Conference Session

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES) Technical Session 2: Identity, Professionalization, and Belonging I

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessica Mary Smith, Colorado School of Mines; Juan C. Lucena, Colorado School of Mines; Junko Munakata Marr, Colorado School of Mines; Jeffrey C Shragge, Colorado School of Mines; Jonah Klemm-Toole, Colorado School of Mines

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)

does notexactly track with socioeconomic status, given that students who are recently independent for taxpurposes may have significant unmet need, as they no longer claim their parents’ income, even ifthey grew up in a privileged household.) Students who received the S-STEM scholarshipparticipate in an exit interview with either the external evaluator or a program faculty memberwho is not their primary advisor. The interview covers how students understand their FOK, howthey view the connections between their FOK and their graduate experience, how theyexperience belongingness in their graduate program and in the wider STEM field, and how theyview their own professional identity. The interviews are all recorded, transcribed, andanonymized.This

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division(MIND) Technical Session 3

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Micheal Oketunde Okegbola, Morgan State University; Pelumi Olaitan Abiodun, Morgan State University; Oludare Adegbola Owolabi P.E., Morgan State University; Abiola Olayinka Ajala, Morgan State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering Division(MIND)

, results, and conclusions or recommendations which were expressed in the study arethose of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.REFERENCES[1]​ L. D. Gonzales, K. Hall, A. Benton, D. Kanhai, and A.-M. Núñez, “Comfort over Change: a Case Study of Diversity and Inclusivity Efforts in U.S. Higher Education,” Innov. High. Educ., vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 445–460, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10755-020-09541-7.[2]​ M. Covington, K. McClain, B. Dwyer, and A. A. Hilton, “Multicultural Education And Diversity Outcomes at Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs),” Multicult. High. Educ. Increasing Access Improv. Equity 21st Century, p. 143, 2020.[3]​ A. Killough, E. Killough, J. Burnett, and G. Bailey, “The

Conference Session

Aerospace Division (AERO) Technical Session 2 - Student Papers 1

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Favour Ocheja, Purdue School of Aviation Transportation Technology; Tracy L Yother, Purdue Polytechnic Institute, Purdue University – West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Aerospace Division (AERO)

Conference Session

New Approaches and Leadership Development Frameworks

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Victoria Kerr, University of Toronto; Brandon Aldo Lista, University of Toronto; Patricia Kristine Sheridan, University of Toronto; Emily Moore P.Eng., University of Toronto

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division (LEAD)

, youth perceptions of leadership move past the traditionalleadership theories and more closely align with the contemporary theories.” [13, p.457].Interestingly, this does not agree with Komives et al.’s findings [5], which observed that studentslargely had traditional, hierarchical views of leadership when entering college.Leadership Identity DevelopmentThe process through which students develop their conceptualizations of leadership andleadership identity has been well developed in the literature. Most notably, Komives et al. [1]developed the leadership identity framework, which describes this process. In their LeadershipIdentity Development (LID) model, Komives et al. [1] conceptualized the creation of leadershipidentity into 6 stages; 1

Conference Session

Military and Veterans Division (MVD) 3 - Moving Beyond the Uniform

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hannah Wilkinson, Utah State University; Angela Minichiello P.E., Utah State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Military and Veterans Division (MVD)

orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarilyreflect the views of National Science Foundation. Data for this study were collected beforeJanuary 20th, 2025.References [1] H. Wilkinson, “Understanding support for student veterans and servicemembers in public undergraduate engineering programs,” Master’s Thesis, Utah State University, Logan, UT, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd2023/15[2] S. F. Barrett, C. H. G. Wright, and M. Martinez, “Veteran’s transition course at the University of Wyoming,” presented at the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, OH, 2017.[3] T. Anderson and J. Shattuck, “Design-based research: A decade of progress in education

Conference Session

Faculty Development: Broad Impact

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jay Mann, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Ali Ansari, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Wayne L Chang, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Caroline Cvetkovic, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Holly M Golecki, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Ramez Hajj, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

. […] I didn’t change assignments or my technical plan but changed how I interacted with the students.” “Personal background information that I would ask my students include[s]: racial/ethnicity, gender identification, and sibling order. I typically don’t feel any hesitancy in asking students to share about themselves.”Yet another member reported that while they have used surveys to assess different relevantinformation, the results have not been leveraged into identifying systemic learning inequities yet.The amount and variety of information gathered from students is challenging to synthesize intoactionable steps one can take to meet the varied needs reported by students through the surveyprocess: “[A] faculty

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE) Technical Session 1

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE)

years in the 1950’s and 1960’s so-called liberal studies (general education)were compulsory for all students pursuing degree equivalent diplomas in technology inColleges of Advanced Technology. This note is included because liberal studies were thesubject of much evaluative research and philosophical discussion that remains relevant [11].Like the engineering education in the US liberal studies in the US has been the subject ofseveral debates, major reports and changes. The creation of the Technological LiteracyDivision may be regarded as a development within the frame of general education, orhumanistic education as it came to be known in SPEE/ ASEE.The purpose of this discussion is to argue that as technological literacy has developed it

Conference Session

Computers in Education Division (COED) Track 3.B

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yuxuan Chen, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Chenyan Zhao, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Kangyu Feng, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Mattox Alan Beckman, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Mariana Silva, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education Division (COED)

their helpful feedback on earlier drafts of this paper. This material isbased upon work supported by the Strategic Instructional Innovations Program in the GraingerCollege of Engineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.References [1] M. Hertz, “What do CS1 and CS2 mean? investigating differences in the early courses,” in Proceedings of the 41st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, ser. SIGCSE ’10. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2010, p. 199–203. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/1734263.1734335 [2] G. Marceau, K. Fisler, and S. Krishnamurthi, “Measuring the effectiveness of error messages designed for novice programmers,” ser. SIGCSE ’11. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division (FPD) Technical Session 2: Designing Creativity - Innovation Through First-Year Maker Projects

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Artre Reginald Turner, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Jason Morphew, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Kerrie A Douglas, Purdue University – West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs Division (FPD)

-O.-13 Rep. Ryan, Chips and Science Act. 2022. Accessed: May 09, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/4346[3] “Chipping Away: Assessing and Addressing The Labor Market Gap Facing the U.S. Semiconductor Industry,” Semiconductor Industry Association & Oxford Economics, Jul. 2023. Accessed: May 09, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.semiconductors.org/chipping-away-assessing-and-addressing-the-labor- market-gap-facing-the-u-s-semiconductor-industry/[4] S. Kurinec, M. Jackson, T. Schulte, N. Kane, E. Lewis, and S. Gupta, “Microelectronic Engineering And Nanotechnology Education For Undergraduates And Pre College Students Through Curriculum

Conference Session

Computers in Education Division (COED) Track 2.B

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Runu Proma Das, University of Georgia; Tathyana Moratti, University of Georgia; Shari Gasper, University of Georgia; Beshoy Morkos, University of Georgia

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education Division (COED)

? The Implications of Large Language Models for Medical Education and Knowledge Assessment,” JMIR Med Educ, vol. 9, 2023, doi: 10.2196/45312.[10] D. M. Katz, M. J. Bommarito, S. Gao, and P. Arredondo, “GPT-4 passes the bar exam,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 382, no. 2270, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1098/rsta.2023.0254.[11] M. Kaushik, P. Baligar, and G. Joshi, “Formulating An Engineering Design Problem: A Structured Approach,” 2018.[12] B.-A. Schuelke-Leech, “A Problem Taxonomy for Engineering,” IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 105–105, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1109/tts.2021.3072213.[13] D. H. Jonassen

Conference Session

Engineering Libraries Division (ELD) Technical Session 2

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Patricia Verdines, The Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Libraries Division (ELD)

mechanical engineering: A guidebook for teaching and learning. Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 2022. DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-85390-7[5] J. Murray, L.C. Paxson, S. Seo and M. Beattie, “STEM-Oriented Alliance for Research (SOAR): An educational model for interdisciplinary project-based learning”. 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access. DOI:10.18260/1-2—35206[6] A. Carvalho Alvesa, F. Moreiraa, M.A. Carvalhoa, S. Oliveiraa, M.T. Malheiroa, I. Britoa, C. Pinto Leãoa and S. Teixeiraa, S. “Integrating STEM contents through PBL in an Industrial Engineering and Management first year program”. Scientific Electronic Library Online, Brazil. Production (29). 2019. Article e20180111

Conference Session

Advancing Educational Technologies: VR, AR & Simulation

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniell DiFrancesca, Pennsylvania State University, Behrend College; Christian Enmanuel Lopez, Lafayette College; Omar Ashour, Pennsylvania State University, Behrend College

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Industrial Engineering Division (IED)

Conference Session

Persistence, Outcomes and Barriers for Women in Engineering

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tianjiao Zhao, East Carolina University; Xi Lin, East Carolina University; Xi Wang P.E., Drexel University; Yidan Zhu, Texas State University; Pianpian Huang, East Carolina University; Bingbing Li, University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Qiuhan Ji, University of British Columbia, Vancouver

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering Division (WIED)

, 2010, Forthcoming.[2] S. Cheryan, S. A. Ziegler, A. K. Montoya, and L. Jiang, “Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others?” Psychological bulletin, 143(1), 1-35, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000052[3] J. M. Jebsen, K. Nicoll Baines, R. A. Oliver, and I. Jayasinghe, “Dismantling barriers faced by women in STEM,” Nature Chemistry, 14(11), 1203-1206, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-022-01072-2[4] C. O’Connell, and M. McKinnon “Perceptions of barriers to career progression for academic women in STEM,” Societies, 11(2), 27, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/soc11020027[5] M. Swafford and R. Anderson, “Addressing the Gender Gap: Women's Perceived Barriers to Pursuing STEM Careers,” Journal of Research in

Conference Session

Military and Veterans Division (MVD) 3 - Moving Beyond the Uniform

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Samuel Shaw, Utah State University; Angela Minichiello P.E., Utah State University; Hannah Wilkinson, Utah State University; Allison Miles, Utah State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Military and Veterans Division (MVD)

education, and 4) an emphasis ofavailable medical and STEM education resources for SVSM. Then, as a team, we formedupdated categories that became the structure of the training itself: Background, transition,resources, and a call to action.Beginning with a general overview section, the purpose behind the training along with settingdesired intentions with the audience, along with a pre-survey to gauge initial participantunderstanding sets a tone and creates a sense of direction. This section can also be utilized tointroduce the speaker(s), rationale for why the training is being presented to the given audience,and positionality of those presenting, although time is also reserved for the speaker(s) tointroduce positionality as an activity via the

Conference Session

Computers in Education Division (COED) Track 4.E

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Thomas Vaccaro Jr, University of Connecticut; Mikayla Friday, University of Connecticut; Zeynep Gonca Akdemir-Beveridge, University of Connecticut; Arash Esmaili Zaghi P.E., University of Connecticut

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education Division (COED)

understanding how AI-powered tools can enhance learning experiences, particularlyin fields requiring tailored support, such as engineering education.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under MCAGrant No. 2120888. The first author (MV) was supported by an NSF Research Traineeship(TRANSCEND) under Grant No. 2152202 at the time this research was conducted. Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those ofthe author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.The authors greatly appreciate the support of Trent Alsup, Jada Vercosa, Brian Hance, andAbhiram Gunti in the initial development of the GPT platform.Finally

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division: Innovative Pedagogy annd Student Engagement

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anh D. Chau P.E., Florida Gulf Coast University; Steve Makredes, Florida Gulf Coast University; Daniel Linares, Florida Gulf Coast University; Long Duy Nguyen P.E., Florida Gulf Coast University; William Patrick Burke, Florida Gulf Coast University

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering Division (CONST)

laboratoriesacross different CEM programs could facilitate broader adoption and continuous improvement ofthese teaching methods. Figure 11. Rebar tying gunAcknowledgementThis work was supported by a grant from the Collier Building Industry Association (CBIA) andCollier Building Industry Foundation (CBIF). The authors gratefully acknowledge CBIA andCBIF's support in developing and implementing the hands-on laboratory components of thestructures for construction course.Reference[1] J. C. Hayes and D. J. M. Kraemer, “Grounded understanding of abstract concepts: The case of STEM learning,” Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 7, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1186/s41235-016-0046-z.[2] S. Persaud and M

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division (ENT) Poster Session

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marcus Melo de Lyra, The Ohio State University; Sherri Youssef, The Ohio State University; Peyton OReilly, The Ohio State University; Shukufe Rahman, The Ohio State University; Benjamin Ahn, The Ohio State University; Adam R Carberry, The Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division (ENT)

to assess the frequency ofeducational technology use in the classroom and the instructors' beliefs related to learner-centered instruction. Houseknecht et al. [20] adopted Walters et al.’s [21] PostsecondaryInstructional Practices Survey (PIPS) to measure the teaching practices of university chemistryinstructors. Compared to the inventory, the survey instruments are designed over a theoreticalframework and can be organized into factors related to the assessed constructs. While inventoriescan characterize classroom teaching, surveys can be more specific and include constructs such asself-efficacy or teaching beliefs in their design. Classroom Observation: Classroom observation instruments referred to the set ofobservation protocols to

Conference Session

Computers in Education Division (COED) Poster Session (Track 1.A)

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tayo Obafemi-Ajayi, Missouri State University; Naomi L Dille, Missouri State University; Dhanush Bavisetti, Missouri State University; Sherrie Ilene Zook

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education Division (COED)

Paper ID #47009BOARD # 71: Integrating Machine Learning into Middle and High SchoolCurricula using Alzheimer’s Disease Prediction ModelsDr. Tayo Obafemi-Ajayi, Missouri State University Dr. Tayo Obafemi-Ajayi is an Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering at Missouri State University in the Engineering Program, a joint program with Missouri University of Science and Technology (S&T). She obtained her B.S and MS in Electrical Engineering and a PhD in Computer Science from Illinois Institute of Technology.Dr. Naomi L Dille, Missouri State UniversityDhanush Bavisetti, Missouri State UniversityMrs. Sherrie Ilene Zook

Conference Session

Innovative Learning Tools and Visualizations in ECE Curriculum

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Danielle Sami Nasrallah PhD. eng., OPAL-RT Technologies; Angelo Antoine Chrabieh, OPAL-RT Technologies; Wolf Peter Jean Philippe, OPAL-RT Technologies; Georges Henri Haddad, Opal-RT Technologies

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer Engineering Division (ECE)

Total (m/s) (W/m2 ) (KW) (KW) (KW) (KW) (KW) (KW) Psource Pload 5 800 0 9.62 21.23 8.97 11.94 9.94 30.85 30.85 5 600 0 7.08 23.77 8.97 11.94 9.94 30.85 30.85 5 300 0 3.35 27.50 8.97 11.94 9.94 30.85 30.85 10 300 4.32 3.35 23.18 8.97 11.94 9.94 30.85 30.85 12 300 6.90 3.35 20.60 8.97 11.94 9.94 30.85 30.85 15 300 10.03 3.35 17.47 8.97

Conference Session

Evaluation and Assessment for Engineering Leadership Programs

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Maria Elena Truyol, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile; Camila Zapata-Casabon, Universidad Andres Bello; Vicente Valenzuela-Riquelme M.Sc., Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division (LEAD)

curriculum toprovide a well-rounded education. Moreover, leadership training should extend beyondtheoretical instruction to include practical applications that demonstrate its relevance inreal-world contexts. As highlighted in the literature, integrating structured leadershipdevelopment programs into the curriculum can significantly enhance the comprehensiveeducation of engineering professionals, particularly by strengthening their leadership skills.References[1] D. Magrane, P. S. Morahan, S. Ambrose, and S. A. Dannels, "Competencies and Practices in Academic Engineering Leadership Development: Lessons From a National Survey," Social Sciences, vol. 7, no. 10, p. 171, Sept. 2018, doi: 10.3390/socsci7100171.[2] S. J. Perry, E. M. Hunter, S

Conference Session

Informal Education and Outreach Programs for Women Engineering Students

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lillian Clark Jeznach, Roger Williams University; Maija A Benitz, Roger Williams University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering Division (WIED)

://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1273006.pdf.[2] Supernak, J., Ramirez, A., & Supernak, E. (2021). COVID-19: how do engineering students assess its impact on their learning?. Advances in Applied Sociology, 11(1), 14-25. https://doi.org/10.4236/aasoci.2021.111002.[3] Baltà-Salvador, R., Olmedo-Torre, N., Peña, M., & Renta-Davids, A. I. (2021). Academic and emotional effects of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic on engineering students. Education and information technologies, 26(6), 7407-7434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10593-1.[4] Asgari S, Trajkovic J, Rahmani M, Zhang W, Lo RC, Sciortino A (2021) An observational study of engineering online education during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS ONE

Conference Session

Industry Advisory Boards, Experiential Learning

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

LEI YANG, University of Hong Kong; Chun Kit Chan, The University of Hong Kong; Kin Sun Lam, MTR Corporation; Chun Kit Chui, University of Hong Kong

Tagged Divisions

College Industry Partnerships Division (CIP)

understanding of how Python programs communicate withhardware for execution. Additionally, this novel test case evaluated the MTR staff’s learning outcomesby applying their knowledge in practice. There are two main difference s: first, the use of a new robotarm with a different configuration—characterized by six degrees of freedom, mechanical limits, andvarying lengths of each link—affects reachability and requires adaptations in the movement programs.Second, the software package created by the university students necessitated that the cohort modifytheir existing code to utilize the functions provided by this new package. Despite these challenges, thecohort successfully completed the tasks in just one morning, demonstrating their ability to apply

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session: Examining Undergraduate Recruitment & Retention

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gholam Abbas Sattar-Shamsabadi II, University of Louisville; Brian Scott Robinson, University of Louisville; Thomas Tretter, University of Louisville; Angela Thompson P.E., University of Louisville; Jessica Buckley

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

codeswere collaboratively compared and discussed, and final coding was unanimously agreed upon.The results and associated discussion focus on three participants from this 16-student cohort,focusing on the academic system context(s) that are potentially malleable by universities. Theselected participants include an African-American female, an African-American male, and aCaucasian female. These students were chosen per the following criteria: a) member of anunderrepresented group in engineering, b) a substantial number of codable comments from theinterview transcript, and c) cumulative coded transcript comments that are overall representativeof comments from the larger, 16-member cohort.ResultsResults are presented for the three participants

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division(MIND) Technical Session 6

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anna-Lena Dicke, University of California, Irvine; David A. Copp, University of California, Irvine; Analia E. Rao, University of California, Irvine

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering Division(MIND)

encounter along with a tendency to engage inengineering-like tasks from an early age [10]. These attitudes are likely to positively affectstudents’ engagement with their engineering studies. More research is needed to betterunderstand whether these factors play a similar role for transfer students and which other assetsand challenges are relevant to their unique engineering journeys.Thus, the current study aims to explore the challenges and obstacles along with the invaluablepersonal assets of engineering transfer students enrolled in an NSF S-STEM scholarship programfor academically talented, community college transfer students with unmet financial needs fromdiverse backgrounds. More specifically, we analyzed essays from 122 engineering

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division (FPD) Work-in-Progress 4: Pathways, Belonging, and Early Experiences

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brian Patrick O'Connell, Northeastern University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs Division (FPD)

://apcentral.collegeboard.org/about-ap/news-changes/ap-score-reports (accessed Dec 15, 2024).[7] T. Fernandez et al., "More comprehensive and inclusive approaches to demographic data collection," presented at the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana, Jun 26-29, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/enegs/60/.[8] D. Collier, J. Mahoney, and J. Seawright, "Claiming too much: Warnings about selection bias," Rethinking social inquiry: Diverse tools, shared standards, pp. 85-102, 2004.[9] S. Keeter, C. Kennedy, D. Michael, J. Best, and C. Peyton, "Gauging the Impact of Growing Nonresponse on Estimates from a National RDD Telephone Survey," The Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 70, no

Conference Session

Two-Year College Division (TYCD) Technical Session 4: Curriculum and Assessment

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Foeday Zinnah, Utah State University; Angela Minichiello, Utah State University; Muhammad Asghar P.E., University of Cincinnati

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Two-Year College Division (TYCD)

publication timeline andtrends, workforce populations studied, types of non-degree credential(s) implemented, industrysectors targeted, and NDC challenges and gaps identified. These preliminary findings providebroader insights for educators, industry leaders, and policymakers currently engaged in shapingthe future landscape of STEM workforce development and for identifying directions for futureresearch in this emerging area of importance to the STEM workforce.BackgroundHigher education degree programs have historically played a critical role in workforcedevelopment in the United States by providing a mechanism for knowledge and skill acquisitionthat is purported to lead to meaningful employment and higher salaries. NDCs play a valuablerole in STEM

Conference Session

Engineering Technology Division (ETD) Technical Session 8

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gretchen Dietz, Western Carolina University; Jordan C Bullington-Miller; Audrey Rorrer

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology Division (ETD)

at least 10 participants. In Summer 2025, we will analyzethe qualitative data and compare it with the quantitative results. In the final phase of our research(Fall 2025 – Spring 2026), we will focus on preparing publications, presenting at conferences,and planning future research initiatives to continue this work.AcknowledgementsFunding was provided by National Science Foundation grant EEC- 2306099.References[1] A. Godwin, “The development of a measure of engineering identity,” in 2016 ASEE annual conference & exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana, 2016.[2] J. P. Martin, D. R. Simmons, and S. L. Yu, “The Role of Social Capital in the Experiences of Hispanic Women Engineering Majors,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 227–243

Conference Session

Aerospace Division (AERO) Technical Session 4 - Teaching Methodology

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Julie B. Coder, The Pennsylvania State University; James G Coder, Pennsylvania State University; Mark D. Maughmer, The Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Aerospace Division (AERO)

significantly, as seen in Figure 2, demonstrating the limitations of generativeAI in solving problems in aerospace engineering. 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Remember Understand Apply Analyze ChatGPT-4 Gemini Fig. 2. Percent correct by ChatGPT-4 and Gemini for each question type.The “Remember” level of Bloom’s taxonomy relies on recalling of previously learned facts andconcepts. Chat GPT-4’s

Conference Session

ELOS Technical Session 4: Empowering Student Learning Through Design, Integration, and Assessment

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Peter Griffiths, University of Virginia; Jill Fennell, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division (DELOS)

[5]. Studies have shown that GTAs feelunderprepared to evaluate communication aspects of technical assignments, and withoutstructured guidance, their feedback tends to focus primarily on technical accuracy rather than onthe clarity, structure, or effectiveness of the communication itself [6, 8, 16]. Additionally, thelack of communication-focused training for GTAs perpetuates the broader issue ofcommunication instruction being marginalized in engineering programs, as it reinforces theperception that communication is a secondary skill, rather than an integral part of engineeringpractice [6]. Rodger et al. (2014)’s analysis of their “TA’s [sic] feedback revealed that themajority of the TA’s written feedback was either copied directly from the

Conference Session

Engineering Libraries Division (ELD) Technical Session 1

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Joseph White, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Libraries Division (ELD)

). Minder’s thesisfocused on how standards are published, indexed, advertised, and distributed. He did not addresshow libraries collect, organize, or use standards.A. S. Tayal of the Indian Standards Institution recommended in 1961 that libraries shouldclassify and catalog standards under the classification system they use for other materials andthat standards should be shelved in three groups: national standards, standards from governmentagencies, and standards from other organizations [29].Methodology and LimitationsThe author’s first task was to compile an inventory of CSA standards published from 1920through 1949. This proved challenging as CSA did not publish a catalog of standards until the1950s. The author reached out to CSA several times and