," in Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, 2020, pp. 10-12.[10] C. B. Moncada, J. F. Buhangin, and N. Q. Angalan, "Review of industry 4.0 competencies and virtual learning environment in engineering education," The International journal of engineering education, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 40-47, 2020.[11] W. Lin and M. Low, "An integrated engineering education alignment model towards Industry 4.0," in Proceedings of the international conference on industrial engineering and operations management, 2021, pp. 1204-1213.[12] B. L. Treviño-Elizondo and H. García-Reyes, "What does Industry 4.0 mean to industrial engineering education?," Procedia
, pp. 449-455, April 2016.[7] S. Amirkhani and A. Nahvi, "Design and implementation of an interactive virtual controllaboratory using haptic interface for undergraduate engineering students," ComputerApplications in Engineering Education, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 508-518, 2016.[8] W. Hu, Z. Lei, H. Zhou, G.P. Liu, Q. Deng, D. Zhou, and Z.W. Liu, "Plug-in free web-based3-D interactive laboratory for control engineering education," IEEE Transactions on IndustrialElectronics, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 3808-3818, 2016.[9] P. Zhou, X. Wang, U. Morales, and X. Yang, "Integration of virtual reality and CFDtechniques for thermal fluid education," in American Society of Mechanical Engineers: HeatTransfer Summer Conference, vol. 57885, pp. V001T03A001, July 2017
During COVID-19,” Front. Educ., vol. 7, p. 851019, May 2022,doi: 10.3389/feduc.2022.851019.[11] F.-F. Cheng, C.-S. Wu, and P.-C. Su, “The Impact of Collaborative Learning andPersonality on Satisfaction in Innovative Teaching Context,” Front. Psychol., vol. 12, p. 713497,Sep. 2021, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713497.[12] Michelene T. H. Chi, “Active-constructive-interactive: A conceptual framework fordifferentiating learningactivities,” Top. Cogn. Sci., pp. 73–105, 2009.[13] N. P. Pitterson, S. Brown, J. Pascoe, and K. Q. Fisher, “Measuring cognitive engagementthrough interactive, constructive, active and passive learning activities,” in 2016 IEEE Frontiersin Education Conference (FIE), Erie, PA, USA: IEEE, Oct. 2016, pp. 1–6. doi:10.1109/FIE
of the Dual-Submission Homework Method,” in 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/efficacy-of-the-dual- submission-homework-method[13] W. S. Tse, L. Y. A. Choi, and W. S. Tang, “Effects of video-based flipped class instruction on subject reading motivation,” British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 385– 398, 2019, doi: 10.1111/bjet.12569.[14] N. Halyo and Q. Le, “Use of video technology to improve student learning,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2013, doi: 10.18260/1-2--22686.[15] M. Noetel et al., “Video Improves Learning in Higher Education: A Systematic Review,” Rev Educ Res, vol. 91, no
Identity Development Among Pre-Adolescent Learners,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 698–716, 2012, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb01125.x.[22] H. Matusovich, B. Barry, K. Meyers, and R. Louis, “A Multi-Institution Comparison of Students’ Development of an Identity as an Engineer,” in 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Vancouver, BC: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2011, p. 22.69.1- 22.69.18. doi: 10.18260/1-2--17351.[23] J. Jorgenson, “Engineering Selves: Negotiating Gender and Identity in Technical Work,” Manag. Commun. Q., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 350–380, Feb. 2002, doi: 10.1177/0893318902153002.[24] G. A. Dietz, “A narrative exploration of the influences of internship experiences on the identities
, the respondents appeared to possess a positive perception of the effectivenessof SIs with 68.8% either somewhat or strongly agreeing with the positive effectiveness of SIs, asshown in Figure 2.Figure 2: Combined Perception of SI Effectiveness (Q 8-14)In order to understand the results shown in Figure 3, the data was assessed across ethnic groups.As can be seen, the African-American, Hispanic-American and Multiracial groups tended toskew towards “somewhat agree”, while White students tended to “strongly agree”. However, ifthe positive “somewhat agree” and “strongly agree” responses are grouped together, the African-American, Hispanic-American, Asian-American and Multiracial groups have a higher percentageof positive responses. This contrasting
impact of virtual reality on engineering students’ spatial ability. In The future of innovation and technology in education: policies and practices for teaching and learning excellence (pp. 171-185). Emerald Publishing Limited.[12]Liu, R., Peng, C., Zhang, Y., Husarek, H., & Yu, Q. (2021). A survey of immersive technologies and applications for industrial product development. Computers & Graphics, 100, 137-151.[13]Marzano Research. (n.d.). Immersive classroom: Virtual and augmented reality. Marzano Research. Retrieved from https://marzanoresearch.com/immersive-classroom-virtual-and-augmented-reality/[14]Beheshti, M., Shah, S. A., Zhang, H., Barnett, M., & Hira, A. (2024). Affordances of Technology for
,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 1779-1790, 2022.[41] D. L. Santos and S. R. Mooring, “Characterizing mindset-related challenges inundergraduate chemistry courses,” Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 99, pp. 2853-2863,2022.[42] M. Wilson-Fetrow, V. Svihla, B. Burnside, and A. Datye, “Course-based undergraduateresearch experiences in a chemical engineering laboratory promote consequential agency,”Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 100, pp. 3752-3763, 2023.[43] Q. Huang, T. Willems, A. Kaur, K. W. Poon, B. Samarakoon, and M. R. Elara, “Apedagogical approach of “Learning from Failure” for engineering students: observation andreflection on a robotics competition (RoboRoarZ-Edition2),” IEEE International Conference
justice-oriented design process in the future.Overall, the pedagogical technique shifted mindsets towards justice. Table 4 summarizes themeasures to evaluate the efficacy for each participant that have been presented in this section,including participants’ preference, and demonstrated mindset shifts. Twelve of the participants(63%) have at least five of the seven measures, and only 1 participant (5%) has less than two. Table 4: Summary of reflective pedagogical technique ParticipantDoes the participant: a b c d e f g h i j k 1 m n o p q r s1. Demonstrate understanding of justice mindset2. Revise any
Approaches to ‘Appropriateness’: A Mixed-Methods Study of Elementary Teachers’ Dispositions Toward African American Language as They Teach a Dialect-Shifting Curriculum,” Read. Res. Q., vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 468–486, 2024, doi: 10.1002/rrq.554.[30] G. Pérez and G. R. Marvez, “On Problem Scoping in Engineering Design: Notes about Language Practices of Multicompetent Learners,” in Pursuing Language and Metalinguistics in K–12 Classrooms, Routledge, 2024.[31] K. N. Silvestri, M. E. Jordan, P. Paugh, M. B. McVee, and D. L. Schallert, “Intersecting Engineering and Literacies: A Review of the Literature on Communicative Literacies in K-12 Engineering Education,” J. Pre-Coll. Eng. Educ. Res. J-PEER, vol. 11, no. 1, Feb
effective and confident computer science tas,” presented at the SIGCSE 2020 - Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 2020, p. 1363. doi: 10.1145/3328778.3372681.[18] N. Justice, “Preparing Graduate Students to Teach Statistics: A Review of Research and Ten Practical Recommendations,” J. Stat. Educ., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 334–343, 2020, doi: 10.1080/10691898.2020.1841590.[19] A. D. Geary, H. Sanfey, L. Glynn, and L. I. Pernar, “Teaching assistant cases in general surgery training – A literature review,” Am. J. Surg., vol. 223, no. 6, pp. 1088–1093, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.11.018.[20] D. Rhodes, Q. A. Fogg, and M. D. Lazarus, “Dissecting the role of sessional anatomy teachers
. W. Choi, “Transition of Public and Academic Library Makerspaces from Physical to Online Settings during a Pandemic,” Libr. Q., vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 155–180, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1086/723848.[17] F. Ferri, P. Grifoni, and T. Guzzo, “Online Learning and Emergency Remote Teaching: Opportunities and Challenges in Emergency Situations,” Societies, vol. 10, no. 4, p. 86, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.3390/soc10040086.[18] S. H. Kim, G. W. Choi, and Y. J. Jung, “Design principles for transforming making programs into online settings at public libraries,” Inf. Learn. Sci., vol. 121, no. 7/8, pp. 619– 630, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1108/ILS-04-2020-0110.[19] E. R. Peterson et al., “How mothers talk to their children about failure, mistakes and
. DOI:10.1177/03064190231169129.[22] V. Souitaris, S. Zerbinati and A. Al-Laham, "Do entrepreneurship programmes raiseentrepreneurial intention of science and engineering students? The effect of learning, inspirationand resources," Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 22, pp. 566–591, 2007.[23] J. Mattioli and B. Braunschweig, "AITA: AI trustworthiness assessment," AI Magazine, vol.44, (2), pp. 202, 2023. DOI: 10.1002/aaai.12096.[24] G. Verhulsdonck et al, "Incorporating Human Judgment in AI-Assisted ContentDevelopment: The HEAT Heuristic," Tech. Comm., vol. 71, (3), pp. 60, 2024. . DOI:10.55177/tc286621.[25] M. Flaherty. (Sep. 12). Q. What does OneSearch search?. Available:https://libanswers.quinnipiac.edu/abl/faq/411035.[26] Y. Engeström
and Electronics Convention, Opatija, 2024.[11] T. K. Chiu, Q. Xia, X. Zhou, C. S. Chai and M. Cheng, "Systematic literature review on opportunities, challenges, and future research recommendations of artificial intelligence in education," Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 4, no. 100118, 2023.[12] S. Altares-López, J. M. Bengochea-Guevara, C. Ranz, H. Montes and A. Ribeiro, "Qualitative and quantitative analysis of student’s perceptions in the use of generative AI in educational environments," arXiv preprint, 22 May 2024.[13] C. K. Y. Chan and W. Hu, "Students’ voices on generative AI: perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education," International Journal of Educational Technology in
.[21] I. T. Afolabi, A. Ayo, and O. A. Odetunmibi, “Academic collaboration recommendation for computer science researchers using social network analysis,” Wireless Personal Communications, vol. 121, no. 1, pp. 487–501, Nov 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-08646-2[22] J. Bian, M. Xie, T. J. Hudson, H. Eswaran, M. Brochhausen, J. Hanna, and W. R. Hogan, “Collaborationviz: interactive visual exploration of biomedical research collaboration networks,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 11, p. e111928, Nov 2014.[23] Y. Yu, Y. Wu, X. Liang, C. Ma, and Q. Lu, “Ncovis: A visual analysis framework for exploring academic collaboration networks under new collaborative relationships,” in 2022 IEEE 25th International
Engineering Education (ASEE), “Profiles of engineering and engineering technology, 2021,” Washington, DC, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://ira.asee.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Engineering-and-Engineering-Technology- by-the-Numbers-2021.pdf[4] M. Curran, Q. Bloom, and S. Brint, “Does cluster hiring enhance faculty research output, collaborations, and impact? Results from a national study of U.S. research universities,” Minerva, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 585–605, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11024-020-09408-3.[5] B. A. Montelone, R. A. Dyer, and D. J. Takemoto, “A mentoring program for female and minority faculty members in the sciences and engineering: Effectiveness and status after 9 years,” J Women Minor Scien Eng, vol. 9, no. 3–4, p
VBA editor (Alt + Q). 2. In an Excel cell, enter the RUT (e.g., 12345678-9). 3. Use the function in an Excel cell as: =ValidarRUT(A1) Where A1 is the cell containing the RUT. 4. The function will return TRUE if the RUT is valid or FALSE if it is not.Example 2: Platform EvaluationPrompt"Assume you are a researcher specializing in ERP systems, and you need to create a comparativetable between various open-source alternatives. Define the parameters that should be used toevaluate the platforms."AnswerWhen creating a comparative table for different open-source ERP systems, it is essential to defineclear parameters that enable an objective and relevant evaluation of each platform. Here are severalcriteria that may be useful for
. W. Reeve, C. Rottmann, Q. Liu, V. Hue, and S. McCullouch, “Engineering Leadership Education: Catalyzing Long-Term Personal and Professional Growth,” Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA), Nov. 2019, doi: 10.24908/pceea.vi0.13869.[9] J. N. Magarian and R. S. Rahaman, “What Engineering Leaders Lead: The Career Outcomes of an Engineering Leadership Program’s Alumni Community,” presented at the 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2023. Accessed: Feb. 20, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/what-engineering-leaders-lead-the-career- outcomes-of-an-engineering-leadership-program-s-alumni-community[10] D. L. Kirkpatrick, “Revisiting Kirkpatrick’s four-level model
Post Ratings Q# Category S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 Q1 SE (Learning) 3 4 4 3 4 5 4 5 5 4 5 5 Q5 SE (Learning) 4 3 4 3 4 1 4 5 5 4 4 4 Q9 SE (Learning) 4 4 3 4 4 4 3 5 4 5 4 5 Q2 SE (Application) 3 3 4 3 4 2 3 4 5 4 5 4 Q6 SE (Application) 4 3 4 3 3 1 3 4 5 5 4 4 Q10 SE (Application) 3 2 5 2 5 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 Q3 SE (Performance
library within the RStudio® software [22]: dgamma(x, shape, rate, log = FALSE) pgamma(q, shape, rate, lower.tail = TRUE, log.p = FALSE) qgamma(p, shape, rate, lower.tail = TRUE, log.p = FALSE)The dgamma function provides the probability density, the pgamma function provides thedistribution function, and the qgamma function provides the quantile function.ResultsData DisplayMisfuelling events from 1989 to 2024 from the NTSB CAROL query are shown in the dot plotin Figure 2. Misfuelling events occur 0 to 3 times each year, where each dot represents onemisfuelling event. Figure 2. Dot Plot for Misfuelling Events 1989 – 2024 from NTSB CAROL Database (Total: 35).The 35 misfuelling events are categorized according to
focusgroup that measures autism knowledge and attitudes. An additional survey was created to furthermeasure autism knowledge. The survey was developed by adapting the Autism Knowledge Survey -Revised (AKS-R), Autism Awareness Scale/Survey (AAS), Autism Spectrum Knowledge Scale GeneralPopulation (ASKSG), and research from Kuzminski et al. (2019). A survey focused on presuming competence and attitudes towards autistic people was created byadapting the Attitude Towards Autism Questionnaire (ATA-Q) and the Societal Attitudes Towards AutismScale (SATA). Additionally, research from Hanel & Shah (2020), Haddock et al. (1993), Harnum et al.(2007), and Nevil & White (2011) informed the development of the survey. Advocacy skills were
provide consent or who did not meet inclusion criteria were excluded from participationin the survey.The first section of the survey consisted of five demographic questions, which purposefullyavoided asking identifying questions to protect participant anonymity. The next section, titled“Knowledge and Confidence” (Q 8-16), asked participants to perform a self-assessment of theirknowledge of disabilities and their confidence in supporting disabled students with libraryservices and instruction. Each question in this section presented a statement (e.g., “I know a lotabout disabilities”), and asked participants to select the option that best applied to them on a five-point Likert scale ranging from "strongly agree" to "strongly disagree." Participants