, thereach of CS ethics education is perhaps less extensive than commonly thought. However, asBrown et al. [12] show in their systematic review of 100 CS ethics education research paperspublished in top venues, there is a roughly even distribution of ethics teaching between standalonecourses (32%) and integration of ethics content into one (26%) or more (35%) modules of atechnical course. With respect to teaching approach, instructors use a mix of pedagogicalstrategies in delivering content, the most common of which are class discussions, readings,lectures, and writing assignments [12]. Active learning techniques such as role-playingsimulations, debates, and games are less common.While approaches to teaching computing ethics vary across institutions
-disciplinary collaboration enabled us togain deeper insights into participants’ gendered experiences by integrating perspectives fromdifferent contexts, such as the workplace, academia, and personal life. Our shared commitmentto fostering a more inclusive work environment was driven by both personal and professionalmotivations.Two women graduate researchers in education and psychology were primarily responsible forthe study design, data collection, data analysis, and writing advised by engineering educationfaculty. Their internship experiences outside engineering helped them empathize withparticipants, while their academic backgrounds provided theoretical and methodologicalexperience to interpret gender equity issues. In addition, two members of the
cannot capture. These comments identify a broader range of negative andpositive course-related issues, providing deeper, student-centered, context-specific insights thathelp improve teaching outcomes [7, 13]. Free-response feedback can also unveil difficulties stu-dents experience during the course [14]. Moreover, the style of feedback itself can significantly shape the student experience. For in-stance, reflective writing can reveal “personal learning experiences” [8]. Research finds that re-flective journaling improves content comprehension and promotes self-analysis, encourages self-efficacy, fosters student engagement (especially when faculty respond to comments), and strength-ens career skills [4]. While collecting student feedback
science courses bring them together and show the connections betweenthe concepts. Many new practices are also introduced in these data science courses, includingdata scraping, data cleaning, unsupervised machine learning, writing functions, and chainingfunctions. This shows that data science holds value as a standalone subject, separate fromstatistics, mathematics, or other subjects.Integration into Existing Courses The nature of K-12 curriculum and schooling does not easilyallow for the creation of an entirely new course focused on data science, largely due to timelimitations. The integration of data science into existing courses can be an efficient way to botheducate students about data science and show practical applications for the concepts
, andexpertise from colleagues. This distributed expertise means that engineers must developsophisticated epistemic skills to evaluate the credibility of different sources and justify their useof others’ knowledge. For example, Gainsburg [2] describes how one engineer came to trust avendor’s specifications through previous interactions that demonstrated the vendor’s deepknowledge of wood properties. Such social validation of knowledge extends beyond individualtrust relationships—engineering judgments are frequently negotiated through team discussions,peer reviews, and professional networks where collective expertise helps validate or challengeindividual judgments. In short, examining the social dimensions of epistemic cognition isparticularly important
writing five complete sentences immediately before the FSCQ questions. Overall, as anarrower and entirely quantitative instrument, the FSCQ was more desirable for this evaluation.The study by Brixton et al (2020) is notable for demonstrating that the three latent constructs offuture self theory are correlated but independent factors; however, it studies these relationshipsthrough multiple modified scales [29], whereas Sokol and Serper examine a single instrument,the FSCQ, across multiple studies. Notably, all three investigations use 10 years as a time framefor imagining the future, in alignment with the time frame used in the initial Future SelfContinuity Scale [21], which all three studies acknowledge as a seminal instrument.The ten questions
importance of finding and incorporating relevant data sources for theiranalysis. They also found that visualization is a powerful tool not only for presenting the finalresults, but also in framing their approaches for analyzing the problem. For example, studentsfound that spatio-temporal analysis using ArcGIS and the resultant visualization were veryinformative, helping them quickly grasp the main characteristics of the dataset. All the teamsincorporated results from spatio-temporal analysis with writing Python code to develop softwaresystems for bike flow prediction. All the students benefited from the process. The competitionformat engaged all team members to contribute to the outcome based on their individualbackground and skill
,only the first-year students exhibited a positive (though non-significant) trend in CD. Thiscontrast may reflect developmental differences between student cohorts. First-year studentsare typically in a period of social and academic transition, during which they are more likelyto engage with new perspectives and unfamiliar peers. In contrast, third-year students mayhave already formed more stable social networks and academic identities, potentially limitingtheir openness to intercultural engagement. These findings suggest that interventions aimed atenhancing global competence may need to be tailored to students’ developmental stages.3.2.Results of STEM COIL modules (one purely STEM COIL and one STEM COIL with supplementary history components
M.S. in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering and her PhD in Engineering Education from Purdue University. Her research expertise lies in characterizing graduate-level attrition, persistence, and career trajectories; engineering writing and communication; and methodological development.Kim-Doang Nguyen, Florida Institute of Technology Dr. Kim-Doang Nguyen is an assistant professor of mechanical engineering at the Florida Institute of Technology. His research interests include engineering education research, data science, machine learning, robotics, and dynamical systems. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Exploring the Role of Data Proficiency in Shaping Engineering
detailed explanations of science and engineering are used throughout the course alongwith replaying some clips related to each relevant topic.Rockets and Launch VehiclesThen, once the reasons for going to space are established, the first critical technology thatenables spaces exploration is rockets. In class, several examples of rockets are introduced whichare connected (one of the 3C’s) back to the Mars Ascent Vehicle (MAV) which Mark Watneyuses to finally escape Mars. In the associated laboratory, students build water rockets and launchthem exploring variables like number of fins for stability, pressurization of the water, and massratios (fuel to vehicle mass) that give the longest flights (Figure 2). The students are then askedto write a
: Engineering Communication: from principles to practice (with Dr. Peter Eliot Weiss) and Writing in Engineering: a brief guide, both with Oxford University Press. He teaches enginee ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Building Sociotechnical Competencies through an Integration of Engineering Ethics and Science, Technology and Society Studies: A Reflection on Instructional PracticesIntroductionWith the goal of providing engineering students with a solid grounding in sociotechnicalthinking, and an opportunity to explore the complexities of sociotechnical systems, engineeringcurriculum can draw from a combination of engineering ethics and STS (Science, Technologyand Society) studies to offer students
1g also address DEI within Society, namely, “treatall persons with respect, dignity, and fairness, and reject all forms of discrimination andharassment” (Provision 1f) and “acknowledge the diverse historical, social, and cultural needs ofthe community, and incorporate these considerations in their work” (Provision 1g).The Natural and Built Environment, Profession, and Peers are identified as stakeholder groups 2,3, and 5, respectively. Equity appears in a number of places. Provision 2c of the ASCE Code ofEthics requires engineers “to mitigate adverse societal, environmental, and economic effects,” 3erequires engineers to “promote mentorship and knowledge-sharing equitably with current andfuture engineers,” 5d requires engineers to “promote
their own experiences and needs while neglecting the lived realitiesof marginalized communities. Additionally, these leaders shape privacy and accessibility policiesto serve corporate interests—protecting profits and consolidating power—at the expense ofusers. This is becoming exacerbated as these CEOs and tech leaders are gaining power ingovernment and access to large data sets. Still, there are some ways that their power is beingdestabilized. A recent example (as of the writing of this paper) of this is DeepSeek, anopen-source model that was developed in China and cost far less to create than other AIplatforms, including OpenAI [21].This disconnect between the people who use technology and those who create it has significantimplications for
., Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET))requirements. It is critical to identify and create best practices that will support both students andsponsors to ensure the achievement of educational requirements (e.g., ABET, technical writing),project deliverables, and student success. The research goal is to identify collaborativetechniques to support project mentors (e.g., instructors, industry partners, faculty) and studentteams, and help determine the type and scope of projects best suited for remote collaboration. Inaddition, we aim to investigate how to determine teaming strategies for fully remote teamsappropriate to the various expectations of project outcomes (computational/theoretical solutionsversus physical prototypes, for
tool for VW experiences,especially among younger audiences. With millions of active users under age 13, Robloxprovides an engaging and immersive environment where children can explore virtual worlds,create games, and socialize with peers [2]. This platform has attracted significant attention fromboth educators and researchers for its potential as a learning tool. Studies have shown thatRoblox fosters creativity and collaboration, allowing children to experiment with gamedevelopment, storytelling, and design. Its user-friendly interface and wide range of gamesappeal to children, while its open-world nature allows for exploration and interaction within asafe, controlled environment. However, despite its entertainment value, concerns have
fourteen working lab stations and flight zone is performed. Then, at the end of the course,the students have an experiential learning where the real-time implementation of controlstrategies is useful to bring theory closer to practice. In coming years, the use of augmentedreality based on animated characters already created will be considered, and the department willmonitor the success of the program through alumni surveys and feedback.AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of Writing Lab, Institute for theFuture Education, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico, in the production of this work. Also, theuse of the Intelligent Control Lab and all the support provided by the Regional Dean of theSchool of Engineering and
, andspaced learning. Additionally, textbook pre-reading assignments and group peer discussionvideos were also available as extra credit throughout the entire course. Feedback was given tostudents for the first two active recall, concept mapping, and weekly schedule assignments, andthe rest was graded for completion. Students were also given a weekly learning journal, whichprompts students to reflect on their learning for the last week, the utility values of the learningstrategies they used for the prior week, and monitor their learning progress as well as makenecessary adjustments. The learning journal assignments (through Google Form) weremandatory up to week 5, and became extra credit assignments later in the quarter, as feedbackwas received from
libraries; they store knowledge for the long term. Cardcatalogs tell us where to find books, just like a FAT or an index block tells us where to find filesegments. Library stacks provide organization much like directories. Some books reside in the“restricted section” just like some files have access restrictions. (This analogy is Galilean in thatlibraries are generally read-only whereas files are frequently read-write.)AssessmentsEach topic was covered on either a midterm or final exam to assess student learning. We use thestudents’ grades on the relevant exam question to assess their understanding of the specifictopic.Data CollectionTable 1 documents the dates of the lessons in which the analogy topics were covered. For eachtopic, it also
disciplinesSupporting LiteratureWithin colleges of engineering, a fair amount has been written over the past several decadesabout designing and incorporating interdisciplinary elements [4]. The importance and relevanceof interdisciplinary education and perspectives is gaining traction; the evidence is seen throughample studies in engineering journals and conference proceedings. New courses and programsdiscussed in the conference proceedings arena alone include Waidley and Bittner [5], Cone, et al.[6], Kurtanich, et al. [7], Backer and Bates [8], and Cho, et al. [9]. The peer-reviewed literatureand other conference proceedings offer more and innovative examples of how to includeperspectives, knowledge and skills across engineering curriculum.However, among
research focuses on the role of curriculum on student access, success, and persistent.Prof. Hyoung Jin Cho, University of Central Florida Professor Hyoung Jin Cho is the Associate Chair of the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the University of Central Florida. He coordinates two undergraduate programs – B. S. Mechanical Engineering and B. S. Aerospace Engineering. He has published over 130 peer-reviewed journal and ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Paper ID #47611proceeding papers. He has 12 and 6 patents granted in the U.S. and Korea, respectively, in the areas ofsensors
measured in four intervals from project release to project completion.consistently higher than their peers who choose not to attend. While this trend occurs to somedegree in Figure 6 as well, the grades are closer together and the standard deviation is widerdespite the smaller sample size in the Winter semester. There are of course outliers– the scores ofstudents who visited 6-15 times for Fall 2024’s Project 4 experienced a spread that did not followthis trend. Additionally, in both terms it appears that while rare, attendance over 15 times for oneproject did yield higher scores, but that scores at or higher were attainable by students notattending this many times. On all but the first project, the students in the Fall 2024 semester whoattended
communication skills through practice. 4- Innovative engineers also encourage one another through peer instruction, professional associations, and group work. 5- Finally, the education of innovative engineers involves sympathetic mentors who provide resources, inspiration, and awareness of the contribution of previous generations.The Framework aims to provide explicit instruction to help students acquire the skills in this list,including skills not explicitly taught in the traditional engineering classroom. Consistent with the valuesof the Framework, students need practice to develop the self-direct learning skills of reading andnotetaking. While pedagogical research has shown some benefit to video resources for class preparation[13], [14
experiences with CoP(consistency across cohorts, authentic / analogous / applicable to PA professional roles, truncatedtime period to avoid burnout, etc.) Each PS started with a single tool area, drafted an initial document with a proposedoutline for weekly activities, then swapped tool areas with another PS to continue refining andexpanding that outline. During the drafting process, there were weekly review sessions as agroup about changes that had been made from the previous week. After that, they passed a roughdraft off to a third PA for testing activities and writing instructions. This resulted in a finalproduct co-created with input from all PSs, a written guide that would allow any PS to step intoany tool area and facilitate a CoP
virtualplatforms disrupted these critical elements, significantly impacting both academic progress andpractical training. The shift to online learning, unplanned due to the pandemic, created widespreadchallenges for faculty, staff, and students to adapt to the "new normal." Additionally, research by(Moran et al., 2023; Paul et al., 2023) highlighted equity and access issues in virtual settings,emphasizing the urgent need to address these concerns amidst such abrupt changes. The mentalhealth impacts of the pandemic on graduate students have been significant. Isolation from peers andmentors, coupled with uncertainties surrounding academic progress and job prospects, increasedstress, anxiety, and other mental health issues (Zaniyah et al., 2021).Before the
, student autonomy, and broader social structures to supporttransformative learning experiences [30].Cavagnetto et al. explored how to foster agency in science education through "authorship," wherestudents actively participated in generating knowledge. The study highlighted that agency depended onbalancing the benefits (e.g., engagement, learning) with the costs (e.g., effort, social critique) ofparticipation. They emphasized creating safe environments with constructive critique and allowingstudents to engage deeply in tasks like designing experiments and analyzing data. Using examples like theScience Writing Heuristic approach, the study showed how inquiry-based practices improved criticalthinking, retention, and confidence in science [31
probationary Assistant Professor in the Department of Integrated Engineering at Minnesota State University Mankato. She teaches for Iron Range Engineering, which is a co-op based engineering program in Virginia, MN. Dr. Christensen received her Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Utah State University in the Summer of 2021. The title of her Dissertation was ”A Mixed-Method Approach to Explore Student Needs for Peer Mentoring in a College of Engineering.” Darcie holds a Master of Engineering degree in Environmental Engineering (2019) and Bachelor of Science degree in Biological Engineering (2017), both from Utah State University. She is passionate about student success and support, both inside and outside of the classroom.Mr
been a faculty member since 2000. He received his Ph.D. in Physics from the University of Utah in 1992 and a Habilitation in Experimental Physics from University of Paderborn, Germany in 2000. Dr. Dierolf’s research focuses on the study of novel electronic and optical materials, with a particular emphasis on rare earth dopants in semiconductors and laser produced single crystals in glass. He has authored or co-authored over 200 publications in peer-reviewed journals, and has been awarded several patents for his work.Dr. Anand Jagota, Lehigh University Anand Jagota is Vice Provost for Research and the Robert W. Wieseman Professor of Bioengineering and of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at Lehigh University. His
in team-based engineering courses, and her research focuses on equity in communication and collaboration as well as in group design decision making (judgment) under uncertainty. She is especially interested in how power relationships and rhetorical strategies affect group judgment in engineering design; one goal of this work is to to understand factors that inhibit full participation of students who identify with historically marginalized groups and investigate evidence-based strategies for mitigating these inequities. In addition, she is interested in technology and how specific affordances can change the ways we collaborate, learn, read, and write. Teaching engineering communication allows her to apply this work
Dr. Sterling & Dr. Ayasoufi9. Appendix B Name: ______________________ Email: _______________________ ENGR 1110 Instructions: This activity is assessed on participation. Please answer each question to the best of your ability without using outside resources (i.e. internet, textbooks, peers, etc). 1. Scenario: The height of a redwood tree is measured independently by each park ranger assigned to the region: 250 feet, 275 feet, 265 feet, 270 feet, 268 feet, and 273 feet. Which equation should be used to calculate the standard deviation? 1 a) 𝜎 = ට ∑(𝑥𝑖 − 𝜇)2 𝑁 1 b) 𝑠 = ට ∑(𝑥𝑖 − 𝑥)2