experiences in the curriculum. Feiseland Rosa, for instance, argued that engineering is fundamentally an applied discipline requiringskills in experimentation, design, and problem-solving, all of which are best cultivated throughwell-designed lab work [12]. Laboratory sessions provide concrete experiences that can enhancestudents’ analytical thinking and bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and real-worldapplication. Indeed, a strong lab component in undergraduate programs has been correlated withimprovements in students’ hands-on competencies and their ability to apply concepts to solvepractical problems. In the context of an emerging field like QISE, experiential learning isarguably even more critical. Quantum engineering education involves
Workforce Development and Process Improvement. She has been an adjunct professor with Purdue University, teaching Organizational Leadership (OLS) and Supervision and Technology Leadership and Innovation (TLI) since 2009. She has been teaching and training since 1992. Lisa has 35 years of experience in workforce development and education.Roxanne A. Moore Ph.D., Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Roxanne Moore is currently a Principal Research Engineer at Georgia Tech with appointments in the Center for Education Integrating Mathematics, Science, and Computing (CEISMC) and Mechanical Engineering. She has spent her 12+ year research faculty career focusing on broadening participation in STEM and creating novel learning
for each course was developed by theconsultant and reviewed and revised in project team meetings. The self-reflection question set wasadopted from the project pilot. It had proven to yield information of the type desired in thatundertaking and following review by the project team in a group meeting was adopted for use inthis project.4.1.1 Validity and ReliabilityThe skills test, self-assessment, and self-reflection questions have face, construct, and contentvalidity (Middleton, 2022). This resulted from development by faculty experts who teach in thefield, their peers who teach in another engineering field, and the research consultant who holds adoctorate in Education with an emphasis in curriculum and instruction and who taught graduatelevel
Paper ID #49379BOARD # 283: NSF RET: Empowering STEM Educators and RevitalizingManufacturing in the U.S. MidwestDr. Md B. Sarder, Bowling Green State University Dr. Sarder is a professor & director of the School of Engineering at Bowling Green State University (BGSU). Prior to joining BGSU, he worked at the U.S. Air Force Academy as a distinguished research fellow. He served as an associate professor, and graduate director of the logistics, trade, and transportation program at the University of Southern Mississippi (USM). Dr. Sarder has a record of excellence in research, teaching, and services as evidenced by the
in Engineering Education: A Systematic Literature Review,” in 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Baltimore, Maryland: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2023.[5] N. Kellam, T. Costantino, J. Walther, and N. Sochacka, “Uncovering the Role of Emotion in Engineering Education within an Integrated Curricular Experience,” in 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Vancouver, BC: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2011.[6] Authors.[7] K. A. Davis and D. B. Knight, “Becoming a researcher: A narrative analysis of U.S. students’ experiences in Australia,” in 8th Research in Engineering Education Symposium (REES) Proceedings, Jul. 2019.[8] N. Diekelmann and J. Diekelmann, Schooling learning teaching: Toward
through data-driven innovations.Dr. Jason Morphew, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI) Dr. Jason Morphew is an assistant professor at Purdue University in the School of Engineering Education. He serves as the director of undergraduate curriculum and advanced learning technologies for SCALE and is affiliated with the INSPIRE research institute for Pre-College Engineering and the Center for Advancing the Teaching and Learning of STEM. He serves as the course curator for the Freshman semester engineering design course that serves over 2,500 freshman engineering students every year. His award-winning teaching has been recognized for his teaching in the First Year Engineering program and is the Dr. Morphew has also
, postgraduate construction management students were asked to complete aquestionnaire on factors affecting their academic performance. One of the responses from thestudents was that the program was not viewed as academic in nature [9].While many construction management programs offer great hands-on experience to theirstudents, it is still an academic major with curriculum like all other majors. Students need toview these programs as academic and promote success by encouraging good habits such asstudying, being organized, and taking notes. Programs have seen these problems and are takingsteps to combat them. One article talks about Generation Z students and how tech-savvy theyhave become by growing up with electronics. To fight boredom, poor retention
., women and/or Black students in engineering). He envisions researching and removing possible systemic learning barriers from the curriculum, pedagogy, assessment, and learning environment to make education more responsive to all learners. Halkiyo taught and worked at a university in Ethiopia, where he was also a principal investigator of the ”Engendering Higher Education Curricula” research project. Dr. Halkiyo is a Fulbright-Hays Fellow, where he conducted his dissertation research on global education policy transfer from the global West/North to the global South/East, specifically Ethiopia, Africa.Dr. Stephen Secules, Florida International University Dr. Stephen Secules is an Assistant Professor in the School of
Research Assistant and Graduate Teaching Associate, primarily teaching first-year engineering and engineering mathematics. She also has both a B.S. and M.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Wright State, where she also worked as a Graduate Teaching Associate for an engineering mathematics course.Mr. James Nathaniel Newcomer, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Former mechatronics engineer and STEM educator who now works with first-year engineering students to help them establish academic trajectories to develop and meet their career goals. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 First-Year Engineering Students' Quantification of "Self" in the
’ sense of belonging across demographics through qualitativeand mixed method analyses. This work is essential for making informed decisions on addressingequity gaps in students learning experience improving course curriculum for all students in theMAE 3 course.References[1] Allen, K. A., Kern, M. L., Rozek, C. S., McInerney, D. M., & Slavich, G. M. (2021).Belonging: a review of conceptual issues, an integrative framework, and directions for futureresearch. Australian Journal of Psychology, 73(1), 87–102.https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530.2021.1883409[2] Davis, G. M., Hanzsek-Brill, M. B., Petzold, M. C., & Robinson, D. H. (2019). Students'sense of belonging: The development of a predictive retention model. Journal of the Scholarshipof
and proactively integrating stress management techniques intothe curriculum.5.1 Implications for Educational EquityThe findings of this study underscore an alarming gap in educational equity within onlinelearning environments, particularly regarding diverse student groups. The disproportionatechallenges faced by students from various demographic backgrounds align with existing researchon educational inequality, suggesting that systemic barriers often obstruct access to the resourcesnecessary for academic success [19], [20], [21]. The results signal a critical need for institutionsto reassess their training and support mechanisms to promote equitable outcomes across diversestudent populations. By adopting culturally responsive instructional
. He started five companies in IT and the Life Sciences (all based on AI), successfully funded four of them, exited from three of them, was named ”Entrepreneur of the Year” in two of them, and has one still standing. In addition to start-up companies, Dr. Addison previously worked for Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Booz Allen and Hamilton, and IQVIA. Ed Addison has a BSEE from Virginia Tech, an MSEE and MS BME from Johns Hopkins, an MBA from Duke, and a JD from Purdue, and he completed a sabbatical year at MIT in Artificial Intelligence on the BG Lamme Scholarship, where he received the Certificate of Advanced Engineering Studies. He received a teaching award from Johns Hopkins University. He previously taught
work of my peers. 12. During my time in the [course/department/program], I know my work and contributions to the [course/department/program] were noticed and appreciated by the instructors and BME faculty.Self-Actualization Needs (AN) 13. The BME [course/department/program] and its curriculum enable me to pursue my dream career. 14. Courses and course materials were divided effectively to allow me to learn at a comfortable pace through all the different courses in BME. 15. Working in groups in [course/department/program] enhances my ability to learn more effectively from peers who may be stronger in specific topics than I am, compared to a traditional classroom.
students bolsteredhers. Kayla, in contrast, developed self-efficacy over time through a productive partnership witha supportive engineering student. These cases highlight the complex relationship between partnerdynamics, teaching roles, perceived success, and self-efficacy development. Implications forsupporting PSTs in engineering-integrated experiences are discussed. Introduction Nationwide engineering and coding standards in K-6 curriculum [1], [2] make instructionin these subjects essential for elementary teacher preparation. Along with content andpedagogical knowledge, preservice teachers (PSTs) need a belief in their ability to teach, alsoknown as teaching self-efficacy [3], [4]. Accordingly
to balance creativity and precision based on the specificrequirements of the task.ConclusionThis study highlights the transformative potential of AI in engineering education while addressingthe limitations and challenges of current tools. By integrating LLMs into the curriculum, educatorscan prepare students for a rapidly evolving technological landscape. The findings offer actionablerecommendations for leveraging AI to enhance learning outcomes, ensuring that future engineersare well-equipped to harness these innovations responsibly and effectively.This research contributes to the body of knowledge in engineering education by demonstrating astructured approach to integrating AI tools into project management curricula. By focusing
Paper ID #48927Creating Mixed Reality Lab Modules for a Chemical Engineering Fluid MechanicsLab – Work in ProgressDr. Keisha C.A. Antoine, Prairie View A&M University (DUPE) Keisha Antoine is an Assistant Professor in the chemical engineering department at Prairie View A&M University where she has worked since 2019. Prior to her foray into academia, she worked as a scientist and engineer working on glass processes and functionalization, carbon footprint and energy analyses at Corning Incorporated, a Fortune 500 technology company. Keisha also has experience in providing technical solutions through her own firm
bring a focus on interculturalcompetency development to graduate student populations.Introduction and MotivationIntercultural competency and global competency, here meaning competencies of working andcommunicating across national and international context, are needed in an increasingly globalizedsociety. Engineers across the globe are solving complex problems that have a reach beyond theirnational borders. The need for intercultural and global competency has been identified forengineers specifically and supported by multinational initiatives such as UN Sustainable goals [1]and Global Grand Challenges [2]. Global engagement has been identified as a required criterion,leading engineering programs to work to integrate intercultural and global
Paper ID #48460Best Practices for Industry Liaisons in Engineering Design Projects: Insightsfrom Students and LiaisonsDr. Edward Latorre, University of Florida Dr. Edward Latorre is an Associate Engineer with the Department of Engineering Education at the University of Florida and the Director of the Integrated Product and Process Design (IPPD) program. His current research areas are in support of his teaching in IPPD, a multidisciplinary senior and graduate level design course sequence where student teams develop solutions for industry sponsored projects. https://www.eng.ufl.edu/eed/faculty-staff/edward-latorre
mathematics, physics, and programming. The survey questionnaire providesinformation about students’ preparedness for classes, the amount of time spent studying andparticipating in extracurricular activities, and their sense of belonging in the classroom. Themethodology employs an ordinary least square model to analyze the impact of these attributes onthe grades students achieve in mathematics, physics, and computer science courses.Results suggest that students who are better prepared for calculus, physics, and programmingtend to achieve higher grades in these subjects. This trend is particularly notable amongComputer Science (CS) majors and female students. Additionally, a strong sense of belongingsignificantly enhances student grades. For instance
areexpected to meet the challenges of integrating both CCSS (Common Core State Standards) andNGSS within their curriculum, they must ensure their students are engaged in analytical andstrategic thinking about major world issues in science, technology, society and theirenvironment. Participants are challenged to create a curriculum that promotes critical thinkingabout global issues, possible solutions, and improving designs. The curriculum plan must includeelements of the research that the teacher conducted over the summer with an emphasis on howthis research supports the goals of CCSS and NGSS. The specific objectives of the College ofEducation curriculum workshops are for participants to develop NGSS-aligned curriculumframeworks that integrate
research on curriculum development, teacher professional development, and student learning in integrated STEM environments. Dr. Alemdar currently serves as PI and co-PI for research on various NSF funded projects that focuses on engineering education, teacher networks and STEM learning environments. Her expertise includes program evaluation, social network analysis, mixed methods, and advanced quantitative methods. Dr. Alemdar is passionate advocate for equitable and inclusive STEM education. She actively engages with educators, students, and communities to promote the importance of STEM disciplines and education research in preparing the next generation for the challenges of the future.She received her Ph.D. in
technicalresources compared to traditional programs. This increased engagement translated to measurableoutcomes, with capstone projects from enhanced curricula scoring an average of 3.2 points higher(on a 10-point rubric) for innovation and practical applicability when evaluated by industry panels.Additionally, the integration of digital simulation tools and performance modeling software—similar to those proposed in our curriculum—resulted in a 38% improvement in students' abilityto integrate multiple sustainability factors in design decisions, as measured through standardizedcase study assessments.The interdisciplinary approach embedded in the enhanced curriculum addresses a critical gapidentified in Yamamoto and Chen's 2023 analysis of 32 green building
presents preliminary findingsbased on semi-structured interviews with four racially minoritized engineering students.Conceptual framework - Hidden curriculum in engineering educational assessmentsWe use the concept of hidden curriculum [27] to guide our research and result interpretation.More specifically, we view the concept of hidden curriculum from an assessment point of view,using data on student experiences with engineering classroom exams to explore what hiddencurriculum looks like for racially minoritized students. Hidden curriculum refers to any type ofimplicit, unofficial, or unintended messages, content, expectations that occurred in aneducational setting [27]. In engineering education, Villanueva et al. [14] have been exploring thekey
years.Overview of Professional DevelopmentThe Project RISE Curriculum workshop equipped educators with a practical framework forimplementing an integrated civics and design thinking curriculum. The professional developmentwas a four and a half day intensive residential workshops with a full day schedule. Teachersengaged in discussions about social studies standards and assessment. They explored theintegration of engineering design and design thinking into their practices, which fosters a moreinterdisciplinary and hands-on approach to social studies education. Emulating the studentexperience, teachers participated in brainstorming sections where they generated ideas andexamples for context, and analyzed problems. They then modeled brainstorming
using theonline discussion board. This assignment prompted small group and class-wide discussions aboutthe variety of disparities that can affect people with different lived experiences. The discussionboard posts for this assignment were quite lively, and the students were very engaged andrespectful in their interactions.Finally, the top coded categories of answers to the survey question about what students likedmost about the course was an increased awareness of disparities overall and how the disparitiescurriculum was integrated into the physiology content and its application to real-life scenarios[Table 1].The healthcare disparities curriculum increased the value students place on social justice issuesand the role BMEs play in addressing
fromexisting programs.Academic programs at other institutions typically emphasize physical design or digitalexperience. Our aim was to create a curriculum that integrates both. To address this, wedeveloped two options for tracks: (i) Physical Design + Manufacturing, and (ii) Digital UserExperience + AI.We reached this point by the start of summer term and then stalled due to the FAB consisting of9-month faculty. University leadership and the Deans wanted the program to launch in Fall 2025and so it needed to be approved by our Board of Regents in their November 2024 meeting. Thisrequired an accelerated timeline to develop the curricular details of the program and to seekfeedback so that it would be ready for approval by the curriculum committees in
many instructors feeling unprepared to teachethics-related concepts. This gap risks fostering a workforce that develops AI technologies with-out adequately considering responsible and ethical practices, potentially leading to serious societalconsequences. Here, we present results from a pilot curriculum that integrates various ethical top-ics related to AI into a graduate-level machine learning course. Activities include a combination ofcase studies, project-based learning, and critical classroom discussions on the ethical implicationsof AI systems design and deployment.Two research questions guided the study: (RQ1) How do computer science graduate studentsperceive ethical issues in AI design and implementation before taking the class? (RQ2
ideas on curriculum innovations and interdisciplinary collaborations. Our workshopaimed to provide faculty with a foundational understanding of generative AI, fosterinterdisciplinary discussions on its implications, encourage critical thinking on its responsibleuse, and support curriculum integration aligned with Jesuit values, which focus on educating thewhole person for a just and humane world. As an essential part of the summit shaping institution-wide discussions on AI integration, our workshop drew 35 faculty members from all fivecolleges at the university, with 70% of the attendees representing their respective departments,engaging in critical discussions on the multifaceted implications of generative AI in highereducation.In this paper
. TheNational Science Foundation's Research Experiences for Teachers (RET) program in Manufacturing Simulation andAutomation at the University of Louisville aims to bridge the gap between academic instruction and industrialapplication by immersing educators in cutting-edge research environments.Each year, the RET team partners with a cohort of teachers and community college faculty from the Louisvillemetropolitan region (spanning counties in KY and IN) to integrate scientific research into their STEM curricula andexpose their students to modern manufacturing technologies and innovations. The RET team includes facultymentors, undergraduate and graduate students, industry advisors, an evaluator and a curriculum developmentspecialist. During the summer
designing an enterprise network; (2)the Question Formulation Technique (QFT), which focuses on enhancing student curiosity and theability to formulate questions, and (3) the Need-Approach-Benefits/Costs-Competition (NABC)framework, which provides a formulaic approach to crafting compelling value propositions. In theNetworks and Data Communications course, these frameworks are used in lab activities, a casestudy assignment, an exploratory research paper, and a design project.Network professionals may fail to consider potential threats until a severe intrusion occurs. Toaddress this gap, the course integrates the outcome of “Considering risk as a factor when designingand configuring an enterprise network” to encourage students to understand the