readings throughdifferent analytical lenses (such as epistemology, findings, consequences, citations, andparticipants). The course and its approach have been the subject of previous scholarship (see [18]and [19]).During the Autumn 2024 iteration of the course, which is the focus of this autoethnography, Iintroduced significant experimental elements that expanded student agency. Students not onlychose their own readings but also participated in selecting the analytical lenses through whichthey would examine the literature. To complement this enhanced student agency, I changed thecourse's reflection component to focus on broader cross-cutting "big ideas:" argument, genre,trustworthiness, significance, and ethics. This teaching context provides a
the responses to the 3 open-ended questions (we used an iterativeprocess to code the themes). We also analyzed the 34 applications in terms of the nature of theproject and how the budget was used.This study was conducted as part of a quality assurance and improvement evaluation of theELATE initiative and TLIF program and as per Article 2.5 of the Tri-Council Policy Statement :Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans [21], Research Ethics Board review was notrequired.Findings and discussionDetails on the TLIF projectsSince the inception of the TLIF program, 34 projects, including those in progress at the time ofwriting, have been funded. These 34 projects involved 32 different faculty members(approximately 20% of the Faculty’s academic
course curriculum, thus we aim to learn about this particular single-case and aimto “capture the complexity of the object of study” [31] as cited in [32]. This research is stillpreliminary research and a work-in-progress, so we present only high-level context andreflections of the case. Ethics approval is underway, but as it is not yet approved, at this time weare unable to provide student feedback. 4. Our Case Study and the Approach in Integrating EOP4.1 The Case Study: SUSE 300 Introduction to Sustainable SystemsIn this section, we present our case study (SUSE300) reflecting on our experience from its firstiteration in Winter 2024. As we implement the second iteration in Winter 2025, we aim toleverage this learning experience to improve the
, detailed inAppendix A, considered qualitative research design, including previous work on student sense ofbelonging [18], [19]. In this study, the qualitative questions complement the aforementionedquantitative questions, providing necessary context. All responses were analyzed for commonthemes to provide a deeper understanding of students’ perspectives.Survey AdministrationThe survey was created using Google Forms and was distributed to all EMPOWER programstudents through email. Participation in the survey was voluntary, and informed consent wasobtained at the beginning of the survey. The study was reviewed and approved by UC SanDiego’s Institutional Review Board (IRB), ensuring compliance with ethical guidelines forresearch involving human
. Instructors must balance the educational objectives of their programs withthe needs of the communities they serve while also considering equity issues when distributingresponsibilities among diverse student design teams. Interestingly, the instructors involved in thisresearch project have long been concerned about the ethical considerations surrounding thesustainability of course projects.In the early 2000s, instructors received external funding to establish a joint course collaborationwith a local university in Kenya. However, once the funding ended, it became impossible tosustain the partnership. In 2020, just before the pandemic began, a new partnership was formedwithout funding in order to explore ways to integrate students from a Kenyan
useof “everyday morality” is an extension of the “ethics” Lambek speaks to above, but it drawsattention to a specific set of “moral questioning and actions” that ethnographers can contributeinsights on through their ethnographic products, but not solve. The artifact-focused curriculumdesign presented here represents this line of thinking and anthropological engagement withengineering and related building processes. The AlaskaCraft game situates its creators andplayers in a design setting that requires seeking information from many sources to design homesappropriate to geographical and sociocultural contexts in remote Alaskan communities, whichvary widely across the region. The students who designed the game collaboratively researchedreal-world
©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Crafting Comprehensive Lab Reports: Techniques for Improved Technical Writing and Data Interpretation SkillsAbstractTeaching labs are a vital component of engineering education. They allow students to participatein all stages of experiential learning, beginning with conceptualization and exploration andprogressing to reflection, analysis, and data interpretation. Laboratories promote a variety ofabilities, including communication, knowledge, teamwork, ethics, and information acquisition,and they supplement lecture learning by improving students' understanding of theoretical topics.In addition, the importance of laboratories in engineering education is evident from two of
to leadership roles [7]. Similarly,minority groups face systemic obstacles, including cultural biases and a lack of role models,which hinder career progression [8]. As a result, as the construction sector becomes increasinglyglobalized and complex, the need for DEI has grown, not only for ethical reasons but also todrive innovation and problem-solving [9].To address these systemic issues, higher education institutions play a crucial role in shaping thefuture workforce of the construction industry. Many universities have implemented initiatives toaddress enrollment gaps and foster inclusive learning environments. For example, programsaimed at increasing minority student participation in STEM fields have improved retention andgraduation rates
. Third YearFor their third, and final phase, the VESA team plans to expand on the work they have alreadydone by collecting data on how VESA technologies have assisted the pilot study abroad programs.According to the VESA proposal, the group is going to “prioritize the use of this technology tofacilitate the establishment of lasting, ethical community relationships that will allow our studentsto contribute to community well-being year after year”, as per their third-year proposal. Due to thesuccessful nature of the VESA group in the past, the team hopes this final phase will benefitstudents learning by expanding access to intercultural learning, supporting ethical service learning,allowing faculty to gather media for advertisement purposes, and
certifies whethereducational programs adhere to established quality standards. Beyond serving as a qualityassurance mechanism, accreditation fosters continuous improvement, requiring institutions toregularly assess and enhance their programs. This cyclical process benefits students,institutions, and employers by ensuring the development of competencies that meet theexpectations of a competitive, globalized workforce [11], [12].In the context of engineering education, accreditation plays a pivotal role in ensuring thatgraduates possess the skills, knowledge, and ethical foundations required for professionalpractice. Programs accredited by bodies such as ABET are subject to rigorous scrutiny, withcriteria encompassing faculty credentials, curriculum
the year-long activities, including a week-long intense ‘GenCyber Summer Camp’ oncybersecurity, organized by Savannah State University’s Engineering Technology Department toprovide the participants with career counseling on cybersecurity and training in CybersecurityConcepts and Ethics through hands-on activities, guest lectures, and other professionaldevelopment presentations. Savannah State University has been organizing this camp since 2018(except 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic), and the funds for conducting the activities arebeing supported by the National Security Agency (NSA) and the National Science Foundation(NSF). The participants for the program are the middle school students from Savannah-ChathamCounty Public School System
align with engineering education and several ABET SOs, and hence the ABET-like terminology within the category questions.Since the adoption of the modern “1-7” Criteria 3 SOs, some engineering educators havedeveloped assessment methods based on internship experiences, mapping internship evaluationsto specific SOs. The Criteria 3 SOs are, in brief: (1) problem solving; (2) engineering design, (3)effective communication, (4) ethical responsibilities, (5) teamwork, (6) experimentation, datainterpretation and engineering judgment, and (7) the ability to acquire and apply newknowledge. An example is Ozis, et al, who mapped internship assessments to six of the sevennew SOs: (1-5) and (7) [14]. Their results demonstrate the impact that internships
initiative: Moving from ideation to implementation 10 Constraints in implementation of creativity and innovative ideas 11 Ethics in creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship 12 Assessing creativity 13 Creativity and leadership 14 Final Vision to Reality Semester Project presentations 15 Teaching and advancing creativity Table 1. Weekly course topics.This creativity course includes a variety of assignments and assessment mechanisms of varyingscope and scale. Two assignments constitute the largest portion of the total points for the course.The first is the Vision to Reality Semester Project which can be completed individually or with apartner and is worth 36% of the total
identificationof key factors in intercultural development. This dual approach allowed us to develop both broadunderstanding of patterns and deep insight into individual experiences.Several key measures were implemented to ensure research quality and ethical conductthroughout the study. Three coders analyzed the data independently to establish inter-raterreliability achieving an IRR of 93%, and member checking was conducted to verifyinterpretations. Regular peer debriefing sessions helped maintain objectivity in the analysis. Datacollected was anonymized, any personally identifiable information was removed, and savedsecurely in encrypted files on Box. These measures helped ensure both the ethical integrity of theresearch and the trustworthiness of our
multinational companies, obscuring the“sociopolitical implications, relevance, and ultimately, liberatory possibilities of teaching andlearning CS” [12, p. 27)] Unlike some K-12 and university coding education models, the codingworkshops studied here are framed within more nuanced conversations about equity and ethics intechnology, countering deficit discourses about marginalized learners and offering a vision ofcoding education grounded in “antiracism and justice” [12, p.36].One of the first inclusive pedagogy strategies we noticed was the relatively expansive view ofaccessibility held by coding workshop organizers and instructors. In our experience, traditionaluniversity software engineering education generally thinks of accessibility in terms
: Teamwork Project Management Research & Development CommunicationThese are the most important skill areas to the success of an engineer.Capstone I Course (ECE 4900)The course description for ECE 4900 is as follows:This course focuses on team-oriented design projects and technical writing by incorporatinggroup projects, oral presentations and written reports. Incorporates engineering standards andrealistic constraints including economic, environmental, sustainability, manufacturability,ethical, health and safety, social, and political. Emulates the problems encountered by engineersworking in commercial, industrial, and governmental entities.The Course Objectives for this course is as follows: Plan an engineering project
reminding the students inmechanical engineering that these were also important expectations and that theseshould be considered throughout the project to maintain the ethical integrity of our work.Lesson 3: The Role of Finite Element Analysis and review of material propertiesFinite Element Analysis (FEA) and a careful review of material properties proved to beboth an invaluable source of information as well as grounds for potential delays.Students discovered that FEA is essential for validating structural and material choicesbut also discovered that its complexity can sometimes result in delays that affect theproject's timeline. However, the accuracy and reliability of FEA ensured that the finalproduct met design criteria despite the considerable
construction disciplines: constructionmanagement, environmental, geotechnical, structural, transportation and water. A major goal isto introduce students to the breadth of civil and environmental engineering and constructionmanagement topics, and to acquaint students with new technology and innovations used in thesefields. Activities incorporate engineering ethics, design thinking, project management,teamwork, and communication. In addition, the course supports overall student learning throughthe use of metacognitive learning strategies, familiarization with university and collegeresources, and development of software skills.Certain phases of the engineering design process were featured heavily in the course activities.These included developing a
, community colleges, and universities. Dr. Linvill’s research is strategically designed to address organizational challenges and create novel solutions to those challenges. Her work has been presented at national and international conferences and has been published in The Routledge Handbook of Communication and Bullying and in Communication, relationships, and practices in virtual work (IGI Global). Dr. Linvill applies an organizational communication lens to her classes on Business Principles, Ethics, Negotiation and Decision Making, Organizational Behavior, and Organizational Leadership, and to Awareness Trainings related to destructive workplace behaviors presented at local high schools. Dr. Linvill is a Member of the
mentors, and their motivations and/or persistence. The first part of her career was spent designing residential split system HVAC equipment and Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) units for Trane in Tyler, TX. Kristin has taught about design, engineering, manufacturing, and ethics to students of all ages in various places, including to preschoolers via STEM outreach, to eighth graders in KatyISD at Beckendorff Junior High, and to freshmen mixed major undergraduates at UH and TAMU, and to senior ME undergraduates at TAMU. Her favorite topic for professional-level education of career engineers is engineering ethics, fulfilling requirements for most state PE licensing boards. She is enabled to connect with and support students with
only a small percentage of students attempted to use AItools for report writing in their project-based assignments. This has been an ongoing challenge,particularly with non-traditional assessments. However, further research is needed to gain abetter understanding of the ethical use of such tools in student assignments and assessments,including ethical use of AI-based tools as programming assistant.Another key observation was that student engagement with the course material, throughattending classes, participating in tutorials, and completing assignments on time, was closelylinked to their final grades. The context-based approach, practiced in class through step-by-stepproblem-solving with dedicated work time, is further reinforced through
ensurethoroughness and accuracy, which can be challenging for faculty members, especially for theResearch in Undergraduate Institutions (RUI) due to limited resources dedicated for training andlearning of research for undergraduate students. Meanwhile, faculty face significant constraintson time and resources when training novice researchers in literature review techniques toestablish best practices while upholding academic integrity and ethical research standards. AItools can enhance the traditional manual method by automating labor-intensive tasks such assearching, summarizing, categorizing and organizing information. This allows researchers tofocus more on how to critically analyze and synthesize the AI-generated literature review, ratherthan on tasks
increasing numerical representation [3]. While demographic diversityis important, this approach fails to address deeper structural barriers and power dynamics thatcreate hostile environments for marginalized students. Recent work by Rankin et al. [6], [7], [8],[9] reveals how traditional engineering classrooms can become "saturated sites of violence"where multiple forms of oppression converge to create hostile environments, particularly forBlack women. These sites include traditional classrooms, predominantly white institutions, andprofessional spaces like internships - all contexts where seemingly neutral educational practicescan perpetuate exclusion through interconnected systems of power.Riley et al. [2] propose an "ethic of care" framework that
readiness to adapt perspectives and behaviors.• Proficient: Demonstrating advanced intercultural skills, including the ability to navigate complex cultural contexts effectively and empathetically.To ensure reliability, two researchers independently coded the data, with discrepancies resolvedthrough discussion. This iterative process enhanced the validity of the findings by minimizingindividual coder bias.Quantitative survey data were analyzed using paired t-tests to assess pre- and post-semesterchanges in ICC and SOB scores. Correlation analyses were conducted to explore relationshipsbetween ICC dimensions and SOB outcomes.Ethical ConsiderationsThe study adhered to ethical research practices, including obtaining informed consent from
=aisel.aisnet.org/ukais2024/19&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=P DFCoverPages.[33] Callaghan, D. E., Graff, M. G., & Davies, J. (2013). Revealing all: misleading self-disclosure rates in laboratory-based online research. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(9), 690-694.[34] Simkin, M. G., & McLeod, A. (2010). Why do college students cheat?. Journal of business ethics, 94, 441-453.[35] Stone, A. (2023). Student perceptions of academic integrity: a qualitative study of understanding, consequences, and impact. Journal of Academic Ethics, 21(3), 357-375.
Center (AI3C) in the School ofEngineering at The Citadel Military College. The National Science Foundation (NSF) funded thecamp to broaden the participation of underrepresented minority girls in STEM. The goal was toinspire underrepresented minority middle school girls to close the STEM gap in South Carolinaby exposure to artificial intelligence (AI) and healthcare. In the summer of 2024, this camphosted 16 middle school girls and one high school volunteer from 12 schools across threeneighboring school districts in the Charleston area. A team of 11 professors, administrators, andvolunteers facilitated the camp.Campers responded positively to the culturally responsive curriculum. The curriculumhighlighted AI awareness and ethics, programming AI
, vision, values, and ethics, and serve as role models. 1b. Leaders are actively engaged in the development, implementation, and continuous improvement of the organization's management system. 1c. Leaders engage with customers, partners, and societal representatives. 1d. Leaders instill a culture of excellence within the organization. 1e. Leaders ensure that the organization stays adaptable, and handles change efficiently
. These interviews were audio recorded,transcribed verbatim, and conducted in accordance with ethical guidelines ap-proved by the University of Toronto Research Ethics Board (REB 42066). Stu-dents who participated in the interviews received a $25 Amazon gift card ascompensation for their time and contribution. The interviews were guided by a protocol grounded in three interrelated theo-retical frameworks: Barry Richmond’s Systems Thinking Process, the Opportu-nity Identification and Development Theory [17], and the Keen EntrepreneurialMindset Framework. Interview questions explored students’ understanding andconfidence in applying Systems Thinking tools, their team’s approach to prob-lem framing and exploration, and their process of
it opened in July and the CLT design of the building itself into appropriate2007. The original bridge on opening day in 1940 is shown in coursework. The Timber History Display has been integratedFigure 10, and the two newer bridges are shown in Figure 11. into ME Senior Capstone Design and content from the Tacoma Narrows Bridge Display into both Engineering Ethics and ME Senior Capstone Design. As the second display has just been completed in early spring 2025, it is anticipated
justice-driven deliberation methods of ancient SouthAsia and African discourse traditions of fairness. Embracing playful andcollaborative learning, it helps faculty use inclusive approaches, enabling studentsto learn from different knowledge systems and apply knowledge in their owndiverse lifeworlds. It uses inquiry-based teaching that seeks out divergent andcreative thinking14. Finally, it uses innovation as the fourth leg of ourmethodology, defining it not as simple novelty but creativity with purpose,connecting purpose with diversity and equity, inclusion and justice that help tomake the world a better place for all. The use of AI to enhance DEI outcomesrequires critical and ethical questioning, even as we seek to harness its vast andemerging