Intelligence (AI) is no longer a subject of science fiction or a niche for specializedindustries. AI permeates everyday life, impacting how people work, communicate, and solveproblems locally and globally [1]. AI applications in higher education have grown significantlyin recent years, as evidenced by the adoption of AI-driven instructional design tools andapplications (e.g., Khan Academy's Khanmigo, ChatGPT for Education, MagicSchool), AI-enabled scientific literature search engines (e.g., Semantic Scholar, Consensus), collaborativeapplications (e.g., MS Teams), smart AI features in learning management systems (e.g., Canvas),and AI-based assistants (e.g., Grammarly, Canva).The widespread infusion of generative AI (GenAI) specifically marked a new
provide practical hands-on experience with thesecomputer architecture concepts. Various software tools exist to allow students to simulate digitallogic, such as Digital [1] and Logisim Evolution [2]. Although you can build a full CPU usingthese systems, they are not intended to study computer architecture more broadly and can be quitetedious. Full hardware design languages such as Verilog, SystemC, and VHDL are quite adept atsimulating modern computer architectures. However, these tools are specialized, andundergraduate computer science students find a steep barrier to learning and correctly applyingthem.Our goal is to guide students in the design and implementation of a RISC-V CPU, culminating ina functional implementation of a single cycle CPU
Engineering Education, 2025 WIP: Students’ reflections on their Sense of Belonging and Motivation in a CS Discrete Math course.1 IntroductionResearchers found that motivation and sense of belonging play a role in course performance[5,6]. In this work we focus on a Discrete Math course which is a required gateway course inthe computing sequence. Given the nature of the conceptual problem solving required inDiscrete Math is unique compared to early programming, this different environment mighthave a differential impact on students’ sense of belonging and motivation. Specifically, wefocus on two aspects of motivation from Expectancy-Value Theory[2]: students’ expectationfor success and the value they place in the course. For sense of belonging [3
in higher education. The third is digital and online laboratory contexts. Lastly, thefourth includes competencies, limitations, boundaries, and feedback mechanisms.The relevance levels are divided into three categories based on their alignment with keyresearch priorities. These categories indicate the extent to which an article aligns with thesepriorities, ranging from high to low relevance. The table 1 below provides an overview ofthese levels and their criteria. Relevance Level Criteria G Assigned to articles that comprehensively address priorities 1, (High Relevance) 2, and 3 together, or include all four priorities (1, 2, 3, and 4). R
studyingefficiency in engineering education.1.0 - Introduction and BackgroundActive recall and spaced repetition are two evidence-based learning strategies widely recognizedfor their effectiveness in improving long-term retention and understanding [1-4]. Active recallinvolves retrieving information from memory, typically by answering questions or solvingproblems, while spaced repetition involves repeated review and recall of study material atincreasing intervals to enhance long-term retention. Despite their proven benefits, many existingtools such as Anki and Quizlet do not fully integrate these strategies in ways tailored to theunique demands of engineering education, such as solving complex, application-driven problems[5]. The process of creating new
adoption of new AI technology. Further insight intothese attitudes may be essential in preparing engineering students for a rapidly evolvingworkplace. This work in progress study explores self-reported data on AI use by universityengineering students.IntroductionAdvances in technology have created a unique environment for learning at the university level.AI-driven tools present immediate opportunities that can be shaped for learning in engineeringeducation. These tools are rapidly advancing, and educators should use this opportunity toprepare for and anticipate these changes in academia [1], [2], [3]. Joseph and others put forth thatAI has the capability to transform and completely change the way we teach and learn [4]. Edaliand others described
interact with the desired visualizations via a simple “app”, leavingthe more complex simulation software unseen in the background.Details of the teaching resource creation process, implementation challenges, and examplecurriculum integration opportunities will be shared, as well as preliminary feedback fromacademics and students using the tools presented. Our hope with this work is to lower the energybarrier for including simulation in the engineering curriculum, allowing students to takeadvantage of the visualization capabilities and familiarize themselves with the concepts ofsimulation tools early in their degree journey.1. Motivation: strengthening experiments with simulation to enhance students’ understandingThe skills which engineering
personalization,efficiency, and accessibility, making it easier than ever for learners to adapt educational resourcesto their unique needs [1], [2], [3], [4]. However, this potential is accompanied by concerns abouttrustworthiness, over-reliance, and academic integrity, which complicate their adoption [5], [6],[7], [8], [9]. Students’ decisions to embrace or avoid these technologies are influenced bycomplex motivational factors, perceptions of trustworthiness, and learning strategies [10], [11],[12]. Understanding these influences is crucial for leveraging disruptive technologies to enhanceeducational outcomes while addressing potential risks [1], [2], [4], [13], [14], especiallyconsidering the ongoing debate about whether faculty should teach students
ongoing and future work.problem descriptionGenerative AI development currently involves three major groups of people involved in anadversarial relationship over fundamental intellectual property rights: 1) artists, 2) AI developers,and 3) producers and distributors of these commercialized artistic works. The members of thefirst group, artists and writers, publish their work as a central element of their professional lives.Without publication and sales, artists and writers cannot make a living. However, whenever anartist or writer publishes something, the published work contains samples of the creativecognitive algorithms the artist or writer used to make the work. For more on cognitivealgorithms, see [1].Cognitive algorithms are an adaptive set
duty members who face similar, and often times, different challenges than traditionalstudents. Student Veterans confront many misperceptions and stereotypes from faculty, staff,fellow students, often exacerbated by media. Some perceptions may paint the Student Veteranspositively, while some perceptions over-simplify them negatively.This paper is part of a larger study of faculty and staff (mis)perceptions towards StudentVeterans and various factors that can neutralize these misperceptions. Using a counter balanced,quantitative survey instrument across several institutions (TABLE 1), GZT was found to have aneutralizing effect on some of the perceptions, but also found to statistically reinforce others. Thesurvey questions compare the agreement
developmentIntroduction/Motivation According to STEM education data from the U.S. National Science Foundation from2002-2012, Aerospace Engineering had the largest percentage change of engineering fields,,while the number of bachelor’s degrees in aerospace engineering more than doubled during that10-year period [1]. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Occupational Outlook Handbookforecasts that the demand for aerospace engineers will continue to increase, with a projected jobgrowth of 6% between 2023 and 2033 [2]. Such data supports trends that are easily observablewith the growth of the airline industry, commercial space races with companies such as BlueOrigin and SpaceX, and the proliferation of drone technology. As a result, several universitieshave
to design a space mission concept, delivered as a final report at the conclusionof the course. In the semester discussed in this paper, 87 students were enrolled in the course.The course is designed to satisfy ABET Student Outcomes 1-7. Specifically, the primary learningobjectives for the course were listed as teamwork, communication, analysis/design, technicalissues, design process, nontechnical drivers, industry-level rigor, professional exposure, andmacroethics. Each learning objective was expanded upon in the syllabus; for example, theteamwork learning objective was described as “students will work in groups and learn abouttechniques needed to create effective engineering teams.” Similarly, the macroethics learningobjective was explained
SummaryFrom the engineering education literature, there are ample opportunities for additional researchinto the role of educational policy and statewide structures on engineering transfer networks. Weknow that education policies vary with modes of transfer in ways that impact the participation ofcommunity and technical college students. The practice of determining course equivalency inengineering pathways complicates an assessment of a community and technical college student’sreadiness for upper-division coursework. Educational policies and statewide structures maycontribute to credit loss for engineering transfer students and the experience of partnerinstitutions as separate, not seamless. Additionally, there has been little research done that 1
implemented to attract, advance, and advocate the participation of underrepresentedengineering students to a research collaboration effort between The University of Texas RioGrande Valley (UTRGV) and a National Laboratory. The purpose of the partnership between thesetwo entities is to meet the following goals: a) find innovative manufacturing techniques forweapons development, and b) prepare UTRGV students to conduct internships and be employedwith the National Laboratory. Similarly, the internal aim of UTRGV is to 1) support studentsuccess in engineering by promoting the participation of underrepresented minorities in researchvenues and foster academic inclusion, development, and mentorship; and 2) increase the numberof underrepresented students
Highland Simulant 1 (LHS-1) and Mexico Lunar Mare 1 (MLM-1), (c)mastering aeroponics, and (d) developing skills in data collection, analysis, and research design.Students were assessed on their ability to program FarmBot for automated watering and plantmonitoring, as well as maintaining and troubleshooting the Tower Garden’s aeroponic systems.They formulated hypotheses, designed experiments, and analyzed key variables such as regolithconcentration and watering schedules. Growth metrics, including leaf width and plant height, werecollected and analyzed. Findings were communicated through written reports and oralpresentations, strengthening their scientific communication skills. This program inspires STEMstudents to tackle space agriculture
, EngineeringThriving. Engineering Thriving is defined as the process by which engineering programs facilitatethe environments for students to develop optimal functioning in engineering programs [1]. Thesignificance of this study lies in the need to identify physical indicators or biomarkers that correlatewith a student’s subjective psychological experience, and, if such indicators exist, to answer ourresearch question regarding the key indicators of thriving. Although survey tools have beendeveloped to assess thriving in undergraduate engineering students [2], physical indicators arenecessary for students who may be less likely to engage with survey tools. For this work-in-progress, we choose to focus on Veteran students, who are less connected to the student
alternative fuels.The aviation sector relies on kerosene-based fuels, which are linked to substantial carbonemissions and, hence, a major contributor to climate change, with air travel continuing to growwith the expansion of the global economy [1]. The aviation industry is transforming as it seekssustainable alternatives to traditional fossil fuels. Aviation accounts for approximately 2.5% ofglobal CO₂ emissions, and with increasing regulatory pressure, there is an urgent need forcleaner propulsion technologies [2].Hydrogen has emerged as a promising alternative due to its high energy content and ability toenable zero-emission flights. However, challenges associated with the constrained air transportenergy paradigm emphasize the need for alternative
lecture, General Chemistry 1 & 2 lecture, recitations, and laboratory, Analytical Chemistry lecture and laboratory, Organic Chemistry laboratory, and Physical Chemistry Laboratory. Natalie’s research contributions focus on innovative teaching methods to enhance student engagement and learning outcomes. Research interests include student misconceptions, instructional materials, and integration of technology to STEM courses. Outside of the university, Natalie has a passion for theater and architecture. Before finding her passion for chemistry education, she was a theater major and has an associate’s degree in computer aided Drafting and Design. ©American Society for Engineering Education
that VF is reasonable for moderately sizedclasses. Student feedback was overwhelmingly positive, highlighting the personalized andaccessible nature of VF and its role in improving motivation and identifying errors.IntroductionEffective feedback is consistently recognized as essential to student learning [1][2][3]. Theeffectiveness of feedback is a function of manner and mode [4]. Though the manner -- content,tone, and approach – is critical to all feedback, here we focus on the mode of delivery. Themajority feedback in engineering education is written[5]. Specifically, we define four types ofwritten feedback: 1. Scored work: A numeric value is assigned to indicate the quality of work (e.g. “+ 2pts”) 2. Scored work with a rubric: A numeric
advanced technology that immerses users in computer-generatedenvironments that they can interact with in a realistic and engaging manner. Traditional VRsystems include a head-mounted display (HMD) headset that tracks the user’s position, as well ascontrollers for input. Though most commonly used in entertainment and gaming [1], VRtechnology has significant applications in the aerospace industry as a means of boostingproductivity and in education as an interactive platform for learning. However, the overlapbetween the two– VR for aerospace education– is a niche field. By creating controlled virtualenvironments, VR can transform knowledge acquisition and practical skill development in arisk-free setting.The primary advantages of VR lie in its
and then branching out throughconnecting themes from the literature gathered. This allowed us to paint a holistic view of thetypes of engineering student experiences. The first keywords consisted of “learning experiences”, “aerospace”, “mechanical”, and“engineering”. This combination of search terms did not yield many results as “learningexperiences” does not seem to be a widely established term in the literature. In addition to that,the additional restrictions of “aerospace” and “mechanical” further restricted the results.However, some of the literature discovered unveiled the Academic Pathways Study (APS) [1], amulti-institutional, longitudinal study that observed undergraduate student pathways toengineering. The findings from this
admissionsto broaden access. These graduate programs highlight innovative approaches to online engineeringeducation but also raise questions about learner preparedness, credential recognition, and programscalability. Finally, we explore the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in asynchronousonline platforms, including both their promise for enhancing personalization and the risks theypose to critical thinking and equity. This paper concludes with actionable recommendations forcourse design, technology use, and institutional policy to support inclusive and effectiveasynchronous learning. 1. IntroductionOnline education, particularly asynchronous programs, has become a popular choice in recentyears. Asynchronous learning is different
accepted applicantsand the required time to evaluate an applicant cohort.Introduction Studies consistently highlight the benefits of diversity within teams, such as improvedcreativity, problem-solving, and overall research outcomes [1], [2]. In contrast, scientificresearch can stagnate without the synergy of diverse perspectives and insights. Academia isparticularly important to analyze, as disparities within academic settings propagate to affect thefuture scientific workforce [3]. Despite efforts to create more inclusive educational and workenvironments, implicit biases in recruitment and selection processes remain a significant barrier[4], [5], [6]. Reviewer biases can influence applicant evaluations in favor of candidates withcertain
mitigate any negative impacts associated with high immersion levels. Cognitive load refers to the amount of information that our working memory can effectively process, highlighting the cognitive limits of information processing. When cognitive demands exceed these limits, it can lead to cognitive overload, which negatively impacts both learning outcomes and overall satisfaction. Therefore, when designing virtual training programs that incorporate various multimedia elements and interactive features, it is essential to manage cognitive load carefully. Maintaining an optimal cognitive load will facilitate effective learning, ensuring that participants can engage fully without becoming overwhelmed by excessive information [1-3]. This approach is
1: Literature ReviewThe first phase involved a systematic review of existing literature to establish a theoreticalframework and identify best practices. The authors conducted a literature review on transfer creditloss, engineering transfer, and transfer pathways. The authors also consulted relevant policydocuments and institutional websites related to transfer policies and practices in higher education.The review focused on: 1) identifying the primary causes of transfer credit loss for engineeringstudents, 2) examining the impact of transfer credit loss on student academic performance, GPAs,and 3) analyzing current practices and strategies employed by institutions to minimize transfercredit loss and facilitate smooth transfer pathways. The
research question (RQ):RQ1: What is the value proposition of digital badges in the military? Figure 1. This figure illustrates the research methodology. The methodology starts fromthe upper left and proceeds sequentially following the arrows. Orange rectangles represent majormilestones with supportive green rectangle sub-tasks. Blue rectangles represent intermediateobjectives. Purple circles represent the start and end of the research. The graphic in Figure 1 shows the overall methodology of this research. Beginning at theupper left corner of the diagram, the ``Define'' item represents the clarification of the purpose,scope, and objectives of this research. The researchers define the problem domain of thisresearch as military talent
. Menekse received four Seed-for-Success Awards (in 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2021) from Purdue University’s Excellence in Research Awards programs in recognition of obtaining four external grants of $1 million or more during each year. His research has been generously funded by grants from the Institute of Education Sciences (IES), the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD), Purdue Research Foundation (PRF), and the National Science Foundation (NSF).Eesha tur razia babar, University of California, Irvine Eesha Tur Razia Babar holds a master’s degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of California, Irvine. She completed her undergraduate studies in Electrical Engineering at the University of
) Workforce Study of end-use manufacturers, the number ofwomen in A&D has stayed around 26%. A similar trend has been observed with underrepresentedcommunities of color, with only 10% of respondent’s workers identifying as Black and just lessthan 9% as Hispanic/Latino [1]. Thus, organizations are exploring different ways to improve talentattraction and retention by improving employee benefits, instituting flexible work models,upskilling existing employees and continuing to make diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) apriority. Despite these efforts employee turnover and attrition rates remain a concern. Thedemographic numbers for aerospace engineering students across the US are better than theworkforce numbers; however, there is still significant
the change betweenpre- and post-test scores, although this may be a result of the low number of questions in thatcategory. All three categories contributed to post-test measurements on the CSEM andaccounted for some of the change seen in all three types of post-test measurements.Introduction One of the most commonly used assessment tools is the Force Concept Inventory (FCI).[1] Since its introduction in 1992, it has been used as a learning assessment tool for physicsclasses worldwide, while its use has been heavily studied. During this time, researchers haveevaluated the tool to understand whether there are some questions on the test that may be biaseddue to gender or present hurdles to those for whom English is not their primary