targetperformances of understanding, and how well they lend themselves to evaluating individualstudent performances” [1, p. 356]. It is known that aspects of student identity have significanteffects on academic performance [11], but their absence from constructive alignment means thateducators have not been provided guidance on how to implement constructive alignment in away that equitably benefits all students and ensures inclusion of a diverse range of studentbackgrounds.Biggs [1] mentioned that teaching and learning activities do not need to be the sole domain oftraditional instructor-led lectures; peer groups and independent learning are also viable avenuesof activities in a constructively aligned course. However, both forms of learning carry their
enables the creation of personalized learning content, automated feedback, and real-timeacademic support. A notable example is OpenAI’s ChatGPT, a large language model trained togenerate human-like text responses, assisting students and educators in various academic tasks,including writing, coding, and content summarization [4]. While several generative AI models,such as Google Bard and Anthropic's Claude, offer similar capabilities, ChatGPT is known for itswidespread adoption in educational contexts, its advanced natural language processingcapabilities, and its frequent integration into learning management systems and academicworkflows. These factors position ChatGPT as a leading AI tool in education, making it an idealcase for examining the
).MethodologyCollaborative autoethnography (CAE) is a qualitative research method that combines personalnarratives with cultural analysis, enabling researchers to explore shared experiences within aspecific context. This work follows the CAE research framework of data collection, analysis, andoutcome writing presented in Chang et al. (2013). Prior to the CAE study, the research team wasinitially formed as part of a CoP supported by a National Science Foundation-funded center attheir home university. The primary objective of the CoP was to foster and disseminate effectivereflection practices in engineering classrooms, with an emphasis on equity-minded teaching.There are six instructors involved in this study. The demographics of each are provided in Table1. The
mustconsider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societalcontexts“ [11], which needs to be consciously reinforced throughout an engineering curriculum[12].This paper describes the implementation of a book project into an upper-level aerospaceengineering course for general engineering students. The students were asked to select anarrative non-fiction book about aerospace history, write a short report, and present theirfindings to the class. The objectives of the project were to help students apply the course materialto a historical context, to promote students’ lifelong learning through reading, and to encouragestudents to explore the societal and historical context of aerospace engineering. The followingsections
DisabilitiesBackground – The transition into higher education from high school presents numerouschallenges for students with disabilities. In the United States, regulatory support changesdramatically in this transitional period; students who could previously rely on accommodationsguaranteed under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) now must rely solelyon the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, whichguarantee fewer educational accommodations.Purpose/Hypothesis - Unique challenges with accessibility in STEM disciplines contribute to adisparity in persistence between students with disabilities and their peers. Libraries are uniquelypositioned to provide resources and foster inclusive learning that
), pp. 201–202). Research shows that the 3DP project interventionsignificantly decreased participants’ science teaching anxiety and improved their scienceteaching efficacy, science interest, and perceived competence in K-3 technological andengineering design science standards (Novak & Wisdom, 2018). 3DP has been used in various disciplines to visualize the science concepts (Papavlasopoulou,Giannakos, & Jaccheri, 2017), most notably in the maker movement. However, out of theselected 43 peer-reviewed articles on the maker movement, only two studies investigatededucational benefits of 3DP (Leduc-Mills & Eisenberg, 2011; Mellis & Buechley, 2012). Smithet al. (2015) conducted observational studies in the Danish school system and
participantsto have direct manipulation and feedback.The program encouraged participants to have an active role in their learning, which follows aconstructivist approach to teaching and facilitation. The summer program began with participantslearning about datasets through the use of iNaturalist when visiting a garden anda museum.They also completed teamwork and planning activities. After this, more scientific discussionsbegan with the use of a peanut butter and jelly recipe writing activity, which served as a segueinto a discussion about algorithms and the importance of data in training AI models. From there,GTM was introduced using the example of shark teeth and three classes: cutting teeth, graspingteeth, and crushing teeth. Computer vision was
experiencedfaculty with less seasoned colleagues to foster professional growth. Long-term initiatives, suchas learning communities or certificate programs, allow for deeper exploration of themes likepedagogical innovation, research development, and leadership skills. Online courses andwebinars have gained prominence, providing flexible, accessible opportunities for professionallearning. Faculty retreats create space for reflection, strategic planning, and collaboration, oftenaligning development efforts with institutional priorities. Additionally, peer observation andfeedback programs promote continuous improvement through constructive dialogue amongcolleagues [2]. These varied approaches ensure that faculty development can be adapted to meetthe unique
lies in the unique rheology measurements of complex fluids as well as engineering education research related to novel uses of technology and big data. He has authored several interactive textbooks with zyBooks and has published over 100 peer-reviewed articles. https://www.trine.edu/academics/colleges-schools/faculty/engineering/liberatore-matthew.aspxDr. Cheryl A Bodnar, Rowan University Dr. Bodnar is an Associate Professor in the Experiential Engineering Education Department at Rowan University. Her research interests relate to the incorporation of active learning techniques such as game-based learning in undergraduate classes as well as innovation and entrepreneurship.Dr. Selen Cremaschi, Auburn UniversityDr. Victor
services that are crucial for their development and persistence in higher education [4]. These hurdles not only affect their confidence but can also lead to difficulties in managing coursework, ultimately influencing their overall academic performance. The challenges faced by first-generation college students are compounded by a lack of academic preparation. An underprepared student is generally defined as one who lacks the requisite academic skills, knowledge, or resources essential for success in postsecondary education. These deficiencies commonly manifest in foundational areas such as reading comprehension, technical writing, and mathematics, often stemming from prior educational experiences marked by academic
teamwork, and encouraging self-assessment of leadership abilities in groupenvironments.The mentorship program follows Kolb’s experiential learning theory, which emphasizes learningthrough concrete experiences and reflection, enabling students to apply theoretical knowledge topractical, industry-related challenges. Additionally, Vygotsky’s social constructivism informs thestructure of the program, where students actively construct knowledge through social interactionswith their mentors and peers, providing a collaborative learning environment.Since its implementation, the program has engaged sixteen industry professionals as mentors.Students are required to meet with their mentors at least three times during the semester,participating in structured
problems, they may write the problems in such a way that either the description ofthe problems is narrowly specific, or the constraints of the problems are overly restrictive.Engineering education researchers view engineering problems as ill-defined [30], and the abilityto gather information to make sense of the problems is a key engineering practice [5]. Therefore,narrow and restrictive problems may lead to straightforward solutions; thus, students employdesign fixation due to restrictions on given problems that discourage creativity and multiplepossibilities. Research in engineering education is needed to better understand the relationshipbetween features of engineering design challenges and students employing design fixation.Research has shown
; ResearchLibraries 85, no. 7 (November 2024): 978–93.Mi, Misa. “Leveraging Research Synthesis for Promoting and Expanding Library Services andEducational Programs.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 42, no. 2 (March 2016): 151–53.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.12.012.Murphy, Jeannette. “Global Trends Health Science Libraries: Part 2.” Health Information and LibrariesJournal 39, no. 1 (March 2022): 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12415.Nachman, Sophie, Luke Barron, Terri Ottosen, Hannah Burrows, Emily P. Jones, and Elizabeth Moreton.“Translation of Systematic Review LibGuide Content Using Plain Language and Scientific Writing BestPractices.” Medical Reference Services Quarterly 43, no. 4 (2024): 279–91.https://doi.org/10.1080
to add to the repertoire of the study strategies they plan to use, but that they aresomewhat indiscriminate about what they plan to add, whereas those who did as expected or didbetter seem to focus their intended strategies on ‘close to course content’ strategies.Based on these findings, we are creating a peer-to-peer web based intervention for fall 2025. ECEstudents will be coached through naming the coping strategies they have used, and they willrecord a brief 2-5 minute testimonial for current students to watch and learn about effectivelycoping with perceived failure and perceived success. Participating fall 2025 students will write abrief reflection on each video they watch. Extent of engagement with videos will be used topredict
, and independent practice were deemed helpful, they had not yetfully developed their skills. The earlier results were more generalized regarding skilldevelopment and did not specify how each activity contributed to learning. In the follow-up survey, the answers were more detailed, clearly articulating the formsassignments on isometric and orthographic views led to greater spatial awareness. The resultsfurther support the notion that students benefited from developing problem solving skills,learning from trial-and-error and collaborative learning. Discussions with peers and workingthrough challenges were essential to building confidence and developing personally, which wasabsent in the first survey results. This suggests that having
human talents contribute to our profession’s social and global relevance.Catherine G. P. Berdanier, The Pennsylvania State University Catherine G.P. Berdanier is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Pennsylvania State University. She earned her B.S. in Chemistry from The University of South Dakota, her M.S. in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering and her PhD in Engineering Education from Purdue University. Her research expertise lies in characterizing graduate-level attrition, persistence, and career trajectories; engineering writing and communication; and methodological development. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Stifling Dissent: Engineering PhD
pedagogical techniques that enhance active learning, e.g.,implementing "think-pair-share" exercises. We observed a noticeable shift from teacher-orientedpedagogy to learner-oriented one, particularly through implementing ALM—"think-pair-share,"and encouraging students to stand up and share their reflections (see photo 1), walk to the frontof the classroom and write their answers on the board (see photo 2), and move around everycorner of the classroom (see photo 3). 8 This shift in pedagogy increased the participation of all students, including students ofcolor. In photo 1, an African American male student stood up in front of his peers and
doctoral studentschanging research labs during their academic programs in engineering graduate education.Recent research has demonstrated over 70% of engineering doctoral students contemplateleaving their programs without a doctoral degree [1]. Depending on the discipline, 40-60% ofengineering doctoral students actually depart due to conflicts with advisors and peers, financialor academic difficulties, and personal or family concerns [2]. Some students remain in theirdoctoral programs by changing research labs, advisors, programs, or even universities [3], [4].While changing research labs can help retain partially trained and qualified students, theassociated individual costs, programmatic barriers, and advisor conflicts complicate the
analysis revealed that student leaders used communication, decision-making, vision, andpassion to lead their teams. In particular, there were differences between women and men leaderswhen it came to leading others; while men leaders used a relaxed and fun way to lead, womenadopted a more serious and rigorous approach in their leadership roles. Furthermore, womenleaders found it more difficult to lead their peers and still have a positive relationship with them,and continue their friendship. Overall, women leaders took advantage of their leadership role inincreasing their sense of belonging to engineering, acquiring technical skills, and expanding theirknowledge of what the engineering profession can look like. Women leaders also reportedhaving
, including educational institutions [37]. The ability tocommunicate clearly and effectively is a skill that can greatly enhance the chances of success inany field. The rise of digital communication tools has also led to changes in how language isused and adapted, highlighting the importance of teaching communication skills that helpindividuals articulate their ideas clearly and tailor their messages to specific audiences. Theseskills not only help in transmitting knowledge but also enable deeper, more beneficialinteractions between teachers, students, and peers. As social networks continue to shape the wayswe communicate, understanding how to use these tools effectively is essential for maximizingthe potential of both personal and educational
writing. It was up to the PST to get her attention and begin the discussion. Discussionsranged from 5 to 9 minutes (M = 7) in duration. Zoom sessions were video recorded and we usedthe auto-transcription service from Zoom to create transcripts, which we then reviewed andcorrected, as needed. Videos and transcripts were not used for research purposes until aftergrades were submitted at the end of each semester, as per the consent process approved by theIRB and given that the instructor was also one of the two researchers of record.Data AnalysisWe used conversational analysis of the 18 discussion transcripts [25], coding each PST turn inthe discussions. By turn, we mean the utterance (i.e., uninterrupted talk) by the PST that ispreceded and/or
that enable participation from diverse andunderrepresented learners [10, 11]. Structural barriers to computing education include access,lack of engaging content, and shortage of role models and peer networking [11, 12, 13, 14, 15].Outside of structural barriers, social and societal barriers like misconceptions and perceptions ofthe field of computing, and stereotypes of the practitioners and working environments withincomputing [11, 16, 17, 18].Prior work has shown that formal engineering and science curricula alone cannot begin to closethe gaps and barriers seen in computing education [19]. In addition, learning outside of the formalclass has been shown to benefit those who are underrepresented in STEM [20]. Knowing this,there have been many
, University of ConnecticutChad DorseyBianca Montrosse-Moorhead, University of Connecticut Bianca Montrosse-Moorhead, Ph.D., is a Professor of Research Methods, Measurement, and Evaluation at the University of Connecticut, where she also directs the Partnership for Evaluation and Educational Research (PEER) lab. As Co-Editor-in-Chief of New Directions for Evaluation and internationally recognized evaluation scholar, Bianca has dedicated her career to bridging the space between evaluation theory, research, and practice. Her scholarship encompasses a broad spectrum of contributions, from evaluating various educational and social programs using diverse methodologies to enhancing the professional training of evaluators
experience to develop the specific tooling infrastructure setup andmethodology described in this paper. As part of their fabrication runs, Efabless also provides awrapper template that includes a RISC-V microcontroller with an exposed memory bus,general-purpose input/output (GPIO) pin interface, and a core management area to interact withthe user’s design. This template allowed the senior design projects to begin writing design codequickly without worrying about the specifics of the fabrication technology node or becomingoverwhelmed by the complex tooling abstracted by the template project.Efabless ChipIgnite ShuttlesAs useful as the OpenMPW fabrication was to starting ChipForge, Efabless has not providedOpenMPW shuttle submissions since MPW-8 in
batteries.After the in-class activity, teams are tasked with writing a report and creating a presentation thathighlights the contributions of four engineering disciplines to the creation of the object theydisassembled. Prompts guiding this analysis typically include revisiting the function or purposeof the various parts and describing a design choice informed by the expertise of each discipline.The hands-on nature of this activity makes it highly engaging, particularly when student teamshave multiple products to take apart and can choose one for their assignment. However, thelimited variety of items brought to class often leads to certain disciplines being consistentlyselected, which reduces the representation of the full diversity of engineering majors
andpedagogical issues that are present in using GenAI are dataset bias, generalization of largedatasets, explainability and potential trouble interpreting complex AI model decisions, andfactual accuracy in generative content that is not always accurate or reliable [2]. Engineering education faces specific AI-related challenges. In a study by Heimdal [18],engineering students who integrated AI into coursework reported improvements in taskefficiency and knowledge acquisition. However, concerns arose regarding the potential deskillingof students, particularly in manual problem-solving and creative writing abilities. Students alsoidentified risks associated with overtrusting AI-generated information, highlighting the need forAI literacy training in
ofstudents created isometric shapes with snap cubes. Each partner drew the correspondingorthographic projection, fostering teamwork and spatial reasoning with immediate peer feedback.After Lesson 7, the final activity involved wooden geometric shapes (Figure 2b). Studentscombined pieces into composite structures, specified a rotation axis and angle, and their partnersvisualized and executed the transformation. This exercise deepened their understanding of spatialtransformations and rotations.These ungraded activities provided iterative learning opportunities, with feedback from peers andthe instructor, preparing students for more advanced assignments and projects later in the course. 4.5 Mini Design Project: Puzzle CubeThe mini-design project
byhaving the students practice reading DNA sequences or performing a short demonstration ofmodel construction. Having students write the complementary sequence to the given sequenceprior to building the model could also rectify this problem. Nevertheless, one student stated thatafter the hands-on activity, “I understood [DNA] much better” (Table 3).As recognized from the students’ workshop preference responses, the Presenting Research:Bioengineering Research Today was difficult for students. Although they enjoyed learning aboutthe cloning of Dolly the Sheep and the breakthrough of AlphaFold, the activity afterward provedchallenging. This workshop was completed in groups where each student followed a documenton a laptop with an accompanying
mentorship insupporting EBIP adoption. Theoretical saturation was achieved when no new themes or insightsemerged from the data.Rigor and trustworthiness were supported through reflexive memo-writing, peer debriefing, andthe use of constant comparative analysis to enhance credibility [25]. Team members who werefamiliar with the project but not involved in the interviews or analysis reviewed the findings toprovide an addition check on accuracy and validity [27]. Ethical considerations includedobtaining informed consent, protecting participant confidentiality, and ensuring secure datastorage [28]. These measures upheld ethical integrity and strengthened the dependability of thestudy.By employing constructivist GT, this study provided a nuanced
professional practice [1].Indeed, team-based, project-based learning experiences are thought to support myriad social,technical, and sociotechnical learning outcomes for engineering students, such as learning tothink and communicate in the languages of engineering, technical writing and communication,prototyping and fabrication, and so on [1]–[3]. However, existing research has indicated that thebenefits of participating in team-based, project-based learning experiences are not always sharedby all students, and sociodemographic characteristics, such as race/ethnicity, sex/gender,socioeconomic status, and international student status, can inform the socioacademic dynamicsby which students come to participate (in)equitably in engineering teamwork.The