University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Exploring Undergraduates' Experiences of a Two-Day Quantum Summer SchoolIntroduction Quantum mechanics and engineering. Perhaps a combination of disciplines sounds likean output from a machine selecting STEM fields at random, but one would be mistaken to thinkthis. Quantum mechanics is in fact foundational in engineering fields such as semiconductors,material science, and nanotechnology [1]. Quantum computing also receives quite a bit ofattention, as it is seen as a definite part of the future of computer science [2]-[5]. On quantumcomputing in particular, MIT writes that quantum computing is no longer an interest
international student access to emerging technologies. She is a certified OSCQR Trainer as well as being Creative Commons certified. She has been a founding member of the SUNY OER Advisory Board as well as a Campus Lead. Nicole is also a faculty development trainer in AI Technology.Dr. Shyam Sharma, Stony Brook University Associate Professor and Graduate Program Director in the Program in Writing and Rhetoric at Stony Brook University. Sharma’s scholarship and teaching focus on issues of language and language policy/politics, cross-cultural rhetoric and communication, international students and education, and the use of new media in education. It Takes a Village: A Collaborative Online Game Supporting Inclusive
learning is properlydesigned to emphasize the aspects of engineering content, pedagogy, curriculum, and assessmentthat e4usa thinks is essential and documents that.e4usa provides hands-on, collaborative learning experiences that prepare teachers to successfullysupport their students in using the e4usa curriculum, developing technical knowledge and skills,and creatively solving realistic problems with their peers. All of e4usa’s professional learningoptions ensure that teachers are well-prepared and supported throughout the program.Teachers, Students, ImpactSince its inception in the 2019-2020 academic year, e4usa has seen over 7700 students and 100teachers complete the program. Student projects have impacted the Nashville Zoo, communitieslocal to
a capstone course?Data CollectionThroughout the capstone course, students recorded themselves speaking based on reflectionprompts. Spoken reflections were chosen to gain an understanding of students’ in-the-momentthoughts without editing. They can be completed quickly and can be easier for students whostruggle with writing. Students were required to complete the reflections to receive pointstowards their grades, but they chose whether or not to consent to have their data used forresearch. The instructor was not informed of their choice to consent for research, and this choicedid not impact their grades. Eleven students declined to participate in the study and sevenstudents who consented to participate did not submit the first reflection
commercialcluster area approximately 1.5 miles to the west along US Route 11 (figure 1) [11]. Figure 1. US Route 11 – Identified Area of Needs in the Town of Potsdam Comprehensive Plan [9]With the approval of the Town’s Comprehensive Plan in late 2020 [12], the Health Imitativesponsored C3G to do an initial data collection project in the summer of 2021 in this zone(inclusive of physical surveying and facilities/asset identification). This was followed by asubsequent C3G project to execute a “Complete Street Study” [13] that included “PublicEngagement and Study Options Development” which included public surveys, engaging inlistening sessions, a national level peer review, and a dedicated public workshop
activities tofurther engage students. For instance, a VLSI club was established, serving as a platform forstudent interaction and collaboration. The team also awarded scholarships to outstandingstudents, attracting more qualified individuals to pursue careers in this field. Furthermore, amentoring program is underway, designed to connect industry engineers with students forprofessional training.In this article, the authors aim to share their experiences and insights with peer researchers andeducators regarding curriculum revamping and VLSI tapeout project design.2. Curriculum RevampingThis work-in-progress project is targeting at developing new courses and enhancing existingcourses to equip students at Electrical and Computer Engineering department
breaks. Strategies such as peer mentoring, where more experienced studentsguide less confident students, or online resources that allow self-paced review of key conceptscould help reduce anxiety and improve confidence. By addressing the disparities in priortraining, engineering programs can create more inclusive learning experiences that enable allstudents to succeed.Teaching ModalityThe online and evening format was widely appreciated for its flexibility, allowing students tobalance work, family, and academic commitments. "Being online is the only way for me to becalm and be able to pay full attention in class. It favors me a lot" (Student 5, Interview 2). Thisflexibility is a significant benefit for nontraditional learners, who often face
problems. They emphasized a preference for teaching styles whereinstructors work through problems step-by-step, taking the time to slow down and providethorough explanations, rather than simply reading from slides. Students also wanted instructorsto avoid assuming prior knowledge and to ensure that they clearly explain concepts from theground up. There was a strong desire for more collaborative problem-solving in class, withplenty of opportunities for students to ask questions and work together with peers. Otherrecommendations included improving the pacing of both lectures and tutorials to prevent rushingthrough material, offering lecture notes in advance for review, and creating a comfortableenvironment for students to ask questions without
lack coordinated, program-leveldevelopment through the middle years of engineering programs. As an initial phase of a largerresearch agenda, this study establishes baseline understanding of first-year design courseinstruction practices and perspectives, which will inform subsequent investigations into howthese professional competencies are maintained and developed throughout the middle years ofthe engineering curriculum.First-year design programs have gained popularity and offer opportunities to introduce studentsto the iterative engineering design process at the beginning of their degree [2]. Such courses areoften transdisciplinary, allowing students to learn from peers with varying interests andperspectives [3]. Often programs integrate
fabrication jobs to million-dollar Department of Defense initiatives students receive directmentorship from professional staff members over a multi-year period.Over the past 10 years the center has grown from a single staff member and a few students tosimultaneously employing over 35 staff and 120 students. In 2024 student employees come from a widevariety of disciplines ranging from Aeronautical Engineering to Film Studies. This paper reports on surveydata from student, staff, and industry partners on the effectiveness of CDME. Based on ten years ofgeneral experience and six years of qualitative surveying students have experienced extremely positiveoutcomes from the program and are significantly better prepared than their peers to enter the nextstage of
patterns [33]. Throughout the coding process, thorough records were kept(electronic data, recordings, memos) and peer review and debriefing was used among theresearch team (one engineering faculty member, one social scientist, one engineering educationfaculty member).PositionalitySeveral aspects of positionality have been woven into this work already. Other potentiallyimportant factors relate to my (the PI’s) belief that students should be able to solve the problempresented in Figure 1 and the use of a theoretical framework for analysis that I personally agreewith. As for my background, I am a white male faculty member with little formal training inengineering education and who has likely pursued this study from something of a
criticalskills such as adaptability, interdisciplinary thinking, and ethical decision-making—qualities thatwill be invaluable as AI continues to disrupt traditional industries and redefine professional roles.Moreover, with the education system itself grappling with how to integrate AI into teaching andevaluation, student-led discussions ensure that the curriculum evolves to meet the needs of thoseit serves. By exploring AI's potential and its limitations, students not only prepare themselves forthe challenges and opportunities of an AI-driven job market but also contribute to shaping aneducational framework that equips their peers to thrive in this dynamic landscape.Eight students were selected among the members of the college’s tech club, who
ofcardboard is transformed from 2-D shapes into 3-D structures, symbolizing the process of turning abstract ideasinto tangible, functional creations with our own hands. The addition of a motor brings the Affirmation Wheel to”life,” representing the drive for determination and motivation. Fig. 1: An initial prototype of affirmation wheel Our approach centers on the individual’s development within a collaborative and supportive team-based envi-ronment. While each participant is individually responsible for executing and completing the project, she receivesencouragement and guidance from her peers throughout the process. This structure is intentionally designed tounderscore the importance of affirming each participant’s
many people do not disclose their disabilitiesto their employers [9]. Additionally, the NCSES report shows that disabled people in STEMoccupations have lower levels of degree attainment, earn less money, and are less likely to beemployed on a full-time basis than their non-disabled peers[8].STEM librarians provide vital access to resources, learning spaces, library instruction, andresearch support for campus communities. They can support disabled students’ success byintegrating inclusive practices that make library resources and services accessible to all.However, many educators – including librarians – often do not implement accessible practiceslike those recommended in Universal Design for Learning (UDL) [10]. Instead, they rely ondisability
Catherine G.P. Berdanier is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Pennsylvania State University. She earned her B.S. in Chemistry from The University of South Dakota, her M.S. in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering and her PhD in Engineering Education from Purdue University. Her research expertise lies in characterizing graduate-level attrition, persistence, and career trajectories; engineering writing and communication; and methodological development. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Creating Public Resources to Diversifying Content in Mechanical Engineering: Fostering Awareness and Ethical ConsiderationsAbstractThis paper explores an innovative
researchers were asked to write reflection entries in response to guided prompts about theirexperiences with the co-design process.Stage 6: Analysis of Experiences (Sep 2024 – Present)After wrapping up on the RAD programming, the researchers worked collaboratively to analyzethe rich data collected throughout the RAD 1.0 and RAD 2.0 programs. The data providedinsight on the accessibility, learning, and co-design aspects of the program. In this work, wefocus on the co-design process.6. Methods6.1. Data CollectionBLV participants were asked to complete final program surveys after RAD 1.0 and 2.0. Thesesurveys included open-ended and closed-ended questions about the participants’ experiences interms of the tool’s accessibility, learning and educational
)equity is or can be shaped by current and future engineering work; (d)Obj. 4: willingness to engage others (e.g., current peers, collaborators, future work colleagues) in discussions of equity in engineering. To teach courses that meet those aims, engineering instructors also need to work towardthose same learning objectives in their own understanding, as well as learn to implement ourframework in their courses. In other words, faculty must work on the same understanding ofequity-centered engineering as students, if they are to cover such ideas in courses, and they mustalso develop equity-mindedness toward the classroom context, given their role as instructors.Ultimately, equity-centered engineering education requires a
were provided with a setof options and could select all that applied, covering various aspects of the project process,including understanding project requirements, coding and implementation, using tools andlibraries, debugging and troubleshooting, teamwork, managing time and deadlines, presentationand report writing, and other challenges. The results are shown in Figure 7. Figure 7. Results to the“Challenge Faced” questionThe results reveal that coding challenges, encompassing both writing code for implementation anddebugging, were the most significant hurdles faced by students, with 6 and 5 votes, respectively.These findings align with the fact that many MET students have limited prior programmingexperience, making the
, highlighted the pedagogical value of using thefilm The Matrix to introduce complex ideas in engineering ethics. Through this approach,students were encouraged to engage in constructive thinking, writing, and discussion aboutchallenging ethical dilemmas. Similarly, Summet and Bates [21] demonstrated how short sciencefiction stories, combined with structured assignments, could effectively engage students inethical reasoning and critical analysis, rendering abstract ethical challenges more tangible andrelatable.A key theme in the literature is the potential of science fiction to encourage interdisciplinaryexploration and critical thinking about technology’s broader implications. VanderLeest [22]described science fiction as a “mental laboratory” where
visitors to the ”numerical methods guy” blog. This work also evaluates how flipped, blended, and adaptive environments effectively help engineering students learn content, hone group-working skills, and perceive their learning contexts. Kaw has published more than 130 peer-reviewed technical papers, and his opinion pieces have been featured in the Tampa Bay Times, the Tampa Tribune, and the Chronicle of Higher Education.Dr. Rasim Guldiken, Oklahoma State University My name is Rasim Guldiken. I am a John Brammer Endowed Professor and Head of the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department at Oklahoma State University. I was also a Professor and the Associate Dean for Academic Affairs of the College of Engineering at
faster product development and more comprehensive exploration of the design space.For these reasons, engineering students should learn simulation.Simulation is also revolutionizing engineering education. Like how writing can be taught directly(“learning to write”) or used to enrich learning of other subjects (“writing to learn”), we coulddescribe use of simulation in education as “learning to simulate” versus “simulating to learn.”One could be concerned about early introduction of simulation in the curriculum because it ischallenging and requires specialist knowledge to be used productively and safely. Indeed, itseems that mechanical engineering students typically learn simulation through upper-level orgraduate courses dedicated to a specific
enter numbers between 0 and 100, totaling 100%. • Teaching • Research and scholarly activities • University or professional serviceHow many peer-reviewed journal articles have you published?The next questions concern your general perspectives regarding the inclusion of undergraduatesin research and scholarly activities.Based on your personal experience with undergraduate students, what do you think about thefollowing statements? [Strongly agree, Agree, Neither agree nor disagree, Disagree, Stronglydisagree, Not applicable] • I know how to effectively involve undergraduates in scholarly activity and research • I have involved undergraduates in my research but have not received useful research products • An undergraduate cannot
at all ● Assignment extensions are available for ● Somewhat students. ● Mostly ● Make-up labs are available to students ● Completely that miss class due to disability or illness ● Unknown/Not Sure for extended periods of time. ● N/A – Not relevant to the course ● Experiments do not require students to come into lab outside of normal class time. ● Lectures are recorded. ● Teams are created with accessibility in mind. ● Teams fill out a team contract. ● Teams complete peer evaluations. ● Accessible lab design is actively taught in the course. ● Disability
discussed how some high schools lacked proper and effective career guidance programsthat were deemed necessary when students were choosing their college major [6]. Academiccommunities and international conferences embraced the importance of women’s representationin engineering by adopting topics pertaining to women as main session themes [3].The gender gap in engineering, although shrinking, may extend into the professional sector withsome women globally reporting challenges related to gender disparities [13], peer pressure [6],and financial barriers [3]. Some women engineers faced social stigma in the engineering industry[14, 15, 16, 17], including access to male-dominated networks, negative attitudes from male peers[6], and some degree of
Engineering at the Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI). He received his BS in 2007 from WPI and his PhD in 2013 from Stanford University. He has co-authored over 50 peer-reviewed articles that have appeared in Advanced Energy Materials, Nano Letters, Flexible and Printed Electronics, and other journals, and have collectively been cited over 4,000 times. His work on printed flexible and stretchable electronics has been funded by the U.S. Department of Defense through the NextFlex Manufacturing USA Institute and the SEMI-FlexTech program; and by the Commonwealth of MA through the Massachusetts Manufacturing Innovation Initiative. His work on photo-catalytic materials for water treatment and clean hydrogen production
various courses from themajor and concentrations. The senior design course sequence goals aim to (1) integrateexperience that develops and illustrates student competencies in applying both -technical andnon-technical skills in successfully solving engineering technology problems, ideallymultidisciplinary in nature; (2) implement Project-Based Learning that includes formal design,implementation, and test processes; (3) significantly improve students’ skills in the areas ofsystem analysis and design, technical writing, public speaking, teamwork, and projectmanagement; (4) ensure that students gain experience and expertise in solving real-world designproblems.Drexel university’s Engineering Technology capstone sequence of senior design courses
customer discovery interviews completed as experientialhomework.The librarian used the Research Out, Knowledge In (ROKI) model [5] to deliver a workshop thatprovided maximum choice and engagement for students in the library databases and ChatGPTclass. The ROKI model invites students to learn by ‘doing and reflecting’ among peers and moreexperienced practitioners. Here, students work through one of four activity sheets, in groups, toexplore library resources such as Pitchbook, BCC Research, Statista, and IBISWorld. Eachactivity sheet provides prompts that guide students in navigating specific features and keycontent pieces that might be useful for their project. Students then share back reflections and anyquestions they have with each other and
Additive Manufacturing and CharacterizationThis course covers topics related to the fundamental concepts of additive manufacturing (AM) andmaterials characterization. The first 60% of the class focuses on the introduction and basic 3principles of additive manufacturing, including but not limited to AM of polymeric, ceramic, andmetallic parts. Topics such as ink-based direct writing, laser-assisted additive manufacturing,thermal spray, and hybrid AM technologies will be discussed. The second part of the class coverstopics on a variety of techniques used to characterize the structure and composition of engineeringmaterials, including metals, ceramics
engineering department’s lab engineerwas able to assist and lend expertise to students. The author would not recommend offering somany different projects at once, ideally limiting the options to 2 or 3 with several groups doingthe same project with their own device. Some of the projects were resource limited and could notbe scaled up to more than a few groups at once. If multiple groups worked on the same project inone class, the instructor could benefit from peer assistance for problem solving. For widespreadadoption to several section there are many logistical issues to be addressed, including space forall of the projects during the semester. Since each instructor differs on experience and interests, a general template for thisframework
agencies really like it too, but it's not always understood by my colleagues what I do. …. I think I even work more with people outside of my department and other disciplines [including] public health, environmental sociologists, and microbiology. It’s like they understand the work. …. The way that I’m engaging is very participatory and bi-directional. …. And I think the funding agencies see the value in it and the amount of information that I'm getting. And the things that I'm learning from the community are so [significant]. … I’m even writing grants differently now, because I have specific things that I propose. But I'm also allocating funding in a space for the community to decide what they want to do, and what they want to