-perception. The leadership styleclassifications and subsequent characteristics are illustrated in Figure 1 in four sectors definedalong a horizontal dominance axis and a vertical responsiveness axis. It is worth noting that noone completely falls into one leadership style, but only one style was assigned to each studentthat best represents their leadership. The project assignment process used only the student’sreported leadership style metric.. It is also worth noting that students are selecting theirleadership style based on their perceptions. In subsequent data collection and analysis, theauthors plan to address the question as to whether students self-identify consistently across thespan of the project. Figure 1
delineate the curriculumdevelopment process of the program, detailing its evolution from version 1.0 to 5.0, and 2) to sharecomprehensive evaluation data that reflects the reception of the curriculum across the last threeiterations. By providing an in-depth look at both the progressive refinement of the curriculum andthe empirical outcomes associated with each version, this paper provides valuable insights toenhance ongoing pre-college engineering education efforts.MethodsProgram ContextLarge-scale pre-engineering programs tend to appeal to students who may already be planning tostudy engineering in college. These programs serve a purpose in helping engineering studentsprepare for college. However, these programs often fail to appeal to students
natural, engineered,or social system. It is dynamically updated with the data from its physical twin, has a predictivecapability and informs decisions that realizes value [24], [25].Digital technologies are transforming how people learn and are increasingly introduced at alleducational levels [26], [27]. The essential role of technology in face-to-face education isreflected in initiatives such as the U.S. National Educational Technology Plan [28], [29]. Whichemphasizes the importance of reconfiguring physical learning environments (e.g., classrooms) tofacilitate technology-mediated learning (TML).When integrated into physical classrooms, digital technologies can offer immediate feedback,promote interaction, and support diverse learning needs by
. Indeed, meta-analyses have confirmed correlations between variables in the model [14], including a meta-analytic path analysis of diverse students in STEM domains [16]. In addition to explaining how career choices develop, SCCT is used to design andevaluate career planning interventions. In a recent systematic review of SCCT’s application tointervention studies [17], the model was used in 18 articles primarily in the United States. Acrossrural and urban settings, the interventions targeted self-efficacy. Self-efficacy1 is the bedrock ofthe theory and a mainstay short-term outcome selected by education practitioners for evaluation. While SCCT is widely used for explaining outcomes and designing interventions,numerous studies using
process and is therefore responsiblefor running the meetings and removing external obstacles for the team. The rest of the teamcomprises developers who complete tasks towards the project’s completion.At the start of each sprint, the team holds a sprint planning meeting to choose tasks from theproduct backlog to place on the sprint backlog [6]. To help them in this process, they assign anestimate to each task of how much effort it will take to complete the task. The team needs tohave accurate effort estimates to ensure the workload for the sprint is appropriate. Throughoutthe sprint, the team holds daily stand-up meetings, approximately 15 minutes long, during whicheveryone on the team gives an update on task status and addresses any challenges
from students of all levels: freshmen, sophomores, juniors, and seniors. The reason forincluding all levels was to. 1. Collect the perception of students on the importance of internship 2. Get feedback from students who have already completed at least one internship.The results from the two groups provided a clear analysis of why internships are important forstudents in their performance and post-graduation plans, whether joining a graduate program orgoing to work in the industry. The articles reviewed collectively emphasize the multifacetedbenefits of internships, from academic performance enhancement to improved career readiness.Key Benefits of InternshipsBridging Theory and PracticeBringing theory and practice from the classroom to the
authors and literaturesuggest the dangers of not engaging meaningfully with communities when working onhumanitarian engineering projects. Considering that the success of the project is related to activecommunity participation and long-term commitment, the parties enrolled should follow the fiveprinciples presented by Mazzurco and Jesiek. These principles facilitate the communityparticipation, planning and management. Therefore, it is important to plan and establishstrategies to ensure the success of the project and promote engagement between engineers andcommunity members to achieve the project´s objectives. The literature provides guidelines thatenables engineers, educators, and community members to work more effectively.The Co-Design is “The
, including developing students’ funds of knowledgeand culturally responsive mentoring, supporting teachers in incorporating these practices intolesson planning and instruction. Pre-service teachers engaged in workshops, reflective journaling,interactive activities, and actual teaching experiences with students. Throughout the program,mentors were supported with training in culturally responsive mentoring practices to ensureongoing guidance.To assess the impact of this experience, data were collected through semi-structured interviewsconducted after the program and a post-program survey. Findings suggest that exposure to EDPand CRP with guided implementation experiences solidified participants’ beliefs, encouragedthem to apply these methods in real
than a standard design/analyze role to one with multiple responsibilities to otheraspects of the system, including stakeholder training, analyses, adherence to regulations, and riskassessment: Design structures to withstand seismic forces and vibrations. Perform seismic analysis to assess building stability during earthquakes. Ensure adherence to local and international seismic codes, laws, and practices - Earthquake Team, Structural Engineer (Civil Engineering) Earthquake preparedness planning, seismic risk audits, conduct safety training programs, oversee seismic monitoring systems - Earthquake Team, Geotechnical Engineer (Civil Engineering)Overly Generalized or Misidentified EngineeringWhile many of the teams identified
systems thinking content as well as environmental impactsand social responsibility content resonated with 100% of engineering faculty participants fromall disciplines (Fig. 2). Based on frequency in survey data and in dialogue, the systems thinkingprinciples that most resonated were: 1) the understanding of interconnections andinterdependence of sustainability challenges and unintended consequences of proposed solutions,2) the Stockholm Resilience Centre’s Planetary Boundaries concept, 3) the application of STEEP(i.e., Social, Technological, Environmental, Economic and Political) framing to their courseteachings and assignments, and 4) systems thinking mapping tools (e.g., Iceberg Model). 80% offaculty planned to add these concepts and exercises
sessions, required meetings, and training.From the group of 38 graduate students who have joined the program, 20 are master students,and 18 are pursuing doctoral degrees. Although the majority of the graduate students who havejoined the program (22) are in various areas of engineering, the program has also welcomedstudents from social work, public policy, public health, communication and media, environmentand sustainability, education, business, art and design, and architecture and urban planning. Thecohort of graduate facilitators in the 2024 - 2025 academic year includes nine graduate students.Graduate facilitators join the program for an average of three semesters of facilitation work, withsome of them continuing in the program for up to ten
wind infrastructure have been successfully integrated into various existing courses, ensuring broader student exposure to the sector. 2. Faculty Engagement: Faculty members have been actively involved in the development of new course modules and have attended workshops and networking events to stay updated on industry trends. 3. Stakeholder Collaboration: Partnerships have been formed with local offshore wind stakeholders to align training modules with industry needs, particularly around advanced manufacturing. 4. Outreach and Recruitment: Efforts to engage underserved communities, especially in high schools, are underway with planned outreach activities in the coming months. 5. Funding Utilization
design process. The study analyses reflection journals from14 third-year material science and engineering students using a qualitative, inductive approach.Results identify four key aspects of problem scoping: (a) gathering information about clients,problem context, and the designers themselves; (b) setting goals based on gathered data; (c)developing solutions using divergent, convergent, and logical thinking; and (d) evaluating andmanaging design outcomes by reflecting on solutions by envisioning outcomes or creatingbackup plans. Both male and female students show similar approaches. Findings contribute tounderstanding students’ problem-scoping processes and highlight opportunities for futureresearch into engineering design education.Keywords
focus on their academic and professionalgrowth. Since its inception, the program has successfully enrolled two cohorts comprising 12scholars, achieving a retention rate exceeding 80%. Notably, the scholarships reduce the need forstudents to take on external employment, which can detract from academic engagement.Personalizing academic journeys with appreciative advising: At the core of ACCESS is theinnovative Appreciative Advising model, which fosters meaningful, strength-based relationshipsbetween advisors and students. This approach is structured into six phases—Disarm, Discover,Dream, Design, Deliver, and Don’t Settle—allowing advisors to build trust, understand students’aspirations, and co-create actionable plans for success. [3] Faculty
zoom since ¾ students from Cohort 1 thatare in PhD programs are no longer in Massachusetts.In the forthcoming phases of our research, we are poised to conduct analyses on survey resultspertaining to self-efficacy as well as evaluate interviews to discern the long-term impact of theprogram on student self-efficacy. Responding to the feedback received, we are preparing toimplement a more structured approach to ensure the Scholars' completion of an "IndependentDevelopment Plan." This plan is a strategic initiative designed to aid students in evaluating theirstrengths and interests, thereby facilitating informed decisions regarding their professionaltrajectories post-MS degree. Additionally, we are intensifying our efforts to attract S
. In addition, wehope to be able to explore longitudinal changes in latent variables and perceptions of supportwithin students—we have been collecting data that allows us to link responses at an individuallevel across survey administrations when possible. This analysis will enable us to understand, forexample, whether program participants exhibit shifts in their confidence or plans following theirundergraduate degrees over time. In addition, we plan to conduct focus groups with students tohelp us interpret the results of the quantitative data analysis. During these focus groups, we willdiscuss the collective student experience with STEM undergraduate education at the institutionand within the STEM Academy. This next step will target the
Renewable Energy undergraduate programs.Jeritt Williams, Illinois State University Jeritt Williams is an assistant professor of Engineering Technology at Illinois State University, where he teaches applied industrial automation and robotics.Dr. Jin Ho Jo Dr. Jin Ho Jo is a Professor of Technology at Illinois State University, teaching in the Sustainable and Renewable Energy program. Dr. Jo also leads the Sustainable Energy Consortium at the university. Dr. Jo is an honors graduate of Purdue University, where he earned a B.S. in Building Construction Management. He earned his M.S. in Urban Planning from Columbia University, where he investigated critical environmental justice issues in New York City. His 2010
grade Milestone 1: Title of the project and a summary (2-3 paragraphs) 5 Oct 17 Project Outline & Planning explaining the project and plans (50 points) Milestone 2: Structure (Layout) for your poster and a brief 2.5 Oct 31 Poster Layout & Presentation presentation to your peers during the class (25 Points) Milestone 3: Submit the first draft of
) serviceability (e.g., 3D-printed part repositories, troubleshooting guides), software options (e.g. Python,MakeCode), and curricular support (e.g. tutorials, guided lesson plans) to design low-cost robotics. Rationale for the inclusion of each framework component is included from a larger project in which bothteachers in under-served communities and experts in robotics were surveyed about implementation and cost of robotics in schools. Here we share how the LCER framework (Table 1) could be applied through an existing, low-cost educational robotics project, Roversa (Bredder, 2024). This project was initially designed usingparts of the Educational Robotics Application framework (Catlin & Blamires, 2010), and we share how the lessons learned
? Q49 - What was the quality of yourPOST 172 2018-2024 1.73 0.517 faculty mentor meetings?Qualitative data. Each REU participant also responded to one qualitative question in the post-assessment that specifically aimed to elaborate on the details of their NHERI REU mentorexperience and two questions that provided students the opportunity to expound on their overallexperience. These two questions often included references to their mentor experience: 1) Q50 - Describe how your mentor interactions could have been improved, if at all; 2) Q31 - How did your participation in the NHERI REU Summer Program influence, impact, or affect your future career plans?; and
teams in planning and development, through research and external evaluation, and as publication support. Most of his work is completed for Minority-Serving Institutions and he publishes regarding findings on a regular basis. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Promoting STEM through summer research experiences for K-12 teachers in a group settingAbstract Hispanics are consistently underrepresented in U.S. STEM employment. One possibleexplanation for this disparity could be that Hispanics are less likely to have a science orengineering background that would facilitate their STEM employment. According to the recentTexas Academic Performance Report, more than 75
implementation of learning objective-based grading for transparent and fair assessment; and the integration of reflection to develop self-directed learners. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Student Self-Reported Knowledge Gains from Reflection Implementation in Two Biological and Agricultural Engineering CoursesAbstractABET 7 emphasizes the importance of developing engineering students’ ability to acquire andapply knowledge through effective learning strategies. Reflection is one way to encouragestudents to evaluate their learning strategies, identify knowledge gaps, and plan ways to achievetheir learning objectives. To reap the benefits of
evaluation in the robotics course. We explore therelationship between the students’ confidence in a robotic project and their project performance(e.g., whether confidence rises before or after a project milestone, and the correlation betweenproject performance and team satisfaction). We also study the changes in the students’ teamworkexperience as the robotic project complexity grows, with the hope that this work may providesome insights on improving student team experience as we design and plan futuremultidisciplinary robotics projects and courses.INTRODUCTIONTeams are common in multidisciplinary robotics projects and courses [1]. Teamwork (“an abilityto function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create acollaborative
thedesign presentation more engaging and easier to follow.2) Expanding the design space and addressing design alternatives and trade-offs: Engineeringstudents may feel pressure to demonstrate that their design is not only feasible but alsoadvancing according to the planned schedule. At the PDR stage, students are often in the earlyphases of design and are expected to compare design approaches and expand solution spacerather than create a single prototype design. This can be successfully done if the team focuses onthe core product requirements while keeping the user and the system in mind. Students also oftenface difficulty in presenting and justifying design alternatives and trade-offs due to designfixation [9] and not being able to think of the
research workshops, field trips to local companies, and lesson plan design. Compared tothe first year, the research mentors were more experienced in assigning research topics andworking more closely with PSTs in the second year of the program. This paper provides detailson the commonality and changes in the second year’s implementation, in comparison to the firstyear. Some follow up activities from the first cohort is also reported. Overall, PST participantsfound the research experience with their mentors beneficial not only to them, but also to theirfuture students according to our findings from interviews. 1. Introduction The Industries of the Future (IotF), comprising artificial intelligence (AI), quantuminformation science (QIS
evaluation data during the semester.FrameworkWe integrated two similar frameworks to launch this project: continuous improvement and theengineering design cycle. Continuous improvement follows an iterative process known asPlan-Do-Study-Act [15], which leverages both practitioner expertise and data-driven insights torefine actions over time. The engineers on our team all embraced the familiarity of theengineering design cycle with its iterative problem-solving through planning, prototyping,testing, and revising. Each emphasizes data-informed, active engagement from stakeholders,iterative practice, context-appropriate solutions, and responsive adjustments based on earlieroutcomes; thus, in practice, we merged the two, as shown in Figure 1
engineering talents, and engineeringeducation must adapt to the needs of the digital development of the industry tocultivate talents with both professional skills and digital skills. China attaches great importance to the digital transformation of education. In2023, the Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China (MOE)implemented the "National Education Digitalization Strategy Action", and hosted theWorld Conference on Digital Education (WCDE) for two consecutive years in 2023and 2024, which showed the world the latest progress of China's digitaltransformation of education and its future plans. In the field of engineering education,China will start the pilot construction of the National Academy of EngineerExcellence in 2022, aiming to
orientation, assessment of higher-order thinking, and the development of strengths-based curriculum to support BIPOC students in K-16 STEM learning. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Insights from a Practice-Based Program: Connecting Women to Technology and Advancing Diversity in ComputingAbstractThe Linking Interested Females to Technology (LIFT) program, led by Miami Dade College(MDC), supports diverse groups of women transitioning into computing careers. These includewomen who are pursuing an Associate of Arts in computer science at MDC with plans to transferto four-year universities to complete their bachelor’s degrees, as well as women who havealready earned an associate degree
mucusbacteria). Secondly, determining what research materials (instrumentation, tools, andconsumables) were required for the execution of the research and obtaining these materials well-ahead of time for the expedition. Thirdly, in some cases (i.e. DNA sequencing, water nutrientquantification) outside commercial contractors were utilized. Determination of which contractorsfit the scientific and logistical criteria was required. When necessary, planning for sampletransport to the U.S. was arranged. Finally, two months prior to the trip a detailed research divingschedule, coordinated with the local diving contractor, was determined.Undergraduate student preparation prior to the trip was vital to successful outcomes. Since theexpedition provided very
the K–12 public school system in lightof rapidly changing policy context. Between 2021 and 2024, eleven states created computerscience graduation requirements for high school students, with more states planning to followsuit. Among many implementation challenges, ensuring and supporting sufficient teachercapacity to offer high quality and equitable CS is paramount but difficult. States are particularlyconcerned that a requirement include sufficient resources for building teacher capacity. In acountry where education decisions are made at the state and local level, these calculations mustfactor in preservice and in-service professional development, credentialing, geographicdispersion of the state and the amount and type of computer science