develop solutions that were more inclusive, equitable, and socially responsible, therebysolidifying the role of design justice in the department’s educational framework.MethodsThe researchers analyzed 9 reports from Spring 2023 (EGR301) and 8 from Spring 2024(EGR402). Each of the student reports were coded by the researchers by sections of the report,that included: Revisions from Previous Reports/Introduction, Solution Level Product DesignSpecifications, Conceptual Design Process, Initial Detailed Design, Plan for Next Year, andTentative Budget. A few reports had a Project Management section, though due to either none orone mention of a PDS term in that section across reports, the researchers determined that it wasnot worth including in the final
theprevious and the new version of the courses. We discuss rationale for considering the newstructure, integrating multiple academic disciplines, setting up the new course structure,preparing the two-quarter course plan, and the experience of teaching it for the first time. Wealso address tensions of integrating non-technical disciplines into a design engineering course. Inthe spirit of user-centered design, we present this as a case study of radically iterating on coursedesign based on stakeholder feedback rather than make small changes to the existing courses.Context The authors are part of a Human Centered Design & Engineering department at an R1university, where the first author is a PhD candidate and the second and third authors
the general educationprogram: a planned sequence of courses that include critical and practical knowledge gainedfrom studies in communications, mathematics, computer technology, science, history,philosophy, literature, and the arts. The course introduces students to computers and selectedpopular applications and their uses in society. We also encourage students in our CS curriculumto complete the IBM Cybersecurity and AI modules in other CS courses. For this paper, we willfocus on the CS 150 course.Catalog Description of CS 150 Computer Technology Course at our institution:CS 150 Computer Technology. 3(1, 2). This course is for undergraduates from all disciplines,which explores the nature and history of computers, their impact on society
beinginducted. Figure 6 represents the same, with 30 of them (41% of 74 responses) being aware of AIapplications in construction safety. The other application areas include tools for planning &designing and robotics for automation with equalized high familiarity among 22 respondents (30%of 74 responses). 26 respondents (35% of 74 responses) were not familiar with AI applications inconstruction. 35 30 30 26 25
majority of hands-on tasks requiredcontrolled lab environments and specialized equipment.The dissemination of this framework to other instructors and students will be facilitatedthrough open-access online repositories, professional development workshops, andeducational conferences. Instructional materials, including detailed lesson plans, laboratoryguides, simulation exercises, and recorded demonstrations, will be made available throughuniversity learning management systems, institutional websites, and platforms such asGitHub or dedicated educational resource portals. Faculty members and institutions adoptingthe framework will have access to implementation guidelines, assessment tools, and bestpractices to ensure successful integration into their
- process efficiency; reduced errors; risk al.(2024) [18] (and others) resources planning, process efficiency, cost reduction Benz; Tel Aviv Sourasky management. Medical Center Forecasting, distribution and transportation strategy, inventory management and warehousing, process Enhanced prediction leading better
process [11]. Examples include utilizing ChatGPT to generate quiz questions tosupport mastery learning [4,12] and providing customized feedback [16, 17]. Other potentialbenefits for educators include assistance with course planning and development, improvedinstructional design performance [15], reduction of workload and significant time savings [14].Despite these advantages, there is a clear need for future research to advance the educational useof generative AI [17]. Specifically, the importance of improving students’ ability to effectivelyutilize generative AI, along with offering guidance to educators on its effective implementation,has been highlighted in several studies [10, 14, 20]. Ensuring that both students and instructorsare well
team members, and documentation. We were also adaptable to any challenges that came up, for example, when the battery box broke, a new one was quickly designed and developed.”The high school student mentioned “During the research process, I think what worked well is how I constantly had something to work on and wasn't left with nothing to do at any moment in the process. Also, the constant advice Dr. [] gave made all of the components of the project the best they could be.” 4. What are your plans after graduation? How has this research experience influenced your plans to work in a specific field (post graduation education, specific industry, academia etc.)?The sophomore student remarked“I plan to
requiring students tointerpret and address client preferences based on provided specifications. The project requiredstudents to consider several key factors, including site selection (coastal vs. inland), environmentalsustainability, flood risk mitigation, functionality, and aesthetic appeal. The final deliverablesconsisted of two primary components: 1. A comprehensive report, covering location analysis, stakeholder identification, design documentation, cost estimation, project management planning, and reflections. 2. A physical prototype constructed using accessible materials such as cardboard, aluminum foil, and plastic wrap, representing structural and aesthetic elements of their proposed design.The project was implemented in
these efforts. Unfortunately, as captured in the 2024 paper, EmpoweringChange: The Role of Student Changemakers in Advancing Sustainability within EngineeringEducation [14], most of these integration efforts are extra-curricular, electives, or only availableto environmental or civil engineering students. Traditionally, these efforts have been led byfaculty and academic staff and have largely excluded students from the ideation, planning, andimplementation processes. EOP is responding to these observed issues by launching a newstudent ambassador program. The goal of the ambassador program is to support students inidentifying and advocating for the curricular changes they are seeking. As described in theaforementioned paper, this might include
Engineering Education, 2025 Data Analytics for Engineering Student Success and College OperationsAs resource constraints have driven calls for more transparency and accountability in highereducation, high demand disciplines like engineering are using data sets to justify decisions andshape strategic planning goals. However, engineering is also well-poised to employ data in visualand useful ways to analyze and synthesize years of data and trends. Serving a largeundergraduate engineering student body across multiple campuses and encompassing multipleengineering disciplines, the Penn State University’s College of Engineering can gain insightsinto the student population, faculty, and departments’ needs. The
, and 3) Scenario Based analysis showing the outcomeof the user defined decision variables.Decision Variables: In this section, the following figure (Figure 2) illustrates the interactivedecision parameters that enable users to dynamically modify maintenance schedules and operatorsettings. Key components include the 𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑀 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝐸𝑛𝑑𝑀 buttons, which allow users to manuallycontrol the initiation and completion of maintenance schedules for specific machines or sections,providing flexibility in scheduling. 𝑁𝑂𝑀𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 , 𝑆𝑐ℎ𝑒𝑑𝑢𝑙𝑒𝑀𝑆 buttons further enhancecontrol over maintenance activities. 𝑁𝑜 𝑀𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 turns off planned maintenance to prioritizecontinuous operations, while 𝑆𝑐ℎ𝑒𝑑𝑢𝑙𝑒
to scholarships, internships, and job offers [6]. In the STEM fields, specifically,these events are known to enhance students' interest in pursuing higher education and research [7].In the fields of construction and architecture, student competitions play a pivotal role in preparingparticipants for industry challenges. The Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC)industry requires professionals to possess not only technical expertise but also strong interpersonaland collaborative skills [8]. Competitions offer a unique environment where students can work ininterdisciplinary teams, mimicking real-world project scenarios [9].Competitions like the NAHB Student Competition provide students with hands-on experience inproject planning
faculty workflow,schedules and needs, and conversations with established LSAMP programs. This paper aims toserve as a roadmap for new alliances to consider as they plan for multi-institution collaborations.IntroductionThe objective of the National Science Foundation (NSF) funded Southern and Central IllinoisLouis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation (SCI-LSAMP) is to recruit, retain, and supportstudents to successful completion of baccalaureate degrees within STEM disciplines in southernand central Illinois. In 2024, this alliance, composed of six institutions, was awarded an LSAMPproject grant after multiple years of planning and coordination. The six institutions forming thealliance are Bradley University, Illinois State University
parallels to a consulting corporation's role within the college. Even thoughwe are part of a larger academic institution, each systematic structure (office, unit, department)functions with a distinct mission, goals, and identity. In addition to resource constraints, such asa small team, OFDS could not address every issue simultaneously, demonstrating the need towork collaboratively with other groups to leverage limited resources. This is where weconducted our own research on how to create our strategic plan, which led us to the HarvardBusiness Review’s introduction to the CBIM [9] for guidance [8].While several entrepreneurial frameworks were considered, such as the Business Model Canvas,Lean Startup, and Design Thinking, these approaches primarily
sociotechnicalframeworks to inform their design decisions and processes, they can assess multiple aspects ofengineering challenges beyond just the technical and quantitative. While these questions weredeveloped for the content of UVA's FYE program, they could be adapted to the needs of otherinstitutions.Introduction and BackgroundIn recent years, sociotechnical knowledge has become an increasingly prominent area of study inthe engineering education community [1], [2]. Twenty years ago, the National Academy ofEngineers [3] laid out a plan for what the “Engineer of 2020” would be defined by: leadership inmoving the world forward in an ethical, sustainable manner. However, as a more recent surveydemonstrated, ethical and sociotechnical considerations have remained
Reflection Identifying Resources & Getting Involved on Campus 5 Professional Skills 4 Engineering Major Exploration & Course Planning 3 Implicit Bias Training 2 Teamwork 2 Time management 2 Career Pathways 1 Engaging with Cultural Events 1 Furthermore, the Scholars shared their understanding of the role that they will play intheir undergraduate
-centereddesign, engineering, and entrepreneurship. Traditionally, there is not a history of interdisciplinaryprograms at the university. In this paper, we report on the process that led to the development ofa new Bachelor of Science in Product Design and Entrepreneurship (PDEP) and situate it in theliterature on other human-centered design programs. This new program aims to equip studentswith the skills and mindset required to create innovative products and solutions that address real-world challenges. It will be offered for the first time in the fall 2025 semester, and we plan tocollect and examine data on student pathways and outcomes in the future.IntroductionThe convergence of physical and digital domains is increasingly evident in areas such as
explores the influence of implementing the EFQM model on customerperformance, emphasizing its structured qualitative and quantitative approach to monitoring andenhancing strategic planning. Lessons learned from the EFQM model’s organizationaldeployment offer actionable strategies to enhance strategic planning, leadership, and processoptimization. This is useful for engineering education as a quality management tool.Keywords: EFQM Excellence Model, Quality Management, quantitative method, hypothesistesting, qualitative method, RADAR. 1. Introduction The European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) Excellence Model serves asa comprehensive framework for achieving organizational development and strategic alignmentby emphasizing
thestudent to a multicultural, collaborative, knowledge-integrating environment. Through GlobalLearning, students identify, analyze, discuss, and develop proposals for solutions to real problemsin an international context, fostering an ideal environment to develop key skills for globalcitizenship and employability [13]. During the planning period of the COIL experience, ProfessorA, responsible for course A in country A, agrees with Professor B, responsible for course B incountry B, through strategic planning meetings to jointly hold sessions and adapt the part of thecourse that corresponds so that the hybrid class between the groups has the same topic [14]. COILaims to link, partially or totally, a course of the institution with another course of
from across the SUNY system and integrating inclusive use ofAI as well as OER distribution plans into the framework. Workshops wereconducted online, with past participants serving as mentors to 38 new participantswho completed modules and collaborated across institutions. Feedback from theparticipants shows the value of the project and the ways in which STEM courseshave been made more inclusive. This project will help to grow a community ofSUNY STEM instructors who can foster among future STEM professionalsdiverse perspectives, inclusive approaches, and equitable applications of sciencein society.I. Background: A. Impact of alternative forms of rhetoric on STEM educationAcross higher education, and especially in STEM fields, educators are
-being.Findings from this research can facilitate targeted infrastructure planning and investment, bettermobility, and ultimately improve the quality of life in urban areas. Future research shouldconsider a wider range of environmental and social factors and how different factors interactover time to influence stress levels.Keywords: Sensor-based modeling, empathic design, walkability, human stress, machine learning.1. IntroductionWalkability is a key element in urban design that profoundly impacts quality of life and fosterscommunity engagement. By promoting physical activity, walkable streetscapes contribute tobetter physical health while reducing air pollution and supporting environmental sustainabilitythrough decreased reliance on motorized transport
-biological specimens. Some of these test samples were olive oil, sunscreen, chicken blood,invisible ink, glow powder, yeast, Escherichia coli (E. coli), and Candida albicans (C. albicans).ConclusionsThe purpose of this collaborative research project was to provide the undergraduate Engineeringand Biology students an opportunity to apply their existing technical knowledge, improve theirtime management, communication skills, and work as a team on a real-world problem. Theproject timeline was illustrated in Figure 8. This one year long project was divided into threestages that were planning, development, and final deliverable preparation. Figure 8. Phase 1 timelineIn the first stage of the project, the authors
each topic aligns with specific chapters, noting key sections or page numbers that cover essential concepts." Lesson Plan Creation: "Create a detailed lesson plan for each week of a chemical engineering course on [specific topic]. For each lesson, include learning objectives, a brief summary, instructional strategies, activities, and suggested readings. Each plan should fit a [class duration, e.g., 60- or 90- minute] session format." Mapping with ABET Outcomes: "Map the syllabus topics for a [specific chemical engineering course] to ABET student outcomes. List each topic and explain how it contributes to achieving specific ABET outcomes (e.g., apply knowledge of mathematics, engineering, communicate effectively, etc.)." Learning Outcomes
, and teaching and research expertise. The current work wasinspired by Voccio and Mansour’s work at the 2024 ASEE Annual Conference, in which theypresented an assessment of which courses in the mechanical engineering program could be mosteasily adapted to include more sustainability material.21 The motivation for this work was to do asimilar assessment for the civil engineering program, and to start to actually develop thatteaching material.The current work includes new material in the form of lesson plans that the authors haveincorporated or will incorporate into the courses they teach in the civil engineering program.Also included are the syllabi for two new elective courses focused on sustainability and climatechange.4.2 Sustainability
Engineering in 2001 and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering in 2005, both from University of Delaware (USA). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Paper ID #47467Mr. Francisco Cima Francisco Cima is a PhD student of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering at Old Dominion University. He obtained his Masters in Business Planning and Regional Development from the Technological Institute of Merida. His areas of interest are innovIsaac Koduah Kumi, Old Dominion University Isaac K. Kumi is a Mechanical Engineering Ph.D. student at Old Dominion University. He has a B.Sc in Biomedical Engineering
inengineering education [5], and accessibility to individuals with disabilities is among ASEE’scommitments [6].While higher-level policy and strategic plans have endorsed commitments to more inclusiveengineering education for learners with disabilities, the real experiences of these learners oftentell different stories of insufficient support and feelings of exclusion [7]. Studies havedocumented how learners with disabilities are often discouraged from pursuing engineeringcoursework in the first place [8]. Cech’s reflexive, quantitative analysis of the ASEE survey dataof 1,729 students found that engineering students with disabilities are less likely to experiencesocial inclusion and more likely to intend to leave their engineering studies [9
, professionalism, ethics, and lifelong learning and development. Thesecompetencies collectively ensure that engineering graduates are well-equipped for the demands oftheir profession. Figure 1. Professionalism outcomes defined by ASCE, ABET, and NACEAmong the various professional competencies, teamwork and communication were selected aslearning objectives of the Statics course due to their alignment with course goals and the nature ofthe planned team activities. The primary objective of the Statics course is to develop engineeringproblem-solving skills through critical thinking, and the planned activity consists of weekly team-based exercises incorporating social interaction, problem-solving, and reflection. These activitiesdirectly enhance
extends DEI to include the term “justice,” and the research team uses thedefinition from the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) that is included in PolicyStatement 417 [16]: • Justice—dismantling barriers to resources and opportunities in society so that all individuals and communities can live a full and dignified life.An array of forces influencing public infrastructure planning, design, construction, maintenance,operation, and education encourages a more comprehensive treatment of DEIJ in infrastructureeducation. For example, creating a diverse STEM workforce is codified in law (Public Law 96-516 sections 1885a and 1885b). Unfortunately, bias and racism have a direct impact on thepreparation of a representative CEE workforce
teacher went from being a novice in engineering tounderstanding that problem solutions require multiple iterations. Furthermore, we discovered thatthis teacher was already infusing some translanguaging practices in her class environment.Implications of this work include a better understanding of how elementary teachers navigate thechallenge of teaching engineering to students and how these teachers specifically plan for,scaffold, and include the engagement of their multilingual students within these lessons.IntroductionMultilingual students comprise 10.1% of US students, and this number is projected to increase[1]. Often emergent English speakers are not afforded the same opportunities as monolingualEnglish speakers due to deficit-oriented