’ Engineering Teaching Self-Efficacy Enhanced By Participation in a Hybrid Community of PracticeAbstractThe first exposure to engineering that most K-12 students have is in the classroom. However, K-12 teachers typically have limited or no experience with engineering or engineering education.As a result, they commonly hold many misconceptions about engineering as a field and a lowself-efficacy with teaching engineering, which makes them reluctant to include engineering inthe curriculum at more than a very superficial level. This leads to a lack of interest in engineeringamong K-12 students. Consequently, there is an urgent and critical need to provide moreexposure to engineering and training in how to teach engineering to both pre
also been made in other areas. Molina-Bolivar and Abella-Palacios [25] created a cost-effective setup to study magnet geometry, while Kuhn and Vogt used smartphones asaccelerometers in free fall experiments [26]. Ferri et al. designed a tabletop mechanism to studyfree vibrations and developed a mobile experiment for a control theory course [27]. To reducecosts, a smartphone attachment was used to record glider acceleration, and video recording wasemployed for data acquisition [28]. An experiment capturing rolling contact was designed usingTracker software [29]. MIT Precision Motion Control developed the FlexLab magneticsuspension system integrating actuators, sensors, and power amplifiers on a single board.However, despite these advancements
Paper ID #46054The ”Ticket Home”: A Scalable Survey System for Rapidly Identifying Barriersto LearningProf. David Coulter Jangraw, University of Vermont David Jangraw received a BSE in EE from Princeton and a PhD in BME from Columbia. He then served at the NIH for six years. In that time, he studied brain-computer interfaces, fMRI methods, and pediatric mood disorders. Now an Assistant Professor of Electrical and Biomedical Engineering at the University of Vermont, he teaches data science and signal processing for engineers and runs the Grass Brain Lab. The lab uses emerging tech to understand the human brain’s response to
Paper ID #48221BOARD # 201: Development of a Programming Environment to Bridge Studentsfrom Block-Based to Text-Based Programming (Work in Progress)Elliot Benjamin Roe, Georgia Institute of TechnologyDuncan Johnson, Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach Duncan Johnson is an undergraduate student at Tufts University majoring in Computer Science. He is the co-founder and Executive Director of BX Coding, a STEM education nonprofit dedicated to building open-source software and curriculum for STEM educators. Through his work with BX Coding and the Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach (CEEO), his research
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Illinois in 2004 and 2002, respectively. He teaches courses in communications, signal processing and probability.Yang Victoria Shao, University of Illinois Urbana Champaign Yang V. Shao is a Teaching Associate Professor in electrical and computer engineering department at University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (UIUC). She earned her Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from Chinese Academy of Sciences, China. She has worked with University of New Mexico before joining UIUC where she developed some graduate courses on Electromagnetics. Dr. Shao has research interests in curriculum development, assessment, student retention and student success in
, especially if the level of rigor is perceived to be much higher than courses in thepre-statics curriculum. And while this perception may be a direct product of the need forimproved pedagogy, it may also be an unearned byproduct of suboptimal preparation in thecurriculum prior to students taking statics. Considerable recent work has been done on betterunderstanding student perceptions in statics and there have been some insightful findings thatincorporate not only the in-class aspects of the technical challenge of the course but also theimpact of non-academic factors. Investigators have reported the student experience in statics is astrong product of how much students struggle with foundational skills in math and science, andespecially with
andprofessional growth.Evidence from Engineering Design Graphics Courses Engineering graphic courses offer early exposure to critical skills that contribute tolong-term success in engineering and technology by supporting student spatial visualizationdevelopment in addition to hands-on experience with engineering-related tools [2]. AnNSF-funded study on active learning in Engineering Design Graphics highlights the positiveimpact of incorporating a supplemental curriculum with an environment that utilizes elements ofstudent-centered learning. A curriculum focused on real-world applications saw improvements instudent engagement, self-efficacy, mental rotation skills, and academic performance [9]. Thesefindings underscore the value of intentional
-based activities.However, the varied impacts across CT components indicate a need for balanced instructionaldesign that addresses all aspects of CT. Curriculum strategies should prioritize VR-based modules in areas with the strongestbenefits, such as algorithmic thinking and problem-solving, while integrating targeted activitiesto strengthen critical thinking, which showed minimal improvement. Recommendations includeincorporating guided reflection activities and analytical challenges to support critical thinkingwithin VR environments, maintaining small group sizes to optimize collaboration and resourceaccess, and continuing pre- and post-CAVE activities to link virtual and physical learning.Diverse assessment methods, including rubrics for
dispositions (reciprocity, community orientation) 3. design propositions that embed trust “by construction” in AI artefacts; and 4. a research agenda for formal verification, large-scale simulation, and cross-cultural validation.By positioning PD reasoning at the heart of AI literacy, we shift pedagogy from ethics byexhortation to trust by design, equipping the next generation of developers to build AIsystems that cooperate reliably with both humans and machines. 2. Conceptual Background 2.1 Trust in AI DevelopmentWe distinguish two mutually reinforcing facets of trust: • Cognitive trust—reasoned beliefs about an agent’s competence, integrity, and predictability (McAllister, 1995). Developers foster it through
diverse fields—from healthcare toeducation—consumers, researchers and policymakers are increasingly raising concerns aboutwhether and how AI is regulated. It is therefore reasonable to anticipate that alignment withprinciples of ‘ethical’ or ‘responsible’ AI, as well as compliance with law and policy, will form anincreasingly important part of AI development. Yet, for the most part, the conventional computerscience curriculum is ill-equipped to prepare students for these challenges. To this end, we seek toexplore how new educational content related to AI ethics and AI policy can be integrated intoboth ethics- and technical-focused courses. This paper describes a two-lecture AI Policy Modulethat was piloted in a graduate-level introductory machine
Darby Riley is a doctoral candidate pursuing her third consecutive degree at Rowan University (Glassboro, NJ). Her research focuses on identity development in engineering education—specifically, how engineering students construct their sense of self through their academic journey and how personal identities shape this process. As a disabled researcher, she brings both academic and lived experience to her work, with a particular interest in how students with disabilities navigate the engineering field.Ing. Eduardo Rodriguez Mejia, Rowan University Eduardo is a Rover Scout, and professional Electronic Engineer with a Masters degree in Electronic Engineer from Javeriana University at Bogot´a-Colombia. He is an adjunct
andcurriculum for future class and 2) having a better understanding of how to apply an anti-racistapproach to curriculum and teaching. Participation in the PDS program has a positive impact infaculty feeling more comfortable in discussing culturally inclusive curricula with colleagues anddiscussing STEM relevance to students’ social and cultural lived experiences.InterviewFaculty participants were interviewed to explore their lived experiences, the impact of the PDSprogram on their pedagogical practices, and their engagement with minoritized students in STEM.Here we provide illustrative quotes that capture the influence of the PDS and supports theanticipated research results, showing that fostering inclusive pedagogies, meaningful faculty-student
, as well as the benefits of equipping thefuture construction workforce with such knowledge and skills to enhance both professionalsuccess and tackle environmental challenges. The findings of this study contribute to the field ofsustainable construction by advocating for curriculum revisions that integrate sustainablepractices. By preparing the future construction workforce to adopt sustainable practices andfocusing on their implementation in post-disaster recovery, this study addresses key sustainabledevelopment goals (SDGs) and supports efforts to create a more responsible built environment.Furthermore, these efforts benefit communities and stakeholders by fostering sustainablereconstruction that not only reduces environmental impact but
-academic audiences.Dr. Muhsin Menekse, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PWL) (COE) Muhsin Menekse is an Associate Professor at Purdue University with a joint appointment in the School of Engineering Education and the Department of Curriculum & Instruction. Dr. Menekse’s primary research focuses on exploring K-16 students’ engagement and learning of engineering and science concepts by creating innovative instructional resources and conducting interdisciplinary quasi-experimental research studies in and out of classroom environments. Dr. Menekse is the recipient of the 2014 William Elgin Wickenden Award by the American Society for Engineering Education. He is also selected as an NSF SIARM fellow for the advanced
that informs learning community theories, policies, practices, programs” [3],defines learning communities as: “...intentional educational approaches to improve the teaching and learning experience. These approaches often emphasize…co-curriculum [development] and prioritize community-building among faculty, staff, and a cohort of students… [Learning communities] include a “structure characterized by a cohort of students participating in an intentionally designed integrative study of an issue or theme” [3].In pursuit of a flexible and generative structure that would invite broad communityparticipation, the NLCA definition provided several tangible linkages that aligned withour vision for the community’s work
, University of Maryland College ParkDr. Jennifer Kouo, The Johns Hopkins University Dr. Jennifer Kouo is an Assistant Research Scientist at the Center for Technology in Education (CTE) at the Johns Hopkins University School of Education. Jennifer’s areas of expertise include Universal Design for Learning, technology integration, assistive technologies, and serving students with a range of disabilities, particularly autism spectrum disorder. She is currently engaged in multiple research projects that involve transdisciplinary collaborations in the field of engineering, medicine, and technology, as well as research on teacher preparation and the conducting of evidence-based practices in multiple contexts. Jennifer’s
Paper ID #48747[Work in Progress] Broadening Participation and Building Students’ Self-EfficacyThrough Experiential Learning Undergraduate Research Experiences focusedon STEM Research for Social ChangeDr. Kenya Crosson, University of Dayton Dr. Kenya Crosson serves as Associate Dean for Faculty and Staff Affairs and Research in the School of Engineering at the University of Dayton (UD), and she is an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Engineering Mechanics. A UD faculty member since 2007, Kenya teaches undergraduate and graduate courses; manages an environmental engineering
commonality in that their sharedevolutions return to humanistic models.Consideration of these social-spatial relationships of learning, these integrated communities canbe ontologically modeled by a Students as Partners (SaP) relationship. A review of SaPrelationships identify four cross-cutting themes that outline this approach: reciprocity, realities ofpartnership outcomes, context of practices, and inclusive, partnered learning communities [28].The interconnectivity of results and implications of SaP as both an ethos and a practice cancorrelate the complex, nuanced, and multifaceted nature of these partnerships. Typically,partnerships are predominantly occurring between students and academic staff. In exploringpartnerships of students and other
of this kind? This project update will share progress toward these goals and research questions. We shareupdated methodological approaches, which include new screening criteria, an updatedframework and rubrics for identifying both the approach to and quality of systemic change work,and the design and preliminary outcomes of machine learning approaches.Methods In metasyntheses, researchers systematically search, review, and integrate the research ona specific topic [2]. Here, we focus on undergraduate STEM instructional change empiricalliterature. However, rather than simply describe or summarize a body of literature, metasynthesesintegrate findings from qualitative, quantitative, mixed method, and theoretical work to createnew
majors at thecollege level. Therefore, we propose that public K-12 education must provide high-qualityinstruction not only in computer science but also in STEM fields in an integrated manner. Toachieve this, improvements in STEM education should be in conjunction with reforms in careereducation. Career education revisions include support for students to overcome traditional genderrole beliefs, along with detailed information about various STEM careers. Revisions are requiredat the college level in addition to the K-12 level. In order for STEM programs to attract students,they need to provide extensive information about the curriculum in a fashion that high schoolstudents can make knowledge-based decisions considering their STEM career paths
(EduFusion NSG) presents an innovative, integrated framework thataddresses the critical gap between academia and industry, providing a structured ecosystemthat promotes collaboration, educator training, and market-relevant course offerings toenhance entrepreneurship and economic resilience on a national scale.IntroductionThe EDUFUSION Project, officially launched on December 1, 2024, is a 48-month initiativefunded under the European Union’s ERASMUS-EDU-2024-CBHE program (Project ID:101179805). This project aims to address critical challenges in Kazakhstan’s highereducation system by bridging the gap between academia and industry, enhancing educatortraining, and delivering innovative, market-aligned online courses. By fosteringcollaboration
, student LPI, and activity rubrics) and used to confirm student knowledgeacquisition (e.g. completion of an assessment indicated exposure to it), a strategy for how toanalyze and interpret the content of these was not fully established. Given the limited capacity ofthe team for assessment and evaluation, the programming team plans to focus the evaluation planon a subset of outcomes next year so that more information can be gathered and specificinterventions assessed. With this approach, targeted improvements can be made year over year.The coach responses to post-survey II were not included in the analysis, though their feedback onhow to improve the integration of the coaches will be used in improving the program design nextyear. The coach survey
minimum criteria for acceptance for the camp was as follows: • Students must be in the 9th through rising 12th grade. • Students must have successfully completed pre-algebra or be qualified for enrollment in pre-algebra for the upcoming school term. • Students must have a cumulative grade point average of 2.5 or higher. • Students must demonstrate an expressed interest in engineering, science, and transportation technology as illustrated in an essay written by the student.Curriculum and Activities: The curriculum combined lectures, interactive workshops, field trips,and hands-on projects to create a comprehensive learning experience. Key activities included: • Introduction to Transportation Systems: Lectures on traffic
social distancing protocols.AcknowledgementsThe research described herein is part of a project titled “Hand-on Experiential Learning toImprove Comprehension and Retention in Engineering Mechanics” funded by an internal grantthrough the Faculty Research Enhancement Program at Angelo State University.Survey data was conducted with the approval of the University Institutional Review Board (andif applicable, other relevant IRB committees)- Approval #HAQ-081121. The survey results willbe published only in aggregate without any information to personally identify participants.Participation will remain confidential.References[1] S. Kaul and P. Sitaram, “Curriculum Design of Statics and Dynamics: An IntegratedScaffolding and Hands-On Approach.” ASEE
needed[4]. Simultaneously, funding mechanismsshould evolve to support context-driven innovation, ensuring that teachers’ boundary-brokeringefforts translate into sustained systemic change[10].AcknowledgementThis work is supported by the Humanities and Social Sciences Project (Project No. 22YJA880096)of the Chinese Ministry of Education.References[1] STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research[M]. National Academies Press, 2014.[2] Gonzalez H B, Kuenzi J J. Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education: A primer[C]. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress, 2012.[3] Freeman S, Eddy S L, McDonough M, et al. Active learning increases student
addresses lies in the limited application of PhET sims within engineeringeducation, particularly in introductory engineering courses. While these tools have beenextensively studied and proven effective in K-12 education and science-based higher educationcourses, there is a lack of research on their integration into engineering-specific curricula. Byincorporating PhET simulations into clicker-based questions, this study explores their potentialto enhance engagement and understanding in a context where traditional teaching methods mayfail to capture students' interest or convey the depth of the material. This work fills a critical gapby extending the use of PhET simulations into an engineering framework, providing new insightsinto how interactive
Paper ID #46309Advanced Microfabrication Manufacturing Course Comparison of Onlineand In-person Teaching with Hands-on Lab Component for InterdisciplinaryGraduate EducationProf. Nathan Jackson, University of New Mexico Prof. Jackson is an Associate Professor in Mechanical Engineering and Director of the Nanoscience and Microsystems Engineering Graduate Program at University of New Mexico. He is the PI of an NSF funded Innovation and Graduate Education project focused on increasing job readiness of graduate students in the semiconductor industry. He is a member of ASEE and Senior Member of IEEE. He was awarded the Junior
Paper ID #45782Work in Progress: Refining a Rigid Body Dynamics Concept Inventory withExpert Feedback and Preliminary Student TestingDr. Amie Baisley, University of Florida Amie Baisley is currently an Instructional Assistant Professor at the University of Florida teaching primarily 2nd year mechanics courses. Her teaching and research interests are alternative pedagogies, mastery-based learning and assessment, student persistence in their first two years, and faculty development.Dr. Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Brian Self obtained his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Engineering Mechanics
student writing self-efficacy, embodied contemplative pedagogies, and welcoming practices in writing centers. She has published in venues including The Writing Center Journal, WAC Clearinghouse, and Composition Forum. She is a co-PI in the NSF IGE project, ”The Writing SySTEM: A Systemic Approach to Graduate Writing Instruction and Intervention.”Dr. Christopher Ryan Basgier, Auburn University Christopher Basgier is Director of University Writing at Auburn University. In that role, he consults with departments about integrating writing and high-impact practices throughout undergraduate and graduate curricula. His research, which spans writing across the curriculum, writing centers, genre, threshold concepts, and
partnership betweenChicago State University (CSU), a small, Predominantly Black Institution (PBI), Quilt, a non-profit community organization, Argonne National Laboratory and industry partners designed toprepare individuals with the skills necessary to start new careers in the semiconductor andmicroelectronics industry in the Chicagoland area. The project focuses on reskilling workersthrough a series of compensated experiential learning activities. The impetus for the programarose from work at CSU’s Center for Information Security Education and Research (CINSER),which is an Intelligence Community, Center for Academic Excellence (IC CAE) [6]. A strategicgoal of CINSER is to prepare individuals for careers in critical and emerging technologies and