108, Apr. 2004, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2004)130:2(95). 6[2] L. M. Ihrig, E. Lane, D. Mahatmya, and S. G. Assouline, “STEM Excellence and Leadership Program: Increasing the Level of STEM Challenge and Engagement for High-Achieving Students in Economically Disadvantaged Rural Communities,” J. Educ. Gift., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 24–42, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1177/0162353217745158.[3