Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session I

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mark A Chapman, University of San Diego

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

. 3, no. 6, p. 100342, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.xinn.2022.100342.[3] S. Weisenburger and V. Sandoghdar, “Light microscopy: an ongoing contemporary revolution,” Contemp. Phys., vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 123–143, Apr. 2015, doi: 10.1080/00107514.2015.1026557.[4] J. H. Thrall et al., “Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Radiology: Opportunities, Challenges, Pitfalls, and Criteria for Success,” J. Am. Coll. Radiol., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 504– 508, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.12.026.[5] L. Seyyed-Kalantari, G. Liu, M. McDermott, I. Y. Chen, and M. Ghassemi, “CheXclusion: Fairness gaps in deep chest X-ray classifiers,” in Biocomputing 2021, Kohala Coast, Hawaii, USA: WORLD SCIENTIFIC, Nov. 2020, pp. 232

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session I

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Opeyemi Peter Ojajuni, Southern University and A&M College; Yasser Ismail, Southern University and A&M College; Fareed Dawan, Southern University and Agricultural & Mechanical College; Albertha Hilton Lawson, Southern University and A&M College; brian Warren, Southern University and Agricultural & Mechanical College

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this publication arethose of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.Reference[1] J. R. Brown, I. Kuznetcova, E. K. Andersen, N. H. Abbott, D. M. Grzybowski, and C. D. Porter, “Full Paper: Implementing Classroom-Scale Virtual Reality into a Freshman Engineering Visuospatial Skills Course,” Jul. 2019. Accessed: Jan. 25, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/full-paper-implementing-classroom-scale-virtual-reality-into- a-freshman-engineering-visuospatial-skills-course[2] D. Moyaki, D. May, N. Hunsu, P. Irukulla, and C. T. Gomillion, “Introduction of a Virtual Reality Laboratory in a Tissue Engineering Course

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session I

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Huihui Qi, University of California, San Diego; Celeste Pilegard, University of California, San Diego; Minju Kim, University of California, San Diego; Saharnaz Baghdadchi, University of California, San Diego; Curt Schurgers, University of California, San Diego; Alex M. Phan, University of California, San Diego; Marko Lubarda, University of California, San Diego

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

intervention and non-intervention courses and developprotocols for investigating long-term strategy transfer and adoption in students’ engineeringcoursework.AcknowledgmentThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under AwardNo. 2315777.ReferenceDattathreya, P., & Shillingford, S. (2017). Identifying the ineffective study strategies of first year medicalschool students. Medical Science Educator, 27, 295-307.Blasiman, R. N., Dunlosky, J., & Rawson, K. A. (2017). The what, how much, and when of studystrategies: Comparing intended versus actual study behaviour. Memory, 25(6), 784-792.McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2020). Training learning strategies to promote self-regulation andtransfer: The knowledge

Conference Session

Biomedical Engineering Division (BED) Poster Session

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Colleen Louise Bringman, The University of Iowa; Amy L Kimball, The University of Iowa

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical Engineering Division (BED)

," Educational Psychology Review, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 271-296, 2010, doi: 10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6.[5] B. R. Belland, Instructional Scaffolding in STEM Education : Strategies and Efficacy Evidence, 1st ed. Cham: Springer International Publishing : Imprint: Springer,, 2017, pp. 1 online resource (XI, 144 pages 10 illustrations). [Online]. Available: https://hdl.loc.gov/loc.gdc/gdcebookspublic.2019761409.[6] R. S. Adams, J. Turns, and C. J. Atman, "Educating effective engineering designers: The role of reflective practice," (in English), Designing in Context, Proceedings, pp. 363-381, 2001. [Online]. Available: ://WOS:000177350200023.[7] M. Lande and L. Leifer, "Difficulties Student Engineers Face Designing the Future," (in

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session II

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Wei Wayne Li, Texas Southern University; Desirée Jackson Ph.D., Texas Southern University; Mahesh Vanjani, Texas Southern University; Yvette E. Pearson P.E., University of Texas at Dallas; Lila Ghemri; Shishir Shishodia, Texas Southern University; Huan Xie, Texas Southern University; Linda Michelle Gardiner, Texas Southern University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

University of Houston. The opinions, findings, conclusions, orrecommendations expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the viewsof the National Science Foundation.REFERENCES[1] National Science Foundation, “Alliances for Graduate Education and the Professoriate (AGEP) Program Solicitation,” Alexandria, VA: NSF 21-576, 2021.[2] E. M. Bensimon, “The Diversity Scorecard: A Learning Approach to Institutional Change”, Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, vol. 36, no.1, pp.44-52, 2004.[3] F. Harris III and E. M. Bensimon, “The Equity Scorecard: A Collaborative Approach to Assess and Respond to Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Student Outcomes", New Directions for Institutional Research, pp. 77-84, 06

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session I

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Avimanyu Sahoo, The University of Alabama in Huntsville; Haejun Park, Oklahoma State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Education Conference (FIE). IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–5. [8] R. Burcin and J. M. Dolan, “Transforming undergraduate research experiences with experiential learning,” 2023. [9] M. Mastronardi, M. Borrego, N. Choe, and R. Hartman, “The impact of undergraduate research experiences on participants’ career decisions,” Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 75–82, 2021.[10] D. Lopatto, “Undergraduate research experiences support science career decisions and active learning,” CBE—Life Sciences Education, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 297–306, 2007.[11] E. Seymour, A.-B. Hunter, S. L. Laursen, and T. DeAntoni, “Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three-year

Conference Session

Biomedical Engineering Division (BED) Poster Session

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alex Nelson Frickenstein, University of Oklahoma

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical Engineering Division (BED)

research and learning: forms of access and perceptions of utility. Heliyon 2018, 4, doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e01052.2. Loke, S.-K. How do virtual world experiences bring about learning? A critical review of theories. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 2015, 31, doi:10.14742/ajet.2532.3. Harsası, M. The Use of Open Educational Resources in Online Learning: A Study of Students’ Perception. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 2015, 16, 74-87, doi:10.17718/tojde.46469.4. Hostager, T.J. Online Learning Resources Do Make a Difference: Mediating Effects of Resource Utilization on Course Grades. Journal of Education for Business 2014, 89, 324- 332, doi:10.1080

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division (FPD) GIFTS Session 2: Foundational Skills in the First-Year Engineering Classroom

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew Thomas Garnett, Auburn University; Lucila Marcela Carias Duron, Auburn University; Maria Lujan Auad, Auburn University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs Division (FPD)

Fall 2023, she began co-teaching Auburn University’s Engineering Orientation (ENGR 1100) course to all first-year students, teaching approximately 1300 students yearly. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 GIFTS: Restructuring a First-Year Engineering Course to Introduce a Variety of Technical Communication ActivitiesMotivation Over the past few years, the Samuel Ginn College of Engineering at Auburn Universityhas been working to restructure the curriculum of the first-year engineering sequence, starting withthe Engineering Orientation (ENGR 1100) course. This course meets once a week for 50 minutesand is a required 0-credit hour Pass (S)/Fail (U) course taken by all

Conference Session

Computing and Information Technology Division (CIT) Technical Session 7

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ashish Kharel, The University of Toledo; Ahmad Y Javaid, The University of Toledo; Quamar Niyaz, Purdue University Northwest; Sidike Paheding, Fairfield University; Devinder Kaur, The University of Toledo

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Computing and Information Technology Division (CIT)

? What are some challenges of implementing secure embedded systems? How confident are you in your ability to identify and fix vulnerabilities in embedded system s/w? How confident are you in your ability to secure embedded systems from cyberattacks?Knowledge What aspects of cybersecurity for embedded systems do you feel most comfortable with?Improvement What aspects of cybersecurity for embedded systems do you feel least comfortable with? How can this lab be improved to help students learn more about cybersecurity for embedded systems? (Only Post-Lab Survey) 2. Reading Material:  Purpose: The reading material titled "Cybersecurity Fundamentals for Embedded Systems" is provided

Conference Session

Computing and Information Technology Division (CIT) Technical Session 3

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nestor L. Osorio, Northern Illinois University; Abul K. M. Azad, Northern Illinois University

Tagged Divisions

Computing and Information Technology Division (CIT)

scholarly production: How great is the impact?" Scientometrics, vol. 105, pp. 1809–1831, 2015.7. R. Thomopoulos, S. Destercke, B. Charnomordic, I. Johnson, and J. Abécassis, "An iterative approach to build relevant ontology-aware data-driven models," Information Sciences, vol. 221, pp. 452-472, 2013.8. N.F. Noy and D.L. McGuinness, "Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology," Stanford University, 2001. [Online]. Available: https://corais.org/sites/default/files/ontology_development_101_aguide_to_creating_your_fir st_ontology.pdf9. A.L.A. Menolli, H.S. Pinto, S.S. Reinehr, and A. Malucelli, "An incremental and iterative process for ontology building," in ONTOBRAS, Proceedings of the 6th Seminar on Ontology

Conference Session

Empowering Pre-College Students through AI and Computer Science: Standards, Self-Efficacy, and Social Impact

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Julie M. Smith, Institute for Advancing Computing Education; Jacob Koressel; Sofia De Jesus, Carnegie Mellon University; Joseph W Kmoch; Bryan Twarek

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

Bloom’s level and the average level for the CSTA standards.The CSTA standards have a higher average level than most states. This portion of the analysisdoes suggest that there is a wide variety in the cognitive complexity of state standards as written,ranging from a high of nearly 4.0 (or the analyze level) to a low of about 2.5 (the understandlevel). Our analysis did not pinpoint the underlying cause(s) of these differences. Future teams ofstate standards writers may, therefore, find it useful to assess whether their standards reflect thecognitive complexity level that they deem most appropriate. To date, there is little to no researchindicating what average level of cognitive complexity – or distribution of cognitive complexity ina set of

Conference Session

Expanding STEM Access and Belonging: Programs and Practices for Inclusive K–12 Engagement

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Valentina Kuskova, University of Notre Dame; Sugana Chawla, University of Notre Dame; Robyn Brenza Kress; Stacy Garrett-Ray; Kim R Jassem MHA, MSDA, PMP, Ascension Foundation

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

review of the statistical methodology used and available. BMC medical research methodology, 16,pp.1-19. Betancourt, J. R., Green, A. R., Carrillo, J. E., & Owusu Ananeh-Firempong, I. (2016). Definingcultural competence: A practical framework for addressing racial/ethnic disparities in health and health care.Public Health Reports, 118(4), 293–302. Dehghanzadeh, H., Farrokhnia, M., Dehghanzadeh, H., Taghipour, K. and Noroozi, O., 2024. Usinggamification to support learning in K‐12 education: A systematic literature review. British Journal ofEducational Technology, 55(1), pp.34-70. Estrada, M., Burnett, M., Campbell, A.G., Campbell, P.B., Denetclaw, W.F., Gutiérrez, C.G., Hurtado,S., John, G.H., Matsui, J., McGee

Conference Session

ME Division Technical Session 2 - Harnessing AI and Machine Learning to Transform ME Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Harrison Zimmerman Brown, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Reza Ebadi, Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH)

). Fundamentals of Engineering Thermodynamics. John Wiley & Sons.NIST. (2024). Refprop. Retrieved from https://www.nist.gov/srd/refprop.Orlando M Ayala, O. P. (2017). Flipped classroom as blended learning in a fluid mechanics course in engineering technology.Patrick Tebbe, S. R. (2007). Promoting student engagement in thermodynamics with engineering scenarios. 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition.Shapiro, M. a. (2023). INTERACTIVE THERMODYNAMICS: IT. Retrieved from https://www.wiley.com/college/moran/it.htmV Ismet Ugursal, C. A. (2015). Student opinions and perceptions of undergraduate thermodynamics courses in engineering. European Journal of Engineering Education, 40(6), 593-610

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division (FPD) Technical Session 9: Hands-On Foundations - Building Confidence, Belonging, and Engagement in First-Year Engineering

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Leendert Schrader, Saint Louis University; Danahe Marmolejo, Saint Louis University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs Division (FPD)

Handouts and Complementary DocumentsInstructional ManualThe instructional manual was structured in six parts: the first four detailed the construction of themechanical components in a sequential joint-by-joint fashion, with the final two parts delineatingthe assembly of the electronic modules on a pre-wired breadboard. Specifically, part one coversthe assembly of the arm base of which contains the stepper motor and principal rotation axisstructure (the “S” joint). Part two requires students to develop the principal forward-backwardcontrol piece (the “L” joint). Part three introduces the secondary forward-backward control via acoupling to the L-joint (the “U” joint). Part four details incorporation of the axes controlling theclaw movement and

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI) Technical Session 2

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sumito Nagasawa, Shibaura Institute of Technology; Hatsuko Yoshikubo Ph.D., SHIBAURA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI)

module was implemented in an inverted pendulum robot to estimate angles and angular velocities, enabling stabilization through optimal regulator control. Furthermore, the module was used to identify critical parameters, such as the viscous damping coefficient, through experimental measurements.Acknowledgement This research is supported by JSPS Research Grants 24K06133 and the 2024 SIT’s Grant for Educational Reform and Research Activity.References[1] R. Rütters, M. Bragard and S. Dolls, "The Inverted Rotary Pendulum: Facilitating Practical Teaching in Advanced Control Engineering," 2024 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Kos Island, Greece, 2024, pp. 1-5, doi: 10.1109/EDUCON60312.2024.10578937.[2] X. Jordens

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division (SWED) Technical Session 3

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mohit Chandarana, Codio; Sindhu Ramachandra, Codio; Joshua Ball, Codio; Maura Lyons, Codio; Phillip Snalune, Codio

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Division (SWED)

teaching assistants:From intent-based chatbots to LLM-powered teaching assistants. Natural Language Processing Journal,8, 100101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlp.2024.100101[3] Lyons, M., & Deitrick, E., & Ball, J. R. C. S. (2024, June), Characterizing Computing Students' Use ofGenerative AI. In Proceedings of the 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, Oregon.https://doi.org10.18260/1-2--48453[4] M. A. Cardona, R. J. Rodriguez, and K. Ishmael, “Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Teachingand Learning Insights and Recommendations,” Office of Educational Technology, May 2023. Available:https://www2.ed.gov/documents/ai-report/ai-report.pdf[5] Lyu, W., Wang, Y., Chung, T. (R.), Sun, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2024). Evaluating

Conference Session

Faculty Development: Round Table Discussions

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephanie Cutler, Pennsylvania State University; Sarah E Zappe, The Pennsylvania State University; Ibukun Samuel Osunbunmi, The Pennsylvania State University; Shawna Dory, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

, "Engineering globalization: Oxymoron or opportunity?," IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag.,vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 8–15, 2005.[6] UNESCO, Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. United Nations Educational,Scientific and Cultural Organization, 2021. [Online]. Available:https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137[7] Osunbunmi, I. S., Cutler, S., Dansu, V., Brijmohan, Y., Bamidele, B. R., Udosen, A. N., ... &Shih, B. P. J. (2024, June). Board 45: Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI)-Assisted Learning:Pushing the Boundaries of Engineering Education. In 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.[8] W. E. Kelly, Ed., Assessment in Engineering Programs: Evolving Best Practices. Tallahassee,FL: Association for Institutional Research, 2008

Conference Session

Supporting Teachers and Students in STEM+C Learning Beyond the Classroom

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rebecca Zarch, SageFox Consulting Group; Jacqueline McCune, University of Texas at Austin

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

: 600 teachersWashington State is considering a CS requirement in high school. In preparation for this potentialchange, CS education advocates estimated the number of teachers needed to support a newcourse requirement. As an initial approach to calculate the number of teachers needed, the stateteam used the following approach: 1)​ The assumption that the requirement would be met with a single high school CS course (which they acknowledge is not a sound assumption given the ambiguity of the law, but does offer the most feasible implementation path). 2)​ Determine the average number of graduating students in the state in a 4-year window (S). 3)​ Subtract the average number of high school students per year taking a CS course

Conference Session

Engineering Technology Division (ETD) Technical Session 6

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeritt Williams, Illinois State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology Division (ETD)

,” European Journal ofEngineering Education, vol. 42, pp. 1–23, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2017.1287664.[4] A. Patrick and M. Borrego, “A review of the literature relevant to engineering identity,” in2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, New Orleans, Louisiana: ASEEConferences, Jun. 2016, p. 26428. doi: 10.18260/p.26428.[5] S. L. Rodriguez, C. Lu, and M. Bartlett, “Engineering identity development: a review of thehigher education literature,” International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science andTechnology, vol. 6, no. 3, Art. no. 3, May 2018.[6] B. Scheuringer, “Multiple Identities: A theoretical and an empirical approach,” EuropeanReview, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 397–404, Jul. 2016, doi: 10.1017/S1062798716000120.[7] J

Conference Session

Mechanics Division (MECHS) Technical Session 1B

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

P.L.STEPHAN Thamban, THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS; Dani Fadda, The University of Texas at Dallas; Oziel Rios, University of Texas at Dallas

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics Division (MECHS)

Section Annual Meeting, Austin, TX, Apr. 2019. [Online].Available: https://peer.asee.org/31543[2] J. Krajcik, C. Czerniak, and C. Berger, Teaching Science: A Project-Based Approach. NewYork: McGraw-Hill College, 1999.[3] Project Workshop – The University of Texas at Dallas. [Online]. Available:https://labs.utdallas.edu/projectworkshop[4] I. B. Pettersen et al., “From making gadgets to making talents: Exploring a universitymakerspace,” Education+ Training, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 145–158, 2020.[5] K. Youmans, I. Villanueva, L. Nadelson, J. Bouwma-Gearheart, A. Lenz, and S. Lanci,“Makerspaces vs Engineering Shops: Initial Undergraduate Student Impressions,” in Proc. 2018IEEE Frontiers in Education Conf. (FIE), San Jose, CA, USA, 2018, pp. 1–5, doi

Conference Session

ME Division 3: Modern Tools and Methods in Structural Analysis and CAD

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shafique Khan, West Virginia University Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH)

problems given in Figs. 1a, 1b & 1c as developed in Blackboard (instructor view) – Dynamics of MachinesFigure 1d shows the Question Set as developed in Blackboard. There are two question sets: Q 1has two problems out of which one will be delivered to a student and Q 2 has only one problemthat will be delivered to every student. One might ask why not put two problems in Q 2 too, onefor each of the alternate problems (given in Fig. 1a & 1b)? The answer lies in the wayBlackboard works. If there are two problems in question set 2 one for each problem in questionset 1, then those may (or will) be mismatched as there is no control over which problem(s) aregiven from the set. It is quite possible that all students may get the same problem in

Conference Session

Reimagining STEM Transitions: Bridging Gaps and Building Resilience in Post-Pandemic Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nicolas Ivanov, University of Toronto; Nhien Tran-Nguyen, University of Toronto; Ferdinand Avikpe, University of Toronto; Ruonan Cao, University of Toronto; Derrick Lim, University of Toronto; Felicia Hope Mikrogianakis, OISE, University of Toronto; Kimberly Meredith Seaman, University of Toronto; Dawn M Kilkenny, University of Toronto

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

Discovery School School LOI alias experience participation subject(s) alias quintile Biology and Linda 25 6 chemistry A 5th Jeff 7 3 Physics Casey 14 3 Biology Greg 3 1 Biology Oliver 5 2 Physics B 3rd Karl

Conference Session

Sustainability and Social Responsibility

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gabriel Azure Antonio Mendez-Sanders, Carnegie Mellon University; Heather Phillips, University of Pittsburgh; Joanne Kay Beckwith, Carnegie Mellon University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering Division (ChED)

Conference Session

Smarter Strategies: Evolving Tools for Engineering Management Excellence

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Paul Lu, USC Viterbi School of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management Division (EMD)

an idea/ developing an initial version/ few customers or users/ mature stage? 5. What is the size of the company? And the team? What is the composition of the team(s)?Questions about the role of the PDM are: 1. What are your duties and responsibilities as PDM? (Business, technical, and design) 2. What are the most important duties and responsibilities? 3. What is your daily routine? 4. Do you have weekly or monthly duties that are not included in your daily routine? 5. Does the team follow a defined development process? How was this process defined? 6. Do you have management duties? 7. What are the tools you use? 8. What are the challenges you face? 9. Have you worked in other companies as a PDM? 10. If yes, what

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session - Student understanding

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eman Hammad, Texas A&M University; Celeste Arden Riley, Texas A&M University - Kingsville; Virginia Pederson; Pierre Atieh

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division (MFG) Technical Session 2

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Israa Azzam, Purdue University at West Lafayette; Khalid Bello, University of Louisville; Farid Breidi, Purdue Polytechnic Institute, Purdue University – West Lafayette; Faisal Aqlan, University of Louisville

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing Division (MFG)

Conference Session

International Division (INTL): Inclusive Global Engagement

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Angela R Bielefeldt, University of Colorado Boulder

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

International Division (INTL)

Conference Session

Broadening Participation in Civil Engineering

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rodolfo Valdes-Vasquez, Colorado State University; Kristen L. Sanford P.E., Lafayette College; Frederick Paige, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Scott Rosas; Philip J. Parker P.E., University of Wisconsin - Platteville

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering Division (CIVIL)

Proceedings, Salt Lake City, Utah: ASEE Conferences, 2018, p. 29935.[6] L. Malcom-Piqueux, "Transformation in the U.S. Higher Education System: Implications for Racial Equity," 2020.[7] E. Wenger, Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1998.[8] S. U. Smith, S. Hayes, and P. Shea, "A Critical Review of the Use of Wenger’s Community of Practice (CoP) Theoretical Framework in Online and Blended Learning Research, 2000-2014," Online Learning Journal (OLJ), vol. 21, no. 1, 2017. doi: https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i1.963.[9] S. R. Rosas, "Group concept mapping methodology: toward an epistemology of group conceptualization, complexity, and emergence

Conference Session

GSD 3: Pedagogy and Curriculum

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary E. Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh; April Dukes, University of Pittsburgh; Susan K Fullerton Shirey, University of Pittsburgh; Götz Veser, University of Pittsburgh

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies Division (GSD)

watch out for with respect to accuracy, assumptions, and extrapolation) 3.6 Transport: Describe and give examples of the three modes of transport 3.5 Thermo: Calculate changes in thermodynamic properties using the first and second laws of thermodynamics in conjunction with equations of state or departure functions 3.5 Math Methods: Apply parametric (t statistics) and nonparametric (U statistic; K-S statistic) tests to determine when significant differences exist between two or more sets of data. 3.4 Safety: Assess the safety of a laboratory operation.3.3 Survey analysis of non-core learning objectivesWe created and

Conference Session

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES) Technical Session 3: Identity, Professionalization, and Belonging II

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Clay Walker, University of Michigan; Mariel Krupansky, University of Michigan; Robin Fowler, University of Michigan; Kenneth M. Alfano, University of Michigan; Colleen Hart, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)

Intelligence”, Journal ofTransformative Learning, 10(2), 92-103.[4] C. Ka Yuk Chan, W. Hu. (2023).” Students’ voices on generative AI: perceptions, benefits,and challenges in higher education.” International Journal of Educational Technology in HigherEducation. Cham: Springer International Publishing.[5] R. E. Cummings, S. M. Monroe, & M. Watkins (2024). Generative AI in first-year writing:An early analysis of affordances, limitations, and a framework for the future. Computers andComposition, 71, 102827.[6] A. Hill Duin, et al., (2023). “Stronger Relationships, Stronger Programs: Asserting Expertisefor a Generative AI Landscape.” Council of Professional, Technical, and ScientificCommunication, Annual Conference. Charleston, SC (September 23).[7] A