Civil, Coastal, & Environmental Engineering Department at the University of South Alabama ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Reflections from S-STEM Scholars: Relative Importance of Integrating Transfer Students into University Culture or College of Engineering CommunityThe LINK scholarship program supports low-income students transferring from communitycolleges to complete engineering degrees at the University of South Alabama, a regional four-year institution in the South. The program is in its sixth and final year, and has been successfulin launching its scholars into engineering careers. Over the course of the S-STEM grant, a totalof seventy-seven
, U: Undecided.3 At the start of the Fall 2024 semester, cohort 1 had 18 scholars. Before the semester finished, ascholar had dropped out of their degree to pursue entrepreneurial interests. Another scholar haddropped out of their degree before the start of the Spring 2025 semester due to not enjoyingengineering and wanted to pursue a non-educational career. [1]Summer Bridge ProgramThe SBP is a one-week residential program designed to help freshman scholars build a solidfoundation for their educational journey. Scholars were given brief introductions to the differentengineering departments, and informative sessions were held by on-campus resources such as theDisability Resource Center, Financial Aid and Scholarships, and the Counseling
organizations have been cultivated and built-upon; website andproject management improvements have been initiated; new resources are standards-aligned;new collection organizations have been established; and NSF RET’s were continually supportedthrough webinars and conference sessions.Poster FocusThis paper and poster will focus on how Teach Engineering is beginning to create a communityof practice among K-12 educators through PD opportunities. Research has shown that whether informal or informal settings, K-12 teachers and influencers need to be trained to bring engineeringdesign into classrooms to increase students’ awareness of engineering, and ultimately, interest inand ability to pursue engineering careers [1]. Yet, many successful mathematics and
around you [2],and attitudes, self-efficacy, and expectancy-value beliefs in a subject [7], [8].K-12 student learners have been shown to start building STEM identities as early as elementaryschool. At this critical time, students begin to see themselves as a science or STEM person anddevelop attitudes and interests toward futures and careers in STEM [2], [3]. It is important tosupport STEM identity and self-efficacy in students, and informal programs can help provideadditional opportunities for learning. Summer and afterschool programs offer K-12 students theopportunity to continue developing their STEM attitudes and interests while fostering STEM self-efficacy and career aspirations [5], [9-13]. These programs often lend themselves to smaller
trend of a more utilitarian outlook frompart-time students continues throughout the question. They had less of a desire to help others,make new discoveries in their field, and to conduct research than full-time students. Part-timestudents did, however, desire more knowledge and career advancement equally to their full-timecounterparts. They desired higher pay more than full-time students. These results showcase thefact that part-time students focus more on the usefulness of their master’s degree than theirpassion for the field.There are other characteristics worth noting as well. While higher pay was a significant drivingfactor for part-time students especially, poor economy/lack of available jobs was not. This couldbe in part due to the state
support the broader effort by qualitatively analyzing the experiences ofLatine/Hispanic TFF who have successfully navigated the pathway to the professoriate and arenow in the early stages of their professional careers. By better understanding how this populationbenefits students beyond what is formally required, we aim to indicate to colleges anduniversities the unique and meaningful support these professors offer their students. Our analysis finds that this population of engineering faculty, through their service andteaching, create and design spaces/programs that profoundly work to provide a foundation for theinclusion and retention of Latine/Hispanic students within their discipline. Additionally, theyprovide a crucial source of
another” [4]. Empathetic capacity allows engineers to understand the consumers orbusiness partners who are impacted by their designs, respond to the needs of communities, andcommunicate effectively. During the last two decades, many articles have been publishedpushing for more empathy in engineering [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. Some argue “that empathy…enables students to develop a nuanced critical understanding of the multiple perspectives whichcharacterize contemporary engineering problems” [10]. Facilitating an environment for studentsto develop empathetic skills allows them to more holistically understand the problems they willencounter in their careers. Literature also suggests that “empathy can support effectivecommunication and collaboration
influencing women’s participation and advancement in engineering. It addresses systemic challenges such as gender bias, workplace climate, stereotypes, work-life balance, and the role of role models and institutional policies, offering a comprehensive lens on the barriers and opportunities that shape women’s experiences in technical fields. • Socio-cognitive Factors. This category focuses on psychological and social processes affecting women in engineering, including identity development, self-efficacy, motivation, and sense of belonging. It highlights the critical role of these factors in shaping women’s experiences and outcomes in STEM education and careers. • Persistence. This category explores factors that
, retain, andsupport faculty of Color [6]. How faculty perceive their roles and responsibility in creatingequitable environments within academia, sometimes termed change readiness [7] contributes tothe slow pace at which representation has increased. For instance, faculty of Color, especiallyBlack, Latiné, Indigenous (BLI), and multiracial BLI faculty (BLI(M)) are often expected toshoulder the burden of creating change in ways that not only overburden them with service earlyin their careers when building their scholarship is what is most crucial but must also do so withina racially hostile environment that devalues their success and competence [8], [9]. They also1 The phrase “of Color” is often used ambiguously. This does not honor the unique
nonbinary students, ultimately contributing to their success in STEM fields.Project BackgroundLarger StudyIn summer of 2022, a team of six nonbinary graduate students and early career faculty, with thesupport of two engineering education faculty, conducted a qualitative study on nonbinary STEMindividuals’ social capital. Participants were recruited from a variety of online STEMcommunities such as LGBTQ+ focused social media websites (e.g., Ace in Stem Discord, 500+Queer Scientists Twitter’s page and Pride in STEM Twitter’s page), small and large professionalLGBTQ+ STEM societies (e.g., International Society of Nonbinary Scientists Twitter and Slack,oSTEM global Discord, Trans and Gender Nonconforming Fieldwork Alliance) and emailcommunities (e.g
Educa. Currently, I am developing a blended learning strategy to bring high-quality STEM education to remote and rural communities. This initiative aims to spark students’ interest in STEM subjects and careers, fostering local talent and opportunities. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 From Pilot to Practice: Expanding Remote STEM Education Across Remote Communities (Evaluation)AbstractFollowing the success of an initial pilot project aimed at addressing educational inequities in ruralareas through a blended remote learning approach, this paper presents the outcomes of its secondand expanded implementation across 11 remote schools in Latin America
promotion. The tenure andpromotion process in academia is complex and challenging, particularly for Black women, whoface unique structural and institutional barriers throughout the process related to race, gender,and intersectionality [1]-[3]. Throughout this journey, many Black women experiencemicroaggressions from faculty and students, invalidation of their research, and a devaluation oftheir service contributions. Thus, coaching has evolved into a proactive tool for career andleadership development and has gained momentum in both institutional settings, such asAAC&U’s Project Kaleidoscope’s STEM Leadership Institute and Office of UndergraduateSTEM Education’s Center for the Advancement of STEM Leaders. Coaching is designed toempower and
student mentors, starting with the 2024 summer cohort.1.2 Near-Peer Mentorship Between Undergraduate Students and K-12 StudentsMentorship experiences are known to play a crucial role in the professional development of STEMstudents, especially those from under-resourced school districts [25]. Effective mentorship canhelp keep such students in STEM, which can strengthen and diversify the future STEM workforce.Mentoring is often hierarchical [26], but may take different forms. Peer or near-peer mentorshipcan be defined as “mentoring relationships formed between individuals who are at approximatelythe same stage of career development” [25]. Mentors and mentees with shared identities andperspectives may find peer or near-peer mentoring particularly
content (e.g. economics, ethics) and skills (e.g. writing, oral presentations) that are usefuland necessary for both personal and professional development. However, students can often seethese courses as not useful or unrelated to their future careers. In this study, a first semestercourse in Civil Engineering was designed and delivered to make deliberate and clear theconnections between the general education portion of the curriculum and students’ future careersas civil engineers. An existing instrument was adapted to measure student aptitudes towardsdifferent skills and knowledge typically presented in general education courses and given to thestudent pre and post instruction, revealing statistically meaningful increases in the
’ perspectives on nature, particularly the incorporationof biology into engineering courses, which are often taught as electives. The insights,experiences, and beliefs they hold about this integration play a crucial role in shaping theircourse selection and career choices, ultimately influencing the future of innovation in both fields.Background & Literature ReviewStudents’ Perceptions of NatureStudents' perceptions of learning, encompassing their views on the process of acquiringknowledge, their self-assessed abilities, and the significance of education, can impact theirmotivation, engagement, and overall academic success [15-17]. A variety of factors, such aspersonal experiences, social dynamics, educational settings, and cultural norms, influence
al. [4] that incorporating dataanalytics and exposing students to real-world datasets improved their critical thinking. Moreimpressively, data science education encourages students to explore STEM careers and alsoprovides a strong foundation for further education and future employment opportunities asstudied by Marques et al. [5].Data Analytics in STEM EducationBrown et al. [6] integrated data analytics in engineering education to address technical require-ments from a multicomplex environment perspective concept using data analytics tools such asIBM Watson Analytics. The results obtained from a multi-complex environment have aided stu-dents and improved their decision approach to quantify data accuracy and project requirements.The
program that delivers high qualityeducation at an affordable price, and some students suggested shorter, topic-focused videos, moreproject-based learning, and fewer exams. They would like the program to be customizable to theircareer needs, with some expressing a preference for self-paced programs.Flexibility in scheduling, such as the ability to pause classes when they are busy and resume themlater, was noted as important. Additionally, students wanted timely support from professors andclarity about breaks between sessions. Some students are already satisfied with the existingcustomization and accessibility of the program and indicate that personal factors, like career goalsand financial support, will influence their decisions more than the
the G.I. Bill program. Academic program preferences for veteran studentshave important implications across an organizational field where attention has sharpened onstudent matriculation, persistence, and retention. Some student veterans may pursue anengineering degree while others may earn a two- or four-year engineering technology degree.Student veterans should be aware of differences in these degrees and the career opportunities ineach. Some may put their technical military experience to use in higher education, while othersmay pursue a radically different educational path. There are numerous activities and processesemployed both before student veterans arrive and during their time on campus to ensure they arepart of the campus community and
Paper ID #45968Engagement in Practice: A Case Study in Construction Engineering PracticumCourse at University ”X”Dr. Ronald W. Welch, The Citadel Ron Welch (P.E.) received his B.S. degree in Engineering Mechanics from the United States Military Academy in 1982. He received his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Civil Engineering from the University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana in 1990 and 1999, respectively. He taught at The United States Military Academy during his 25 year military career. After retiring form the military he has taught at the University of Texas at Tyler and The Citadel, where he was the Dean of Engineering for
combining the information they have to form perceptions of each major.Using these perceptions and their own desires for their future career, students then select anengineering major.Universities use different types of matriculation processes for students to enter a major, such asdirect matriculation into a major or a common first-year program with an application to a major.Additionally, not all universities use the same type of engineering major application process,where students may be automatically accepted by meeting certain criteria, applying to individualmajors separately, or even applying through a common application across all engineering majors.Because these processes differ, students traversing them may need supported in different ways
conscious self-perceptions, implicit measures are uniquely positioned toreveal internalized beliefs that may create tensions between students' engineering backgrounds andemerging researcher identities—tensions that could affect their integration into academicengineering communities and long-term career trajectories [13].The transition from undergraduate to doctoral engineering education presents unique identitychallenges that persist throughout graduate training [14], [15]. Even for students with strongundergraduate engineering identities, doctoral education requires developing new professionalself-concepts as students transition from consumers to generators of engineering knowledge [16].Recent empirical work demonstrates that EDS must integrate
to teaching, someheld administrative or curricular leadership roles within their departments. All professors showeda strong commitment to addressing systemic challenges related to the research-over-teachingculture of their institution and to participating in CoPs to address critical problems they identifiedin the courses they taught. Their varied yet overlapping identities and career paths provided anuanced view of how CoPs can foster innovation, mentorship, and professional development inresearch-intensive contexts.We collected data from multiple sources for this study: semi-structured interviews via an onlinevideo (8–10 pages transcripts) used as the primary data source and artifacts related to their TIPparticipation. Semi-structured
at syllabi from the last 40 years at different Universities. We exploredifferences in the material included in structures focused classes for both engineers andarchitects and discuss the potential implications of these separate trainings on their careers andcollaborations in the respective professions over time. While we acknowledge the reasons forseparating engineering and architecture education, we speculate on ways to integrate aspects ofbuilding structures education. By being critical of past pedagogies, we can make informedchanges in future teaching endeavorsCONTEXTIn our analysis, we consider the contexts of syllabi in coursework and briefly summarize howengineering and architecture professions split into their own disciplines. The
experiences. Traditional course delivery methods can besupplemented with visual and experiential tools such as augmented reality, virtual sitewalkthroughs, and 3D scanning demonstrations. Such methods improve student interest and aidin better retention of course material, as students connect theoretical knowledge to practicalapplications. For instance, the ability to visualize 2D plans in 3D using LiDAR fosters a deeperunderstanding of spatial relationships, which is critical for construction management. • Industry Feedback58% of professionals consider these technologies essential for career preparation, while 28%view them as helpful but not critical. Industry participants noted that familiarity with tools likeGPS and LiDAR significantly improves
Results - Themes Identified So far, the findings reveal that “street smarts” was a meaningful term to all of the alumni, and they consistently recognize its importance in their Explore Alumni Perspectives: careers—often valuing these skills over other kinds of smarts, including purely technical expertise. Below are the five most prominent themes Explore the potential value of researching alumni perspectives by discovering identified, but the rest are
' familiarity with these topics before and after using the resource.Approximately 500 students enrolled in the “Introduction to Engineering and Problem Solving” coursewill participate in the study. The students will be divided into two groups: Group A will have access toe-REF as a continuous resource throughout the semester, while Group B will receive similar instructionbut rely solely on materials provided through the learning management system. The surveys will assessthe students' knowledge of engineering documentation, literature review techniques, data management,and programming tools, as well as their interest in applying these skills to their career development.Ultimately, e-REF aims to provide students and engineering populations at large, with
Computing Education at the University of Cincinnati. His work examines the intersections of engineering, social justice, and critical pedagogies. He focuses on dismantling deficit ideologies in STEM, centering Latino/a/x student experiences—especially of those along the U.S.-Mexico border. His work draws on Chicana/o/x studies, raciolinguistics, and bilingual education to explore how language, race, and socialization shape engineering pathways and engineering practice. In 2025, Dr. Mejia received the Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) Award for his contributions to engineering education.Julio C Mendez, University of Illinois ChicagoLuis E Montero-Moguel, The University of Texas at San
. Dehghanian is the recipient of the 2015 IEEE-HKN Outstanding Young Professional Award, the 2021 Early Career Award from the Washington Academy of Sciences, and the 2022 George Washington University’s Early Career Researcher Award. In 2015 and 2016, Dr. Dehghanian was selected among the World’s Top 20 Young Scholars for Next Generation of Researchers in Electric Power Systems.Dr. Chung Hyuk Park, The George Washington University Dr. Chung Hyuk Park is an Associate Professor in the Department of Biomedical Engineering in the School of Engineering and Applied Science at The George Washington University (GW). He received his Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology in 2012 and M.S
experiences.Dr. Elif Miskioglu, Bucknell University Dr. Elif Miskioglu is an early-career engineering education scholar and educator. She holds a B.S. ˘ in Chemical Engineering (with Genetics minor) from Iowa State University, and an M.S. and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from Ohio State University. Her early Ph.D. work focused on the development of bacterial biosensors capable of screening pesticides for specifically targeting the malaria vector mosquito, Anopheles gambiae. As a result, her diverse background also includes experience in infectious disease and epidemiology, providing crucial exposure to the broader context of engineering problems and their subsequent solutions. These diverse experiences and a growing passion
[1] J. Cuseo, “‘Decided,’ ‘Undecided,’ and ‘In Transition’: Implications for AcademicAdvisement, Career Counseling, and Student Retention,” in Improving the First Year of College,Psychology Press, 2005, pp. 36–56. [Online]. Available:http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781410611864-7[2] C. A. Malgwi, M. A. Howe, and P. A. Burnaby, “Influences on Students’ Choice of CollegeMajor,” Journal of Education for Business, vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 275–282, May 2005, doi:10.3200/joeb.80.5.275-282.[3] D. Ghosh, S. Harford, H. Darabi, and J. Amos, “Board 315: Improving Students’ Decision-Making Behavior in Choosing an Engineering Pathway,” in ASEE Annual Conference andExposition, Conference Proceedings, Baltimore, United States, Jun. 2023.[4] Tran, Ashley Y