in authentication, encryption, access control, communication, anddetecting malicious activities becomes paramount to meet the heightened demands offuture networks Ahmad et al. (2019); Hakeem et al. (2022). This paper proposed integrating security-related concepts tailored for next-generation communication into existing Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE)curricula. This strategic integration aims to position security considerations as afoundational prerequisite in the design phase of any system. In alignment with thisvision, the research introduces an innovative, interactive, and visualized hands-onmodule designed to seamlessly integrate into the current curriculum. Additionally,this module is a comprehensive educational tool
butundecided about which field to pursue. As the first course students encounter in their academicjourney, this exploratory class is designed to help them reflect on their interests, capabilities, andaspirations while deciding if a career in engineering technology aligns with their goals.For many students, this course serves as their initial exposure to the field, particularly for thosewho may lack prior knowledge or role models to guide them in selecting a college major. Thecourse objectives, listed in Table 1, reflect an integrated approach to student development,focusing on industry engagement, career preparation, professional resources, teamwork, andcommunication skills.Table 1. Course Objectives in Engineering Technology Introductory Course
. Practitioners, developers, andresearchers have identified the need for an engineering-specific definition and approach toleadership development and, therefore, assessment [6], [7]. Providing a transferable frameworkwith consistent metrics would enable diverse programs to leverage a shared assessment of theleadership skills developed across their programs. Furthermore, aligning the assessment withemerging models of EL development could support an integrated and prepared engineeringworkforce.Considering the growth in undergraduate engineering leadership development programs and thevital role that feedback plays in developing engineering students’ professional skills, ouroverarching research goal is to develop a survey instrument that: • Assesses
BME programs, recent work in BME education has highlighted examples of theintegration of ethics as a spine for BME curriculum [21]. Despite the progress for design andethics as curricular “spines” in BME, only a few works in progress exist (e.g., [22]) to considerhow to incorporate health equity across multiple levels of courses within BME curriculum.Combined, the lack of existing models for incorporating health equity into BME curriculumalongside the timely call to action for BME to advance health equity [6] presents an urgentopportunity to expand our understanding of effective practices for integrating health equity intoBME curriculum.We aim to contribute to this gap in literature through sharing insights from a collaborativeautoethnography
interdisciplinaryskills, changed their self-ideaology of their abilities in non-home disciplines, and valued interdis-ciplinary collaboration. In this work, we present our curriculum, findings, and recommendationsfor the design of interdisciplinary engineering curricula.Course DesignThe 14-week course integrated engineering, math, and weaving through lectures and hands-onactivities that demonstrated the application of math and engineering to weaving. Our course wasbuilt around RoboLoom, an open-source Jacquard loom kit [7], and used the available materi-als 1 . Students worked individually using a traditional shaft loom2 and interdisciplinarily usingRoboLoom [7]. The course covered robotics and mechatronics, including mechanism basics,electricity, and
integrators in our society, andundergraduate programs must adapt to meet this challenge [5]. It is this deficiency in CEengineering education that this project aims to eliminate. We, as CE engineering facultymembers, need actions to educate and equip the next generation of CE engineers with these newdemands of our rapidly changing world!Coordinating a national multi-university effort and aligning it with the various academicaccreditation agencies, and local, state, and federal professional organizations, to completelyrevamp CE engineering education across the board is, at best, an aspirational dream. However,we hypothesize that analytics-based system thinking can be infused into any existingundergraduate CE engineering curricula without requiring
energy integration into smart grids, ensuring efficient energy management and grid stability, aiming for a sustainable impact. She is a member of IEEE, ASEE and SWE and has worked on several NSF and NREL funded projects.Dr. Margarita D. Takach, Seattle University Dr. Margarita Takach is an Associate Professor in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at Seattle University. She earned her PhD degree from the University of Washington. Her teaching interests include digital logic, circuits, analog electr ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Reimagining the ECE Curriculum by Bridging Technical Preparation, Professional Formation, and University
four times per semester, approximately once per month, using the skills-based, learner-centered BOPS method. Finally, this paper describes the contents of the workshop, including thecompetencies the workshop aims to cultivate and exercises used to do so. This paper is not meantto be an exhaustive description of either the IREI project or workshop but, rather, a sketch of themotivations for and nature of workshop so far.Background and objectivesNational legislation in the US, such as the America COMPETES Act and, more recently, theCHIPS and Science Act, highlights the importance of research integrity in innovation andcompetitiveness of the US economy [1], [2]. Given federal funding mandates, researchinstitutions have developed interventions and
., & Seabrook, B. E. (2023, June). Applying STS to Engineering Education: A Comparative Study of STS Minors. 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--42279[16] Conroy, K. M., Sours, P., Jayakumar, A., & Tuttle, R. M. (2023, June). Engagement in Practice: Better Preparing Students for Community-Engaged Engineering by Restructuring an Academic Program, Minor, and Curriculum. 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Baltimore, Maryland. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--43283[17] Carr, V. A., Smith, M. C., Wei, B., & Jones, M. E. (2021). Learning Experiences of Social Science Students in an Interdisciplinary Computing Minor. 2021 ASEE Annual Conference and
participation in engineeringDr. Avneet Hira, Boston College Avneet Hira is an Assistant Professor and Sabet Family Dean’s Faculty Fellow in the Department of Engineering with a courtesy appointment in the Department of Teaching, Curriculum and Society at Boston College. She is also an affiliate faculty of the Schiller Institute for Integrated Science and Society. Her research is in the field of engineering education with a focus on educational technologies and humanistic design. She specializes in community-based participatory design methods and working in informal educational environments with youth and families, for which she was awarded an NSF CAREER award in 2023. Her work is funded by the NSF Directorates of STEM
: Section 130: SustainableMaterials and User-centered Design in the Winter 2024 and 2025 semesters and Section 270:Next Generation Computing Hardware in the Fall 2024 semester. Snyder taught one of the threesections discussed in this paper: Section 910: Socially-Engaged Design of Nuclear EnergySystems in Fall 2024.Section 130: Sustainable Materials and User-centered DesignSection 130 has a materials science in engineering (MSE) focus, and the semester project isdesigning and manufacturing a simple tool (e.g. screwdriver, claw hammer, chisel) out of abronze alloy. Students complete these projects in teams of 3-4 people. The two lead instructorspracticed an integrated lecturing approach where the technical and technical communicationcontent wasn’t
Paper ID #47630How faculty focused on pre-college engineering education and outreach canleverage this free digital library of engineering resources. (Pre-college Resource/CurriculuExchange)Mrs. Stephanie Weber, National Center for Women & Information Technology https://ncwit.org/profile/stephanie-weber/Dr. Lyn Ely Swackhamer, NCWIT/University of Colorado Dr. Lyn Swackhamer is the PI on the NSF funded Teach Engineering grant. Teach Engineering is a digital library of K-12 engineering education materials. Dr. Swackhamer has a PhD in education innovation with an emphasis on research and evaluation methodology. She has been the
Paper ID #48064Impact of An Engineering Task on Development of Middle School Students’Engineering Design Practices (Fundamental)Dr. Natasha Wilkerson, Vivify, LLC Natasha Wilkerson is co-founder of Vivify STEM and President of the Cosmic Leap Foundation. Natasha specializes in research and development of engineering curricula and programming for K-8 grades. Natasha has a B.S. in Aerospace Engineering and an M.S. and Ph.D. in Curriculum & Instruction from Texas A&M University.Joanne K Olson, Texas A&M UniversityJustin Wilkerson, Texas A&M University ©American Society for Engineering
also presented theirbeliefs about their roles as educators in engineering courses. The workshop leader was careful toaddress the concerns while centering on the practices and pedagogies of CR2, bringing attention tohow these beliefs affect teaching practices[20].Initial faculty cohort. While the workshop attendance included seven (7) faculty, the initialfaculty cohort involved in integrating CR2 includes two educators who teach introductory BECEcourses in the Spring 2025 semester. They understand how to create an environment conducive toengaging all learners using CR2 practices and will incorporate CR2 in their own creative ways.Future teaching observations. In the Spring 2025 semester, teaching observations will beconducted to focus on the
Paper ID #48539Natural Language Processing Models to Detect Affective Fluctuations of EngineeringFaculty and Students Responding to a Hidden Curriculum SurveyMr. Gadhaun Aslam, University of Florida Gadhaun Aslam is a PhD Candidate & Graduate Assistant in the TWISTER Lab within the Department of Engineering Education at University of Florida (UF). His research interests include extracting data from institutional websites to understand the trajectory of engineering education, exploring student learning experiences using multi-modal tools (e.g., eye tracking and physiological electrodermal sensors) and integrating
industrial needs. It includes curriculum redesign, project-based learning, and Curriculum Improvement the development of skills, such as teamwork and communication. Analyze how to train engineers from an ethical perspective to make Ethics and Society in Engineering Theme 4 responsible decisions. It includes the integration of ethical frameworks into Education programs and the analysis of the social impact of engineering solutions
technical portion of thecivil engineering curriculum, which are apparent to the instructors, are lost on students.Speaking for the humanities, Ruprecht [10] states that “humanities can only serve their purposein a technical education if they are really integrated in the curriculum as branches with all theweight that other subjects have”. It would follow that the rest of general education courses wouldbe similar, and their benefit can only be fully unlocked by integration within an engineeringcontext.BackgroundThe purpose of a general education is “the general development of the intellect in reason,judgement, and communication […] united in the respect that clear thinking, critical analysis,and concise communication are paramount to understanding
1st year students and transfer students coming into the field of engineering. She is working to advance the field of engineering education through accessibility while also researching, developing, and integrating practices to support students’ growth in teamwork, leadership, communication, and meaningful engagement in the community. Through this effort, she also works to advance ways to integrate emerging technologies as productive tools to support student learning and assessment.Dr. Benjamin J. Laugelli, University of Virginia Dr. Laugelli is an Assistant Professor of Engineering and Society at the University of Virginia. He teaches courses that explore social and ethical aspects of engineering design and practice
NSF-funded project that aims to support teachers inimplementing front-end design concepts with secondary students. The project is driven bytargeted modifications to an existing web-based platform, CLUE (Collaborative Learning UserEnvironment), that was originally developed to support collaborative project-based learning inother STEM fields. Concurrently, an Earth Science and Environmental Science focusedcurriculum is being developed that integrates front-end design approaches with challenges in thecommunity to develop socio-scientific and design skills among 7th - 11th grade students. Theproject team works in multiple interdisciplinary sub-teams to develop the 1) technology, 2)curriculum, 3) teacher professional development, and 4) research
ABET Student Outcomes annually.The goal of this process is to ensure that curriculum changes can be made to attain the StudentOutcomes and that courses remain rigorous, relevant, and well-integrated in the program. Due toperiodic faculty turnover, course assessment also serves as a means of maintaining coursecontinuity. At the course-level, we assess course outcomes annually using a formal writtenassessment called a Course Assessment Report. Effective course assessment considers allrelevant information to identify strengths and weaknesses in each course. Where appropriate,these areas for improvement are used as the basis for well-coordinated changes to courseoutcomes, course content, or course processes. Effective course assessment is an
on real engineering challenges, (3) mastery-based learning and assessment, (4) and focused mentoring [1]. In Year 2, the project transitionedfrom a project-based learning to work-integrated learning model. In the second pilot semester,students will experience a 3-week pre-internship preparation session and spend 12 weeks in apaid internship while taking engineering coursework. With this transition, the team designed anew curriculum and created a new research plan to learn from the work-integrated learning pilot. The purpose of this poster paper is to describe the transition of an engineering programfrom a project-based to a work-integrated learning model. Based on this transition from Year 1 toYear 2 of the NSF grant, we discuss
and undergraduates through completing all of the activities in theprogram, modeled facilitation strategies, and programmed all activities. Teachers unable to attenda live session or complete an activity were required to complete the session outside the sessions.To ensure facilitators participated and completed the training, they submitted activity assignmentsand artifacts to document their ability to conduct the activities.Figure 1: Process of working with program locations that select their summer program locations and teachers andthe support from the GGEE program in the form of training, curriculum materials and guides, and trainedengineering undergraduate student co-facilitators.2. Study PurposeThe summer programs provide authentic STEM
grapples with effectively integrating lectures and hands-on labcomponents across the curriculum. Despite their importance, many lab experiences remainnarrowly focused on procedures rather than conceptual applications, limiting students’ ability totranslate theoretical knowledge into professional expertise. To address this gap, this studyevaluates a novel system-based Learning Studio (LS) approach in a mechanical engineeringdepartment at a Northeastern R1 institution. Through semi-structured interviews with eightstudents, we examine whether repeated, hands-on encounters with real-world systems bolsterstudents’ confidence, engagement, and conceptual understanding. Findings indicate that LSsfoster deeper comprehension of core mechanical concepts
Paper ID #46322BOARD # 347: Creating Inclusive Engineers through Humanitarian EngineeringProjects: A Preliminary Model and Framework for Integration (NSF RIEF)Dr. Kirsten Heikkinen Dodson, Lipscomb University Kirsten Heikkinen Dodson (pronouns: she/her) is an Associate Professor and the Chair of Mechanical Engineering in the Raymond B. Jones College of Engineering at Lipscomb University. She earned her B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Lipscomb University and her Ph.D. from Vanderbilt University before returning to her alma mater. Her research interests focus on the connections between humanitarian engineering
Paper ID #47719Effect of Sophomore Cornerstone Course on Senior CapstoneDr. Melinda Holtzman, Portland State University Melinda Holtzman is an Assistant Teaching Professor and Undergraduate Advisor for the Electrical and Computer Engineering department at Portland State University, where she has been on the faculty for 19 years. Before coming to PSU, she taught at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo and University of Nevada Reno, where she also did research in high-speed, frequency-hopping phase-locked loops for telemetry applications. Previously she worked in research and development of infrared sensors at Hughes Aircraft
©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025NSF ATE: Improving Electrical Engineering Education Structure by BridgingCTE, Community College, and University Programs through Hands-on Skills Integration: Year 11 1. IntroductionStudent engagement and retention in lower-division electrical engineering courses, particularlyamong first-generation college students, represent significant ongoing challenges. Minorityengineering students often have less exposure to engineering-related careers and applications.Studies indicate a substantial attrition rate in technical programs, with 40-50% of studentsdropping out during their first year [1]. This issue is further compounded among underrepresentedstudents, who are
-101.[63] Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231.[64] Aglan, H. A., & Ali, S. F. (1996). Hands-on experiences: An integral part of engineering curriculum reform. Journal of Engineering Education, 85(4), 327-330.[65] Giralt, F., Herrero, J., Grau, F. X., Alabart, J. R., & Medir, M. (2000). Two-way integration of engineering education through a design project. Journal of Engineering Education, 89(2), 219-229.[66] Cronk, S., Hall, D., & Nelson, J. (2009, March). Living with the Lab: A Project-Based Curriculum for First-Year Engineering Students. In Proceedings of the 2009 ASEE Gulf- Southwest Annual Conference.[67] Etkina, E
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Exploring High-Energy Cosmic Particles: Integration into the Advanced Physics and Experiential Learning for Undergraduate Engineering Students using PASCO Apparatus and Software.Abstract.The School of Engineering has strategically redesigned its Advanced Physics course to addressthe evolving demands of global education. This initiative equips undergraduate engineeringstudents with essential research skills and practical experiences, fostering their development ascompetent professionals and researchers in alignment with the university's mission to contributeto the betterment of the human condition.A cornerstone of the course is the integration of experimental research using the
at the University of Pittsburgh. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 A Description and Evaluation of a Team-Based Composition Course Integrated into a First-Year Engineering ProgramAbstractThis paper provides a description and evaluation of an English Composition course integratedinto a First-Year Engineering Program. ENGL XXX is a hybrid course taught at University X, inwhich some instruction is provided asynchronously and online, and some instruction is providedin person through visits to students’ first-year engineering course during the second semester ofstudents’ first year in engineering.ENGL XXX walks students through the process of writing a 6,000-word conference
engineering and other courses across the CS curriculum at Moravian University, The College of Wooster, and Xavier University, where he is currently using SPSG in the Software Engineering II and senior capstone courses.Prof. Mikey Goldweber, Denison University Professor of Computer Science at Denison University specializing in Computer Science Education. Additionally, I was a past Board member of Chair of ACM SIGCAS, and a current Associate Editor of ACM Inroads. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 IUSE: Applying Scaffolded Projects for the Social Good to Integrate Service-Learning into Software Engineering EducationAbstractThe Scaffolded Projects for the Social Good