equations and conceptual definitions while providing handwritten step-by-stepguidance for practice problems. I adapted by shifting from writing on an iPad to using slides thatincluded pre-built equations and solutions for examples. However, I noticed that students found iteasier to follow when I wrote out solutions during demonstrations. This led me to adopt a hybridformat—using slides for presentations and final solutions but handwriting for demonstrations. Theeffectiveness of these pace adjustments was evident in the absence of pace-related concerns incourse evaluations. Students also reported that the integration of real-life examples significantlyenhanced their learning experience and conceptual understanding. In this quarter, the
content–learning how to be an engineer, todevelop an understanding of engineering content.Taken together, the dual trends of valuing accuracy, factual correctness, and integrity while alsovaluing GenAI’s ability to serve as a learning tool to check, practice, and understand engineeringcontent reveals a relatively balanced tension between students’ beliefs about the limitations andopportunities for GenAI to enhance their learning and growth as engineers. On the one hand,students are concerned about the accuracy of information developed through GenAItechnologies, and they emphasize the need to use GenAI in a way that doesn’t disrupt authentic,deep learning in their discipline. On the other hand, students value the potential for GenAItechnologies to
lower beliefs about their abilities to understandengineering and do well in engineering courses. Summative assessments may place the focus incourses on grades over growth and reinforce a static mindset of who can become an engineer [7].Additionally, content rooted in conventional engineering applications can cause students to feelless motivated or disconnected from the major due to a difference in interests within the field.Alternatively, many general first-year courses have integrated active learning or design-basedpedagogies [8]. However, these courses are typically focused on general engineering and oftenhave large enrollments. Additionally, design projects in these courses are often mechanical orelectrical engineering focused as those
concepts from multiple subject areas todevelop a solution, and choose an optimal solution from an assortment of viable solutions. Theseattributes are all consistent with modern professional engineering practice [2]. Furthermore, toreceive ABET accreditation, programs must also be able to demonstrate that their students have“an ability to apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs withconsideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social,environmental, and economic factors” [3]There are a multitude of opportunities to integrate real-world projects into the undergraduatemechanical engineering curriculum to help students engage more deeply with the course content.For instance, several
the FYS program. The task force’s objectives included updatingthe FYS courses to ensure relevance to first year engineering students, standardizing thecurriculum to provide a uniform experience, and integrating key themes such as ethics; diversity,equity, and inclusion (DEI); and sustainability into the engineering curriculum. Additionally, thetask force aimed to explore innovative teaching approaches and best practices to enhance theoverall educational experience. The task force operated under the guiding principle that first-year engineering studentsshould be well-supported to succeed in their academic pursuits. The redesigned FYS courseswere intended to foster engineering student development across five key domains: personal,academic
review and not a majorfinding, it represents a future direction for the field.Faculty Recruitment: Faculty recruitment of applicants involves ensuring transparency in bothapplication requirements and communications with prospective students. While programwebsites typically outline the basic requirements, additional details—often referred to as thehidden curriculum—can significantly enhance an application but are not always visible [12]. Indisciplines like economics, transparent faculty communication about key admissions factorssupports fair practices, helping students tailor applications to meet committee expectations [7].This transparency allows prospective students to better tailor their application packages based onwhat faculty advisors are
Paper ID #47302Swarm Test Arena for Resilient Systems: an experimental setup to study andtest bio-inspired algorithmsMs. Rasika Ravindra Kale, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University I am currently pursuing M.S. Systems Engineering and have graduated with B.E. in Mechanical engineering from University of Pune, India and M.S. in Aerospace Engineering from Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach FL. My research with BID4R lab at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University involves creating a robotic swarm platform with an initial goal of creating a proof-of-concept test arena for biologically inspired resilient systems
Automation Letters, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 7145–7152, 2021.[25] J. Hu, H. Li, and W. Chen, “A squid-inspired swimming robot using folding of origami,” The Journal of Engineering, vol. 2021, no. 10, pp. 630–639, 2021.[26] K. Zhang, C. Qiu, and J. S. Dai, “An extensible continuum robot with integrated origami parallel modules,” Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics, vol. 8, no. 3, p. 031010, 03 2016. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4031808[27] Y. Xu, Q. Peyron, J. Kim, and J. Burgner-Kahrs, “Design of lightweight and extensible tendon-driven continuum robots using origami patterns,” in 2021 IEEE 4th International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft), 2021, pp. 308–314.[28] D. Jeong and K. Lee, “Design and analysis of an
interests include miniaturized robots using Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems technologies and robot education for STEAM. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Investigating the Usefulness of Robots as Educational Resources in High School Science: Aiding Students to Obtain Measurement Data That Are Easy to Examine Using the Kalman FilterAbstract This study proposes a robot-based teaching tool with an integrated data acquisition andanalysis support system to facilitate the understanding of motion concepts in physics education.Since sensor noise might increase cognitive load and degrade conceptual understanding, thesystem applies Kalman filtering for automatic data correction in the
, academic advisorsjoin the class and the instructor-of-record to help students understand their degree plans, selectappropriate courses for the following semester, and plan their academic trajectory. The activeinvolvement of academic advisors ensures that students receive timely and relevant guidance,which is particularly important for those still uncertain about their major.One of the course’s unique features is its integration of faculty presentations from across the sixdepartments within the Southern Polytechnic College of Engineering and EngineeringTechnology without an increase in the effective workload of any faculty member. During theremaining twelve weeks of the course, students see presentations about the programs offeredwithin the
Foundations and Curriculum, Faculty of Education, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, 810222, Nigeria7 Africa Centre of Excellence on New Pedagogies in Engineering Education, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, 810222, Nigeria8 Multifunctional Materials Laboratory, Shell Office Complex, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, 810222, Nigeria Corresponding author*: David O. Obada (doobada@abu.edu.ng)AbstractThis article explores the effectiveness of integrating a modified jigsaw teaching approach withinthe framework of a new teaching pedagogy called CACPLA (Collaborate, Assessment,Communicate, Problem
Paper ID #46813Stakeholder-Informed Review of a First-Year Engineering Program ´Dr. Juan David Ortega Alvarez, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University ´ Juan David Ortega Alvarez is a Collegiate Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech and a Courtesy Affiliate Professor at Universidad EAFIT. He holds a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University and an M.S. in Process Engineering and Energy Technology from Hochschule Bremerhaven. With over 10 years of experience teaching undergraduate and graduate courses, Juan also
teaching-focused institution located in Pennsylvania,and the Greenway Institute, a non-profit focused on reimaging engineering education located inVermont. The Greenway Institute was recently recognized by the Central Vermont RegionalEconomic Development Corporation and the Central Vermont Regional Planning Commission atthe top of the Regional Project Prioritization List for 2025 for their engineering educationinitiatives. Elizabethtown College and the Greenway Institute established the Greenway Centerto pilot an innovative work-integrated learning engineering curriculum. During the pilotprogram, the students left their primary campus in Pennsylvania and spent the semester inVermont. The Greenway Center engaged in additional partnerships
differing attention. Additionally, case studymethodology involves in-depth examination of the phenomena, so both course material andinterviews, are needed for data collection. Lastly, the main- and sub-research questions wereinformed by Lattuca and Stark’s eight components of the curriculum (see Appendix C).Design: The design phase focused on finalizing the research design, which entailed scoping thestudy, determining the cases that will be studied, and determining the units of analysis for eachcase. Lattuca and Stark’s [18] framework was used to scope the study. The authors define anacademic program as a group of courses and experiences designed for a specific subset ofstudents [18]. In this study, an academic program is undergraduate BME, which
already so packed.” One student reflected on their experience saying“I don't know if this is standard in every school, but we have a class in middle school calledSTEM and you take it like an elective for a third of the year because that's how we do electivesin middle school. And I think it could be a good place to integrate, like, some, like, very simplecomputer science, like, principles and stuff because it's already, you know, science, technology,engineering, math, stuff like that. So I just think that could be a way to integrate it at an earlierage, but still when kids are old enough to understand it.”A CS Policy Could Promote Stability of CS ProgramsComputer science programs have been voluntarily developed by school districts across the
analyzes student choices to identify their learningpreferences according to the Felder-Silverman learning style model, and then uses thesepreferences to personalize STEM-related educational texts. The results of this work maysubstantially enhance the application of large language models in K-12 and post-secondaryscience education. In many instances the use of these models in education is discouraged, oftendue to concerns surrounding academic integrity. In response to these concerns, we discussstudent perceptions and the potential benefits and drawbacks of an LLM-poweredpersonalization framework. The hope is that this work will demonstrate the ways in which LLMscan support education by improving the accessibility of educational texts to diverse
offeringsin mobile robotics, computer vision, autonomous vehicles and artificial intelligence added in thefollowing decades. In the academic year 2013 -14 we modernized our by-design curriculum andin 2015 the name of the department was officially changed to Robotics and Control Engineering.The program is housed in a stand-alone department and graduates about 75 students per year,including our honors program.The curriculum is centered around the project-based-learning (PBL) paradigm (Fig. 1)– withnearly every course including hands-on lab experiences and an open-ended final project. Thecurriculum is structured as follows. ● Sophomore Year: Programming (Fall) and Mechatronics (Spring) gateway courses that provide the foundation for future PBL
Education Graduate Student Association and Black Graduate Student Association.Mr. Bruce Wellman, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Bruce Wellman is a National Board Certified Teacher (NBCT, Chemistry) who taught high school chemistry and engineering for 22 years. He is currently a doctoral student in the Engineering Education Department at Purdue UniversityDr. Morgan M Hynes, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Dr. Morgan Hynes is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University and Director of the FACE Lab research group at Purdue. In his research, Hynes explores the use of engineering to integrate academic subjects in K-12 cla ©American Society
) is a Ph.D. student at the Engineering Education Transformation Institute at the University of Georgia. Their research explores user experience and the transition of engineering students into the workforce.Dr. Lilianny Virguez, University of Florida Dr. Lilianny Virg¨uez is an engineering educator with extensive experience teaching first-year engineering students in large, multidisciplinary programs. Her research focuses on student motivation and academic persistence in engineering. Dr. Virg¨uez brings industry-informed insights to her teaching and curriculum development, drawing on her professional background in telecommunications. She holds a Ph.D. in Engineering Education and a Master’s degree in Management
Engineering Education, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 120–141, 2017.[5] P. W. Wickenden and R. K. Stobart, “Integrating Formula SAE with the Engineering Curriculum,” in SAE 2005 World Congress & Exhibition, SAE International, apr 2005.[6] D. Gallarta-S´aenz, J. Rico-Azagra, and M. Gil-Mart´ınez, “Learning Enhancement of Control Engineering: A Competition-Based Case,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 38240–38250, 2023.
Paper ID #47355Social Equity Perspectives in Transportation EducationMs. Binita Acharya, Colorado State University Binita Acharya is a Graduate Research Assistant and Master’s student in Construction Management at Colorado State University. She holds an undergraduate degree in Architecture and has professional experience in both the design and construction sectors. Her research focuses on integrating social equity and sustainability into construction and engineering educationDr. Rebecca A Atadero P.E., Colorado State University Rebecca Atadero is a professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at
1990s, the OECD (Organisation for EconomicCo-operation and Development) recommended that that “educational institutions…focus ondeveloping transferable, domain-general knowledge, skills and capabilities” [15, p. 3]. In the‘Learning Compass 2030’, released in 2019, the OECD broke from its previous stance “thattreated disciplinary knowledge as outmoded” [16, p. 473] by emphasizing that disciplinaryknowledge is “essential to knowing interdisciplinary knowledge” [16, p. 473]. The evolution inthe OECD’s recommendations was not surprising as it reflected a growing awareness thatintegration of CR into education is not simply a matter of figuring out an interdisciplinary—ortransdisciplinary—curriculum. Replacing the emphasis on the ‘generalist
Civil Engineer education. Students are prepared for leadershipchallenges by developing them in a curriculum incorporating leadership challenges throughoutthe program. Leadership levels and types of leadership learning vary from learning interpersonalskills to leading small and large teams. Delivery methods include guest speakers, hands-onlearning, capstone, and full-scale events with specific objectives. Multiple opportunities areprovided for personal leadership, group leadership, and team leadership. Leadershipresponsibilities and expectations are increased over time.Learning leadership is an iterative approach requiring multiple experiences at different levels[15]. This work explores leadership theory and practice in civil engineering
methods of engineering; introduce skills which are basic to engineering; and acquaintstudents with the interaction of skills, techniques, logic, ethical responsibility[2], and creativity inengineering problem formulation and solving. Although the curriculum is common, the actualschedule for each student is based on their incoming background and their anticipated major. Thescience and general education requirements are the same regardless of whether they enter the FirstYear Engineering Program or as a first-year student or as a transfer student. Upon the successfulcompletion of the first-year curriculum, students choose their major from any of the tendepartments or programs.First year students (and transfer students) also participate in an
Paper ID #47523Founding a New College of Engineering at Illinois State University: An Overviewof the Department of Electrical EngineeringDr. Umar Iqbal, Illinois State University Dr. Umar Iqbal is an Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering and a Founding Faculty Member of the College of Engineering at Illinois State University. He specializes in autonomous systems, multi-sensor integration, robotics, control, and intelligent navigation, with over 15 years of interdisciplinary experience. His research contributions include MEMS-based inertial systems, GNSS-challenged navigation, radar, LiDAR, and sensor fusion
:10.1080/09523987.2018.1512448Sullivan, P., & McCartney, H. (2017). Integrating 3D printing into an early childhood teacher preparation course: Reflections on practice. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 38(1), 39-51.Vaccarezza, M., & Papa, V. (2015). 3D printing: a valuable resource in human anatomy education. Anatomical Science International, 90(1), 64-65.Verner, I., & Merksamer, A. (2015). Digital Design and 3D Printing in Technology Teacher Education. Procedia CIRP, 36(Supplement C), 182-186.Yi, S., Park, H., & Lee, Y. (2016). Development of the TPACK-Based Curriculum with 3D Printer for Pre-service Teachers. The E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government
Processes, and Senior Design Project. As the Program Coordinator for Mechatronics Engineering Technology, he oversees curriculum development and student advisement within the program. Dr. Wilburn’s expertise includes Robotics, Automation, Mechanical Design, and Artificial Intelligence. He is passionate about advancing STEM education and creating industry partnerships. In addition to his teaching and coordination roles, Dr. Wilburn serves as Chair of the Appreciative Advising Committee and is an active member of various other university-wide committees. Committed to fostering innovation, he strives to equip students with the practical skills needed to address real-world challenges in engineering technology.Dr
–157, Apr. 2010, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01051.x.[11] E. Buckley et al., “An interdisciplinary approach to high school curriculum development: Swarming Powered by Neuroscience,” in 2022 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC), Princeton, NJ, USA: IEEE, Mar. 2022, pp. 1–8. doi: 10.1109/ISEC54952.2022.10025252.[12] A. L. Beck and E. J. Cha, “Board 44: Work-In-Progress: What Goes into an Engineering Decision: An Infrastructure Decision-Making Game for Exploratory Equity Learning,” presented at the 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2023. Accessed: Jan. 07, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/board-44-work-in-progress-what-goes- into-an-engineering-decision-an
Paper ID #46265Investigating the Impact of an Online Freehand Sketching and Spatial VisualizationIntervention on First-Year Engineering Students’ Skills and Cognitive DevelopmentDr. BURCU OZDEN, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Burcu Ozden holds a master’s degree in physics education as well as a doctorate in physics. She is currently an assistant professor at Penn State Abington. Her work focuses on defects, exciton-polaritons, radiation studies, engineering education, and the integration of sustainability in engineering.Dr. Sabahattin Gokhan Ozden, Penn State Abington Dr. Sabahattin Gokhan Ozden is an associate professor of
to Black and Latino male collegians’ success in engineering and related STEM fields,” ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2013.[11] X. Jiang, “Women in STEM: Ability, preference, and value,” Labour Economics, vol. 70, no. 101991, 2021.[12] E. A. Cech and T. J. Waidzunas, “Systemic inequalities for LGBTQ professionals in STEM,” Science Advances, vol. 7, no. 3, eabe0933, 2021.[13] L. Niu, “Family socioeconomic status and choice of STEM major in college: An analysis of a national sample,” College Student Journal, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 298-312, 2017.[14] S. L. Dika and M. M. D’Amico, “Early experiences and integration in the persistene of first-generation college students in STEM and non-STEM majors,” Journal of Research in