STEM education. Teachers were recruitedfrom diverse school districts and regions, provided with room, board, and a stipend, and engagedin research, training, and curriculum development activities. They received instruction on anddiscussed topics of ethics, with an emphasis on science, technology, and engineering, developedlesson plans, and created posters showcasing their integration strategies. The participants alsointeracted with other E3 groups to explore best practices in engineering education. This paperdescribes the teacher selection process, program structure, and key outcomes, including ongoingdiscussions to assess the integration of ethics into their curricula. Lessons learned from thisexperience will inform future efforts to enhance
professional attitudes. • Integrity is firm adherence to a code of especially moral values • Dependability is defined as the quality of being able to be counted on or relied upon • Consideration of Others is thoughtful and sympathetic regard to the needs of others • Flexibility is the ability to change or be changed according to the situation and is critical for civil engineers working within a diverse group and in an ever-changing environment.Fostering Affective LearningCognitive learning. Across our curriculum, we naturally teach cognitive knowledge aboutprofessional attitudes in various course activities. This is mostly because our faculty have allworked in professional practice, so the technical “in
talentcultivation models of top international universities. North America boasts richexperience in cultivating engineering management talents, with MIT’s System Design& Management (SDM) program being a typical representative. Upon comparison,numerous similarities and differences emerge between the talent training models ofChinese and North American universities. Specifically, regarding training objectives,both programs emphasize the fostering of interdisciplinary awareness and abilities.However, this program underscores the ability to integrate digital intelligencetechnologies with engineering management. Conversely, SDM emphasizes thedevelopment of systematic thinking and leadership. Regarding curriculum setting, thisprogram focuses on establishing an
Foundry-guided courses. Specifically,the intervention includes the purposeful pairing of the Engineering for One Planet (EOP)framework [1] with the Renaissance Foundry model (i.e., the Foundry) [2] in an undergraduatechemical engineering course that requires student teams to address societal challenges as learningoutcomes. The Bio-Foundry Initiative was initially funded by a VentureWell Faculty grant thatprovided support for the first iteration of the initiative that focused on biomimicry elements. Thiswas expanded upon by an American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) EOP Mini-GrantProgram wherein the biomimicry elements were integrated into the nine principles reflected in theEOP framework. Both represent an expansion of the normal course
hypotheses and discusses the survey instruments used to prove them. Section 4explores the case study of an aeronautical fixture designed to measure drag force by SeniorMechanical Engineering (ME) students using PLM tools. Finally, the conclusion is offered insection 5 with complete references afterward. The appendices contain the research survey, finaldeliverable results, and the final report rubric for the design project.2. Use of PLM Utilities in Higher Education and GapThe introduction of PLM software into engineering education has taken many forms, rangingfrom dedicated courses to seminars or integrated into class projects. In many ME departments,3D modeling or CAD software is a mainstay in their curriculum, and some universities havePLM minors
model videos (one component of BOAST)develop students’ engineering career awareness, offer insights into preparing for college, and providereflection opportunities for how students’ own background and interests fit into an engineering pathway.ROLE MODEL VIDEOSTen role model videos feature predominantly minoritized students, professors, and other professionalsdescribing their work in engineering careers, how their interests developed, challenges theyencountered, and how they persisted. Each role model video also has a series of reflection questions (seeexample above). Videos can creatively be integrated into classes, clubs, advisory periods, and more.OUR ROLE MODELS JEREMY BROWN DUNCAN PARKE
theirproject-based and lab-heavy nature, demands a robust foundation in programming. This aspect ofthe curriculum is not merely about teaching programming as a skill; it is integrally woven into thefabric of the learning process, enabling students to apply these skills in real-world scenarios,thereby preparing them for the complex challenges of the robotics field.Understanding the significance of programming in robotics, the RBE curriculum strategicallyincorporates 1 unit, equivalent to three courses, in computer science, ensuring that students arewell-equipped with the necessary computational tools and techniques. These foundationalcourses set the stage for more advanced exploration and application in subsequent RBE courses.However, unlike many
labs and experimentation in a separate course. At West Point, the labs aretypically integrated into the appropriate course with an additional 0.5 credit hours. Finally, thebiggest difference was the significant emphasis on hands-on experiences at West Point, toinclude the academic flight program. This is an important feature that will continue to make ourprogram unique. Given the nature of what our graduates will do after graduation compared toaspirant institutions, the decision was to retain it within the program. During the second round of benchmarking, the team focused on the programs offered atUSAFA and USNA, primarily because they operate under similar constraints with a high numberof required courses in the core curriculum. USNA’s
, and providing opportunitiesfor students to engage in projects that address real-world sustainability challenges. Byfostering a deeper understanding of the climate crisis and equipping engineers with theknowledge and skills to develop sustainable and equitable solutions, we can empower them toplay a crucial role in mitigating climate change and creating a more sustainable future for all.This paper examines the development and implementation of an interdisciplinary Liberal Artsand Sciences Curriculum (LASC) at a private university. Designed to integrate sustainabilityprinciples into engineering education, the program aligns with the United Nations SustainableDevelopment Goals (SDGs) and equips students to address the multifaceted challenges
physics, BA in studio arts, and MT in secondary science education at the University of Virginia, followed by her PhD in science teaching, learning, policy, and leadership at the University of Maryland. Building on her background in physics, sculpture, art history, and high-school physics teaching, Dr. Shirey is passionate about using integrative-STEAM education to reach more students, engaging students in real-world explorations using science and math content, and helping teachers and students to grapple with complex problems in novel ways.Ava Samuel, Purdue University Ava Samuel is currently pursuing an undergraduate degree in Mechanical Engineering in the Johns Martinson Honors College. She holds an interest in
engineer.Vision and ValuesPierrakos established a clear vision to "Educate the Whole Engineer for Human Flourishing"through an interdisciplinary, integrated, and student-centered curriculum. Together, the foundingteam established six shared values (empowerment, integrity, inclusion, compassion, growth, andjoy) to shape the culture, program development, curriculum design, faculty hiring, pedagogicalstrategies, advising, space renovations, student recruitment, etc. The founding team deliberatelycreated an inclusive environment from the start. While the admissions team predicted only 15%women in the inaugural class, the program achieved 40% female enrollment, a percentage theymaintained in subsequent years. By year three, Wake Forest Engineering had grown
Paper ID #48410”Living” Engineering Laboratory: Enhancing Undergraduate Learning ThroughPlace-Based Education and Lab-Scale Engineering ModelsDr. Kushal Adhikari, Juniata College Dr. Adhikari currently serves as an Assistant Professor of Civil & Environmental Engineering at Juniata College and brings in his teaching experience from Cal Poly Humboldt and Texas Tech University. Dr. Adhikari strongly believes in experential learning and strives to create research opportunities for students while creating an impact on human lives and society. His research interest lies in integrating sustainability dimensions into
Paper ID #48556Using industry standard tools to set up students for successDr. Bridget Ogwezi, ANSYS, Inc. For the last 5 years I have been part of the Academic Program at Ansys, supporting engineering education.Dr. Kaitlin Tyler, ANSYS, Inc. Kaitlin Tyler is currently a Senior Academic Program Engineer at Ansys. Her role focuses on supporting the usage of Ansys tools in academia, with an emphasis on materials teaching and pre-university engagement. She is also the lead for the Ansys Academic Content Development Program, which focuses on developing instructional content to support integration of Ansys tools in curriculum
Assistant Professor and Product Design Lab Director in Industrial and Enterprise Systems Engineering at the Grainger College at the University of Illinois. She is also courtesy faculty in Mechanical Science and Engineering, Curriculum & Instruction (College of Education) and Industrial Design (School of Fine and Applied Arts). Dr. Goldstein’s research focuses on student designers through the study of their design actions and thinking.Dr. Charles XieDr. H. Onan Demirel, Oregon State University Onan Demirel is an assistant professor of mechanical engineering at Oregon State University. He received his Ph.D., MS, and BS degrees from Purdue University. Dr. Demirel’s research interests lie at the intersection of human
Computer Systems Engineering, and many years of experience teaching and developing curriculum in various learning environments. She has taught technology integration and teacher training to undergraduate and graduate students at Arizona State University, students at the K-12 level locally and abroad, and various workshops and modules in business and industry. Dr. Larson is experienced in the application of instructional design, delivery, evaluation, and specializes in eLearning technologies for training and development. Her research focuses on the efficient and effective transfer of knowledge and learning techniques, innovative and interdisciplinary collaboration, and strengthening the bridge between K-12 learning and
spaces. She is creating and testing innovative, interdisciplinary curricular approaches that engage students in developing models of real-world problems and their solutions.Dr. Morgan M Hynes, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Dr. Morgan Hynes is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University and Director of the FACE Lab research group at Purdue. In his research, Hynes explores the use of engineering to integrate academic subjects in K-12 claSiddika Selcen Guzey, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PWL) (COE) Dr. Guzey is a professor of science education at Purdue University. Her research and teaching focus on integrated STEM Education.Anne DeLion, Purdue Engineering
University Dr. Mohamed Khalafalla is an Assistant Professor of Construction Engineering at Florida A&M University’s School of Architecture and Engineering Technology. His research expertise includes risk analysis, cost estimating, and concrete materials research. Dr. Khalafalla has contributed extensively to projects sponsored by the Department of Energy and the Tennessee Department of Transportation, conducting studies in sustainability, risk analysis, cost estimation, and concrete performance. He also has significant expertise in STEM education and research, particularly in innovative teaching methodologies and curriculum development aimed at enhancing student engagement in STEM fields. Dr. Khalafalla has authored
Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Surveying civil engineering student attitudes toward the use of computational tools Sotiria Koloutsou-Vakakis, Megan L. Matthews, Cheryl Cohen, Jacob Henschen, John S. Popovics, Ashlynn S. Stillwell Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana- Champaign, 205 N. Mathews, Urbana, IL 61801, sotiriak@illinois.eduAbstractThe discussion about integrating computing into curricula of non-computer science engineeringmajors remains open. Such integration is desirable, as computing is an essential tool forengineering practice. In addition, computing can enhance engineering education throughsimulation and
. It will also illustrate theinterdisciplinary nature of smart city development, demonstrating how these programs canwork together to prepare students to address the multifaceted challenges of urban energyefficiency. This comprehensive approach aims to foster an integrative educational frameworkthat equips graduates with the knowledge and skills to lead in the development and operationof energy-efficient smart cities.Proposed Curriculum Model & OutcomesThe curriculum mapping of the construction management undergraduate program is given toexplain how the proposed ‘Introduction to Urban Technologies & Smart Cities’ would fit intothe three programs. Curriculum Model Details are given in two parts: Part A and Part B in Table 4and Table 5
complexity. 5 • Projects: Replacing traditional tests, students complete three major projects, applying C++ to interdisciplinary engineering problems. This approach reinforces practical applications and interdisciplinary learning 2. MethodologyThe study evaluates the effectiveness of integrating C++ into an engineering curriculum,comparing student performance in a traditional programming course versus a redesigned coursewith an engineering-focused C++ approach. The study was conducted over two semesters withall students enrolled in the course participating.Sampling and Group AssignmentStudents were not randomly assigned to the
you get to see the entire process." • "No, because incorporating more projects from multiple courses could overload the curriculum and make time management difficult for students who have not been good at certain classes and need to catch up. Also, not all courses have such a direct connection to warrant an integrated project, and it could lead to more confusion than meaningful learning." • "Yes. It is less daunting to refer back to an earlier project rather than starting from scratch in every class. It also helps me feel like I'm investing in an actual project that is meaningful and not just a box to check to get a good grade." Table IV includes a sample of
] J.D. Ford. “Integrating Communication into Engineering Curricula: An InterdisciplinaryApproach to Facilitating Transfer at New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology.”Composition Forum, no. 26, Fall 2012. [Online]. Available:http://compositionforum.com/issue/26/new-mexico-tech.php[11] M.C. Paretti “Teaching Communication in Capstone Design: The Role of the Instructor inSituated Learning.” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 491-503, 2008.[12] Mallette, J.C. & Ackler, H. (2023). “Building a Communication-Integrated Curriculum inMaterials Science.” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, June 25-28Baltimore, MD. American Society for Engineering Education.[13] Blakeslee, A. Mallette, J.C., Nowacek, R
responsibilities—key attributes of engineers according to the AccreditationBoard for Engineering and Technology (ABET) [1]. The Studio was established in October 2005as a joint initiative of the College of Engineering and Louisiana State University (LSU)’scampus-wide Communication Across the Curriculum (CxC) program, a program initially fundedby an engineering alumnus, who agreed to a campus-wide program on the condition that it beginin engineering.The Studio began as a support hub for the newly created communication-intensive (C-I) courses,but opportunities to study communications require contexts in which to occur, so the studiomission expanded to include a corporate-sponsored workshop series focused on leadership skillsdevelopment and a tutoring
serving as Assistant Provost for Academic Assessment and Faculty Development. Since 2014, Dr. Carnasciali has facilitated and coached workshops for faculty focused on integrating curiosity, connections, and value creation into the curriculum, helping students develop skills for solving complex, real-world challenges. Her research explores the role of informal learning environments, decision-making frameworks, and mindset development in fostering innovative problem-solving. As an advocate for experiential and entrepreneurial education, she brings deep expertise in integrating these principles into engineering programs and broader faculty development efforts.Dr. Andrew L Gerhart, Lawrence Technological University Andrew
, xmeasurements, and experiments and toanalyze and interpret the results toimprove processes; and5. an ability to function effectively as a x xmember as well as a leader ontechnical teams.Alignment with ABET (Accreditation & Curriculum Recommendations) Curriculum RecommendationsThe integration of hydrogen-related competencies into aviation education requires a restructuringof existing curricula to accommodate the technical, safety, and sustainability challengesassociated with hydrogen-powered flight. One possible adjustment is the inclusion of specializedcourses on hydrogen propulsion systems. Such courses should provide students with an in-depthunderstanding of hydrogen
engineeringcourses, then a results and discussion section, and finally a section to conclude.BackgroundLiterature ReviewThere has been an argument for giving social science issues more prominence in engineeringcurricula, as a thorough understanding of the social world is crucial to successful engineering [1].Holistic engineering education combines traditional engineering coursework with subjects likeeconomics, sociology, psychology, business, and other disciplines, creating engineers who arecapable of leading multidisciplinary teams and driving innovation [2]. In essence, holisticengineering education integrates all knowledge to some purpose [3]. The aim is to produceengineers who are capable of engineering in sustainable and socially responsible ways.In
technical skills are often the focus of engineering programs,students rarely receive formal guidance on effective teamwork. Without proper training, negativegroup experiences can challenge their future workforce professional success. Therefore,integrating teamwork training into the engineering curriculum is vital for preparing students forthe collaborative nature of their careers and this is our primary motivation.There is an open question on how and where to fit these teamwork preparations into thecurriculum. Developing teamwork skills involves understanding key elements in team dynamicssuch as, managing roles and expectations, effective communication, and conflict management -shown in Figure 1. Successful teams build trust by clearly defining
discipline. This raises concerns because the content programs choose toemphasize in their undergraduate curriculum can impact the way students come to view andunderstand the field, including perceptions of what skills and knowledge are valuable to learn fortheir future careers. An underemphasis on the social and contextual dimensions of engineeringcan create a narrow representation of the field that leaves students inadequately prepared tonavigate the realities of engineering work. Additionally, previous research has shown thatwomen and students of color often pursue STEM degrees, including engineering, with an interestin how they can leverage their degree to create positive social impact. Thus, examining how theengineering curriculum might
struggling andmake adjustments to the curriculum and program structure to better prepare graduates for success.Additionally, the analysis of student performance can provide valuable feedback to faculty andadministrators, helping them to continually improve and adapt the program to meet the changing needs ofthe industry. Overall, a thorough analysis of student performance in the first year of an engineeringgraduate program is an essential component of ensuring that graduates are well-prepared to succeed intheir careers and make meaningful contributions to the field of engineering [1].The analysis of student performance in their first engineering graduate program has been a key aspect ofevaluating the effectiveness of such programs for many years. In
meaningful curriculums where student choice is considered as animportant factor for engaging the middle-level learner [4]. Further, when young adolescents areactively engaged in learning they are more likely to achieve at higher levels [4]. The workshopdesign decisions were based on the aforementioned reasoning.MethodThe Team: An interdisciplinary team of researchers and educators collaborated to design andconduct the workshop. The team consisted of individuals with expertise in computational cameras,AI, visual media, multidisciplinary engineering, sociology, STEM education, and media arts andsciences. The collaborative work between the team of experts and teacher participants wasinstrumental in creating valuable content and management for the