Design for HCD problemThe prompt was designed such that the generative AI elicited responses that reflect userexperiences in the workstation according to the four elements of a prompt [33]; instruction,context, input data, and output indicator, while also integrating emotional state cues. Theseelements ensure clarity, and specificity in generating insights to usability, user experience, andemotional responses to system interactions. For instance, this approach was applied to thefollowing prompt: "Write 500-word interview notes with a person sitting at a workstation in aprivate office who seems frustrated with their ability to concentrate, with that person answeringquestions about what is good and bad about their workstation, including the chair
assisted in the various collaborative activities. Forboth offerings, the middle school students completed validated and reliable pre- and post-surveysadapted from the Student Attitudes Toward STEM (S-STEM) Survey and the Group Work SkillsQuestionnaire Manual. The S-STEM survey assessed STEM interests, while the Group WorkSkills Questionnaire Manual Survey evaluated collaboration. Preliminary results from aWilcoxon Signed-Rank test indicated positive significance that the 2024 ECE summer campsessions led to greater enjoyment for campers than the 2023 offering. Daily reflection surveyswere also administered to understand the comparison of cohorts and the impact of individualactivities students participated in each day. Results were analyzed to
“detailed skills, which takes place withoutcontext and often even in contrast to their all-round development” as Maier [22] explains.These poles identified by Maier [22] also tend to be reflected in the results of the cyclical motivesfor choosing a course of study. According to the classification developed by Snow [23], at least anindeterminate proportion of those with a lower educational background can be assigned to thepragmatic, career-oriented, calculating ideal type of the “homo oeconomicus”. Anger concluded[24] it is because the engineering profession is a prototype for social advancement througheducation. The opportunities for advancement here are least dependent on parental educationalbackground while another indeterminate proportion of the
lecturer in engineering education. Her work explores the psychological dimensions of engineering mindsets, with a focus on perfectionism and personal values. She bridges behavioural science and human-centred design in engineering problem-solving to foster reflective, ethical, and innovative practices, shaping the next generation of engineers into sustainability driven, responsible changemakers. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9187-611XDr. Karen A High, Clemson University Dr. Karen High holds an academic appointment in the Engineering Science and Education department and joint appointments in the Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering department as well as the Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences department. Prior
settings.Jack Boomer Perry, University of Michigan .Dr. Aaron W. Johnson, University of Michigan Aaron W. Johnson is an Assistant Professor in the Aerospace Engineering Department and a Core Faculty member of the Engineering Education Research Program at the University of Michigan. His design-based research focuses on how to re-contextualize engineering science engineering courses to better reflect and prepare students for the reality of ill-defined, sociotechnical engineering practice. Current projects include studying and designing classroom interventions around macroethical issues in aerospace engineering and the productive beginnings of engineering judgment as students create and use mathematical models. Aaron holds
appropriate institution to attend in the short term, they are alsoexpected to plan long-term for what kind of career that enrollment will lead to [18]. Whilestudents typically pick a major course of study based on interest in that field, they expect thatcompleting the institution’s program will enable them to find a high-paying job [19].Amidst this pressure of applying and having to make long-term plans at a young age, collegeapplicants also need to parse unclear messaging from universities. Institutional missionstatements, which inform their marketing to applicants, are often designed to attract applicationsrather than be reflective of the “lived mission” of those institutions in practice [20, 21]. Even ifinstitutions try to hold a unifying mission
at anytime without consequences. The selection of participants was conducted as follows:• Group 1 (with AI): Included 19 students, representing 50% of the total sample. Most of these students were in the age range of 25 to 35 years. All students in this group agreed to participate in the surveys and interviews.• Group 2 (without AI): Nineteen students were included, constituting 50% of the sample. Their ages ranged between 25 and 36, and all agreed to participate in the surveys and interviews.The gender distribution among the participants was 39.47% female students and 60.53% malestudents, reflecting the typical demographics of industrial engineering programs in the region.Both groups are evening students.Data analysisThe
management and prioritization, study skills, and use of theinstitution’s online recourses. Therefore, it is meaningful to assess whether our Bridge programhas an impact on academic adjustment and how this variable may relate to student subsequentacademic success. It is particularly interesting to examine the program’s impact on academicadjustment, especially considering that to the best of our knowledge, academic adjustment hasnot been studied within Bridge programs.The elements of our program described above reflect the emphasis given on both academic skillsand psychological attributes with the goal of student success in college. It remains, however, toevaluate and understand empirically the impact of the program on our students. Howparticipation
information literacy, critical thinking, research skills,and library orientation, for example. However, covering such an array of topics in a limitedtimeframe resulted in a perceived lack of instructional autonomy, a challenge also noted in theresearch [1]. With instruction as a primary responsibility, teaching has become a critical aspectof librarian identity. This librarian-educator identity reflects efforts to forge sustainable andimpactful relationships with disciplinary faculty in addition to seeking out mentorship andprofessional development opportunities to further enhance one’s teaching skills [2]. There are numerous critiques of the one-shot model in the information literacy instructionscholarship that informed this team [3] [4] [5
increased to 4.248 and 4.333, respectively (p < 0.01, effect size = 0.43).According to Cohen’s classification of effect size [38], we observed statistically significantchanges with a medium effect size in the averaged test of the six Likert-scale awarenessquestions. This reflected students’ increased awareness of mobile accessibility challenges facedby people with disabilities and increased intention to consider them when designing mobileapplications.5.1.2 Knowledge Gain in Accessible DesignBefore game-playing, students exhibited some willingness to design accessibly in their responsesto the open-ended question following the Likert-scale questions, but their responses were general,e.g., “To keep in mind people with disabilities,” “To create
(including videos and digital whiteboards). In this report, wewill focus on the tools and activities listed below, which were later used to understand thestudents’ responses and perspectives. The objective of using the UDL strategies below is to trackstudent activity without assigning grades. Non-graded UDL activities and assignments couldfoster an inclusive, low-pressure learning environment emphasizing growth over performancefrom various perspectives. First, it could encourage a growth mindset, reduce stress, and promoteintrinsic motivation by allowing students to focus on mastering skills without fear of failure.Second, this approach supports self-regulation and reflection, enabling students to take ownershipof their learning. By focusing on
decreasedsignificantly (t (90) = -3.75, p < .01 with a mean difference of -1.57, suggesting a moderatedecline (Cohen’s d = -0.39) in perceived prejudice within the college environment. Additionally,College-Specific Social Distance increased significantly (t (90) = 2.18, p = .03) with a meandifference of 0.90, suggesting a slight increase (Cohen’s d = 0.23) in perceived social distanceamong students within the college setting.Engineering Identity exhibited a significant decline over time (t (90) = -6.58, p < .01) with amean difference of -2.58, reflecting a substantial decline (Cohen’s d = -0.69), in students’identification with the engineering field. Similarly, Engineering Belonging decreasedsignificantly (t (90) = -5.64, p < .01) with a mean
have yet to be cataloged in anyway. Penn State University participated in the AEC depository program for most of itsexistence and amassed a very large collection of reports, over 500 linear feet, most of which hadbeen transferred to storage decades ago. The collection contents were recorded on check-incards, which reflected the format of the individual report received, i.e., paper, microfiche, smallmicrofiche, or microopaque. Over the years, the print reports had been cataloged and added tothe online catalog but the other formats remained in storage and invisible to users. In 2018, webegan to investigate how to improve access to these AEC materials. Initial efforts focused on thebulk of the stored collection, which had been issued on 4
different ways; by using AI or by using pre-defined answers. Depending on whatstudents are asking, chatbot can respond differently to each student. This will increase the senseof ownership of students. In addition, the responses of the students provide data for the teacher toget to know the student better. This allows the teacher to improve the interactions by adjustingthe chatbot’s design.2.1-Chatbot Assistant in a ClassroomChatbot could be very helpful in a classroom. The following are several areas that this softwarecould assist.1- As a Mentor by providing feedback.2- As a Tutor by providing some personalized direct instruction and answering personalizedquestions.3- As a Coach by providing opportunities for reflection.4- As a Teammate in group
Paper ID #49036More than a summer bridge programSehba Midhat Hasan, Tufts University Sehba Hasan is an engineer, educator, and advocate committed to equitable STEM education. She holds a Bachelor of Science in Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering and an MBA in Management . She is currently a Ph.D candidate in STEM education. Sehba’s career reflects her passion for inclusive STEM programming and innovative teaching methods. Her experience includes roles as an Engineering Instructor an Assistant Trio Director and an Associate Director. She played a crucial role in guiding underrepresented students through higher
continue, but the overall project structureworks well with the limited about of time in a 10-week quarter system and students enjoyed theprocess.References[1] Knight, Daniel W., Lawrence E. Carlson, and Jacquelyn F. Sullivan. "Improving engineering student retention through hands-on, team based, first-year design projects." Proceedings of the International Conference on Research in Engineering Education. 2007.[2] Green, Graham. "Redefining engineering education: the reflective practice of product design engineering." International Journal of Engineering Education 17.1 2001: 3-9.[3] Kwaczala, Andrea. 2022. Making with Purpose: Assistive Technology Makerspace Activities. Engineering Unleashed, https://engineeringunleashed.com/card/2367
, characterized by execution and monitoring of goal-directed tasks;and appraisal, characterized by reflection and adaptation [9, 10]. Research across multiple aca-demic domains suggests that SRL-based interventions can improve student learning outcomes atvarious educational levels [10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 9, 16, 17, 18, 19].Several major models of SRL have emerged that have seen some justification from empirical stud-ies in educational psychology, including Zimmerman’s Cyclical Phases model; Boekaerts’ DualProcessing model; Winne and Hadwin; Pintrich; Efklides; Hadwin, J¨arvel¨a, and Miller [10].We designed self-study tasks aimed at promoting students’ agency in learning course material. Dueto SRL’s evident effectiveness, we adopt the SRL framework to
leverages the strengths of each whileattempting to minimize weaknesses.We developed an interview protocol consistent with the methods of narrative analysis and thethree-interview data collection approach [15], [16]. We used a three-interview data collectionprotocol to build rapport, capture participants’ epistemic experiences, and facilitate reflection ofthe impact of those experiences on their personal epistemology, respectively with each interview.As this protocol has not been tested in EER, we conducted a piloting phase to ensure the qualityof the data collection instrument [17], [18]. This paper offers a potential procedure for pilotingthree interviews for narrative analysis, even though piloting studies are rare for narrative analysismethods
feedback cycle [2], constructed from aniterative loop of seeking information, analyzing opportunities to address shortcomings andincrease successes, and implementing these improvements. The evaluation methodology designwas partially informed by outcome-based assessment practices used within education disciplines[3], and partially organically developed as the program design has iterated annually, improvingthe evaluation processes themselves each year. Within the AACRE program, as shown in Figure1 below these methods. Those are implemented by seeking feedback alongside assessment ofthe program using a set of metrics, reflection processes to analyze how these insights can informprogram improvements, and iterating these into the design and
of the probes with respect to the jet centre.Finally, the last question for the students in the discussion is to propose a solution to makethermocouples measure the true total temperature when exposed to a high-speed flow. Inanswering this question, the students have to reflect upon how the measurement of the totalpressure was physically obtained in a Pitot-static tube in order to mimic the same effect in the caseof a temperature measurement.ConclusionThis article presents a laboratory designed for aerospace engineering students, allowing them toconnect their theoretical knowledge to a practical experience. By the end of this laboratory,students will understand, for example, that the choice of a thermocouple for measuring fluidtemperature is
valuable engineering-specific skills and habits of mind and internalizethe meaning of engineering concepts or skills reflected in their own FoK.Third, we advocate for a shift in perspective using the FoK framework to expand rural children,caregiver, and library professionals’ understanding of what counts as engineering. Broadeningthe definition of engineering to include problem-solving skills found in activities, such asfarming, gardening, DIY projects, sports, and games helps uncover engineering thinking alreadypresent in our everyday life. Also, emphasizing engineering mindsets, such as empathy,collaboration, resourcefulness, and critical thinking—often developed through family andcommunity engagement—can further broaden our conceptualization of
Ahn (Eds.), Reflecting the past and embracing the future: International Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS) Annual Meeting 2021 (pp. 629-632). Bochum, Germany: International Society of the Learning Sciences.Lauer J. E., Yhang, E., & Lourenco, S. F. (2019). The Development of Gender Differences in Spatial Reasoning: A Meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 145(6), 537-565. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000191Levine, S. C., Huttenlocher, J., Taylor, A., & Langrock, A. (1999). Early sex differences in spatial skill. Developmental Psychology, 35(4), 940–949. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.35.4.940Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and Characterization of Sex
assistant teaching professor. She was a faculty member at the University of Washington from 2010 - 2022, after which she joined the University of California San Diego. Areas of interest include industry engagement, communication, reflection, universal design, and fostering a sense of community, connection, and inclusion in engineering education. Dr. Taylor aims to foster the development of inclusive, thoughtful engineering graduates who will integrate their technical and professional skills to positively impact society and she is excited to contribute to the educational journey of engineering students. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Work in
researchers have termed these individualsforeign-born/foreign-trained (FB/FT). In the study by Gheorghiu [22], international faculty weredefined as those born in a foreign country with a foreign undergraduate degree while U.S. facultywere born in the U.S. or a foreign country but had earned an undergraduate degree from aninstitution in the U.S.; in their study 10.8% of the faculty were international under this definition,including 55.7% who were U.S. citizens. This reflects the reality that many FBF earn U.S.citizenship [23]. Among the U.S. faculty, only 0.5% were non-U.S. citizens [22].An array of intersecting demographics can be significant in the experiences of FB scholars. Visastatus influenced the number of years spent as post-doctoral
members who develop and teach courses selected as TI courses receive avariety of incentives, such as small stipends for new courses or modifications to existing courses,financial support for external speakers, and, if the course is team-taught, full teaching credit foreach faculty member for the first iteration that the course is offered.The process for selection as a TI course is competitive. A call for proposals goes out in Octobereach year for potential multidisciplinary courses for the following academic year. Proposals arethen due by the middle of January. The proposed course must align with the TI mission andaddress contemporary and emerging societal challenges. The proposals require a tentativesyllabus that clearly reflects the mission of
to rework any assignment, even up to aFinal Exam. Critically, the student must leverage the clearly established power of reflection inlearning when resubmitting the assessment by explaining what went wrong in the initial attemptand providing corrected work. It is often valuable to reward students who navigate the classwithout the use of tokens, such as by providing an automatic "pass" on the Final Exam. Somestudents find this reward to be more of a stick than a carrot. The pressure to hold on to everytoken increases the perceived importance of every assignment.The number of tokens and the schedule for when they are issued to the students are issues thathave no easy answer. Some suggest counting the number of high-impact assignments, such
(47.5%) or pursuing a STEM degree (50%). Respondents also reported that theirinvolvement resulted in an increased desire to become involved in STEM outreach opportunities.Verma and Ali [15] evaluated the impacts of the Xavier University of Louisiana’s Mobile Outreachfor Laboratory Enrichment (XULA-MOLE) project, a six-week long mobile STEM outreachprogram for high school students from under-resourced communities with undergraduate studentsfrom the same or similar communities serving as near-peer mentors. This program was meant toincrease access to high-quality STEM education. The near-peer mentors in this program receivedlaboratory safety training and pedagogical training. Data was collected in the form of self-reflections, which indicated that
structured nature of research activities and deadlines. • Technical Skills: All participants indicated enhanced technical skills, particularly in data analysis and AI methodologies. Alumni highlighted how these skills directly and indirectly contributed to their professional success. • Self-Confidence: All respondents experienced an increase in self-confidence, especially in presenting findings to varied audiences, including academic and industry professionals. • Independence: 83% noted greater independence in tackling complex problems, reflecting the problem-solving and critical thinking skills developed during the projects. • Qualitative Feedback: Respondents expressed appreciation for the real-world
study identifies as a Latinx–Asian cisgender woman who studied engineeringfor her undergraduate degree and is currently a tenure-track assistant professor in STEMeducation. She considers herself an emerging scholar whose work explores issues of equity inSTEM education, with a specific focus on historically minoritized learners, such as youngwomen and Students of Color. In engaging in this research work, she is aware that while herindividual experiences, particularly as a past undergraduate engineering student, provide insightfor interpreting the analytic results, these perspectives may be limited and can lead to oversights.Therefore, the author has carefully reflected and considered alternative interpretations of theresults through discussions
focused on a low-cost, customizable module. Team 3 emphasized a versatile, safe designthat is easily adaptable to different lab setups. In many cases, the students also discussed lessonslearned and self-reflected on their development in their oral presentations. The following sectionwill discuss limitations and opportunities for next steps from the faculty instructor’s perspective.Limitations and Next StepsFuture work should consider further refinement and revision of these prototypes. This can bedone in a variety of ways. First, notably absent from this work, is the actual testing of the productbeyond fitment and basic movements with the industrial robot. This is mainly due to timeconstraints in the project term. However, this could be enhanced