factors.Part 4: Wrapping up the interventionWe concluded the intervention by reflecting as a class on major takeaways. For example, beingmore “aware of our unawareness” as engineers makes us better engineers. In this part, we alsoconnected back to textbook topics on mitigating errors, biases, and assumptions in problemdefinition; promoting ethical behavior in engineering; and the engineering design process as awhole. With the few remaining minutes, we opened the class to questions for Practitioner 2 aboutthe unconscious, psychoanalysis, and his professional experiences. Many students took us up onthis offer and we ended the intervention with an engaging discussion that extended these topicseven further
support reflective learning andcommunication in computing courses [1].The goal of this work is twofold: 1. Provide a retrospective analysis of a novel instructional model, offering sufficient detail for other educators to adopt, adapt, or extend the approach. 2. Demonstrate the effectiveness of this modified instructional approach in addressing stagna- tion in content delivery, preparing students for the rapidly evolving field of computer science.In a field as rapidly changing as computer science, modifications to the methods of instruction mayhelp intrinsically prepare students for this rapidly changing ecosystem.Theoretical FrameworkConstructivism as an educational theoretical framework has often been applied to the sub-field
, theseframeworks support the iterative updating of curricula to reflect the latest technologicaladvancements, such as artificial intelligence, robotics, and augmented reality [1, 2]. Furthermore,their integration into Continuing Engineering Education (CEE) programs ensures thatprofessional students remain competitive and well prepared for emerging industrychallenges [11, 16].Through a structured approach, dynamic taxonomy frameworks bridge the gap betweentheoretical education and practical industry requirements. They offer a scalable and adaptablesolution to align curriculum development with the future skills landscape, enabling professionalsin the engineering and INFOCOMM sectors to thrive in an era of constant technologicalinnovation and disruption [4
myths with survey items, summarizing both veteran and civiliansemantic polarities. Survey items 8 and 9 capturing veteran combat experience and employmentexpectations do not have a civilian corollary, as indicated in Table 1. These myths or stereotypesare sourced from known veteran stereotypes of veterans [2] and do not reflect the authors’perspectives. Some civilian-focused survey items take an opposite ‘polarity to the veteran-focused statements to allow for counter-validation of the survey [3].Table 1: Veteran and civilian-coded survey items Veteran Veteran-coded Civilian Civilian-coded Item Item 1 Veterans are more likely to suffer 13 Civilians are
mechanical engineering suggests a movement in the field towardsmore a more customizable view of what constitutes fundamental knowledge for doctoralstudents. This shift towards greater customization and personalization also reflects the potentialfor more equitable assessment in preliminary examination formats, as movement away from aone-size-fits-all standard exam model to instead flexible and unique exam strategies suggests thataccommodations for student differences can be recognized rather than ignored or hidden. As thejourney to complete a doctoral degree is undoubtedly personal and one-of-a-kind, incorporatingpersonalization in each step of doctoral examination is consistent with the desired eventualspecialization in individual research
book excerpts,with 5 being “very strong” and 1 being “not at all.” Responses scoring either 1 or 2 weresubsequently removed from further consideration. From there, references to notes culled fromthe readings, along with initial reflective comments, were added to each response to provideadditional fodder for analysis and commentary. These activities allowed the formulation of thefollowing set of observable behaviors for further consideration: 1. Engages in psychological safety practices that allow for informed risk-taking. 2. Employs sets of empathetically-based and cognitively-diverse problem framings for better recognizing innovative opportunities. 3. Demonstrates a propensity to suspend judgement and mitigate bias while seeking
administrative staff and not by the courseinstructor. The survey was created such that learners would be able to reflect on their experiencesafter they have played the Multi-Materials Marbles Game. Below is the complete list of surveyquestions. (Q1-Q7: 1 strongly disagree --------- 5 strongly agree) 1. Before this activity, I had a clear understanding of materials science. 2. Before this activity, I had a clear understanding of the materials selection process. 3. This activity helped me better understand materials science. 4. This activity helped me better understand how to plot materials property chart. 5. This activity increased my interest in learning more about materials science. 6. This activity (including the reading materials) helped me
thatsupports an argument and a conclusion.Example conclusions from written reports are shared in Figure 4. There is a clear contrast in theconclusions, with the new conclusion reflecting a stronger purpose. The change is because thereis a person to write the report for, and a reason why they need the results. These improvementsstem from the scenario.(a) The highest marked report from the previous activity. Laminar flow results do not coincide and areclearly too high in some cases. There are no error bars. Results from the literature (i.e. the Moody diagram)are not used for comparison. The 15 mm pipe was labelled to the students as ‘rough’, so there was no inquirynecesary to find the results. No conclusion is possible.(b) A student report from the new
in research? Question source: Modified from URSSA Response options: did not do this activity, not at all, a little, a good amount, a great deal a. Research reflection b. Researcher interview c. Why Do Research reflection d. Exploring opportunities e. Technology in daily life f. Find a grant program g. Research opportunity bingo 5. Of the activities / assignments related to engineering research, which did you find most enjoyable? Please share any feedback or suggestions you have about these activities. Response options: Free responseDemographics and previous research experience 6. What university do you attend? (Drop down menu) 7
modelemphasizes technical proficiency, such as grammar and syntax, while the academic socializationmodel focuses on understanding and applying disciplinary conventions for effective writing. TheAcademic Literacies Framework (ALF) builds on these models by incorporating aspects likeunderstanding how to analyze and interpret information critically, creating new insights orperspectives that contribute to deeper learning or scholarly discourse, institutional practices, andliteracy development, offering a more comprehensive perspective on writing and student learning[20].This emphasis on identity challenges conventional perceptions of writing as a technical or skill-oriented endeavor, instead positioning it as a critical and reflective practice. By
competent mentoring involves awareness of one’sown potential implicit or explicit biases, recognition of the diversity of experiences, and howthese experiences inform relationships and engagement in graduate school. Graduate studentsmust be able to explore, reflect, and learn in a culturally sensitive, safe, and respectfulrelationship with their mentor [14], [17].Perhaps no mentoring relationship is more important in a graduate student’s degree than therelationship with their faculty advisor. Faculty advisors can “make or break” a graduate studentexperience by providing or withholding financial, professional, academic, and even emotionalsupport to their mentees [11], [18], [19]. Graduate students who receive these supports are morelikely to
physical phenomena, the mathematicalrepresentations, and the computational representations. Based on research from the learningsciences, they recommend that learners need to engage in cognitive and metacognitive processesincluding reflection and evaluation of the importance of each step in the modeling or simulationprocess [18]. Surveying student attitudes, as in our work, motivates additional reflection.3. ApproachWe have reported on earlier efforts to integrate computational thinking in our two 2 nd-yearrequired civil engineering courses [19, 20]. The current efforts focus on the 3 rd-year coursesrequired for CEE areas that students major in.Even though a course CoP determines how and when during a semester integration of R orPython commences
challenges, preparing them for leadership in space explorationand technological innovation. Through hands-on experimentation and critical analysis,participants gain the expertise needed to contribute to sustaining human life on long-term lunarand Martian missions.I. IntroductionIA. The Challenge of Sustaining LifeNational Aeronautics and Space Administration’s (NASA’s) Artemis mission represents atransformative step in humanity's journey to explore and inhabit the Moon, setting the stage for along-term presence that goes beyond the temporary visits of the Apollo era1. By emphasizing theprinciples of "Go, Land, Live, and Explore," the mission reflects a holistic approach to spaceexploration. While the "Go" and "Land" components address the logistical
, project-based learning experiences. These challenges reflect workplace scenarios, enabling participants to acquire practical skills in software development, UX/UI design, cybersecurity, and other technical fields. The projects also allow mentees to create portfolios that showcase their talents to potential employers [15]. 3) Skill Development Workshops and Courses: The program provides various technical and soft skills workshops. These include coding boot camps, digital transformation training, resume-building workshops, and mock interview sessions. These workshops empower women with job-ready skills, ensuring they remain competitive in the tech job market. 4
to repeat things a lot to make sure people are staying on top of it and then just communicating and obviously leading by example by doing your stuff as well. Super important. (WOMAN-FG1) I think heading with communication was a big thing. Figuring out what needed to get done and who was working on what parts and what was completed. (WOMAN-FG2)Through these quotes, students reflected on the critical role of leaders in maintaining effectivecommunication. Two men leaders commented on their experiences in communicating with teammembers. These two quotes seem to have a more passive tone compared to women’s experiencesin making sure communication was effective, on time, and understandable. The environmentaldesign project
and engineering students.Together we engaged in reflexivity throughout the research process. Reflecting on our identities,experiences, and areas of expertise helped us to collectively develop this study.MethodologyThis study employed a convergent parallel mixed-methods design [42] (see Figure 1 for anoverview of the study). Consistent with this design the results from the quantitative andqualitative portions of the study were merged at a singular point of integration in the final phaseof the study. The combined results triangulate core findings and patterns in addressing theresearch question with greater trustworthiness, nuance, and reliability than possible with eithermethod alone.Figure 1: Research DesignParticipating faculty came from two
andunderstanding of religious beliefs. When it comes to religious beliefs, mostrespondents directly expressed “respect”, and understood the “devoutness” of localpeople’s religious beliefs. “Pakistan believes in Islam, worships regularly, and is verydevout. We must respect it, otherwise it may cause religious conflicts.” (E-3)The respondents’ respect for the culture of foreign countries is also reflected in gettingalong well with the locals and establishing friendly and equal relationships. Whenasked “How do you get along with the locals?”, the respondents described in apleasant tone, expressing their positive experience of working and living in the “Beltand Road” countries. “We get along very well with Indian engineers, often chattingtogether and
perceptions of SI effectiveness differ by gender? Do they differ by ethnicity?3. How are the SI’s effectiveness perceived by higher performing students versus lowerperforming students?4. Do SIs offer capabilities that improve the classroom environment for new faculty?MethodologyA 36-question survey was formed with the goal of understanding the students’ perceivedeffectiveness of supplemental instruction and recognition, interest, and performance ofengineering students at the University of South Alabama, as shown in Appendix A. It should benoted that the questions in the survey were worded to reflect a positive response, so that therespondent agreeing with the statement reflects a positive perception of the effectiveness of theutilization of SIs. The
Biotechnology has investigation of cosmetic products including manipulation of any gene in a cream. We have to deal with things, manipulate, work with bacteria, micro-organisms. We have a theoretical part that later we will apply in practice, then it seems that all ideas are articulated with each other, and everything makes sense even DNA manipulation and everything.”We believe Mariana’s story helps us see some types of connections and motivations thatare often overlooked by academics. Mariana’s motivation reflects family ties andchallenges gender stereotypes.Sharing stories like those of Fabia and Mariana could be valuable in outreach activitiesto attract more female students to STEM programs [6, 16, 17, 18
] and the Oregon State University [5]. How GenAI Can Supplement Human Skills Learning Engage in both creative and cognitive Support brainstorming processes; processes that leverage human lived suggest a range of alternatives, experiences, social-emotional enumerate potential drawbacks and Create interactions, intuition, reflection, and advantages; describe successful real- judgment to formulate original world cases; create a tangible solutions
automatically registered for the MAC 1906 course. Communications continued a weekbefore the start of classes notifying students of their subject assignment and expectations for thefirst week of class. Timely and informative communications from the program administrationcontinued throughout the semester in addition to instructor in-class announcements. At theconclusion of the semester, student enrollment was swapped from MAC 1906 to reflect thehighest math subject earned. The new course posted to the transcript allowing students to easilymeet degree requirements even if the student transferred internally to a new major or externallyto another institution.The cocurricular human link provided by Math Launch was just as important as the support inthe
to decide toresearch how the avatars influenced GTAs as opposed to students because we assumed the latterwould result in the same finding as Kecskemety, Theiss, and Kajfez (2015)—a decrease instudent grades, and that we would also have the same reflection. They wrote: We do not believe that this trend represents a difference in the technical writing aptitude of our first-year engineering students but rather indicates that our expanded training program has better prepared our TAs to correctly identify and respond to students’ mistakes. This data may indicate a better understanding of both the rubrics and grading policies across the program that will continue to normalize over time. [8]Therefore, we selected
the gap betweensecondary and tertiary mathematics. According to Clark and Lovric (2008), this is one of themajor causes of failure in the transition and relates to the poor communication betweensecondary level and university” [22, p. 835]. Only one citation references inflated grades insecondary mathematics. “One factor that appears to have a significant effect on the predictivevalue of high school grades on university is grade inflation” [23, p. 1234]. For the affectivetheme, the student’s attitude toward mathematics is reflected in the citations as well as theiremotions related to the disruption in their routine.Remedial efforts, 4.8%, and synthetic model, 1.6%, themes describe how students struggle oncethey are in college mathematics. The
traditionalpedagogies [24].Co-teachingCo-teaching has the potential to promote pedagogical change and shifts in instructional practice[25]. Noted pedagogical changes include adopting an interactive approach to teaching,developing a critically reflective teaching practice, developing teaching knowledge, and shiftinginstructors’ thinking about students and teaching. Hagg and colleagues [25] argue that co-teaching can be a lever for pedagogical change characterized by new ways of thinking and theuse of evidence-based instructional strategies. They further challenge institutions to transformco-teaching into a systematic approach for pedagogical change. Other researchers identifyessential elements that support effective co-teaching. One study [26] identified five
factor pertains to the outdated nature of current safety standards. As it was mentionedabove, the most standards were developed nearly three decades ago, during a time when thewidespread use of internet-enabled devices by toddlers was inconceivable. In comparison, it isnow common for young children to access internet-connected devices during everyday activities.Given these shifts, there is an urgent need to revise and update safety standards to reflect therealities of modern technology use and its profound implications for early childhood developmentand familial relationships.2.5 Household Reduction of EMF Exposure …at no cost…Several practical recommendations have been proposed to mitigate the potential environmentaland health impacts of
professionalisminstruction to develop their skills in these areas. While getting real-time experience in theirengineering work, they need support in learning to navigate the ins and outs of the profession.All staff and faculty members select workshops and assessments based on their expertise andinterest levels. The instruction in these spaces is delivered in various formats, includinginteractive live seminar sessions, workshops, podcast content [9], and videos. In order to assesstheir learning in these areas, a variety of methods are utilized. They write papers that includeboth literature reviews on the areas and reflecting on how their personal experience connects,complete learning journals on various design and professionalism topics, record videos of
concentration of ECEdepartment heads to maximize its impact. Agnieszka Miguel has been involved with iREDEFINEsince its inception and has served as the organizational lead since 2020. Barbara Marino joinedthe initiative in 2021 and has served as co-organizer since 2022.3.2 Representative iREDEFINE SessionsEach iREDEFINE workshop offers an engaging blend of interactive sessions, insightful paneldiscussions, professional development activities, networking opportunities, and social events.Although the content and schedule evolve annually to reflect emerging trends and participantneeds, a few representative sessions are described below. • Strategies for a Successful Job Search: In this session, workshop organizers and invited experts will
. As a survivor of violence healing among other survivors, I discovered emotionshave a factual component and reason for an individual, something to process in order to respondafter reflection, not react impulsively, and are important to consider in the design of publicservices. In my graduate study at Syracuse University’s Maxwell School for Citizenship andPublic Affairs I learned that public policy success depends upon “thick” participation (definedlater in this paper), where qualitative research is an example. “Indifference towards people and the reality in which they live is actually the one and only cardinal sin in design.” — Dieter Rams, German industrial designerpublic policy failures and relevance of qualitative
dip at mid semester that maycoincide with project 2.Figure 1: Tandem teamwork response score averaged across all teams throughout the semester(obtained from a total of T=7 teamchecks, N=51 students, M=17 teams). Best viewed in color.For this course offering, the “team confidence” category showed the biggest response scoreimprovement as the semester went on. This is in accordance with the text-based feedback andself-reflections provided by the student surveys. In the beginning of the term, some studentsshared sentiments such as “I worry a lot about how people perceive me…. I need to improve myconfidence in my own ideas and voice them out” and “My main problem in teamwork is that Iwon't share my thoughts during a team meeting…I am hoping that…I