more information, resources, and structure than they were originally provided.Training materials and information packets were created for the second cohort’s peer mentors.Faculty Mentoring: Each INNOV student also has a faculty mentor, in addition to their facultyadvisor, to provide a one-on-one relationship for academic support and career guidance. Thesefaculty also help students explore research and professional opportunities. Lesson learned:Students and faculty both needed direct information on expectations for their role in the mentoringrelationship.Professional Mentoring: INNOV scholars meet regularly with non-faculty staff mentors who helpthe students navigate academic and social challenges. Lessons Learned: 1) These mentors wereable to
resources to this mission. To date, theprogram has provided eighty-three semesters worth of tuition support to thirty-six students.Additionally, the program provides financial support to promising student projects that havebeen vetted by the scholar cohort and undertaken as class projects in the host department’sProject-Based Learning (PBL) curriculum. This paper outlines the program and activitiesundertaken in 2024.2. Program ObjectivesThe FLiTE scholarship program is strongly motivated by the financial needs of students and thecommercial needs of the western North Carolina region that WCU serves. Frequently, studentsfrom the region who obtain STEM degrees will choose to build their careers elsewhere due to adearth of local employment
tenure reviewer perceives the portfolio's research quality, with higherscores indicating greater excellence.For the factorial experiment, we used independent variables that were dichotomous, as describedin the list below. • Viewpoint: Peer comparison in rating the portfolio (reviewers perception of research excellence vs. their colleagues). • Ph.D.: Prestige of the candidate's degree-granting institution (high vs. moderate). • Field: Mainstream vs. out-of-the-box field in a discipline. • Journal: High-impact vs. lower-impact publication venues. • Publications: High (30) vs low number (5) of publications since appointment. • h-index: High (25) vs. low (5) research impact. • Funding: NSF CAREER grant vs
Paper ID #49403BOARD # 455: Stimulating Interdisciplinary Graduate Research Across NSF-NRTInstitutionsDr. Shana Lee McAlexander, Duke University As Associate Director, Shana leads grant operations for the Harnessing AI for Understanding and Designing Materials (aiM Program), a Research Traineeship program supported by the National Science Foundation. Shana’s research interests revolve around STEM Education; representation in science and engineering careers; access to internships; team science, convergence, and interdisciplinarity.Prof. Catherine Brinson, Duke UniversityDr. Richard J. Sheridan, Duke University Richard
interest in STEM careers byempowering teacher leaders to enhance their own and their colleagues' effectiveness.Faculty and staff at MTU and NMU are collaborating for MTP to enact long-standing plans forcollaboration to improve teaching and learning in Michigan schools. The partnership betweenNMU and MTU leverages NMU’s strengths in teacher education in pedagogy and praxis andMTU’s strengths in STEM. The project is managed by the PI team at MTU in coordination withrepresentatives from NMU and an external evaluator from Western Michigan University.Program ObjectivesTwenty teachers with master’s degrees are supported as a cohort in their development asteacher-leaders. Years 1-2 of the teacher leadership programming will include training onleadership
)IntroductionAccess to enriching engineering experiences remains a challenge, particularly for Latinx highschool students with one or more parents who are migratory seasonal farmworkers, herein referredto as migratory students. A migratory student is a child/ whose parent(s) is a migratory agriculturalworker. There are approximately half a million migratory children navigating the Americaneducation system, and they face unique challenges—including frequent relocations, Englishlanguage learners, and disrupted schooling—that significantly impact their academic outcomesand career aspirations [1], [2]. Migratory students have limited access to engineering learningexperiences and also encounter curricula that often fail to connect meaningfully with their
ongoing study toinvestigate how our diverse mentoring group interacts to learn qualitative research methods inthe context of EER. Collaborative autoethnography is a qualitative research method that is“simultaneously collaborative, autobiographical, and ethnographic” [8, p. 17] in that it involves agroup of people collectively reflecting and documenting their perceptions of a shared cultural orlearning experience. It can be described as “a study of self [that is] conducted in the company ofothers” [8, p. 17]. In this work, we are a group of five academic researchers and practitioners atmultiple career stages collectively reflecting on our perceptions of mentoring relationshipswithin the context of the two RIEF projects that began in August 2024.A
were at acomparable point in their degree program. Of the 22 students in the two cohorts, 10 graduatedwithin 4 years, 10 are on track to graduate within 4 years while 2 are progressing toward degreecompletion within an extended timeline of 4.5 years. Key successes included full placement ininternships or research experiences, which proved to be vital for both professional and academicdevelopment. Additionally, graduates of the program achieved high rates of professionalplacement or entry into graduate programs. These outcomes underscore the program’s ability toeffectively prepare students for success in their careers or further education, reflecting the robustsupport and opportunities provided throughout their participation in the ECS Scholars
wellness, engineering student career pathways, and engagement of engineering faculty in engineering education research.Jeanne Sanders, University of Michigan Jeanne Sanders (she/her/hers) is a researcher in Engineering Education. She graduated with her Ph.D from North Carolina State University in the Fall of 2020 and works as a staff researcher in the Thrive Lab at the University of Michigan.Dr. Mark Vincent Huerta, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Huerta is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He earned his PhD in Engineering Education Systems & Design at Arizona State University and has a BS/MS in Biomedical Engineering. His research group
courses. The Postsecondary Instructional Practices Survey (PIPS) revealed severalcore strategies consistently employed by instructors. These included guiding students throughmajor topics, connecting course content to their lives and future careers, and crafting detailedsyllabi that provided clear expectations. Immediate feedback emerged as a key practice whichenabled students to quickly correct misconceptions. Additionally, instructors frequentlyacknowledged and built upon students’ prior knowledge and created a foundation for deeperlearning. Peer and instructor interaction were also emphasized that fostered collaborative andinteractive learning environments.Classroom observations offered further evidence of thoughtful course design and
Paper ID #48338BOARD # 315: A Customizable Engineering Outreach Program for Elementarythrough High School Students (EDU/DRL)Mrs. Kathleen Dinota, Stony Brook University Kathleen Dinota received her B.S. in Marine Science and M.S. in Secondary Education, retiring in 2017 after teaching in public schools on Long Island, NY for 31 years. During her career, she taught earth science, biology and chemistry as well as science research. Kathleen has also worked in test development at NY State Education Department as an Education Specialist for the Regents Physical Setting Chemistry exam for the past 20 years. She is a former NYS
worth investing time into amidst their stressful schedules. Particularly in thefield of engineering, graduated students find work everywhere from the oil and gas industry inHouston and Qatar to civil engineering projects in Flint, Michigan and the Dominican Republic.We believe that framing teaching about the variety of people they will work with intoprofessional-skill career preparation [13] will engage students further. Through this mechanism,we will still engage trained peer leaders to have mentorship groups for discussion, reflection, andsupport, but teaching all students communication and conflict resolution skills will hopefullyreach a broader student population.AcknowledgmentsWe would like to thank the National Science Foundation for the
Paper ID #48436BOARD # 357: ECR: Core. Identity Intersections of Indigenous Engineersand Computer ScientistsNuria Jaumot-Pascual Ph.D., TERC Nuria Jaumot-Pascual, Ph.D. is a Research Scientist at TERC. She leads studies on the experiences of people of color in STEM education and careers through creative methods and meta-synthesis, methods that she provides professional development on. She is Co-PI in four NSF-funded projects and a Spencer Foundation project, two of which focus on the experiences of Native students and professionals in STEM. She has a Ph.D. in Qualitative Research Methodologies from the University of
Cincinnati Dr. Joel Alejandro (Alex) Mejia is a Professor of Engineering Education in the Department of Engineering and Computing Education at the University of Cincinnati. His work examines the intersections of engineering, social justice, and critical pedagogies. He focuses on dismantling deficit ideologies in STEM, centering Latino/a/x student experiences—especially of those along the U.S.-Mexico border. His work draws on Chicana/o/x studies, raciolinguistics, and bilingual education to explore how language, race, and socialization shape engineering pathways and engineering practice. In 2025, Dr. Mejia received the Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) Award for his contributions to
service-learningparticipation, students reported increased awareness and understanding of others, strongerconnections with peers and community members, and the ability to apply academic knowledge inreal-world settings. Additionally, students gained practical experience in their fields of study andexplored potential career paths. Many participants also expressed significant personal growth asleaders.Rose-Hulman Institute of TechnologyAt Rose-Hulman, leadership principles from The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People areincorporated into a freshman civil engineering design course [6]. Students work in teams,interact with clients, and produce a final report in the form of a feasibility study and preliminarydesign. This experience enhances their
. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education. Her research earned her a National Science Foundation CAREER Award focused on characterizing latent diversity, which includes diverse attitudes, mindsets, and approaches to learning to understand engineering students’ identity development. She has won several awards for her research including the 2021 Chemical Engineering Education William H. Corcoran Award, 2022 American Educational Research Association Education in the Professions (Division I) 2021-2022 Outstanding Research Publication Award, and the 2023 AIChE Excellence in Engineering Education Research Award.Trevor Franklin, University of
, which can have important implications for faculty andgraduate student research, publishing, funding, and careers. Literature ReviewAcademic EntrepreneurshipAcademic entrepreneurship refers to the activities in which faculty, students, and researchersbecome involved to translate research, knowledge, and innovations into commercially viableproducts, services, and entities. These activities include patenting, the founding of startupcompanies, consulting, and licensing agreements with industry, all of which generate economicdevelopment and societal impact from academic science (Etzkowitz, 2003; Rothaermel et al.,2007). Shifting attention to entrepreneurial outcomes represents a change in how universities
. McDonnell, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PWL) (COE) Christine is a PhD student in the school of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Christine is interested in exploring the connections between integrated STEM education in K-12 classroom settings and the impact on student learning, career interests, and reducing premature departure from STEM pathways.Ms. Azizi Penn, Purdue Engineering Education Azizi Penn is a professional software engineer, a professor at California State University, Sacramento, and an engineering education Ph.D. student. Prior to and during her graduate work, she developed a passion for providing engineering practice experiences to pre-college students.Brian Povilus, University of
University. His recent courses focus on foundational engineering subjects, including statics, project design, and computational problem-solving. Prior to his academic career, he worked as a engineer in the maritime construction industry, specializing in hydraulic sediment transport modeling and geotechnical analysis. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 WIP: Computation and Student Engagement in First-Year EngineeringAbstractOur WIP describes an exploratory quasi-experimental study to determine if first-yearengineering students' academic motivation and engagement could be improved using WebTA.WebTA is a "code critiquer" to assist novice programmers in
MicroaggressionsAbstractThis full research paper draws attention to challenges faced by women of color in their academicjourneys in STEM. Within the stories shared by minoritized women, many were recentlyexploited during their time as doctoral students, research scientists, postdoctoral scholars, and asearly career faculty within STEM fields in academia. Many of these incidents could becharacterized as hierarchical microaggressions. Listening to their stories we can consider theextent to which individual bad actors were responsible for these harms, versus exploring thesystem-level conditions and cultures that enable these situations. This work encourages faculty tolean into the power, positionality, and agency they possess to work toward creating a culture
on engineering identity development, career pathways, and integrating computational and AI-based methods in engineering education. He has been actively involved in developing and assessing engineering courses, including project-based learning initiatives.Chanyee HongHyeyeon Lim ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Work in Progress: Exploring Biomedical Engineering Students’ Perceptionsof Large Language Model in Academic SettingsIntroductionIn Work in Progress (WIP) study, we are particularly interested in how engineering studentsperceive utility value and self-efficacy in using LLM for their engineering studies. Previousresearch has shown that self-efficacy is closely linked to academic
Paper ID #48491WIP: A Call to Action: Developing A Leadership Program that SupportsAcademic Caregivers Using the Kotter Change ModelDr. Megan Morin, North Carolina State University at Raleigh Megan Morin, Ph.D. (she/her) is the Associate Director in the Office of Faculty Development and Success at North Carolina State University’s College of Engineering. Her career began as a middle school teacher in the North Carolina Wake County Public School System. Following that, she took on roles such as the KEEN Program Coordinator at UNC-Chapel Hill and Senior Project Specialist at ASHLIN Management Group. In her current position
technical skills are often the focus of engineering programs,students rarely receive formal guidance on effective teamwork. Without proper training, negativegroup experiences can challenge their future workforce professional success. Therefore,integrating teamwork training into the engineering curriculum is vital for preparing students forthe collaborative nature of their careers and this is our primary motivation.There is an open question on how and where to fit these teamwork preparations into thecurriculum. Developing teamwork skills involves understanding key elements in team dynamicssuch as, managing roles and expectations, effective communication, and conflict management -shown in Figure 1. Successful teams build trust by clearly defining
serves as Deputy Editor with the Journal of Engineering Education and Chair of the Education Research and Methods Division in the American Society for Engineering Education. He earned his Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University, his M.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Purdue, and his B.S. in Computer Engineering from Harding. Dr. Huff is a qualitative researcher whose work lies at the interdisciplinary nexus of engineering education research and applied personality and social psychology. An NSF CAREER Awardee, he is committed to fostering care as a central mindset of engineering and other professions through his in-depth examinations of personal lived experiences of identity and emotion
Paper ID #48439Beyond Implementation: Exploring Research through Design to Elevate EverydayEducational Innovation in Engineering EducationDr. Jennifer A Turns, University of Washington Dr. Jennifer Turns is a full professor in the Human Centered Design & Engineering Department in the College of Engineering at the University of Washington. Engineering education is her primary area of scholarship, and has been throughout her career. In her work, she currently focuses on the role of reflection in engineering student learning and the relationship of research and practice in engineering education. In recent years, she
into modernmanufacturing practices and emerging technologies. Through collaborative workshops and interactive sessions,participants develop innovative curriculum modules that bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and real-world applications, which enables them to effectively teach these concepts in their classrooms. The RET Site alsofeatures plant tours and guest lectures to provide educators with a comprehensive understanding of themanufacturing landscape and the skills needed for today’s workforce. As a result of their experiences, educatorsreturn to their institutions equipped with new teaching resources and a deeper understanding of the manufacturingindustry, which results in a greater interest in STEM careers among their students
cultivates and unites multidisciplinary interests to studyadvanced structures and systems with application to hypersonics, space, propulsion, and energy.Participants engage in a 10-week experience, conducting graduate-level research under a facultymentor and alongside a graduate student teammate. In addition to the core research experience,HYPER incorporates a series of professional development seminars, technology training sessions,faculty mentor presentations, and social events.HYPER has seven core objectives: (1) technically prepare students for graduate school and/orresearch oriented careers, (2) escalate students’ abilities to simulate phenomena using multi-physics software, (3) improve participants’ oral/written communication skills, (4
throughout their careers. In the US, foreign-born workers accounted for 19% ofthe STEM workforce in 2019 and represent 45% of the subset of STEM workers (i.e.mathematical and computer scientists, physical scientists, life scientists, social scientists, andengineers) with doctoral degrees in 2019 [5]. Therefore, American engineers who transition toindustry or pursue graduate research are likely to work directly with foreign-born professionals.It is then incredibly important for students to develop the intercultural communicationcompetence to work effectively with persons from other countries and cultures. A component ofintercultural communication competence is intercultural sensitivity, which Chen and Starostadescribe as a person's "ability to
theirmotivation to learn. Implemented across multiple institutions, Earth Trek not onlyimproves students' laboratory skills and geotechnical knowledge, but also integrates smartcity design concepts and develops their metacognitive and problem-solving skills. Beyondclassroom teaching, the game supports self-paced learning, promoting lifelong educationand preparing students for careers in geotechnical engineering.INTRODUCTION Today's society is facing global challenges due to climate change, energy shortages, andaging infrastructure. Geotechnical engineers play a crucial role in addressing these issues,but the complexity of geotechnical engineering demands interdisciplinary knowledge andinnovation, posing challenges to current education models
example ofan external environment that impacts students can be seen through space exploration. Accordingto Collins [16], “Without pronounced personal interest, if they never see astronauts that looklike them nor understand how that career field will affect their innermost circle of friends andfamily, there is decreased value to that field of study for them” [16, p. 161]. Figure 1 furtherdemonstrates how these aspects contribute to a STEM identity. Figure 1. Black student STEM identity [16].MethodsResearch DesignThis study used a mixed-method methodology to explore students’ self-efficacy andperformance based on quantitative data sources (pre- and post-implementation surveys andqualitative sources (quality of participants