development topics into the ECEcurriculum. We present the results of a one-week module for graduate students that linksdisciplinary and intrapersonal knowledge through a design thinking framework. We present acontent analysis and descriptive statistics from two surveys distributed to students from Fall2024 about their experiences with the module. These surveys asked students about theirexperiences with the module, their engineering identity and belongingness, and their beliefsabout their future careers. A major takeaway from this analysis was the saliency studentsexperienced around the topics of ambiguity, failure, and risk in the context of thinking abouttheir future careers. Finally, we offer recommendations for other ECE educators interested
mentorship and professional development strategies. Building on thisfoundation, the Expanded Network for BP-AE (ENBP-AE) program was established to extendthese efforts and scale the impact to a broader network of institutions and students.The ENBP-AE program strategically added five institutions selected based on the desire toincrease pathways into aerospace careers and existing faculty connections. Since the program’sexpansion, one of the added institutions has established an undergraduate program in aerospaceengineering, and a core institution has launched a graduate program in Aerospace Engineering,further enhancing the capacity for aerospace education within the network.The train-the-trainer mentorship model was pivotal for integrating these
Paper ID #47463WIP: Statics in Space - Developing a Dungeons and Dragons Inspired StaticsCourseLeslie A Brown, Utah State University Leslie Brown is an Engineering Education PhD student at Utah State University. She recently completed a Master’s degree in Engineering Education at Utah State University with thesis focus on training high school STEM teachers to implement engineering curriculum into their classrooms.Dr. Marissa A Tsugawa, Utah State University - Engineering Education Marissa Tsugawa is an assistant professor at Utah State University who leverages mixed-methods research to explore neurodiversity and identity and
literacy experiences outside ofSTEM and engineering curricula [16-17]. GenAI promises to disrupt education and learningprimarily by intervening in and altering the literacy practices that students use to acquire expertknowledge.The formation of expertise is an established concern in engineering education. Litzinger, Lattuca,Hadgraft, and Newstetter argued for increased attention on the development of expertise inengineering education through learning experiences that foster deep conceptual knowledge andskill development related to engineering practice [18]. The disciplinary knowledge that structuresengineering curricula both modulates and is shaped by the engineering identities acquired byindividuals who make up the community of practice [19-21
Engineering Liaison Council and is a doctoral student in Engineering Education.Dr. Winny Dong, ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Understanding and Addressing Transfer Credit Loss in Engineering EducationAbstractThe persistent transfer credit loss among engineering transfer students, particularly in California,has far-reaching implications for individual academic pathways, the higher education landscape,and workforce development. Academic transfer credit loss can result from multiple factors,including issues of transfer requirements, missing transfer pathways, and curriculum misalignmentbetween community colleges and universities, often stemming from variations in course content,sequencing, and rigor
University’s Whiting School of Engineering where he has served on the faculty since 2008 with secondary appointmeRachel E Durham, Notre Dame of Maryland University Rachel E. Durham (PhD, Sociology and Demography, Pennsylvania State University) is an Associate Professor in the School of Education at Notre Dame of Maryland University, and a Senior Fellow with the Baltimore Education Research Consortium (BERC). With a background in sociology of education, education policy, and demography, her research focuses on graduates’ transition to adulthood, career and college readiness, community schools, and research-practice partnerships.Ms. Alisha Nicole Sparks, The Johns Hopkins University Alisha Sparks serves as the Executive
State University (SFSU) Elysee Matembe Ekanga was a senior undergraduate student majoring in Civil Engineering at San Francisco State University at the time of the project. She is dedicated to promoting diversity and equity in the field of engineering. Over the years, she has gained valuable knowledge and experience in construction management through various internships, both in her home country, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and in the United States. This coming fall, she will pursue her graduate studies at Stanford University in the Sustainable Design and Construction program. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Underrepresented-minority students’ portrayal of engineering
classroom, and graduate education.Catherine G. P. Berdanier, The Pennsylvania State University Catherine G.P. Berdanier is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Pennsylvania State University. She earned her B.S. in Chemistry from The University of South Dakota, her M.S. in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering and her PhD in Engineering Education from Purdue University. Her research expertise lies in characterizing graduate-level attrition, persistence, and career trajectories; engineering writing and communication; and methodological development. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Characterizing Interactions Between Master's Engineering Students and Their
of the five. This finding aligns with TPI development, which notesthat this perspective reflects “a small, but important group” of educators [31]. In terms ofgraduate students who are currently building their identities as instructors, this pattern may alsoreflect the challenges of integrating broader societal change into teaching practices when needingto prioritize more immediate classroom concerns. Further, the differences identified betweenparticipants’ beliefs, intentions, and actions underscore the importance of providing structuredteacher training. Such training can play a critical role in helping graduate students navigate thedissonance and conflicts they experience as they reconcile their evolving teaching philosophieswith practical
, and increasing self-efficacy through those programs for pre-college students.Mrs. Cori Dennis, The University of Arizona, College of Engineering With over 20 years of experience in education, Cori is a dedicated leader specializing in special education, educational leadership, and inclusive program development. She holds a Master of Education in Educational Leadership from Northern Arizona University and has completed extensive graduate-level coursework in special education at Towson University. Cori currently serves as Coordinator of High School Outreach and Summer Programs for the College of Engineering at the University of Arizona. In this role, she leads strategic STEM initiatives, directs the Summer
Engineering Sciences from Dartmouth College, and PhD in Mecha ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Work-In-Progress: Exploring Knowledge, Skills, Attributes and Technical Learning in a Work-Integrated Learning Engineering ProgramIntroduction Throughout the history of engineering education there have been continued calls for theneed to educate and prepare engineering students for the “future of work” [1]. According toscholars, these calls can be traced back to the 1918 Mann Report [2] and continue through therecent Transforming Undergraduate Education in Engineering reports [3]-[6]. Additionally, therehave been tensions between academia and industry on competency development and what itmeans
. During his time at STCC, Professor Khan developed a curriculum in building heating efficiency and restructured the hands-on portion of the heating program to focus on providing traditional and non-traditional students with the fundamental skills required for workforce development. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 The Effect of SLOs Focused Lectures and Class Modality on STEM Latinx Students’ Success In schools serving minority students or Hispanic-Serving Institutes (HSIs), therestructuring of class material delivery methods is crucial for improving student learningoutcome (SLO) attainment. The recent pandemic has accelerated the shift towards
agreed. Similarly,engineering coursework does not frequently require students to work on interdisciplinary or largeteams. Students on project teams routinely work with students who are not in their courses ormajors. On multiple diagrams, students wrote about learning how to work and communicate witheveryone on the team. In addition, during the focus groups, students discussed how they oftenhave to work with students they did not agree with or even got along with. In courses, studentsoften have the luxury of choosing who they work with. However, students on project teams haveto learn how to navigate and work on teams where they do not pick their colleagues. Studentsmust get experiences where they can develop their professional skills during their
in Durham, NC. He oversees the data collection and program evaluation of informal education programs at the Museum and science communication of grant-funded projects. He also works with Duke University as a community partner for the Ignite Program to offer informal education expertise to the program.Dr. Nirmala Ramanujam Ph.D., Duke University Nirmala (Nimmi) Ramanujam is the Robert W. Carr Professor of Biomedical Engineering, Professor of Cancer Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, and Global Health at Duke University. She founded the Center for Global Women’s Health Technologies (GWHT) in 2013 to reshape women’s health through technology innovation. Her translation program in cervical and breast cancer has brought
Research Assistant in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Morgan State University, Maryland, where he is pursuing his M.Sc. in Civil and Environmental Engineering with a concentration in Construction Management and Transportation Engineering. He earned his B.Tech. in Building Structure from the Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria. Michael has extensive professional experience managing large-scale heavy construction and fac¸ade projects, including high-rise and industrial developments across West Africa, having held key roles in the field. His research interests include the integration of digital tools in construction education, resilient building design, and asset management in civil
overall success of students. In this paper,we study the positive impact of a Layered Mentorship Program (LMP) on the development ofSTEM identity for engineering students. This impact becomes more evident in urban universitieswith many commuting students. In such circumstances, the students have less opportunities forcommunity building and development of STEM identity. As a result, the significance ofmentorship programs becomes more obvious. The main objective of this research study is tounderstand the relationship between participation in LMP and student success through thedevelopment of STEM identity and peer-mentoring.In the previous work by the research team, a theoretical framework was proposed to examine therelationships between mentorship
Paper ID #47222Exploring the Engineering Classroom Experiences of Students with Non-ApparentDisabilitiesDarby Rose Riley, Rowan University Darby Riley is a doctoral candidate pursuing her third consecutive degree at Rowan University (Glassboro, NJ). Her research focuses on identity development in engineering education—specifically, how engineering students construct their sense of self through their academic journey and how personal identities shape this process. As a disabled researcher, she brings both academic and lived experience to her work, with a particular interest in how students with disabilities navigate the
Paper ID #49397ECS Web Lab: A Web-Based Solution for Equitable and Engaging WebDevelopment EducationMr. Samuel B Mazzone, Marquette UniversityDr. Dennis Brylow, Marquette University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 ECS Web Lab: A Web-Based Solution for Equitable and Engaging Web Development Education AbstractUCLA developed the Exploring Computer Science (ECS) curriculum to increase participation ofwomen and people of color in computer science, focusing on content comprehension,inquiry-based learning, and educational equity. Initially launched in Los
Paper ID #47384[Work in progress: Intersection of Design and ”X” Research Papers] Globalmeans local too: Integrating anti-oppressive practice into community-basedcapstone design projects.Ms. Kerry Eller, Duke University Kerry Eller is a 4th year PhD Candidate in the Center for Global Women’s Health Technologies at Duke University’s Biomedical Engineering Department. Kerry is working to develop cervical cancer screening technologies that are more accessible for both patients and providers but is also excited about engineering education and design pedagogy.Dr. Megan Madonna, Duke University Megan Madonna is an Assistant
pursued a Master’s Degree in Educational Studies at the University of Nebraska -Lincoln (UNL). While pursing his Master Degree he worked as the coordinator for the student technology program on the UNL campus, where he taught over 150 workshops on technology uses in the classroom to faculty, staff and students. Dr. Daher completed his Ph.D in Educational Studies with a focus on Instructional technology from UNL and is currently serving as the Director of the Engineering and Computing Education Core, College of Engineering and an Assistant Professor of Practice of Engineering Education. Tareq focuses on transforming engineering education in the College through graduate courses, faculty and graduate student professional
in Architectural Acoustics from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and a PhD in Education (Curriculum and Instruction) from the University of Maryland. Prior to his academic career, Stephen was an acoustical consultant for 5 years. His education research has focused on culture and equity in engineering education, particularly undergraduate contexts, pedagogy, and student support. Through his work he aims to use critical qualitative, video-based, participatory, and ethnographic methods to look at everyday educational settings in engineering and shift them towards equity and inclusion. He also leads the Equity Research Group where he mentors graduate and undergraduate students in pursuing critical and action-oriented
Paper ID #49216Sociotechnical integration in data science educationProf. Cathryn Carson, University of California, Berkeley Cathryn Carson is an STS scholar and a historian of science and technology who has been active in interdisciplinary collaborations in undergraduate and graduate education, including nuclear engineering and data science. Ari Edmundson is an STS scholar and intellectual historian who has collaboratively developed integrated course materials and dedicated courses to embed critical thinking about human contexts and ethics in data science curricula. Ramesh Sridharan is a computer scientist
Resilient Infrastructure Engineering at the Department of Civil Engineering, Morgan State University. He is also a graduate research assistant at the Sustainable Infrastructure Development, Smart Innovation and Resilient Engineering Research Laboratory also at the Civil Engineering Department. His research interests include UAV applications in high-rise and bridge infrastructures monitoring, Remote Sensing and GIS in engineering applications, engineering education, student success and hands-on engineering pedagogy for program enhancements. He is an alumnus of University of Nigeria (UNN), having earned his M.Sc. in Surveying and Geoinformatics (Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System). He previously completed
at Austin and his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from The University of Texas at Arlington.Andrea Lidia Castillo, Arizona State University A.Lili Castillo is a second-year graduate student in the Engineering Education Systems and Design PhD program at Arizona State University. Lili is a recipient of the 2022 National Science Foundation’s Graduate research fellowship. Her research interests include engineering identity formation, high-impact learning experiences, and Latino/a/x & first-generation college student pathways in engineering. Through her research, Lili hopes to amplify the voices of historically underrepresented populations in engineering to foster an inclusive space in engineering
responses like “it depends,” theyreveal engineering judgment’s nature as a complex construct operating at the intersection ofprofessional practice, cognitive capability, and identity formulation [6]. This conceptualcomplexity creates a fundamental pedagogical tension: how can educators facilitate thesimultaneous development of technical engineering competencies and professional judgment?Addressing this question requires an examination of engineering judgment’s conceptualevolution within engineering education research.The foundational empirical work on engineering judgment emerged through ethnographicstudies, most notably Gainsburg’s [2] observations of structural engineers. This researchestablished a taxonomy of engineering judgment practices
, “So Iguess, thinking about my place in engineering, I was always thinking about more of the technicalapproach of engineering application. But through my [graduate] experience… I’ve realized thatthere is this gap in understanding engineering application and communication, and there’s amissing piece… let’s bring trust back into engineering and application by using these themes of[humanitarian engineering and science].”We also tracked the evolution of STEM identity using the survey. The survey follows [9], [29] intheorizing STEM role identity as a combination of recognition as a scientist or engineer (bothinternal – “I see myself as a scientist/engineer” – and external – “Others see me as ascientist/engineer”); interest in science or engineering
.• Study Abroad Experiences These programs develop global competencies through international technical coursework or field-based projects. They cultivate cross-cultural communication, adaptability, and understanding of contextual engineering practice. Most effective when incorporating intentional design elements and structured reflection to help students process cultural differences.• Undergraduate Research Students work with faculty on original investigations, developing research methodologies and specialized knowledge. These experiences cultivate curiosity, analytical thinking, and perseverance while demystifying research processes and informing decisions about graduate education.• Design Competitions Structured
each assignment and lecturewith communication in the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields inmind. Although this course was placed within the Department of Electrical and ComputerEngineering, an effort was made to develop a course that would be equally helpful and accessibleto STEM graduate students from a wide range of backgrounds and interests.The “continuous not discreet” principle, commonly referred to as scaffolding in pedagogicalliterature, grew from experiences in STEM courses, such as math and chemistry, in which eachlesson builds upon the previous, and in courses like design in which there is final project that isworked upon throughout the semester. As much as possible, every class presentation, activity,and
, prioritizing intelligibility ratherthan fluency or discursive sophistication. Their social support networks were often anchored inSpanish-speaking or Latinx communities, providing emotional containment and culturalresonance. In these cases, professional identity did not expand toward a global orientation butwas reinforced through a localized lens, affirming their role as development agents withinColombia.Self-Determination Theory (SDT) further enriches this analysis. Graduate-oriented participantsdemonstrated progressive development of the three pillars of SDT: competence (e.g., masteringtechnical tools and scientific English), autonomy (e.g., navigating lab environmentsindependently), and relatedness (e.g., forming meaningful relationships with
discipline, finding meaning in connecting research to real-world outcomes) [17] N/A The PROMISE Engineering Institute (PEI) program, creating a virtual community and offering professional development opportunities [18] Self-preservation, "push through" mentality, connecting Culturally sensitive mental health with peers, lab mates, or postdocs, active coping resources, awareness & help-seeking through problem-solving