Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division (SYS) Technical Session 2

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Garrett Goodman, Miami University; Suman Bhunia, Miami University; Peter Jamieson, Miami University

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering Division (SYS)

static int sumSkipDuplicates(Stack data) { return 0; } /** * Puts all of the digits of an integer into a stack, with the first * digit of the integer at the bottom of the stack and the last digit * of the integer at the top of the stack. */ public static Stack integerToStack(int n) { return null; } /** * Reverses a given stack, so that the top of the stack becomes the bottom * and the bottom becomes the top. */ public static void reverseStack(Stack s) { }}Below is a sample of the code that ChatGPT-4 generated for reversing a Stack. /** * Reverses a given stack, so that the top of the stack becomes the bottom ,→ and * the bottom becomes the top

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division (SYS) Technical Session 2

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Abul K. M. Azad, Northern Illinois University; Jim Goodell, INFERable and IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee; Aaron Kessler Ph.D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Scotty D. Craig; Hamadou Saliah-Hassane ing., TELUQ University

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering Division (SYS)

hope this overview provides a thought-provoking invitation toengineering education professionals and educators. We hope it can lead to a productive sharingof knowledge that can strengthen both fields.References:[1] J. Dewey, “Education as Engineering,” New Republic, 20 September 1922, 89–91.[2] H. A. Simon, “Job of a college president,” Educational Record, American Council on Education, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 68–78, 1967.[3] K. E. Willcox, S. Sarma, and P. Lippel, “Online Education: A Catalyst for Higher Education Reforms”, Final Report, Online Education Policy Initiative, April 2016. https://oepi.mit.edu/files/2016/09/MIT-Online-Education-Policy-Initiative-April-2016.pdf[4] C. Dede, J. Richards, and B. Saxberg, Learning Engineering for

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division (SYS) Technical Session 1

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Mendoza-Garcia, University of Florida; Andrea Goncher-Sevilla, University of Florida; Mengyu Li, University of Florida

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering Division (SYS)

independentlyassessed by three raters using Grohs's systems thinking assessment tool [9], and the scores weresubsequently compiled. For instance, the following is Participant 20's response to Prompt 7,where the three raters did not completely agree: “One challenge is getting the government to agree to helping this village. It may not help at all. Another challenge is figuring out who gets the $1,000 grants. One limitation is that only 50 people will get the grant.”The three raters provided the following scores for this answer, as shown in Table 1. Prompt 7: Implementation Challenges Rater Notes by rater 1 Rater Notes by rater 2 Rater Notes by rater 3 Student ID Rater 1 Rater 2

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division (SYS) Technical Session 2

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Khadija Ishfaq Rana, University of Toronto; Emily Moore, University of Toronto

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering Division (SYS)

thinking in philosophy, and theories on leadershipdevelopment and community building. The framework discusses three dimensions: problem,perspective, and time. According to Grohs et al. “These three dimensions…and their interactions[describe] elements of a systems thinking approach to problem-solving that is sensitive to thecomplex and ambiguous nature of wicked problems” [20]. The constructs associated with each ofthe dimensions are presented in the table below which summarizes the framework.Table 1: The three dimensions of Grohs et al.’s systems thinking framework [20] Grohs et al.’s Problem Dimension Perspective Dimension Time Dimension Dimension Purpose Names technical and Elaborates how Evaluates how