areexplained away by a false sense of meritocracy, an idea that people get what they personallymerit, rather than seeing injustice as a consequence of technological design, bias or largersystemic issues [2]. Faculty who been trained immersed in this culture, tend to normalize themainstream values and lack training and comfort in integrating social justice issues in theircourses [4]. And students who have interest in social justice often feel they must leave it at thedoor of their engineering classes [2]. As a result, students are often unaware of how engineering intersects with social justice[3]. And even when they are aware, it becomes less important to students over the course of theircareers [2]. Prior scholarship has highlighted a narrow
Paper ID #45945Reclaiming Space: Fostering Inclusivity for Women in Engineering FieldsShaundra Bryant Daily, Duke University Shaundra B. Daily is the Cue Family Professor of the Practice in Electrical and Computer Engineering at Duke University. Prior to joining Duke, she was an associate professor with tenure at the University of Florida in the Department of Computer & Information Science & Engineering. She also served as an associate professor and interim co-chair in the School of Computing at Clemson University. Her research focuses on the design, implementation, and evaluation of technologies, programs, and
undergraduate students. In addition to his role as Director, Dr. Chui holds the position of Assistant Dean (Teaching and Learning) in the Faculty of Engineering at HKU, responsible for driving curriculum reform and active learning activities. His research interests include database and data mining, as well as pedagogical research in engineering education. Dr. Chui has been the recipient of several prestigious awards, including the University Distinguished Teaching Award (Individual Award) at the University of Hong Kong for the 2024-25 academic year, the University Outstanding Teaching Award (Individual Award) at the University of Hong Kong for the 2015-16 academic year, and the Faculty Outstanding Teaching Award
during the class. Indeed, it might not even have confirmed the presence ofthe student either. At the University of Ottawa, during the pandemic, it was decided thatrequesting a student to turn on their web camera, while potentially helping to improve student’presence’, constituted an invasion of privacy (i.e. forcing the student to invite the instructorand/or other students into their bedroom).The absence of the Metacognitive Self-Regulation scale among the four most significant latentvariables implies that reflection skills may not be an essential factor in the course. Since the studywas conducted, a series of three reflection assignments have been designed and integrated into thecourse curriculum. These are designed to encourage students to
issue affecting women’s participation in STEM fields.Dr. Stephen Secules, Florida International University Dr. Stephen Secules is an Assistant Professor in the School of Universal Computing, Construction, and Engineering Education at Florida International University. Secules holds a joint appointment in the STEM Transformation Institute and a secondary appointment in the Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering. He has bachelor degrees in engineering from Dartmouth College, a master’s in Architectural Acoustics from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and a PhD in Education (Curriculum and Instruction) from the University of Maryland. Prior to his academic career, Stephen was an acoustical consultant for 5
-related- learning-outcomes[7] E. Thomas et al., “A Body of Knowledge and Pedagogy for Global Engineering,” Int. J. Serv. Learn. Eng. Humanit. Eng. Soc. Entrep., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 37–57, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.24908/ijsle.v16i1.14483.[8] G. A. Boy, “Design for flexibility [electronic resource] : a human systems integration approach / Guy André Boy.,” Jan. 2021.[9] L. MacDonald et al., “Aligning learning objectives and approaches in global engineering graduate programs: Review and recommendations by an interdisciplinary working group,” Dev. Eng., vol. 7, p. 100095, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.deveng.2022.100095.[10] J. Lucena, J. Schneider, and J. Leydens, “Engineering And Sustainable Community Development: Critical Pedagogy
development. His research interests are in the areas of engineering education, microwave absorber design, ferroelectrics, photovoltaics, THz sensors, signal integrity, and semiconductor device characterization, design and simulation. He is a member of IEEE and ASEE.Dr. Jamie Lyn Kennedy, The College of New Jersey Jamie Kennedy is currently a Director of Innovation and Research at Chadwick School in Palos Verdes Peninsula, California. She has been teaching for over a decade at both the higher education and K-12 levels. Currently, she teaches 6th - 12th grade in areDr. Melinda Holtzman, Portland State University Melinda Holtzman is an Assistant Teaching Professor and undergraduate advisor for the Electrical and Computer
Paper ID #47790Non-Traditional Spatial Ability Training Methods and their Effect on CADProficiencyLogan Izaiah Abraham, Florida Polytechnic University Logan Abraham is a Mechanical Engineering student specializing in aerospace at Florida Polytechnic University, where he also serves as an Undergraduate Research Assistant. His work centers on engineering design and the integration of spatial abilities into the curriculum, exploring how these skills impact engineering education and influence the long-term success of students in STEM majors. An active member of ASEE, Logan is committed to advancing engineering education through
average 12 / semester) to successful completion of an end produ ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Work in Progress: Project Health as a Capstone Rubric ElementAbstractSenior Design capstone programs help students develop many skillsets, including the ability tosuccessfully manage a project. Students struggle transitioning from small assignments with clearinstructions to large projects with less defined short-term activities and deliverables. As studentshave little to no experience managing large projects, the curriculum must provide tools andtemplates to help students manage their projects. A common method is to introduce ‘gates’ withspecific deliverables for each gate, as typically used in
Paper ID #48266Writing Assessment Training for Capstone Design InstructorsDr. Jessie Cortez, Texas A&M University Jessie Cortez is a lecturer in the J. Mike Walker ’66 Department of Mechanical Engineering at Texas A&M University. She specializes in writing pedagogy, rhetoric and composition, and technical communication.Dr. Joanna Tsenn, Texas A&M University Joanna Tsenn is an Assistant Professor of Instruction in the J. MikeWalker ’66 Department of Mechanical Engineering at Texas A&M University. She earned her B.S. from the University of Texas at Austin and her Ph.D. from Texas A&M University. She
equitable participation for women in engineering," International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 34, no. 2, 2017.[13] R. Castro and J. Nichols, "Experiential learning in the curricula: Integrating the makerspace into first-year engineering coursework.," in 6th International Symposium on Academic Makerspaces, 2022.[14] A. Longo, B. Yoder, R. Chavela Guerra and R. Tsanov, "University makerspaces: Characteristics and impact on student success in engineering and engineering technology education," in American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition 2017, 2017.[15] D. Baker, S. Krause, S. Yasar, C. Roberts and S. Robinson-Kurpius, "An intervention to address gender issues in a course on
students as of the first semester of2024, underwent rigorous preprocessing. This included the normalization and transformationof 36 predictive variables (detailed in Appendix A) to ensure data quality and homogeneitybefore integrating them into the predictive models.The models selected for evaluation, Gradient Boosting Regressor (GBR), Random ForestRegressor (RF), AdaBoost Regressor (ADA), K-Neighbors Regressor (KNN), and LinearRegression (LR), were chosen for their flexibility in capturing non-linear relationships andtheir adaptability to various data patterns. The methodology involved an initial split of thedata into training (80%) and testing (20%) sets, along with a 10-fold cross-validation schemeto ensure stability and representativeness of
Paper ID #48756Aerospace Engineering Education in the Era of Generative AIJulie B. Coder, The Pennsylvania State University Julie B. Coder is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction in the College of Education at Penn State University.Dr. James G Coder, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Jim Coder is an Associate Professor of Aerospace Engineering at Penn State University, specializing in applied aerodynamics and computational fluid dynamics.Dr. Mark D. Maughmer, The Pennsylvania State University Dr. Mark D. Maughmer is a professor of Aerospace Engineering at Penn State University, specializing in
dimensions.MethodologyThe study employed a mixed-methods approach to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of ahands-on physical model lab for teaching reinforced concrete concepts in a structures forconstruction course. The research focused on junior-year undergraduate students majoring in aconstruction management program at a public university in Florida, representing a critical pointin their academic progression when they begin engaging with advanced structural concepts. Asshown in Figure 1, the research methodology unfolded across three distinct phases: (1) needsassessment, (2) lab development and implementation, and (3) effectiveness evaluation.The initial needs assessment phase, conducted in Spring 2023, began with an end-of-semestersurvey integrated into
Georgia Racheida S. Lewis, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor at the University of Georgia in the Engineering Education Transformations Institute (EETI) and the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Dr. Lewis believes in creating a diverse engineering field and strives to do so through connecting with teaching and mentoring future engineers. She has devoted her life to this mission through her leadership and lifetime membership in NSBE, SWE, & SHPE. Ultimately, Dr. Lewis aspires to bridge together research and pedagogy within the academy to improve engineering education within the field and across disciplines.Nyna Jaye DeWitt, University of Georgia Nyna, born and raised in Durham, North Carolina, obtained
gas or liquid.” [4] Mechanics isdefined as “the study of forces and motions.” [5] Common disciplines that include fluidmechanics are mechanical engineering, chemical engineering and civil engineering. While theprinciples are the same, key applications often differ. Engineering educators have sharedinnovations in fluid mechanics instruction. Examples are provided below and presented basedon whether the course is discipline-specific or a shared course.Discipline-Specific CoursesFaculty at University of Wisconsin Madison [6] describe an innovation in a civil engineeringfluid mechanics course created because hydraulics was needed in the curriculum and wasn’ttaught in solid mechanics. The paper acknowledges that fluid mechanics is taught in
are currently underway to involve students from our otherengineering programs (e.g., biomedical, building). Since communication must flow both ways,the information gathered from the surveys will help us identify areas for improvement in theactivities, enhancing coordination and aligning resources across departments and faculty. Thispaper will be included in the M-MCDP documentation provided to students and instructors, andis an integral part of our continuous improvement process. We will continue our effort toimprove uniformity, coordination, and calibration between instructors and staff. Instructors havebeen administered to the graduating students will also be Additionally, we are continuouslyadjusting the SharePoint tools used to facilitate
formal onboarding practices were only laboratory 34% 22% safety training. It appears that most student process preparation must take place on an individual basis, No formal 60% 72% which means that the faculty mentor must be process responsible for it. Don't know 5% 5%Based on the responses to questions on research credit in the curriculum, most programs haveformal offerings that can count toward a chemical engineering degree, most commonly fulfillingrequirements either for chemical engineering electives or technical electives (Table 4). For mostof those, the
Paper ID #46108Investigating Preliminary Examination Practices in U.S. Mechanical EngineeringDoctoral ProgramsDr. Grace Burleson, University of Colorado Boulder Grace Burleson is an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering at CU Boulder where her research focuses on advancing engineering design theory and methodology. She earned her PhD in Design Science at the University of Michigan as well as a dual MS in Mechanical Engineering and Applied Anthropology and a BS in Mechanical Engineering from Oregon State University in 2018 and 2016, respectively. She was an ASME Engineering for Change Fellow from 2017-2021.Dr. Janet Y
overcome, they require careful planning and a significant investment of time whencreating the course or when adapting the course for specifications grading.Specifications grading can be tailored to support the learning outcomes of an individual courseand the course’s role in the curriculum. For example, Tsoi [14] describes the development ofthree specifications grading variants for undergraduate science and mathematics courses. Incourses with “core” learning objectives foundational to subsequent courses, students wererequired to master all core objectives to pass the course. Students could earn a higher grade bycompleting additional (non-core) learning objectives. In other courses, all learning objectiveswere deemed equally important. Students
learning experiences via her own research and in her professional role supporting interdisciplinary research teams. She uses social network analysis and qualitative methods to understand relationships between team members and plans to develop interventions to build closeness and belonging in teams.Dr. Ruben D. Lopez-Parra, Universidad del Norte Ruben D. Lopez-Parra is an Assistant Professor in the Instituto de Estudios en Educaci´on (Institute for Educational Studies) at the Universidad del Norte in Colombia. His Ph.D. is in Engineering Education from Purdue University, and he has worked as a K-16 STEM instructor and curriculum designer using various evidence-based learning strategies. In 2015, Ruben earned an M.S. in
settings.Jack Boomer Perry, University of Michigan .Dr. Aaron W. Johnson, University of Michigan Aaron W. Johnson is an Assistant Professor in the Aerospace Engineering Department and a Core Faculty member of the Engineering Education Research Program at the University of Michigan. His design-based research focuses on how to re-contextualize engineering science engineering courses to better reflect and prepare students for the reality of ill-defined, sociotechnical engineering practice. Current projects include studying and designing classroom interventions around macroethical issues in aerospace engineering and the productive beginnings of engineering judgment as students create and use mathematical models. Aaron holds
. The frequency ofconcerns cited by students having used and not used Gen. AI is presented in Table 2. Note thatnot all concern prompts were provided to both groups and in the case of a group not receiving aprompt an “N/A” is shown. Both groups most frequently had concerns around low qualityresponses and academic integrity issues. An AI policy was circulated stating students were freeto use any tools they wished but that students were responsible for the accuracy of the work theysubmitted, and this policy was mirrored in the communications course. In general based on theresponses students seemed to have a healthy amount of skepticism in terms of Gen. AI usage.One noted difference between groups, is that none of those using AI reported an issue
pre-service teachers requires time and coordination. Additionally, a modest budget of approximately$150 per team is necessary to cover project materials, transportation costs, and hourly wages forpre-service teachers.To build confidence in their teaching and ensure everything works as designed, each team shouldrehearse their lesson with the assigned pre-service teacher. Based on written reflections, studentswho delivered lessons in a local school engaged more deeply with the experience compared tothose who participated in an on-campus outreach event.ConclusionThis paper presents a semester-long leadership development course for first-year engineeringstudents. A community-engaged team project is integrated into the curriculum, allowing
program’s primary objectives includedelivering a comprehensive high school engineering curriculum, providing professionaldevelopment for teachers, and conducting research to advance engineering education, promotingequitable learning environments for students from diverse backgrounds [6].The project’s prior research has examined students’ interest and intentions to pursue engineering.This work-in-progress expands previous findings through an analysis of survey data gatheredbefore and after course participation from high school students enrolled in a high schoolengineering curriculum during the 2022-2023 academic year to examine whether previousfindings persist. The focus of the investigation is on the experiences of TGNC students withinthe course
Practice: Tips for how to do it Right,” in Robotics: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications: concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications, IGI Global, 2014, pp. 193–223. doi: 10.4018/978-1-4666-4607-0.ch011.[12] A. S. Gomoll, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, E. Tolar, S. Šabanovic, and M. Francisco, “Moving Apart and Coming Together: Discourse, Engagement, and Deep Learning,” Educ. Technol. Soc., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 219–232, Jan. 2017.[13] D. Bernstein, G. Puttick, K. Wendell, F. Shaw, E. Danahy, and M. Cassidy, “Designing biomimetic robots: iterative development of an integrated technology design curriculum,” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 119–147, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11423-021- 10061-0.[14] S
integrating project-based learning in the ECE curriculum. Through an isolated and emotional experience, this studywas able to document the effect of project-based learning (PBL) on conceptual connections andearly professional development.IntroductionProject-based learning (PBL) has long been recognized as an integral tool in engineeringeducation, enabling students to bridge theoretical knowledge with practical applications throughhands-on experiences [1-2]. Research demonstrates that, compared to traditional curricula,students in PBL-focused programs exhibit significantly increased levels of self-efficacy, intrinsicvalue, cognitive strategy use, and self-regulation [1]. Furthermore, PBL fosters a greaterabundance of self-regulated learners and
which prompted an evaluation – and ultimatelya redesign – of its undergraduate curriculum. At the same time, the engineering school wasreevaluating its approach to undergraduate education in response to a university-driven effortleading to an increased emphasis on design, including plans for a new school-wide design center.Thus, in keeping with the mission of the University and to fulfill a multitude of our ownobjectives – e.g. attracting and retaining students by making them feel part of a community,integrating an authentic design experience early in the curriculum to build students’ designthinking skills, and engaging students with the community in their adopted city – the programadded a one-credit cornerstone design course to its new first
become an essential toolfor academic and professional growth. Over the past couple of years, the use of GenerativeArtificial Intelligence (GAI) in academia has been the subject of several debates, with discussionsfocusing on its ethical implications and how to use it to aid teaching and learning effectively. AsGAI technologies become increasingly prevalent, raising awareness about their potential uses andestablishing clear guidelines and best practices for their integration into academic settings isessential. Without proper understanding and frameworks in place, the misuse or over-reliance onthese tools could undermine the educational goals they aim to support. Workshops and seminarsplay a critical role in addressing these concerns by not only
., Kaczynski, Developing culturally competent teachers: AnD., & Leonard, S. N. (2015) international student teaching field experienceQuiñonez, T. L., & Olivas, A. P. Validation theory and culturally relevant curriculum in the(2020) information literacy classroomKettle, M. (2017) International student engagement in higher education: Transforming practices, pedagogies and participationWang, R., & BrckaLorenz, A. (2018) International student engagement: An exploration of student and faculty perceptionsOlayemi, M. (2023) Understanding Culturally Relevant Engineering Education