Introduction & Background Learning ‘Street Smarts’ This in-progress research project explores the value of using Alumni to inform engineering undergraduates about the nature of the industry and assist them in developing the necessary competencies to succeed. Students of the Engineering Leadership Program at
, 2025SFS Microelectronics Supplement: Igniting High School Students' Interest inSemiconductors Through a Chip Camp Wei Zhang Department of Computer Science and Engineering University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292AbstractThis paper introduces a work-in- progress of our recent project in o6ering a chip camp tolocal high school students, which was partially funded by NSF SFS through a supplementalgrant. The camp was held during the fall break of the local student district, making itconvenient for high school students to attend. The camp introduces the full lifecycle ofsemiconductor chip design and microfabrication with short lectures, hands-on exercises,demos and
ERI: A Mixed-Methods Study of Statistical Thinking, Informed by Engineering PracticeThis short report gives an update on the NSF-supported project “ERI: Towards Data-CapableEngineers with a Variability-Capable Mindset” (Grant No. 2138463).Statistical variability is important, but under-emphasized in engineering. Variability is thephenomenon of non-identical behavior, which has important effects on designing systems forpeople (who are different), and on designing for safety (in the face of variable conditions). Ourproject seeks to better understand how people—engineers in particular—react to statisticalvariability, and to use these insights to improve undergraduate education.Statistical variability is under-emphasized in
grounding and historical perspective on the ways in whichgrant-funded DEI-focused initiatives in the U.S. are shaped by institutional conditions. Byinterrogating these conditions, we can move towards a more critical understanding of how aproject’s context including PI motivation, leadership ideology, scaling goals, and administrativebackbone may or may not influence potential outcomes. These factors are usually eitherpresented by project leaders in shorthand as “background conditions” for proposed research,barely relevant to the envisioned intervention, or omitted entirely from research design. Thisdeemphasis may have a practical purpose, cordoning off politically sensitive activity amidbroader institutional resistance to DEI, but it is an approach
the backlog of USinfrastructure projects [6]. Yet, its success depends on having a skilled workforce to design,build, and maintain critical infrastructure. The Bureau of Labor Statistics denoted CivilEngineering will grow at 6% between 2023 and 2033. This is faster than the 4% average of alloccupations [11]. In February 2024, 51% percent of engineering firms continued to turn downwork due to workforce shortages [1]. This suggests that Industry needs a skilled and readyworkforce. As one interviewer clearly responded that their firm is “looking for recent graduatesto hit the ground running.” The gap between industry requirements and student preparation impacts companies'productivity. Despite significant work to prepare students to enter
Paper ID #46514The Influence on Engineering Industry Career Paths of Specific UndergraduateStudent Experiences and ActivitiesD’andre Jermaine Wilson-Ihejirika P.Eng., University of Toronto D’Andre Wilson-Ihejirika is currently a PhD candidate at the University of Toronto within the Institute for Studies in Transdisciplinary Engineering Education & Practice (ISTEP). Prior to that she worked for many years as an engineer and project manager in the Oil & Gas industry. She is originally from Nassau, Bahamas, and completed her B.Eng in Chemical Engineering at McGill University and her MASc. from the Centre for
robotics curriculum toprepare students for the many robotics industry positions and research careers that utilize thismiddleware [5]. Learning ROS can at times be non-intuitive and overwhelming for students[1].Limited online resources exist to help students learn ROS asynchronously[6], and none havestudied how students perceived self-efficacy in tackling future robotics project challenges.Asynchronous tutorials help students learn material that would take too much time to step throughin class, enhancing the principles taught. They can help students troubleshoot specific issues theyrun into, allow students to go at their own pace, and allow flexibility in how students approachdifferent challenges. In this Introduction to Robotics course, over three
Active Experimentation.Prototyping, progressing through conceptual, functional, and production stages, provides apractical mechanism for engaging students in iterative design. Prior studies, such as Larson et al.[3], have demonstrated the potential of project-based learning to develop adaptive expertise inupper-division courses, but limited evidence exists for first-year contexts.Methods/Assessment: The study takes place in a first-year “Design for Manufacturing” coursethat emphasizes hands-on learning. Students work in teams to identify design problems, developconcepts, and fabricate prototypes using tools such as 3D printers, CNC/manual mills, andwelding equipment. A taxonomy of prototypes guides the process: 1. Conceptual Prototypes: Low
complete a design project. Buildingon our previously reported work, this paper investigates students’ reported ability and self-efficacy as it relates to a design framework and mindset in a restructured materials designcapstone course. In AY 2022-23, a two-semester capstone sequence was piloted to improve thestudents’ design experience via a fundamental restructuring of the course elements, replacing thetraditional, one-semester course. In AY 2023-24, the two-semester sequence was formalized inthe course catalog with over 50 students taking the two-course sequence.In this restructuring, two frameworks were integrated in the course content: Human-CenteredDesign (HCD) framework, a method to formalize the design process in discrete stages, and
Paper ID #45686Curriculum Design for All LearnersDr. Cathy P. Lachapelle, STEM Education Insights Cathy is particularly interested in how collaborative interaction and scaffolded experiences with disciplinary practices help children learn science, math, and engineering. Her work on STEM education research projects includes design, evaluation, and effiDr. Medha Dalal, Arizona State University Dr. Medha Dalal is an assistant research professor and associate director of scholarly initiatives in the Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. Her career as an engineering education researcher focuses on
on micro-ethics rather than systematic impact [7]. Nieusma [4]argues that it is important to frame engineering curricula with liberal education that scaffoldsstudents’ reflexive practices rather than augment by adding more liberal arts. Similarly,communication should be integrated throughout curricula with multiple opportunities to developskills through practice [8]. To encourage students to consider the sociotechnical aspects of engineering design, manyprograms implement a human-centered or user-centered design (UCD) pedagogy. User-centereddesign courses are strong examples of hands-on, project-based courses that offer students theopportunity to learn to incorporate stakeholder perspectives and iteratively design products fortheir
Paper ID #46613Overseas Team Building for Student Leaders in Academic MakerspacesDr. Chun Kit Chui, University of Hong Kong Dr. Chun Kit Chui serves as the Director of the Tam Wing Fan Innovation Wing in the Faculty of Engineering at the University of Hong Kong (HKU). The Innovation Wing aims to unleash students’ creativity by entrusting them to spearhead ambitious innovation and technology projects that will shape the future. This iconic facility is situated at the heart of the campus, offering 2400m2 of space with state-of-the-art resources and a supportive environment to enhance hands-on and experiential learning for
Paper ID #47974Using Tinkercad in introductory electrical and computer engineering coursesProf. Branimir Pejcinovic, Portland State University Branimir Pejcinovic received his Ph.D. degree from University of Massachusetts, Amherst. He is a Professor and former Associate Chair for Undergraduate Education at Portland State University, Electrical and Computer Engineering department. He has led department-wide changes in curriculum with emphasis on the project- and lab-based instruction and learning. He was awarded the best paper award by the ECE division of ASEE in 2017 for his work on freshman engineering course
featuringdifferent civil engineering disciplines and a semester-long design project. Through scaffoldingand repetition, students work through problem definition, criteria development and forming anevaluation matrix multiple times over the course of the semester. The second course is a capstonedesign course that is taken in the final semester. Students complete a project based on a real-world problem and are guided by the instructor and external mentors.We assessed students’ abilities to apply the engineering design process in both classes. In thesecond-year seminar lab, we examine students’ success over time with writing problemdescriptions and needs statements, generating design criteria, and recognizing design constraints.Through repeated practice
in the real world. We investigate the role that motivation and learning strategiesplay in the learning of design skills, taught in a higher education setting, but requiring team-baseddesign project activities and interaction with external clients. We measure motivation for a total of155 students across multiple concurrent sections of English-speaking students in a first-yearengineering design course, using separate cohorts of students in five distinct school terms. Themode of instruction of the school terms ranges from fully online through Hybrid Flex (HyFlex) tofully in person. Due to the global COVID-19 pandemic restrictions, the 2021 Fall term courseoffering was held completely online, while the 2022 Winter term offering of the same
. She is currently engaged in multiple research projects that involve transdisciplinary collaborations in the field of engineering, medicine, and technology, as well as research on teacher preparation and the conducting of evidence-based practices in multiple contexts. Jennifer’s publications appear in the Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, and Journal of Science Education for Students with Disabilities. Before joining the CTE, Jennifer was an Assistant Professor in the Department of Special Education at Towson University. Prior to joining higher education, she was a special education teacher at the
Johns Hopkins University, Laboratory for Computational Se ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Integration of Capstone Class and Student Competition Design TeamsAbstractMany student competition design teams, such as SAE Collegiate Design Series teams, ASMEdesign project teams, and others, feature interesting and challenging projects. These projects areoften open-ended and require use of material from multiple engineering classes and disciplines,which suit them in many ways for capstone projects in senior design classes. In this paper, a teamof faculty who have been involved with student competition design teams and have taughtcapstone classes analyze the student experiences with capstones and
SigmaAbstractIn this paper, a Lean Six Sigma project aimed at improving the course scheduling process in alarge engineering department at Texas A&M University is presented. The current schedulingprocess faces numerous challenges, including inadequate enrollment capacity, a lack ofdocumentation, and inefficiencies that frustrate students and faculty members alike. By applyingthe DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) methodology, this project identifiescritical areas for improvement and proposes a new streamlined scheduling process. Keyoutcomes include reducing classroom overcapacity and ensuring equitable access to courses.This case study demonstrates how Lean Six Sigma tools can address systemic issues in academicoperations, benefiting
Theory and Practice: Active Learning and Real-World Applications in Mathematical Analysis Course Djedjiga Belfadel, and Danushka Bandara Fairfield UniversityAbstract:This Evidence-Based Practice Paper outlines the redesign of the sophomore-level Mathematical Analysiscourse at Fairfield University, focusing on enhancing the practical application of mathematical conceptsfor engineering students. The course has been redesigned from a predominantly theoretical frameworkinto a hands-on, project-based approach. Building upon the successful integration of MATLAB, theredesign emphasizes active learning techniques and interactive programming
Lab, he has been the co-instructor of an innovative project-based course, Diagnostic Intelligent Assistance for Global Health, that exists as part of the University of Michigan’s Multidisciplinary Design Program.Caleb William Tonon, University of MichiganGuli Zhu, University of Michigan Guli Zhu is a graduate student in the Health Data Science program at the University of Michigan. His research interests include machine learning, large language models, and multimodal learning, particularly in the context of healthcare applications.Tyler Wang, Stony Brook UniversityRafael Mendes Opperman, University of Michigan Rafael Opperman is a second-year undergraduate pursuing a B.S.E. in Industrial & Operations Engineering
and advanced vector networkanalyzers, that are typically used in the SI laboratory, which tends to be very expensive andbeyond the standard laboratory equipment in an undergraduate program. In this paper, we reporton the efforts that we have made to keep our signal integrity lab current with new laboratoryexperiences and capstone projects and undergraduate research. For example, recently, we haveobtained support from the Office Naval Research and the local administration to acquire newVector Network Analyzer to enhance undergraduate/graduate education and research in signalintegrity. We have also received a time domain reflectometer (TDR) donation from a localcompany, and submitted a new Major Research Instrumentation (MRI), National
the interactions between student motivation and their learning experiences. Her projects include studies of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers and scientists, and their development of problem-solving skills, self-regulated learning practices, and epistemic beliefs. Other projects in the Benson group involve students’ navigational capital, and researchers’ schema development through the peer review process. Dr. Benson is an American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Fellow, and a member of the European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI), American Educational Research Association (AERA) and Tau Beta Pi. She earned a B.S. in Bioengineering (1978) from the University of
competencies necessary for engineers to perform well,contribute to their field and lead [4,5]. Key components include communication skills, that is, theability to effectively convey, receive, and interpret information through verbal, non-verbal, andwritten means for different audiences; teamwork, which entails collaborating effectively withothers and exhibiting leadership; and the metacognitive skills needed to remain effective in arapidly evolving field, including problem-solving, leadership, project management and self-management.At the University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney, Australia), design thinking andprofessional practice are taught to Chemical Engineering undergraduate students in the Level 2course DESN2000 Engineering Design and
, Engineering and Science (ELATES) Program.Elizabeth Generas, Wright State University Elizabeth Generas is an external evaluator for education and social justice projects. She completed a graduate certificate in Program Evaluation from Wright State University, where she is also a doctoral candidate in the Doctor of Organization Studies program.Dr. Leanne Petry, Central State University Dr. Leanne Petry is a Materials Engineer and Professor in the College of Engineering, Science, Technology, and Agriculture (CESTA) at Central State University (CSU). Her expertise lies in analytical and materials characterization techniques, including microscopy, spectroscopy, chromatography, and electrochemistry. Her research focuses on
engineering graduate programs through her engineering education research. Prior to academia, Dr. Godwin worked for many Fortune 100 companies, including Intel Corporation.Dr. John K. Wagner, University of New Mexico Dr. John K. Wagner is a Postdoctoral Fellow for the Alliances for Graduate Education and the Professoriate (AGEP) joint project between the University of New Mexico, Arizona State University, and the University of Oregon. His research interests focus on improving equity in higher education, and the impacts of technology on public opinion and political psychology. Specifically, Dr. Wagner’s research explores how to improve equity and inclusion by measuring latent support for exclusionary practices, and designing
operaƟonsare key to sustaining the public health and safety and economic viability of a Smart System.We launched the Research for Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) Site to address the needfor training a future workforce that can develop smart soluƟons to enhance the resilience andsustainability of urban systems to ensure a high quality of life for urban inhabitants [4]. To meetthese workforce needs, we adopted an integrated approach to design the REU Site byintegraƟng the evaluaƟon framework for our project. We were intenƟonal to consider howprogram parƟcipaƟon would influence parƟcipants’ social capital related to graduate school.We were also interested to characterize the extent to which parƟcipants had the opportunity topracƟce professional
, and considers the intersection between policy and organizational contexts. Knight currently serves as the co-Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Engineering Education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025NSF IUSE: Advancing Student-Centered Teaching for Disciplinary Knowledge Building inEngineeringAbstractThis NSF-funded project (DUE2215989) investigated effective instructional practices in middleand upper-level engineering courses to enhance student learning. Using a participatory actionresearch (PAR) approach, we examined how exemplary faculty translate their teaching beliefsinto practice within disciplinary contexts. Participants identified by department heads asoutstanding instructors engaged
aims to understand and disrupt the ways in which socially constructed identities allow for the reproduction of social inequality, with a focus on understanding the ways institutions of higher education and other social structures challenge or uphold hegemonic environments in which majority populations accumulate power that harms students underrepresented in certain contexts.Ms. Isabel Anne Boyd, Georgia Institute of Technology Isabel is a first year Ph.D. student in the Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University. She has conducted several mixed-methods research projects centered around diversity and inclusion in engineering and is passionate
experience with ongoing curricular sociotechnical integrationand its generative tensions for a team of instructors including STS, Electrical Engineering andComputer Sciences (EECS), and Statistics. The paper presents two case studies of sociotechnicalintegration in undergraduate technical courses that include practical exercises of applyingprinciples and techniques to real-world situations. In a junior-level data science fundamentalscourse, a multi-week course unit teaches students linear modeling and feature engineering byway of a real-world case study about the politics of predicting housing prices for property taxassessment. In a senior-level inference and decision-making course, students are asked tocomplete an integrative course project in
Paper ID #47232BOARD # 175: A Novel Teaching Strategy for Integrating Freshman andHigh School Students in Introductory Mechanical EngineeringDr. Massie Kazemi, Wentworth Institute of Technology Massie Kazemi is a Visiting Assistant Professor in the Mechanical Engineering program at Wentworth Institute of Technology. She is actively involved in STEM outreach projects and regularly mentors student research in mechanical and biomedical engineering. Her research interests include advanced manufacturing, biomechanics, multiscale modeling, materials characterization, and engineering education.Dr. Gloria Guohua Ma, Wentworth