permeated people’s minds andpractical work, not everyone agrees with this concept. Some people believe that CQIis not a completely new concept, but just a label that may not be as successful as theyclaim. However, the requirement explicitly prescribed by EC2000 is a novelty. ABETnot only requires engineering program to record what teachers teach students, but alsowhat students actually learn. However, this paradigm and conceptual transformation isunlikely to occur without policy changes [14].(2) The relationship between assessment form and accreditation effectivenessSince the implementation of the EC2000 reform in ABET, there have been somechanges in engineering education within colleges and universities. However, in someuniversities, especially
Paper ID #45427Ambiguity as a key experience acceleration mechanism in a sophomore systemsengineering courseDr. Alejandro Salado, The University of Arizona Dr. Alejandro Salado is an associate professor of systems engineering with the Department of Systems and Industrial Engineering at the University of Arizona. His research focuses on unveiling the scientific foundations of systems engineering aDavid Herring, The University of Arizona ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Ambiguity as a key experience acceleration mechanism in a sophomore systems engineering
Paper ID #45914Technical Standards as a Form of National Literature: Exploring Early 20thCentury Canadian National Standards, 1919-1950Mr. Michael Joseph White, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario Michael White is the head of the Engineering and Science Library at Queen’s University in Kingston, Ontario. Mike has been a STEM information professional for more than 30 years. Prior to joining Queen’s in 2005, he was a librarian at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (1998-2005); engineering librarian at the University of Maine at Orono (1995-98); science librarian at Loyola University Chicago (1993-95); and a library
Paper ID #49172Clean Energy Education Study Results and Recommendations: Curriculumto Change Lives and Address Climate ChangeDr. Brian Patrick Murphy, SUNY Buffalo State University Professor Brian P. Murphy, Ed. D. PE, SSBB, is a highly trained, motivated, results-driven higher education and engineering professional. He is inspired to teach in high-needs social impact areas, sharing industrial, military, and professional engineering expertise. Dr. Murphy is teaching Engineering Technology at SUNY Buffalo State University. Passionate about process improvement and environmentally friendly energy sources. Education: Naval
wellthey perform in their first-year college courses. It was found that students tend to stick with theirmajor if their grades are high in first-year introductory courses [2]. A statistical report from theNational Center for Education Statistics in 2013 [3] shows that nearly one-third of STEMstudents change their majors and based on cultural belonging [4], [5]. A study on the cognition ofthe human mind and specifically the conation; or the students’ willingness, drive, anddetermination; reports that an introductory engineering course has the potential to activatestudents’ conation, but that there is no significant evidence that such a course impacts students’conation [6].The orientation course discussed here was designed to achieve several goals
engineering sub-disciplines, most commonly inmechanical and civil engineering courses. Courses available to multiple course levels werecounted for each applicable level. We found that CUREs were more frequently implemented injunior or senior level courses, or in courses available to multiple levels including juniors andseniors. 3 Figure 2. Research Domain by Course Level: Which research domains each CURE course implemented by course level.Analysis of code-counts revealed three prevailing topics on faculty’s minds as they reflected ontheir experience: Course Operations Details, Course Content Delivery, and Grading (Figure 3).Respectively
Paper ID #48540From Good Pedagogy to Racial Equity: Experimenting with what works inEngineering ClassroomsDr. Atota Halkiyo, Florida International University Dr. Halkiyo is a Postdoctoral Associate at the School of Universal Computing, Construction, and Engineering Education at Florida International University. Dr. Halkiyo graduated in Education Policy and Evaluation from Arizona State University and uses mixed methods but largely qualitative inquiry to study his primary research interest: enhancing higher education equity for all students, particularly those from international and/or underrepresented backgrounds (e.g
a pragmatic and theoretical approach to finding the best approach for that study. Myadvisors encouraged the rule breaking pragmatism, they didn’t mind me forging new groundmethodologically or theoretically and would give me sufficient critical feedback to progress thework towards their satisfaction and appropriate scholarly justification. I skipped my ownrecommended research methods class, asking instead to take an anthropology class and a criticalqualitative methods class instead. I wanted to learn to think differently, to hone a particular set ofmethodological and theoretical skills.My first experience with engineering education methodological norms was through reading andeven more through writing to the ASEE conference and Journal of
shortcuts, and the criticality of a projected timeline is lost.3. The marble machine project3.1 Project overviewThe Marble Machine project was successfully implemented for three semesters (Fall 2023 -Summer 2024) at the Junior level mechanical engineering curriculum. The project parameterswere designed with the following general goals in mind:• The project should be reasonably complex and manufacturing quality-sensitive, but in a compact size suitable for most college manufacturing facilities and budgetary concerns.• The final solution should result in a physical device that is primary mechanical in nature.• The project should impart critical lessons regarding the importance of tolerancing, prototyping, and conducting a thorough failure
Paper ID #46642Engaging Engineering Students in Experiential Learning through Robot Droidsand K-12 OutreachDr. Joshua Montgomery, THE Ohio State University & Southern State Community College Dr. Joshua Montgomery is a Computer Science Professor at Southern State Community College, a Senior Lecturer at The Ohio State University, and an AI instructor at Southern New Hampshire University. With over a decade of experience as a professor and 13 years as the Technology Director for Chillicothe City Schools, Montgomery has been deeply involved in education and technology leadership. He serves as Co-Director of the Ohio Code
ethics case studies or modifyingour virtue-of-the-week modules to incorporate more decision-making opportunities for students.Additionally, we are in the process of developing more rigorous assessments to quantifyimprovements in students’ understanding of virtues, engineering ethics, and ethicaldecision-making. Furthermore, we plan to collaborate with other engineering faculty toimplement these teaching modules in their courses as well.References [1] C. S. Nair, A. Patil, and P. Mertova, “Re-engineering graduate skills–a case study,” European journal of engineering education, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 131–139, 2009. [2] R. E. McGinn, ““mind the gaps”: An empirical approach to engineering ethics, 1997–2001,” Science and Engineering Ethics, vol
electrochemical, optical, and MEMS devices. A champion of diversity and equity in engineering education, Dr. Yung has designed innovative curricula that integrate project-based learning, hands-on activities, and peer collaboration. He is a strong advocate for incorporating disability perspectives in biomedical engineering, aiming to train a generation of engineers who are equipped to tackle accessibility challenges in healthcare technology. Dr. Yung’s commitment to STEM outreach is evidenced by his extensive work with underrepresented K-12 students in Central New York. Through various programs, including those at La Casita Cultural Center and local schools, he has fostered a love for science and engineering in young minds
Paper ID #46618BOARD #129: AI as a Teaching Assistant: Aiding Engineering StudentsBeyond Office HoursMr. Ernest Wang, University of California, Davis Ernest Wang is a current undergraduate student in Electrical and Biomedical Engineering at the University of California, Davis. He is interested in the application of commercially available LLM models in helping engineering undergraduates with their studies. His other research interests include microfluidics and bioelectronics.Harry Zhang, University of California, Davis Harry contributed to this research through the practical development and testing of the AI Teaching
Paper ID #46560BOARD # 360: EDU Core—Engineering Systems Change for Equity: AFocus on Change ProcessesSandra Laursen, University of Colorado Boulder Sandra Laursen is senior research associate and director of Ethnography & Evaluation Research (E&ER), where she leads research and evaluation studies focusing on education and career paths in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields. She has studied ADVANCE projects for 25 years as an evaluator and researcher, and has published articles, books and online resources on strategies for institutional change to advance equity and inclusion for faculty
working inuncertain environments and having adaptable decision-making [7]. Engineers are known forbeing methodical and analytical, so an entrepreneurial mindset allows for full use of those skillsin entrepreneurial-minded ways [6]. One way to add entrepreneurship into education is by addingcourses, but incorporating practical courses may be difficult with the current curriculum.Entrepreneurship can also be integrated into existing engineering courses through adding moreprojects, bringing real-world examples into the classroom, and lecturing less [8].Many components of the entrepreneurial mindset have been identified through the years, butengineering educators have emphasized three main components: curiosity, connections, andcreating value (3Cs
limitations of knowledge acquisition,” Child Dev, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 477–493, 2016, doi: 10.1111/cdev.12469.[9] L. Vygotsky and M. Cole, “Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes,” 1978.[10] H. J. Passow, “Which ABET competencies do engineering graduates find most important in their work?,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 95–118, 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00043.x.[11] ABET, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2025 – 2026,” 2025.[12] S. A. Kalaian, R. M. Kasim, and J. K. Nims, “Effectiveness of small-group learning pedagogies in engineering and technology education: a meta-analysis,” Journal of Technology Education
[16]D. Grasso and M. Berkins,Holistic Engineering Education: Beyond Technology. 2010. [17]A. Van den Beemt, M. MacLeod, A. Van de Ven, S. van Baalen, R. Klaassen, and B. Mieke, “Interdisciplinary engineering education: A review of vision, teaching, and support. Journal of engineering education, 109(3), 508-555.,” vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 508–555, 2020. [18]C. Hoadley, “Methodological Alignment in Design-Based Research,”Educ. Psychol., 2004. [19]L. S. Vygotsky,Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge
readings that students completed during the seminar course also helpedstudents contemplate their own education as engineers and their own role in the learning process.For example, advocating for more community-centered approaches to engineering work, Casperreflected:1 Pseudonyms were assigned to each student. If engineers want to work in the humanitarian space, they need to keep the community in mind, whether its people or resources…. I don’t think that shift in mindset would be any more difficult for an engineer to adjust to, the difficult part would be building the expertise in the various considerations…if these concepts were added more into school then it wouldn’t be as difficult to socialize later.It is
Paper ID #48021Using student-led case studies in engineering to build cultural awareness,self-knowledge, and ethical engagementKelsey McLendon, University of Michigan Kelsey McLendon is a Lecturer in the Program in Technical Communication in the College of Engineering at the University of Michigan. Her research interests are technical writing, social and emotional learning, and DEIJ in engineering education.Dr. Katie Snyder, University of Michigan Dr. Snyder is a lecturer in the Program in Technical Communication at the University of Michigan. She teaches writing and presentation strategies to students in the College of
. Schmelzenbach, "Integrating ChatGPT in an Introductory Engineering Undergraduate Course as a Tool for Feedback," in American Society of Engineering Education Conference, Portland, 2024.[20] A. AlRabah, S. Yang and A. Alawini, "Optimizing Database Query Learning: A Generative AIApproach for Semantic Error Feedback," in American Society of Engineering Education Conference, Portland, 2024.[21] L. Floridi and M. Chiriatti, "GPT-3: Its Nature, Scope, Limits, and Consequences," Minds & Machines, vol. 30, p. 681–694, 2020.[22] M. Z. Li, "Using Prompt Engineering to Enhance STEM Education," in IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC) , New Jersey, 2024.[23] H. Kyul Kim, A. Roknaldin, S. Prakash Nayak and X. Zhang, "ChatGPT
teachers develop teaching efficacy and identity as STEM educators. Through her research, Dr. Hammack aims to advance understanding of how to enhance STEM education in rural schools and communities, providing opportunities to meet the unique needs of rural students.Julie Robinson, University of North Dakota Dr. Julie Robinson is an Assistant Professor at the University of North Dakota and the Director of UND’s Center for Engineering Education Research. Her research explores strategies for broadening access and participation in STEM, focusing on culturally relevant pedagogy in science and engineering. She also investigates strategies for increasing representation in STEM through teacher professional learning opportunities
productivity,leading to better outcomes in client experiences. If engineering education is to prepare ourstudents for future careers, our students need to be mindful of how human-centered values areessential for real-world success. This leads to the question: how can we proactively make ourdesigns and solutions more inclusive while upholding justice and maintaining ethicalobligations? Our approach aims to parallelly equip students to apply their technical skills toaddress real-world problems and foster a mindset considering a broad range of humanexperiences in their decisions. This focus aligns with ABET accreditation requirements, whichinclude producing solutions that account for public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global,cultural, social
Paper ID #46486Complementary and Contrasting Perspectives: Collaborative Teaching acrossEngineering, Computer Science, and the Liberal ArtsDr. Carolyn M Rodak, Union CollegeDr. Luke Dosiek, Union CollegeAndrew Burkett, Union CollegeChristine Henseler, Union CollegeChristopher Chandler, Union CollegeDr. Nick Webb, Union College ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Complementary and Contrasting Perspectives: Collaborative Teaching across Engineering, Computer Science, and the Liberal ArtsAbstractThe global challenges of today require creative interdisciplinary solutions that span engineering,science, social
Paper ID #46495Student Flow State in VR/AR Module for First-Year Architectural Engineering& ConstructionC. Elizabeth George, University of Notre Dame C. Elizabeth George is a rising senior at the University of Notre Dame studying Chemical Engineering with a minor in Engineering Corporate Practice. In the summer of 2024, she participated in the Engineering Education Research Experience for Undergraduates (NSF REU Site) program at the University of Nebraska – Lincoln (UNL). There, she worked with Dr. Heidi Diefes-Dux, Dr. Erica Ryherd, and Euclides Brandao Maluf to research flow state in VR/AR modules for first-year
Paper ID #46557Best Practices for Developing Virtual Reality Education SimulationsMollie Johnson, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Mollie Johnson is a graduate researcher in the Engineering Systems Laboratory at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. She received her BS in aerospace engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology and is furthering her education as a Masters’ student in AeroAstro at MIT.Dr. Olivier Ladislas de Weck, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Olivier de Weck is a Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics and Engineering Systems at MIT. His research focuses on the technological
Paper ID #47409Integrating Reflective and Technical Competencies in Engineering Design: ACognitive Approach to Project-Based Course RedesignL’Nard E.T. Tufts II, Stanford University L’Nard Tufts is a Ph.D. candidate in Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University and a member of the Graduate School of Education’s IDEAL Research Lab. Drawing on cognitive psychology and the learning sciences, his research advances integrated design education in engineering and maker-centered learning environments. He holds an M.S. in Design from Stanford, where he helped teach introductory engineering design through the Product Realization
Paper ID #48600Exploring Threshold Concepts in Interdisciplinary Engineering Education:A Delphi Study in Cyber-Physical SystemsYunmeng Han, University of Cincinnati Yunmeng Han is a PhD student in Engineering Education at the University of Cincinnati. She holds a Master’s degree in Computer Science from Northeastern University and serves as a reviewer for prominent engineering education conferences, including ASEE 2025. Yunmeng has been actively involved in NSF-funded research projects and is experienced in applying both quantitative and mixed-method research designs.Dr. David Reeping, University of Cincinnati Dr. David
Paper ID #45501Case Study of Integrating Standards, Codes, and Specifications into EngineeringCurricula: Various Pathways to Professional ReadinessDr. Shenghua Wu, University of South Alabama Dr. Shenghua Wu is an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil, Coastal, and Environmental Engineering at the University of South Alabama. His research areas include civil engineering materials characterization, pavement performance evaluation and modeling, design, and maintenance, multidisciplinary approach to address complex engineering issues, as well as STEM education. He holds multiple leadership roles, including the Director
Paper ID #47372Development of a Pre-College Curriculum for Nuclear Science and Engineering(Fundamental)Daniel Alejandro Gonzalez, Rensselaer Polytechnic InstituteBrandon Costelloe-Kuehn, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Department of Science and Technology Studies Brandon Costelloe-Kuehn is an anthropologically-oriented scholar working in the interdisciplinary field of science and technology studies (STS). His research lies at the intersection of community engagement, design research and pedagogy, and environmental justice. His scholarly work on the contexts that enable effective collaboration, communication, and engagement
and co-curricular activities on campus.One way in which our program supports hands-on learning is through teaching skill-buildingworkshops. These workshops focus on creating a space that empowers students to apply newlylearned technical skills in their hands-on engineering courses. A team of engineers,manufacturing specialists, and student staff offer approximately 1,000 skill-building workshopson 20+ topics each year to over 7,000 participants. Students take these workshops for ● required components of their coursework, ● general engineering skill building, and/or ● personal interest in the topic.These workshops are designed with flexibility in mind, allowing faculty to integrate them intotheir courses as replacements or supplements