Asee peer logo
Displaying results 451 - 480 of 551 in total
Conference Session
Software Engineering Division (SWED) Technical Session 2
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ingrid Buckley, Florida Gulf Coast University; Bogdan Carbunar, Florida International University; Juan P Sotomayor, Florida International University; Peter J Clarke, Florida International University
Tagged Divisions
Software Engineering Division (SWED)
. Additionally, Dr. Buckley has authored and co-authored several peer-reviewed conference and journal papers, contributing to research in pedagogy.Bogdan Carbunar, Florida International University Bogdan Carbunar is an Associate Professor in the Knight Foundation School of Computing and Information Sciences at FIU, and directs the Cyber Security and Privacy Research (CaSPR) Lab, where he develops secure and usable systems. His research interests are at the intersection of security, privacy, and distributed systems, where he derives novel insights through the use of machine learning, applied cryptography, and user studies. He holds a PhD in computer science from Purdue UniversityDr. Juan P Sotomayor, Florida International
Conference Session
Empowering Pre-College Students through AI and Computer Science: Standards, Self-Efficacy, and Social Impact
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Shana Lee McAlexander, Duke University; George Delagrammatikas, Duke University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)
tools, machining, circuits/breadboards/soldering,microcontrollers, and instrumentation (i.e., thermocouples, pressure transducers). Andprofessional skills or project experience with: report writing, oral presentations, statisticalanalysis of data, problem identification/problem formulation, creative ideation of designalternatives, project management tools (i.e., Gantt chart, Kanban board), research literaturereview, conflict resolution, time management, website creation. Within the pre/post programevaluation survey students about their interest in science and engineering, what they know aboutengineering careers, and if they see themselves pursuing engineering in school or jobs as seen inTable IV. A subset of survey items were repurposed from
Conference Session
ECE-Cybersecurity and Quantum Technology Education
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sandip Das, Kennesaw State University; Benjamin Klein, Kennesaw State University; Seung Joon Paik, Georgia Institute of Technology; A. Bruno Frazier, Georgia Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Electrical and Computer Engineering Division (ECE)
Paper ID #48438Preparing Fab-skilled Engineers for the U.S. Chip Industry Through Hands-onIntegrated Circuit FabricationDr. Sandip Das, Kennesaw State University Sandip Das is an Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Kennesaw State University, GA, USA. Dr. Das received his Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from University of South Carolina, Columbia, in 2014. He has 15+ years of research experience in semiconductor materials and devices. Dr. Das has authored more than 35 peer-reviewed journal articles and conference proceedings, and has authored two book chapters. He has served as a PI/Co-PI for various
Conference Session
Engineering Education in Colonial and Local Contexts (Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division ECSJ Technical Session 8)
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ashish Agrawal, Rochester Institute of Technology (CET); Sarah Aileen Brownell, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE)
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY), Equity
class upbringing as well as a decadeworking with community groups in northern Haiti on ecological sanitation projects. As a white,cisgender, straight-presenting, US trained engineering professor with the associated privilegesafforded and potential biases, she is working to learn from colleagues and students holding otherintersectional identities about their experience of engineering culture in an effort to expand bothits welcome and self-critique. Her motivation for creating the class was to create space fordiscussion, reflection, and peer to peer co-learning around engineering and social justice issues -something that would have helped her thrive as a female engineering student. 3. Course Description Following a faculty learning circle
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division (FPD) Technical Session 3: Session 3: Curriculum in Motion - Redesigning the First-Year Experience
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ivan E. Esparragoza, Pennsylvania State University; Abbie Canale, Pennsylvania State University; Erin A Hostetler, The Pennsylvania State University; Bradley J. Sottile, The Pennsylvania State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs Division (FPD)
-economic disparities, inadequate K-12 preparation, and social isolation[8-9]. Studies have shown that these students often experience lower self-efficacy and a weakersense of belonging, which can negatively impact their persistence in engineering programs [10-11]. According to researchers, well-structured first-year seminar courses permit students toexperience a better transition from high school to college, understanding the new expectationsand work demands, developing time-management and study skills, particularly for students atrisk [12]. Besides, small group seminars facilitate the interaction with faculty and peers creatinga community of support leading to a better outcome of persistence and performance [13]. First-year seminars offer also an
Conference Session
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES) Technical Session 8: Communication and Liberal Education
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Shazib Z Vijlee, University of Portland; Stephanie Anne Salomone, University of Portland; Andrew Guest, University of Portland
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)
groups showed increased curiosity in Faith & Ethics and Aesthetics & Creativity.While engineering students maintained higher overall curiosity in Science & Problem Solvingcompared to their peers, and non-engineering students showed higher curiosity in Diversity & TheCommon Good, both groups demonstrated similar growth patterns in humanities-oriented domains.This suggests that while students may enter college thinking they are primarily curious aboutspecific disciplinary interests, their intellectual curiosity can expand into new domains during theirfirst semester. 1.8 Non-EGR Students - Start of Term
Conference Session
Interrogating Race, Caste, and Power (Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division ECSJ Technical Session 4)
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Stephen Secules, Florida International University; Atota Bedane Halkiyo, Florida International University; Maimuna Begum Kali, Florida International University; Nivedita Kumar, Florida International University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY), Equity
racial diversity decreases, and thefact that between high school and graduate school or the profession the racial diversity of theengineering field decreases [4], then we can presume that undergraduate engineering educationcontributes to racial inequity. Although many aspects coincide within undergraduate engineeringeducation, including advising, finances, curriculum, pedagogy, grading, peer groups, etc., we canpresume that classroom practice constitutes a bulk of student lives and therefore is a primaryplace we may expect to find mechanisms of racial inequity.Methodologically, classroom observations through ethnography or video research are theprimary tools for investigating classroom practice and interaction as mechanisms of inequity.While
Conference Session
ME Division Technical Session 2 - Harnessing AI and Machine Learning to Transform ME Education
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jason Daniel Christopher, U.S. Air Force Academy; Vincent Italo Bongioanni, United States Air Force Academy; Lauren V Scharff, U.S. Air Force Academy
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH)
policy for AI, it is relevant to share the boundaries bywhich this course approached using AI on assignments. In line with the university and departmentpolicies, this course allowed AI on homework and laboratory assignments while requiringstudents to document its usage consistent with receiving help from another resource (such as helpfrom a classmate). Each assignment type has unique limitations. Quizzes and tests, for instance,are individual effort so no outside help is authorized. Homework and laboratory write upsauthorize help from other students, but the work must be primarily that of the submitter. Thus werequire students to specifically state what they received help on for a given problem (e.g. helpwith a particular stein a problem, how to
Conference Session
Computers in Education Division (COED) Best of CoED Paper Session (Track 1.B)
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jean Louis, University of Florida; Nadia Simone Jean Morrow, University of Florida; Juan E Gilbert, University of Florida
Tagged Divisions
Computers in Education Division (COED)
-projects were designed to re-inforce active learning, enabling students to engage with the material through practical exercises.For instance, during the week on circuits and sensors, students built a light-dependent circuit. Thisapproach not only deepened students’ understanding of the current week’s IoT concept but also in-troduced skills that would be valuable in their semester projects and future personal IoT endeavors.A further example of a mini-project involved learning to read and write digital and analog valuesin a microcontroller, demonstrating the practical application of IoT concepts.This was a project-based class, but a few knowledge quizzes were given to test certain concepts,such as definitions, formulas, or engineering scenarios
Conference Session
DSAI Technical Session 7: Natural Language Processing and LLM Applications
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Alexis Frias, University of California Merced; Shrivaikunth Krishnakumar, San Jose State University; Ayush Pandey, University of California Merced
Tagged Divisions
Data Science and Artificial Intelligence (DSAI) Constituent Committee
’ interests and can lead to an increase in student engagementand agency.Recent innovations aim to address these limitations by integrating ML and NLP technologies intoautograding systems. These advancements enable tools to assess nuanced aspects of code, suchas design patterns, code readability, and logical structure [4]. For instance, ML models can ana-lyze code comments and programming styles to provide more personalized and detailed feedback.These systems balance the efficiency of automation with the depth of personalized evaluation,particularly for open-ended and creative assignments [5]. Furthermore, peer grading systems andML-based similarity detection are being explored to handle diverse outputs in open-ended projects.These innovations hold
Conference Session
Inclusive and Reflective Practices in Pre-College Engineering Education
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Robert Hayes, Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach; Jennifer Cross, Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach; Elissa Milto, Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)
same access to STEM as their typically developing peers,specifically, as discussed in this paper, access to computational thinking and robotics. We reporton the co-design of technologies for Opportunities for Robotics, Building, and InnovativeTechnology (ORBIT), an educational robotics program for autistic middle school studentsdesigned to integrate learning computational thinking (CT) practices with executive functioning(EF) skills. The program includes a computer coding component and several student-facingscaffolds. We are developing this program through a research-practice partnership betweenresearchers at a private northeastern university and practitioners at a local public school within asub-separate, special education program designed
Conference Session
Shaping Inclusive STEM Curriculum and Teacher Development for K-12 Education
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Krista Dulany Chisholm, University of Florida; Sarah Louise Langham, University of Florida; Kassandra Fernandez, University of Florida; Nancy Ruzycki, University of Florida
Tagged Divisions
Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)
equitable teaching practices and encouraged student agency to ensure positive learning outcomes. Their first year of PhD research focused on undergraduate student perceptions of social responsibility in STEMM, with special emphasis on science communication and policy advocacy, as well as the intersection of institutional culture and transformational change towards cultivating more inclusive and equitable access for underrepresented STEMM students. They are currently exploring undergraduate perceptions of STEM mentorship within student organizations and near-peer mentorship between undergraduate student mentors and K-12 student mentees within educational out-of-school time STEM programs. Outside of their research, they
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division (FPD) Technical Session 5: Supporting Student Transition
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kathryn Hasz; Jessica Lavorata, Carthage College
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs Division (FPD)
design firsthand, fostering a deeperappreciation for the importance of integrating diverse perspectives and disciplines inproblem-solving.This paper describes the redesign of the Introduction to Engineering Design course for Fall 2024.The structure and rationale of the course design is discussed, including the integration of theEOP Framework and an assessment method based on writing engineering memos. Results of anIRB approved (Protocol 2232887-1) survey taken at the beginning and end of the semester arealso included. The goal of the survey was to assess how the students’ understanding of theinterconnected nature of design decisions, especially in terms of how sustainability encompassesmore than just environmental concerns, evolved throughout
Conference Session
ERM Technical Session: Methods in Graduate Education
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Malini Josiam, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education; Olivia Ryan, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Varun Sridhar, Independent Researcher
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)
, collaborating/working on a team 6 research Conducting theory, practice, critiquing, writing, presenting 18 Development of content, assessment, pedagogy, EngE teaching research driven teaching 16 other Did not fit into an identified category 7Of the 67 POs, 34 (50%) focused on research or teaching. 21 POs (31%) were in the categoriesof career, DEI, engineering expertise, engineering education issues, and professionaldevelopment.The remaining 13 POs (19%) were not neatly categorized, as we disagreed on the category (6),or the POs did not fit into an identified
Conference Session
Inclusive and Interdisciplinary Approaches in Labs and Research
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Felipe Anaya, The University of Kansas; Claudia J. Bode, The University of Kansas; Kent Smith, The University of Kansas; Mark B Shiflett P.E., The University of Kansas
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering Division (ChED)
included their research experience, fieldof study, or the life events that led them to this program. Student choices of topic were diverse,and some created multiple story spines. Most students wrote about the life events that led them tothis program, with many others writing additional story lines about their love of science, thesummer research experience, or aspects of their research project.The incubators were intended to foster a low-stake space for experimenting and practicing.Students had fun creating narratives about familiar topics, while also practicing and developingskills for effective communication. Additionally, students shared their work with each otherduring the incubator sessions helping them to learn from everyone’s experiences
Conference Session
Student Success and Support Mechanisms in Engineering Education
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jemal Bedane Halkiyo, Arizona State University; Abdisa Bedane Halkiyu, Bule Hora University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
to the absence of immediate feedback from instructors and peers, making the understandingof demographic influences on self-regulated learning essential for recognizing the specificchallenges diverse learners face. Additionally, Tinto’s Model of Student Retention underscoresthe significance of institutional support and personal commitments in influencing students’academic persistence [10]. This model is especially pertinent when considering the timemanagement challenges experienced by students from various demographic backgrounds, asminority students frequently encounter unique pressures related to cultural expectations andresponsibilities, complicating their capacity to allocate time for academic pursuits [11]. Bysituating this research
Conference Session
WiP: Gen AI, Mixed Reality, and Simulations
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Keisha C.A. Antoine, Prairie View A&M University (DUPE); Kazeem B Olanrewaju, Prairie View A&M University; Justin Foreman, Prairie View A&M University; Penrose Cofie, Prairie View A&M University; Michael Preuss, Exquiri Consulting, LLC; Jorge Federico Gabitto, Prairie View A&M University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering Division (ChED)
dealt with this issue. In thePrairie View A&M University (PVAMU) Chemical Engineering Department (CHEG), studentswere provided with videos of the instructors describing and displaying lab equipment andperforming the lab experiments for the course. Representative data for the experiments wereprovided to the students for their analysis and they were asked to combine what they learned fromthe video and their analysis of data to write lab reports. While an effective approach under thecircumstances, it lacked the first-person, immersive experience that is crucial to developing deeperknowledge and understanding (Bonasio, 2019). This deficit was an instructional limitation as wasfaculty lack of videography expertise which made the remote
Conference Session
Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI) Technical Session 4
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Wiline M Pangle, Central Michigan University; Itzel Marquez, Central Michigan University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI)
. She has worked extensively with K-12 educators around the Great Lakes area and had led inquiry-based teacher workshops on Beaver Island at CMU’s Biological Station. She is the co-author of two books, one that explores the intersection of science and writing, the other interdisciplinary teaching approaches. She has received prestigious grants and fellowships, such as the American Association of University Women International Fellowship, for her doctoral work carried out in Kenya on spotted hyena behavior.Itzel Marquez, Central Michigan University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Lowering barriers for marginalized students through equitable multidisciplinary
Conference Session
Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI) Technical Session 9
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Carolyn M Rodak, Union College; Luke Dosiek, Union College; Andrew Burkett, Union College; Christine Henseler, Union College; Christopher Chandler, Union College; Sohini Chattopadhyay, Union College; Nick Webb, Union College
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI)
ofSTS from a range of faculty perspectives. (2) To explore key STS texts by writing argumentativeessays and completing project-based assignments that engage in basic ways with secondarycriticism, theory, and/or history, etc. (3) To practice course discussion skills in the classroomthrough a seminar-style format. (4) To address contemporary and emerging societal challengespresented by a range of developments in various forms and fields of technology and science,while also probing the historical, philosophical, material, and theoretical backgrounds andtrajectories of such global challenges. (5) To give a formal presentation on and write/create afinal paper/project at the end of the term that explores objectives 1, 2, and/or 4 above. Studentsare
Conference Session
ENT-8: Mentorship, Creativity, and Ethics in Academic Entrepreneurship
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nathalie Duval-Couetil, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Voichita Maria Dadarlat; Yi Wang, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division (ENT)
conflicts of interest affectingacademic researchers. First, there continues to be a significant push to get more graduate studentsinvolved in technology commercialization through university-based initiatives or nationalprograms such as the NSF’s I-Corps. Second, in a class we teach on technology entrepreneurshipand research translation (see Duval-Couetil, Ladisch, et al., 2021), we observed that graduatestudents had limited awareness of potential conflicts that can occur when engaging inentrepreneurial activity.Each year, students in this course attend a lecture on COIs relevant to academicentrepreneurship, presented by an administrator from our university’s Office of Research. Afterthe last lecture, we asked students to reply in writing to the
Conference Session
Innovative Approaches to Biomedical Engineering Education
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ashley R Taylor, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Kinsley Tate, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Andre Albert Muelenaer Jr, Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Tech; LaDeidra Monet Roberts, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Christopher Arena, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Sara L Arena, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Biomedical Engineering Division (BED)
is a practical underpinning forconsidering curricular revisions across curricular levels (e.g., course, multiple courses, or project).Figure 1. Elements from Lattuca and Stark’s [23] Academic Plan Model were used as a theoreticalunderpinning for our study.Biomedical Engineering Program ContextOur program context is the undergraduate BME program at an R1 institution in the southeasternUnited States. Our ABET-accredited BME program was newly established in 2018, with the firstcohort of undergraduates graduating in May 2022. At the time of writing, our BME programcurrently enrolls ~250 undergraduate students seeking a B.S. in BME, with an additional ~80students pursuing a minor in BME. For over two years, faculty across the tenure and
Conference Session
ENT-5: Pathways for Developing Entrepreneurial Skills Across Educational Levels
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Irene Reizman, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Maysam Nezafati, Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering at Georgia Tech & Emory University; Michelle Marincel Payne, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Liping Liu, Lawrence Technological University; Mary Lauren Benton, Baylor University; Blake Everett Johnson, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Mitchel Daniel, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Jonathan Rylander, Baylor University
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division (ENT)
. ● Use concept mapping to help identify open questions in your research project and collect information needed to understand your research opportunity. ● Identify key stakeholders for your research project and describe the interests of those stakeholders. 2. Thriving in a ● Describe the importance of using SMART goals to be able to answer your Research Environment research question and make connections between your research and the interests of stakeholders. ● Practice writing SMART goals for next steps in your research. ● Prepare a goal-setting plan that
Conference Session
Mechanics Division (MECHS) Technical Session 2
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Anthony Battistini, Angelo State University; Mohammad Shafinul Haque, Angelo State University; William A Kitch P.E., Angelo State University; Soyoon Kum, Angelo State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Mechanics Division (MECHS)
ofcompleting assignments during lab hours. As a result, students can approach the assignedproblems at their own pace. During the lab session, students engage with the problems anddiscuss their solutions with peers, sharing thoughts on problem-solving strategies. Some studentstake on teaching roles, which reinforces their understanding of concepts. In hands-on activitysessions, they exchange a variety of ideas related to the assigned problems. A tangible hands-onmodel allows them to demonstrate different static conditions, often leading to those enlightening“aha” moments with the models. Overall, students enjoy lab sessions and make the most of themto succeed in Statics class. Some students hesitate to attend office hours or SI sessions due totime
Conference Session
Innovative Approaches to Biomedical Engineering Education
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lindsay Tolchin, The Ohio State University; Rachel C Childers, The Ohio State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Biomedical Engineering Division (BED)
careershave a stronger purpose in life [11]. In a university engineering setting however, this could provechallenging for undergraduates whose end goal is to work in industry as many faculty have onlyknown academia, and lack industry experience. Kirschenman writes “Engineering is aloneamong professional careers that try to educate future professionals with people that are notproficient in the practical side of the profession” [12]. Therefore, it is imperative thatundergraduate students are connected with professionals who have the real-world, hands-onexperience in the workforce that they hope to pursue in the future. Particularly in an engineeringfield, mentoring is a high impact practice that can assist students in reaching the next stages oftheir
Conference Session
Computers in Education Division (COED) Track 6.D
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Shana Shaw, Texas A&M University; L. Taylor Starr, Texas A&M University; laila badran, Texas A&M University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Computers in Education Division (COED)
industry soft skills in engineering” • “AI use in engineering classes” • AI AND “measuring engineering soft skills” • engineering AND (“academia-to-industry readiness gap” OR “industry readiness gap”) • “impact of using AI to teach engineering undergraduates industry skills” • “undergraduate engineering curriculum using generative AI” Table 1. Search Criteria In screening the articles reviewed in the general search, specifics were looked forinvolving a combination of engineering, AI, professional skills, and the assessment of these skillsin engineering curricula while emphasizing criteria such as scientific rigor, peer reviewedarticles, and impact factor
Conference Session
Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI) Technical Session 3
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Joshua L. Hertz, Northeastern University
Tagged Divisions
Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI)
“general” engineering) provides opportunities and risks. Forexample, program graduates may be—or may be perceived to be—better able to fulfill the ABETstudent outcome B5, “…understand ethical and professional responsibilities and the impact oftechnical and/or scientific solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts”yet less able to fulfill outcome B1, “…applying knowledge of mathematics and science and/ortechnical topics to areas relevant to the discipline”. The first cohort of students in the programare currently in their fourth year of study. In this paper, the author (who is external to the institution being studied) will firstoverview the department’s curriculum and compare it to the most relevant peer programs
Conference Session
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES) Technical Session 9: Collaboration and Community
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Todd Nicewonger, Virginia Tech; Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Tech
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)
addition, one of our primary goals is to support and engage in the co-creation of artifacts,collaborating with participants to transform data into practical tools and resources, such asdesigning homes with diverse stakeholders. This method emphasizes producing tangibleoutcomes that reflect participants’ lived experiences and aspirations. On the other hand,immersive approaches of observing participants’ environments and social realities in real timecapture moments that cannot be reproduced, contrasting with objectivist research paradigmsfocused on replicability (Lederman 2023). The significance of these different orientationstowards research is explained by the anthropologist Rena Lederman who writes: Being with people wherever they actually
Conference Session
ECE-Outreach and Engagement Strategies for Inspiring Future Engineers
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Angela Luojia Zhang, Basis San Antonio - Shavano Campus; Michael Frye, University of the Incarnate Word
Tagged Divisions
Electrical and Computer Engineering Division (ECE)
5-10 hours 10-15 hours Other: (Please fill in .)These four questions, SQ5 – SQ8, evaluate the team's efforts during and outside the competitionseason. Since the FTC program aims to strengthen community impact, the survey also examinesthe team's involvement in outreach activities.SQ9: Does your team have training sessions on the following topics? Encoder Odometry Camera/image processing Programming CAD CNC Control Presentation Safety Collaboration Documenting Other : (Please list ) If you have multiple training sessions on a topic, please write the number of
Conference Session
Biological and Agricultural Engineering Division (BAE) Technical Session 1
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Woongbin Park, Purdue University; Yunjin Lim, Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation; Jung Han, Purdue University; Hyeree Cho, Purdue University; Seokyoung Kwon; Juhyun Kim, Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education
Tagged Divisions
Biological and Agricultural Engineering Division (BAE)
▪ Hardware and software troubleshooting 14-15 ▪ Troubleshooting (problem-solving; 8 ▪ Analysis of problems and discussion of adjusting the software and hardware) improvements 16 ▪ Presentation and peer evaluation The program was structured differently for middle and high school students according tolevels of achievement (Table I). The middle school program consisted of 16 lessons, which wasroughly double the time required for the high school program. This was because high schoolstudents had prior knowledge of physical computing and did not require additional learning onmicrocontrollers, resulting in shorter lesson times. Both programs began with an introduction tosmart farming, and the hardware
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session II
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Alexander John De Rosa, University of Delaware; Teri Kristine Reed, The University of Oklahoma Polytechnic Institute; Samuel Van Horne, University of Delaware
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
[18,19] based on the knowledge transfer frameworkof Belenky and Nokes [20,21]. Multiple investigators conducted the interviews and analyzed theresulting data before peer debriefing within the project team was used to develop and integratethe resulting themes and discuss patterns in the data.These first three implementations of the think aloud protocol and problem solving activity arefurther detailed in [10-12]. A summary of the major findings of these activities is as follows: ●​ Across all implementations, only one UG student was able to correctly solve the problem without any additional help or prompting. ●​ The accuracy and completeness of the prior knowledge required to solve the problem appeared to differ significantly