for the Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning) at theProf. Susan K Fullerton Shirey, University of Pittsburgh Susan Fullerton is an Associate Professor, Bicentennial Board of Visitors Faculty Fellow, and Vice Chair for Graduate Education in the Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh. She earned her Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering at Penn State in 2009, and joined the Department of Electrical Engineering at the University of Notre Dame as a Research Assistant Professor. In 2015 she established the Nanoionics and Electronics Lab at Pitt as an Assistant Professor, and was promoted to Associate Professor with tenure in 2020. Fullerton’s work has been recognized
engagement and learning outcomes. To mitigate suchissues, future iterations of the curriculum should focus on integrating it into the actual coursetaught by regular STEM teachers. Furthermore, providing professional developmentopportunities for STEM educators will equip them with the necessary skills and resources toimplement the BSEE curriculum effectively and consistently.Lastly, the evaluation of the BSEE curriculum was limited to self and peer assessments becauseno data were collected directly from the students. Such a decision was intentional, given that thiswas the first exposure of these students to an integrated STEM curriculum. Our team also soughtto avoid adding additional workload, such as completing surveys or participating in
students to learn howto engage with stakeholders can be challenging with only a few case studies published in thisarea. In Fall 2023, a novel student-stakeholder interaction model was implemented as theBiomedical Stakeholder Café, with a successful second iteration in Fall 2024. The paper presents(1) an overview of key improvements to the stakeholder café interaction model and (2) ananalysis of student and stakeholder perspectives of the café experience in Fall 2024 compared toFall 2023.Key improvements implemented in Fall 2024 include changes to timing and number ofconversations, increased communication of expectations to stakeholders, and integrating a noveladaptation to the Relevance, Authority, Date, Appearance, and Reason (RADAR) framework
Paper ID #49047Assessment of FE ethics performance and experiences integrating ethics intothe curriculum in a Civil Engineering department at a military institution[Research Paper]Dr. Rebekah L Martin, Virginia Military Institute Dr. Martin completed her bachelor’s in Civil and Environmental Engineering at Bucknell University and her PhD in Civil Engineering at Virginia Tech. She is currently an assistant professor at VMI teaching fluids, environmental engineering and water resources courses. Her research focuses on drinking water quality and public health. She also co-advises the newly formed Society of Women Engineers at
Paper ID #45775BOARD # 26: Work in Progress: Integration of Medical School and BiomedicalEngineering Curriculum through the Physician Innovator Training Program(PITP)Prof. Christine E King, University of California, Irvine Dr. Christine King is an Associate Professor of Teaching in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at UC Irvine. She received her BS and MS from Manhattan College in Mechanical Engineering and her PhD in Biomedical Engineering from UC Irvine, where she developed brain-computer interface systems for neurorehabilitation. She was a post-doctorate in the Wireless Health Institute at the University of
of the lived experiences of students and their families in urban settings, and 4) ability to implement culturally responsive teaching strategies.Open-ended prompts follow each survey statement to explain their response. This same surveywas designed to be administered at other points in time along the TPP curriculum (e.g., start ofTPP, before and after student teaching practicum). Our Noyce program evaluator collected thesurvey data and held a focus group with the students at the end of the pilot course.Upon enrollment in the pilot foundational course, TPP students shared that they werecomfortable with teaching in an urban environment that includes a wide range of diversity,verifying that they have had previous experience working with
-ciency. Initially, we followed Gradescope’s recommended method 9 by creating a separate assign-ment for revised submissions. We instead suggest allowing students to upload a link to their revisedfile via a regrade request for only the problems they got wrong as a solution. This would ensure wedon’t regrade the entire assignment if they only missed one problem and also eliminate the need tomanually consolidate grades via an external spreadsheet, which is prone to human error. Not onlywill this simplify the process and reduce administrative burden, it will also ease the integration ofGradescope with our Learning Management System (LMS). By tying one question to each learn-ing objective (LO) as earlier discussed in conjunction with applying the
system under development. However, if this aspect of design work is not madeexplicit, students who are new to design challenges may not realize they are engaging in systemswork. A case has been made for integrating systems thinking into the fabric of the curriculum,with concrete examples provided for incorporating systems thinking into discrete problemscovering an array of topics in a variety of mainstream engineering disciplines using a systemdynamics approach [12].The inclusion of systems thinking in undergraduate education has primarily been in the contextof systems engineering programs [12], [17] - [21]. Systems Engineering is transdisciplinary, atthe intersection of science, technology and management, with systems thinking at its core [22
Paper ID #49033Developing and Evaluating a High School Summer Research Program in anUrban District Through a University-School Partnership (Evaluation)Nidaa Makki, The University of Akron Dr. Nidaa Makki is a Professor in the LeBron James Family Foundation School of Education at The University of Akron. Her work focuses on STEM curriculum integration and teacher professional development.Dr. Katrina B Halasa Halasa Science and Health Learning Specialist k-12 since July 2006 for Akron Public Schools. She is in charge of professional development, curriculum and assessment development. She taught biology, chemistry, human anatomy
offer opportunities for local high schoolstudents, particularly underrepresented and first-generation students, to take college-equivalentcourses that are otherwise not available to them. The study will focus on five main themes thatwere integral to the course design: strategies used to create a cohesive and engaging learningcommunity, methods employed to help students manage their learning in an online environment,building students' self-efficacy in their engineering abilities, approaches used to maintain studentengagement, learning and motivation in a virtual setting, and the implementation of onlinehands-on laboratory sessions that students completed at home. By examining these themes, thepaper aims to provide insights into the effectiveness
and preserviceteachers alike have had little training in this topic [7].To help teachers integrate AI into their curriculum, developers and educational researchers arecreating AI educational innovations for young people, many of which introduce AI using largelanguage models (LLMs) and chatbots (e.g. [8], [9]) in afterschool settings (e.g. [10], [11]).While these endeavors have been successfully implemented, there remains a gap for introducingAI technologies beyond LLMs and chatbots in the formal K-12 setting. Specifically, computervision is an underutilized and accessible way to introduce young people to CS and AI, and haspotential to be integrated into core middle school science standards.To address this gap, our interdisciplinary team of
participation of diverse perspectives in building a sustainable future. This paperdescribes the theoretical support and work in progress for our Engineering for One Planet (EOP)mini-grant. The objective of our mini-grant is to design an undergraduate course and assignmentthat integrates systems thinking, engineering ethics, design justice, and the EOP sustainabilityframework through the lens of ethnographic design. This assignment, and the course it is situatedwithin, are co-designed by an anthropologist who directs several design initiatives in the schoolof engineering and an associate professor of systems engineering at the authors’ home institution.Our process includes implementation and evaluation of our assignment in the Spring Semester2025. This
, 2025 Incorporating the Envision Rating System as a Teaching Tool for Sustainability in Civil Engineering InfrastructureAbstractThe Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure’s Envision Rating System [1] is becoming a widelyused framework for guiding design work and assessing resiliency, social equity, andenvironmental justice of civil infrastructure projects. To prepare our students and equip themwith the knowledge base to proactively utilize this framework as a design tool, we haveincorporated the Envision Rating System as a teaching tool with several touchpoints in therequired civil engineering curriculum. Envision is introduced in a required sustainable civilengineering course, examined in an engineering mechanics
. Asdiscussed (Section 4.2), this may be more reflective of differences in how departments andprograms are structured however, rather than actual differences in the amount of sustainabilitycontent students receive.The degree to which sustainability was integrated throughout the curriculum also had an effect onwhich EOP sustainability competencies were covered, with less integration of sustainabilitycontent across technical electives leading to less coverage of more concrete sustainabledevelopment skills like materials selection or environmental impact assessment. For example,typically (in 8/10 of the programs we analyzed) Electrical Engineering programs required forstudents to take a course that introduced at a high level, the impact of technology on
Paper ID #46142360 Degrees of Collaboration: An Autoethnographic Approach to DevelopingVR-Based Aviation Maintenance TrainingNathanael Kloeppel, Purdue Polytechnic Graduate ProgramsMr. Denis Uebiyev, Purdue University Ph.D. student in the Learning Design and Technology Program, focused on integrating and developing VR programs for training and adult education.Dr. Lisa Bosman, Purdue University Dr. Bosman holds a PhD in Industrial Engineering. Her engineering education research interests include entrepreneurially minded learning, energy education, interdisciplinary education, and faculty professional development.Mr. Joshua
benchmarking process offers insights into the strengths and limitations ofLLMs in an educational context.This work serves as a call to action for educators across disciplines. By systematicallybenchmarking our curriculums against LLM capabilities, we can better understand the evolvingrelationship between AI and education. This understanding will allow us to refine our teachingmethods, emphasize uniquely human skills, and prepare our students for a future wherecollaboration with AI is expected. As we move forward, it is crucial that we, as educators, takecharge of shaping how these powerful tools are integrated into our classrooms and beyond. Thiswork will illuminate the need for curriculum-based learning outcomes at high levels in Bloom’staxonomy.1
Paper ID #49378FRCDesign.org - An Open source Advanced CAD and Engineering DesignCourse for Highschool Robotics (Curriculum Exchange)David Doan, frcdesign.orgJonathan Mi, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor Jonathan Mi is a doctorate student in the Robotics department at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. His research is focused on hardware and control of soft and tensegrity robots. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025FRCDesign.orgAn open source, free, learning coursefor learning advanced computer aidedrobot design for competitive high Makingschool
environments that support diverse learners.Dr. Swarup BhuniaDr. Pavlo Antonenko Pavlo ”Pasha” Antonenko is an Associate Professor of Educational Technology at the University of Florida. His interests focus on the design of technology-enhanced learning environments and rigorous mixed-method research on the effective conditions for tecWoorin Hwang, University of Florida Woorin Hwang is a Ph.D. candidate at the School of Teaching and Learning at the University of Florida. Her research is focused on assisting learners’ career choices by integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) in teaching and learning, with ongoing projects related to AI literacy, Edge AI, and recommender system in engineering education. Prior to joining the
University Bryan Van Scoy is an assistant professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Miami University whose research focuses on algorithms in optimization and control. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Results and Evaluation of an Early LLM Benchmarking of our ECE Undergraduate CurriculumsAbstractThe rapid integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into engineering practice necessitatescritically examining our educational approaches. This paper presents an investigation into theperformance of Large Language Models (LLMs) within the context of our Electrical Engineering(EE) and Computer Engineering (CpE) undergraduate curricula at Miami
Paper ID #49038Modernization of Nuclear Engineering Undergraduate CurriculumDr. DuWayne Schubring, University of Florida Dr. DuWayne Schubring is an Instructional Professor in the Nuclear Engineering Program in Department of Materials Science and Engineering at the University of Florida. He has served as the nuclear program’s undergraduate and ABET coordinator for 10 years, as the SACSCOC coordinator for 7 years, and as the curriculum committee chair for the NE program for 4 years. His teaching interests including nuclear reactor thermal hydraulics, capstone design, and advanced nuclear fission power systems.Prof. Ira
Paper ID #46129BOARD # 379: IMPROVING TEACHERS’ ATTITUDES TOWARD PHYSICSBY INTEGRATING MUSIC IN ONLINE AND IN-PERSON PROFESSIONALDEVELOPMENT. AN ITEST STUDY.Dr. Victor Hugo Minces*, University of California, San Diego Corresponding Author. Dr. Minces studied physics at the Universidad de Buenos Aires and obtained his Ph.D. in Computational Neurobiology at the University of California, San Diego. His interests are very diverse, including sensory and neural processing in animals and humans. He is the creator of Listening to Waves, a program creating online tools and curriculum for children to learn about science and computing
from our course. TheCPU pipelining topic is covered by the Computer Architecture course in our department’scurriculum. On the other hand, the Operating Systems course in our department’s curriculumdoes not include the topic of storage. Again, CSC2023 suggests covering the topic of storage ineither the CompOrg course or the OS course[2]. By implementing storage in our course, we nowcover the missing storage topic in the department’s curriculum. Lastly, we want to emphasizeagain that storage is considered mandatory in CompOrg while considered optional in OS assuggested by CSC2023; thus, it is more favorable to implement the storage topic in our coursethan in the OS course.EvaluationIn this section, we evaluate our effort of integrating storage
limited class time can result in suboptimal project outcomes. Moreover,an insufficient understanding of design requirements at the outset can have severe repercussionsduring the prototype development phase by students.In parallel with these and other similar challenges, over the past several years AI-based platformshave gained significant popularity among students, teachers, and researchers [8] [9] [20]Platforms such as Khan Academy, Duolingo, Quizlet, Coursera, and Edmodo have integrated AItechnologies to offer personalized and adaptive learning experiences. These tools analyze userperformance and learning habits to deliver tailored content, adaptive quizzes, and real-timefeedback. This shift has enhanced accessibility to education, enabled
Paper ID #47462CASE STUDY: Project-based integration of societal context with engineeringcommunication and computational thinking in an upper-level civil and environmentalengineering courseDr. Megan L. Matthews, University of Illinois Urbana - Champaign Dr. Megan L. Matthews is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Her work involves developing multiscale computational models to explore plant engineering strategies for sustainably improving the security and equity of global food, water, and environmental systems. Megan earned her
curricular units and then examine their strengths andchallenges from the perspectives of middle school teachers, based on their classroomimplementation experiences. This work contributes to our knowledge of K-8 computerscience integration, particularly teacher perspectives on K-8 computer scienceintegration.Food Sovereignty Curriculum We designed an integrated social studies unit and a computer science unit aroundthe topic of food sovereignty for Indigenous peoples. Food sovereignty is the right ofindividuals and communities to access nourishing and culturally specific foods that areproduced sustainably. Food sovereignty also includes the right of peoples to define theirown systems of food production [3]. For Indigenous communities in the
Paper ID #45695BOARD # 250: Integrating Generative AI into an Upper Division STEMWriting and Communications Course (IUSE)Dr. Tamara Powell Tate, University of California, Irvine Tamara Tate is Associate Director of the Digital Learning Lab. She leads the Lab’s work on generative AI and writing. As the PI of a NSF-funded grant, she is studying the use of generative AI in undergraduate writing courses. She also studies secondary student writing as a member of the IES-funded national WRITE Center. She received her B.A. in English and her Ph.D. in Education at U.C. Irvine and her J.D. at U.C. Berkeley.Beth Harnick-Shapiro
Paper ID #45605Integrating Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion into Civil Testing Materials Course:A Curriculum Intervention on Infrastructure and Social JusticeDr. Asif Ahmed, State University of New York, Polytechnic Institute Asif Ahmed is an Assistant Professor at College of Engineering at SUNY Polytechnic Institute, Utica, New York. Dr. Ahmed is a strong advocate of STEM education, inclusion of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) in curriculum. Primarily trained as a Geotechnial Engineer, Dr. Ahmed’s current research also focuses on engineering education. Currently, his interest is modification of the civil engineering
engineering (in the field of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics) from Cornell University.Dr. Michael Machas ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Incorporating an Entrepreneurial Mindset in Online Introduction to Engineering Courses: A Study of Value CreationShort AbstractThis study examines the impact of integrating entrepreneurially minded learning (EML)principles into an online Introduction to Engineering course at Arizona State University. Theintervention focused on value creation, encouraging students to consider the political, economic,social, technological, legal, and environmental impacts of their designs. Quantitative data frompre- and post-surveys were analyzed using independent t
% of students feel that they do not have sufficient AI skills,48% felt unready for an AI-enabled workplace, and 80% say AI integration at their university isnot meeting their expectations [3]. These surveyed students asked for greater using andunderstanding AI (>70%) so that they would be better equipped to evaluate AI-generatedresponses. Critical thinking is key to be able to evaluate and consider the trustworthiness of AIresponses in practice, and therefore would be a way of helping to address these concerns ofuniversity students.Within chemical engineering, inquiry- and problem-based activities have been used to help teachcritical thinking skills across the curriculum. Prince et al. describe activities in which studentsneed to predict
industry stakeholders should be considered to refine coursecontent and update the curriculum to include emerging technologies and trends in constructionautomation. Since the construction sector is witnessing a skills gap as the adoption of automationincreases, the systematic integration of automation into the curriculum can address this gap byequipping students with relevant technical skills and knowledge. The long-term success of thisintegration hinges on fostering strong construction industry-academia partnerships, investing infaculty development, and maintaining a flexible, future-focused construction managementcurriculum. The efforts will ensure that the next generation of construction managers is well-prepared to lead in an increasingly