, the goal of research analysis is not to reduce scholarly contributions to a set ofmetrics, but to offer meaningful, contextualized information that can inform planning, supportstrategic initiatives, and foster reflection on scholarly activity and research impact.Software & ToolsResearch analysis can also involve a variety of software-based tools and coding in languagesincluding Python or R. Unlike the proprietary/subscription resources listed above, many of thesetools are open access or at least at a more accessible price point for many libraries. Thesesoftware and tools also tend to have active support networks online with many YouTube videos,Reddit threads and even code packages on GitHub. Here we highlight some of the numeroussoftware
significantly more time than the lower-order thinking skills toteach and learn. Figure 1 shows two dimensions of Bloom’s taxonomy: cognitive and knowledgedimensions [19].However, this distinction between “higher” and “lower” can confuse educators in somehowevaluating the quality of an LO based on where it sits in the taxonomy. As illuminated by Lang[20], professors can fall into the trap of simply wanting to teach “higher-order thinking skills” andassume that the lower skills can be looked up using technology such as search engines and thelike (including LLM tools like ChatGPT). In reality, achieving skills such as “create” and “plan”in Bloom’s taxonomy requires a human to keep and think about ideas and concepts within a fieldof study that requires the
withinan academic setting, and through this to begin to invite different ways of being / thinking / doing.Logistically, we plan our monthly faculty gatherings with the following considerations: (1)identifying a regular time of the week (in our case, Friday afternoons) that tends to be a littlemore open for our group members, (2) being sensitive to the cadence of the academic year, andworking around particularly busy periods and vacation times, (3) ensuring the availability ofrefreshments that appeal to the group and feel like a treat, (4) setting out small activities(coloring books, puzzles) for those who like to work with their hands, and (5) pre-circulating adraft agenda that offers entry points for the group’s deliberations on a given day.In
STEM.Furthermore, further investigation into the direct impact of mentorship, institutional policies, andevolving career pathways can provide more nuanced insights into how structural changesinfluence career sustainability and long-term retention for women in STEM. Moreover,examining how factors such as ethnicity, educational background, and socio-economic statusintersect with career challenges could offer deeper insights into the diversity of experienceswithin these fields and inform more targeted support strategies. To support future researchefforts, we also plan to make anonymized data available for further analysis.ConclusionsIn conclusion, this study offers meaningful insights into the challenges and opportunities facedby women in STEM, emphasizing
Institutions (HSIs) Fact Sheet: 2020-21. Washington, D.C.: Excelencia in Education.Flowers III, A. M., & Banda, R. M. (2015). The Masculinity Paradox: Conceptualizing the Experiences of Men of Color in STEM. Culture, Society & Masculinities, 7(1).Flynn, D. T. (2016). STEM field persistence: The impact of engagement on postsecondary STEM persistence for underrepresented minority students. Journal of Educational Issues, 2(1), 185-214. http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/jei.v2i1.9245Foltz, L. G., Gannon, S., & Kirschmann, S. L. (2014). Factors That Contribute to the Persistence of Minority Students in STEM Fields. Planning for Higher Education Journal, 42(4), 1–13.Frederick, A., Daniels, H. A., Grineski, S. E., &
for Excel overall.The results were also consistent in terms of achievement of course goals, with all except one ofthe question statements receiving a positive response rate above 80%. An unexpected findingwas that only 46.2% of students in Fall 2023 and 40.5% in Fall 2024 agreed with the statement,“I would have enjoyed projects more if I had chosen my own teammates.” Open responsefeedback indicated that many students appreciated the opportunity to meet new people whenworking in groups.While most feedback was positive, there are areas for improvement. First, the Excel Solverproject has been identified as the mini project requiring the most significant enhancement. Ourproposed improvements are twofold. We plan to initiate the project by
facilitate theunderstanding of abstract concepts of computational thinking; the world of programmingputs concepts into practice and promotes thinking, creative processing, and understanding ofabstract concepts. For Arabit & Prendes, robotics allows the development of skills throughgames and playing, enabling students' capacities for exploration and manipulation and theconstruction of meanings from their own experience [17]. It is not just a matter ofincorporating ICT in the classroom but of integrating it with pedagogical intentionalitythrough a planned instructional action. For Hurtado and Soto, activities involving roboticsfrom an early age allow children to appropriate the knowledge of these areas and, in thefuture, facilitate their
designed to help Ukrainian refugees adapt to new cultures. It offers multimodal learning modules, interactive quizzes, a database of social services, a messaging feature, and a feedback hub. The app focuses on addressing cultural challenges beyond basic needs, with Germany identified as the launch site. Development included backend prototyping (transitioning from SQL to NoSQL) and user interface design via Figma, with plans for integration, testing, and expansion.MethodologyTo comprehensively evaluate student development, we employed a mixed-methods strategy thatintegrated both quantitative and qualitative approaches, offering a complete picture of theoutcomes. A validated survey instrument—the Global Perspective
usage, (3) collaboration with librarians to teach AI literacy and (4)demographic information. This article omits the third aspect as the author plans to address itin future publications within the library science discipline. The 16 questions are summarizedas follows:1. Do you agree or disagree with the assertion that students must acquire AI literacy skills to be successful in the future workforce?2. How familiar do you think your students are with the methods generative AI tools use to create new information? (ChatGPT, Google Bard etc.)3. How familiar do you think your students are regarding the strengths and limitations of generative AI tools?4. How concerned are you about your students’ ability to evaluate/verify the information
prior to Senior Design/Capstone projects. Without an appreciation for the purpose offastener subtypes, the students cannot make decisions after meaningful consideration of needsand application. Permitting glue and other adhesives in design-and-build projects at this levelprevents students from researching better joining methods and fasteners. This is why restrictingadhesives full-stop is a beneficial project constraint—it motivates student to explore thehardware libraries for better, smarter solutions as opposed to quick shortcuts. Furthermore, thestudents must put forethought and planning into these decisions so the specific hardware can beordered and shipped in time to be utilized in the project build. Permitting adhesives leads tocrunch-time
, before a paper is formally published.The updated curriculum assists students in learning the trends and the latest achievements in thefield and making decisions about their career paths. Patrick from department I shared that hisdepartment always invites engineers from various companies to give talks related to the coursecontent.Research and Financial Support It is worth noting that not all students decide to enter full-time positions directly after graduation,so support related to research and providing proper funding is necessary, especially for thosewho plan to attend graduate schools as their career path. During the interview, five participantsemphasized that their departments offered financial and research support to diversify
treatment. However, I overcame my fear and started my treatment plan at the end of the first month.She worries that international students’ quest for acceptance can lead to non-disclosure of theirchronic health challenges, which might come at a huge, life-threatening cost.Another point related to physical wellness came up when an author shares her struggle witheating and staying healthy in the new U.S. culture: Personally, I am not adventurous, and I am always skeptical about trying new things. So coming to a different culture, I have struggled with adapting to the new cuisine, which has contributed to developing unhealthy eating habits.This quote illustrates how trying to eat
competition. In the engineering design competition, the students receiveinstructions to create a design that addresses a specific problem. For 2024, the theme was“decades.” The instructor assigned students to one of fourteen groups, which focused on adifferent decade (1910s, 1930s, 1970s, 1980s) from which to derive a problem. For example,students assigned to the 1910s developed a technological plan to address issues stemming fromthe 1918 influenza pandemic. Students assigned to the 1930s actively helped resolve the GreatDepression. Students in the 1970s worked to resolve the energy crisis, while those in the 1980shelped address the Exxon Valdez oil spill. While designing with these prompts, MEPO studentswere also explicitly instructed to consider
destination. Using this information, the students programmed a “Mission Plan” andtried to get their Rover around obstacles to the way points and the destination.Results and AssessmentThis course was taught during the 2017/2018 and the 2018/2019 academic year. The course wasnot initially tagged in the DU course database as an SI-NPW course, so students signed up in Fallrather than Spring for the Fall course. However, this late enrollment worked out well as we wereable to prototype the course for the first year with 25 students rather than having the typical 75 to100 students. The second year, we set the enrolment limit as 75 students and had 76 studentsinitially enrolled. The typical student majors enrolled in these courses were business
, professional experiences, hobbies, or life events,covering topics like how turbines work (creating value) and baking bread (making connections).A comprehensive list of these student-generated activities is provided, along with survey resultsreflecting their experiences. Insights from open-ended survey responses informed the developmentof four instructor-led micromoment activities targeting curiosity, connections, and value creation,including examples such as The Science of Sap and Maple Syrup Collection and How Does BreadBake?. These guides aim to support the future implementation of micromoments in fluid flow andheat transfer courses, with plans to assess their impact on learning and engagement in subsequentevaluations.1. Introduction and
Foundation, 1998.[21] American Society for Engineering Education, Current Status of the U.S. Engineering and Computing Workforce, 2019. Department of Institutional Research and Analytics, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://ira.asee.org/national-benchmark- reports/workforce2019/?utm_source[22] J. Littenberg-Tobias and J. Reich, "Evaluating access, quality, and equity in online learning: A case study of a MOOC-based blended professional degree program," The Internet and Higher Education, vol. 47, p. 100759, 2020.[23] M. Guthrie, "Graduate certificate vs. master’s degree: Which is right for you?" Ohio State Online, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://online.osu.edu/resources/plan/graduate- certificate-vs
survey. Each student had the option to opt in or out of the data collection process at thebeginning of each survey and only responses from those who opted in are included in this paper.Differences between the surveys for each cohort were primarily to accommodate for differencesin the speed of which the topics were covered. High school students answered questions aboutvarious labs within one survey whereas college students had a survey correlating with each lab.CohortsThe first cohort was in Fall 2021 where college students learned first on a desktop five-axisPocketNC, then transitioned to a three-axis HAAS VF3. This first cohort did not finish all theassignments planned for the semester due to underestimating the time needed to learn skills
necessary measuresto rectify them in the next version. Currently, we are working on to further expanding the basequestion bank. By expanding the question bank, the App can provide students with a broader rangeof problems to practice, reinforcing their understanding across a wider array of topics in circuitanalysis and related fields. Another area of our future development focuses on integrating adaptivelearning algorithms into the App. The current version of the App provides random questiongeneration capability based on difficulty levels, but there is potential to personalize the learningexperience for each student based on their individual strengths and weaknesses. We plan to developa future version of the App with integrated machine learning
mismatch between the unmodifiedcurriculum and ECS-WL. The existing ECS curriculum provided solid content, but the associatedactivities fell short. It instructed students to apply HTML and CSS concepts to their websiteswithout direct assignments, resulting in confusion due to the broad scope and lack of guidance oncontent.Curriculum Adjustments for ECS-WLThe existing ECS curriculum was updated to better align with the ECS-WL. Previously, thelesson plan covered HTML and CSS concepts. The revised curriculum retains these concepts butenhances learning by requiring students to create web pages based on their interests. Thisapproach aimed to encourage student research and provides specific instructions, making thetasks less ambiguous.The curriculum
, Kenya discovered the “monumental” possibility of finding peersto support her journey. Her encounter with NSBE also proved to be a type of “classroom” thattaught her to meet struggle head-on and develop an action plan to “figure out how to get throughit.”Grounding in Movement and Lineages of OrganizingIn this pillar, participants highlighted that PAR caused them to lean into organizations wherethey felt supported, and it inspired more inclusive approaches to engaging with communities ofcolor. First, most frequently, and perhaps because of how PAR caused participants to reflect onnormalized violence in engineering, they discussed seeking out and running to communitieswhere they felt supported. For example, Shabazz mentioned his fraternity and the
) “Transitioning to engineering practice,” European Journal of Engineering Education, 44(6), 821-837, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2019.1681631. [Accessed Mar 12, 2025].[5] R. Pan, J. Strobel, and M.E. Cardella, “Engineering Students’ Experiences of Workplace Problem Solving,” In Proceeding of the 121st ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, USA, June 15-19, 2014.[6] H.W.J. Rittel, and M.M. Webber, “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning,” Policy Sciences 4, June 1973, pp.155-169. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730. [Accessed Mar 12, 2025].[7] G.B. Graen, and M. Uhl‐Bien, “Relationship‐based approach to leadership: Development of leader‐member exchange
curriculum must include “content that ensures awareness of diversity, equity, andinclusion for professional success consistent with the institution’s mission.” [1] Actions taken bythe EAC are subject to approval by the Engineering Area Delegation (EAD). In October 2022, theEAD approved the proposed language. The EAC also proposed, and the EAD approved, a plan toconduct a two-year voluntary pilot study to identify how programs may comply with the DEIcomponents in Criterion 5. Ultimately, changes to Criterion 5 were approved by the EAD inOctober 2024 and were to become effective in the 2025-26 accreditation cycle.Programs visited during the 2023-2024 and 2024-2025 review cycles were given the opportunityto opt-in to the voluntary pilot study. Programs
; development of an awareness training for institutional agents comprises one aspectof the project plan. The broader goals of the project team focus on increasing inclusion of andopportunity for SVSM within engineering and STEM disciplines. The team adopts an anti-deficit, asset-based mindset by focusing research on the unique strengths of SVSM inengineering to improve inclusion and awareness within and beyond classroom settings.The first author brings a strong commitment to equity and inclusion to the project. Havingextensive experience working in and developing programs for university-level equity andinclusion spaces, the first author supports the project team in adopting best practices forcommunicating across multi-level groups, introducing student
]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3626252.3630960 [9] P. Denny, J. Leinonen, J. Prather, A. Luxton-Reilly, T. Amarouche, B. A. Becker, and B. N. Reeves, “Prompt Problems: A New Programming Exercise for the Generative AI Era,” in Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1, ser. SIGCSE 2024. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2024, pp. 296–302. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3626252.3630909 ¨ It Till We Understand It¨to Resistance[10] S. Lau and P. Guo, “From Ban ¨ is Futile¨: How University Programming Instructors Plan to Adapt as More Students Use AI Code Generation and Explanation Tools
. Greene and N. G. Lobczowski, "A Systematic Review of Research on Personalized Learning: Personalized by Whom, to What, How, and for What Purpose(s)?," Educational Psychology Review, vol. 33, pp. 1675-1715, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10648-021-09615-8.[13] A. Shemshack and J. M. Spector, "A systematic literature review of personalized learning terms," Smart Learning Environments, vol. 7, no. 33, 2020, doi: 10.1186/s40561-020- 00140-9.[14] National Academy of Engineering, "NAE Grand Challenges for Engineering," National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2017.[15] U.S. Department of Education, "Reimagining the Role of Technology in Education: 2017 National Education Technology Plan Update," Washington, DC, 2017.[16] Z. Wu, H
understand it better. F. I know what to do to increase student interest in STEM.InterviewsTeachers were interviewed after the last of their summer program sessions to gain more contextinto how participating in the summer programs impacted their teaching practice with respect to theconcepts developed during the summer camp. Teachers were asked the following two questions: • How has your participation impacted the way you think about teaching? • How do you plan to incorporate computational thinking, engineering design, use of technology and system thinking in your future classrooms?The research team chose these questions as they captured how teachers’ perspectives on teachingin STEM may have changed after participating in an
Development for adoption and adaptation of new instructional practices. In S. Linder, C. Lee, S. Stefl, & K. High (Eds.), Handbook of STEM Faculty Development (pp. 3–13). IAP.Birt, J. A., Khajeloo, M., Rega‐Brodsky, C. C., Siegel, M. A., Hancock, T. S., Cummings, K., & Nguyen, P. D. (2019). Fostering agency to overcome barriers in college science teaching: Going against the grain to enact reform‐based ideas. Science Education, 103(4), 770–798. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21519 19Estaiteyeh, M., & DeCoito, I. (2023). Planning for Differentiated Instruction: Empowering Teacher Candidates in STEM Education
GATHERings and in the conferencesession underscored the value of combining speculative design with technology to envisionequitable futures. Moving forward, we plan to refine our approach by integrating morehuman-centered facilitation alongside AI tools, ensuring accessibility and addressing hesitancies.This experience taught us that technology should complement rather than replace humancreativity and connection. By centering equity and inclusivity in tool design and implementation,we can expand the reach and impact of activities like this. Above all, the GATHER Storycrafterreminded us that even in the face of systemic barriers, collaborative storytelling can inspireradical hope and catalyze meaningful change.LimitationsWhile this paper highlights
number of the items in the construct; nEFA = The number of items groupedfor a latent factor resulting from EFA; N/A = Not applicableV. DiscussionThe EFA revealed the latent factor structure of the climate scale for six climates indicated by 36items. Although we expected to have two distinct constructs for psychological safety climate andmastery climate, the items for the two constructs did not group together. Therefore, we plan torevise these scale items for the next round of validity study, as the literature differentiatesbetween these constructs (See Table 1). Internal consistency reliability evidence for theremaining six scales was excellent. The survey data were used to inform the second round of 16phenomenological interviews with a
contribute to improved exam performance [29]. Additionally,extending this methodology to a wider range of engineering courses and disciplines couldhelp refine and validate its effectiveness, offering a new pedagogical framework forevaluating students in a way that prioritizes their mental well-being and promotes moreaccurate assessments of their knowledge. As this study is part of an ongoing exploratoryeffort, the team plans to expand the research with quantitative data to assess the long-termbenefits of this intervention and to create practical guidelines for implementing coffeebreak exams across diverse academic settings.References[1] J. Acosta and M. A. Guerra, “Validating Guerra’s Blended Flexible Learning framework for Engineering Courses