real-worldprojects. By bridging theoretical concepts with practical applications, VEs enhance learning,improve skill development, and offer an engaging educational experience [11, 12].Integrated feedback mechanisms within VEs allow students to refine their strategies iteratively,creating a continuous improvement loop. Similar to varied treatments in medical SA, differentVE approaches can be studied to determine their impact on student engagement andachievement. 1.2. Research ObjectivesThe primary objectives of this study are to: a. Design and development of virtual environments for engineering core course as “treatment” to enhance engagement b. Apply FLASH to forecast student success based on engagement data in VEs within
Cornell University and Bachelor degrees in Mechanical Engineering and Physics from Cedarville University. His research interests are focused on best practices for student learning and student success. He is currently developing and researching SMART assessment, a modified mastery learning pedagogy for problem based courses. He created a multi-year integrated system design (ISD) project for mechanical engineering students. He is a mentor to mechanical engineering graduate teaching fellows and actively champions the adoption and use of teaching technologies. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Increasing Participation in Late-Afternoon Friday Lectures: How
. The Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) framework encourages K–12 educators to integrate engineering concepts alongside scientific practices by incorporatingmodel development, problem-based investigations, and iterative design processes [1, 4, 5]. Atleast 41 states have adopted engineering knowledge and skills into their educational standards.While Carr et al. [2] provided a baseline for engineering's inclusion in K–12 standards, theimplementation and impact on student learning remain underexplored. The degree to whichinstructional approaches are consistently applied across different school systems is unknown, asengineering integration varies widely between districts and states.Without such established baseline experiences, institutions
Paper ID #47089Creative Changemaking within Complex Institutional ContextsDr. Rae Jing Han, University of Washington Dr. Rae Jing Han (they/them) is a Research Scientist at the University of Washington Center for Evaluation & Research for STEM Equity. ¨Selen Guler, University of Washington Selen G¨uler is a PhD Candidate in Sociology at the University of Washington, and a research assistant at the University of Washington’s Center for Evaluation and Research for STEM Equity (CERSE). Selen’s research interests include institutional change, social movements, and the cultural foundations of policy-making.Dr
contributions of microfluidic systems in the visual system. She received the 2023 AIMBE Professional Impact Award for the inclusion of Health Disparities within under/graduate training and was honored as the 2024 Plenary Speaker to the BMES Council of Chairs for integration of health disparities in Biomedical Engineering curricula. She is an executive committee member for the Rutgers Connection Network that develops inclusive forms of peer mentoring for mid-career faculty as well as new faculty.Kelsey Watts, University of Virginia Kelsey Watts is a postdoc at the University of Virginia in Biomedical Engineering. She is committed to developing more inclusive teaching and research practices
onlineplatforms, impacting classroom modality significantly. These institutions have experienced anotable decline in SLOs, evidenced by reduced class retention (staying in the program) ratesand assignments completion. This paper examines the impact of incorporating best practices identified in theliterature and students’ feedback to enhance Latinx students' SLOs and academic success over anine-year period. The research investigates the correlation between Latinx student retentionand: (1) course material delivery format/structure (comparing in-person, hybrid, and fullyonline modalities); (2) the impact of group activities versus individual assignments (assessingstudent performance on multiple-choice quizzes, essays, and projects designed for
andsocietal implications of this proliferation of AI tools, especially in educational settings, warrantinvestigating. Yet research regarding the implications of AI in education and best practices forusing AI tools in the education industry is lacking, especially regarding the needs of teachers.K-12 teachers have the potential to help students learn to interact responsibly with AI inside andoutside the classroom. Also, teachers can use AI tools themselves to facilitate student learningand reduce the workload associated with teaching. While some AI-powered tools for teachersand student learners have been developed, a paucity of literature explores connections betweenAI tools and K-12 teachers’ needs, or factors influencing teachers’ interest and
], library assessment [16], and thevalue of public libraries [17].Furthermore, the authors had to review policies about uploading literature to AI tools for analysisand each author had different license agreement language and institutional policies that coveredthis type of work. The authors took care to only upload articles to tools in a closed university research environment, but this work demonstrated that evidence synthesis practices will be greatly impacted by the proliferation of AI search and analysis tools and that libraries offering these services need to be prepared to understand how AI is and can be used in this method of work and to advocate for license agreements and institutional policies that facilitate evidence
integrating these technologies into the curriculumand their impact on student learning. Second, it examines the effective strategies forimplementing these technologies within education programs. Lastly, the study investigates theoptimal timing of introducing these tools in the curriculum to ensure maximum engagement andknowledge retention. Overall, the study aims to address these three questions: 1. Why is it necessary to implement sensing technologies? 2. How should these technologies be implemented in the curriculum? 3. When is the best time to introduce these tools into the curriculum?MethodologyThe data collection for this research involved the distribution of survey questionnairesspecifically designed for students and industry participants
research plan is to develop modules which integrate technical and social topics related to theIntroduction to Circuits course. We will pre-pilot each module at a small private institution(University of San Diego), pilot it at a large public research institution (University of Michigan),and then scale it to other large circuits courses. To develop new modules, we worked with acohort of graduate students.Our research questions include 1. How can graduate students apply proven course design practices to effectively integrate sociotechnical issues into an Introduction to Circuits course? 2. What is the impact of the modules on students’ sense of social responsibility and their adherence to normative cultural beliefs? How do these
practices of these coding organizations. Ultimately, thisresearch seeks to offer a framework to critically evaluate pedagogical practices for softwareengineering education as well as specific strategies for cultivating a more inclusive learningenvironment and improving the learning experiences of underrepresented students inengineering.2. Study Exigence and Research QuestionsOur study exigence arises from both our academic commitments and personal experiences. Ourresearch team consists of one technical communication faculty member who co-teaches withengineering faculty in advanced capstone design courses, and three undergraduate researchersmajoring in software engineering and aerospace engineering. Our faculty researcher witnesseschallenging
. Morphew is affiliated with the INSPIRE research institute for Pre-College Engineering and the Center for Advancing the Teaching and Learning of STEM (CATALYST). Dr. Morphew’s research focuses on the application of principles of learning derived from cognitive science and the learning sciences to the design and evaluation of learning environments and technologies that enhance learning, interest, and engagement in STEM.Junior Anthony Bennett, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Junior Anthony Bennett is a Graduate Research Assistant and Lynn Fellow at Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA. He is pursuing an Interdisciplinary Ph.D. program in Engineering Education majoring in Ecological Sciences and
throughgraduate students. Team members may have participated in VIP for one semester or up to threeor more semesters. The VIP model enables tiered mentoring, from faculty to graduate students,graduate students to undergraduates, and more senior to newer students [1]. The goals of UofM’sVIP program are to: (1) help build a more inclusive research culture; and (2) help students buildSTEM identity, as well as self-efficacy, mindset, and intentions to stay in engineering. The firstgoal is based on research about the positive impact of active learning and mentoring forrecruiting and retaining women and other historically excluded groups in STEM [2]. The secondgoal builds on previous work on mentoring and community building on STEM Identity, whileextending
and a local school district, Hammond Central Schools, C3Ghas successfully constructed two pop-up/temporary traffic gardens [19]. Through these efforts,research group has now formed to better understand traffic gardens in rural contexts, resulting ina collaborative proposal to NSF RITEL by Clarkson University and YYYY University alongwith the Hammond Central School District [20]. As far as impact, for the community, this quotefrom a recent press release is probably the best way to explain: “The Hammond Central School district is grateful for the partnership with the Health Initiative and Clarkson University over the past year,” said Lauren Morley, Superintendent of Hammond Central School District “The collaboration between Clarkson
statements madein an academic article, with emphasis on criticality and researcher reflection, emphasizes howtrans studies can guide TNBGNC research in STEM education. Papers from trans studies wereanalyzed for actionable manifest content regarding the current discourse of TNBGNC researchpractices. Papers we selected from STEM education were analyzed for their alignment to thediscourse of trans studies scholars, and how STEM education researchers navigate work with theTNBGNC community. This preliminary analysis, combined with consistent memoing throughoutthe analysis process, formed the basis for a comparison of conversations across the twodisciplines to provide recommendations on how STEM and engineering education researcherscan best incorporate
will be awarded to the top two teams in terms of these three plus a score for theirpresentation to a panel of technical experts. Finally, the students participating will also gainknowledge about graduate study and research through an immersive tour of the lab at IllinoisCenter for Transportation and hands-on demonstrations of graduate student research in pavementsand materials at UIUC.DiscussionThis paper conducted a literature review to better understand the current understanding ofoutcomes resulting from student design competitions. Based on this review, extensive review hasbeen conducted to better understand how student competitions contribute to learning outcomesand “soft” skill development. However, there are relatively few studies
Teaching Focused Faculty.”In summary, the UC HIRE team takes a comprehensive approach to understanding the TFFexperience by investigating both the hiring process, specifically identifying what factorscontribute to the inclusive search process, and the experiences of current Latine TFF in STEMdepartments. Our research not only uncovers the development of inclusive hiring practices thatvalue the contributions of TFF, but it sheds light on the important role that these faculty hold inserving diverse student populations. Ultimately, this work aims to inform hiring strategies thatfoster equitable hiring processes and develop supportive departments for Latine STEM TFF tobetter support the student population
ata science center, finding modest improvements in goal-setting behaviors 29-33. They usedconfirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling to demonstrate that informal scienceresources have a small but significant impact on understanding scientific concepts. Other casestudies, exploration of constructivist learning models, provide insights into the complextransformations resulting from informal learning experiences.Visitor EngagementWe examined the impact of our exhibits on visitors from diverse public (families, K-12 students),emerging professional (undergraduate engineering, art, and science students), and professional(Scientific Organization members) audiences. The research questions are aligned with design anddevelopment
Institute of Technology, merging interests in academia and industry.Parker Gavin Ferrer, University of Georgia Parker Ferrer is a student at the University of Georgia pursuing a double major in Mechanical Engineering and Electrical Engineering with a focus on robotics and human-centered design. At the University of Georgia’s Cultivate Lab, Parker played a key role in the mechanical prototyping and collaborative development of a self-playing guitar, combining his technical skillset with a passion for engineering education and meaningful, interdisciplinary innovation. He plans to make a lasting impact by applying his engineering skillset to develop solutions in automation and medical device design.Dr. Sarah Jane Bork
maximize the benefits of PBLin BIM education. This study contributes to the development of effective pedagogical strategies for BIMeducation and underscores the need for further research into hybrid models and long-term impacts oncareer readiness.1 Introduction1.1 BackgroundProject-based learning (PBL) is widely recognized as an effective pedagogical approach for fosteringcritical thinking, collaboration, and practical application of knowledge in real-world contexts. Thisapproach is particularly relevant in construction management and architecture education, where bridgingtheoretical concepts with practical skills is essential for preparing students to meet industry demands.Building Information Modeling (BIM), a digital methodology that
objectives of this paper are to (1) assess the readiness ofthe industry for the adoption of AI as a necessary instrument for solving CEM problems, (2)identify AI tools that may be best suited for inclusion in construction related curricula, and (3)provide academic programs with recommendations regarding how AI applications can beincorporated in construction curricula. The research methodology includes a comprehensiveliterature review if AI applications in CEM and a nationwide survey to the construction industryprofessionals. The results of this study are expected to leverage the understanding about AI in theindustry and enhance construction workforce development. This paper contributes to the body ofknowledge by investigating the effectiveness of
practices and guide decisions to promote energy-conscious building designs. Thefindings will contribute to theoretical knowledge and improve buildings' energy efficiency.Pedagogical AssociationsThis paper resulted from a graduate student’s research for their Master’s Report in ArchitecturalEngineering. The student is the primary author, while the co-authors are the major professorspecializing in structural engineering and a committee member specializing in mechanicalengineering. The research scope was limited to the carbon footprint of a single-story, single-baystructure with concrete walls of varying thicknesses. Within this research, the student conductedconcrete analysis for foundation members, learned to use the program eQUEST for
Education, 2025 Incorporating Industry-Sponsored Technical Writing into Engineering LaboratoriesIntroductionLaboratories are critical courses within engineering curricula because they allow students tobridge the gaps between conceptual knowledge and practical applications. For example, thematerials testing laboratories in mechanical engineering programs allow students to find materialproperties and safely test components before finalizing designs [1]. In 2022, ABET releasedupdated criteria for accredited programs from 2023-2024. Under criterion 3, ABET notes thatstudents should be able to solve complex problems, apply design to produce solutions,effectively communicate with a range of audiences
provides unique opportunities on campuses for a variety of engagementactivities. Many student organizations, including ASCE student chapters, are encouraged toengage in events such as participating in professional industry meetings, community serviceprojects, field trips to civil engineering project sites, leadership development workshops, K-12mentoring events, and engineering design competitions. These engagement experiences provideopportunities for students to elevate their sense of belonging, which research studies have linkedto such positive outcomes such as self-efficacy [2], mental wellness [3], academic motivation[4], major satisfaction [5], grit [6], persistence and academic performance [7], [8], [9].Most student chapters are typically
, University of Michigan Robin Fowler is a Technical Communication lecturer and a Engineering Education researcher at the University of Michigan. Her teaching is primarily in team-based engineering courses, and her research focuses on equity in communication and collaboration as well as in group design decision making (judgment) under uncertainty. She is especially interested in how power relationships and rhetorical strategies affect group judgment in engineering design; one goal of this work is to to understand factors that inhibit full participation of students who identify with historically marginalized groups and investigate evidence-based strategies for mitigating these inequities. In addition, she is interested in
lived experiences. This study aims to shed light on how challengingmath coursework can impact self-efficacy and retention for students who enter engineeringprograms below a calculus level and provide research-backed suggestions for improving theexperience these students have during their college journey, thus increasing retention inengineering programs. Early findings suggest that positive faculty-student interactions, a sense ofbelonging, and the ability to feel success (instead of defeat) in early mathematics coursework arekey contributors to what improves self-efficacy for students who struggle in math-specificcourses.Keywords:self-efficacy, mathematics, engineering education, underserved populationsIntroductionThe Mindset Report published
of reducing interventions from the first year to thesecond year can provide valuable insights for shaping future interventions and best practices.This paper examines the second-year academic performance of the first cohort of SSP studentsby assessing them against comparable engineering students who did not receive the same first-year academic support resources. The research question driving the study is:What impact does reducing academic support from the first year to the second year have onSSP students' academic progress and success?The SUCCESS Scholars ProgramThe SSP, funded by the NSF, was created to support low-income first-year engineering studentsby offering academic resources, financial aid, community-building initiatives, and
traditional role of teaching and administering a modest graduate research program. At Trine University, a small private school in Angola, Indiana, he focused on undergraduate education while teaching ten different courses ranging from introductory freshman courses to senior capstone. Scott also served as an advisor to many different undergraduate research projects. He then moved on to Michigan State University and took a position as a teaching specialist concentrating on undergraduate classroom instruction. Scott finally settled at York College of Pennsylvania. He has been at York College for over ten years and feels as if he has found a place where the focus on teaching and students aligns well with his background and
maintaining a sense of fairness across all student groups.Research questions and corresponding precedents regarding the state-of-the-artThe following research questions (RQ) were established for evaluating existing literaturepertaining to the current study. • RQ1. What are the best practices for adding or enhancing the level of involvement of external industry mentors into the civil and environmental engineering capstone, in regard to project type, targeted deliverables, meeting structures, student group structures, and other factors? • RQ2. What are the best measurements to evaluate student experience outcomes of enhancing the level of involvement of external industry mentors into the capstone that are not
past the coaching: for example, achieving level 3 requires thepublication of a paper or a card on Engineering Unleashed.AssessmentTo evaluate the reach of the WEU activities on faculty and students, we recorded the number offaculty engaged in training, impacted student credit hours, number of microcredentials issued, andnumber of Engineering Unleashed cards published.Pre- and post-incubator surveys were developed to assess the success of the incubator in increasingfaculty participants’ confidence and skills in incorporating EM (specifically, each of the 6 Cs) intotheir course design and curriculum. Differences in the pre- and post-surveys were analyzed using a2-way repeated measures ANOVA (factors: survey timepoint, item category).ResultsWEU