Paper ID #48156Bridging Education and Industry: Integrating Offshore Wind Knowledgeinto CurriculaDr. Khosro Shirvani, State University of New York, College of Technology at Farmingdale Khosro Shirvani, Ph.D. is an assistant professor in the Mechanical Engineering Technology at Farmingdale State College (FSC His research areas includes Renewable Energy, Engineering Education and Advanced Manufacturing. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Title Bridging Education and Industry: Integrating Offshore Wind Knowledge into CurriculaAbstract: This paper introduces a novel strategy for incorporating
environments with an average cost range of $80 to $150 per unit.As a result of combining physical hardware, industrial protocols, and cybersecurity modules,this framework offers students a comprehensive curriculum that prepares them for real-worldscenarios that arise when securing CPS and IoT systems.3.2 Laboratory ModulesThe laboratory modules in this work provide students with practical hands-on experience insystems and control, networking, and cybersecurity. Using an embedded development kit,these modules integrate theoretical foundations with practical experimentation, enhancinglearning outcomes and preparing students for real-world challenges.• System modeling and Control Modules on systems and control introduce students to system modeling
gender presentation (asindicated by preferred pronouns).Despite individual variability in TPI responses, no statistically significant differences were foundbetween engineering and non-engineering students in terms of their dominant or recessiveperspectives, as well as their perspective-specific beliefs, intentions, or actions. These resultssuggest that interdisciplinary, centralized teaching training programs, even when not discipline-specific, can be a valuable experience for graduate students. The study highlights the TPI’spotential as a useful tool in teaching development and underscores the broader applicability ofgeneral pedagogical training across fields.IntroductionGraduate training is an expectation of most faculty in the United States
on sustainable materials in either course. However, the courseinstructors believe that students in both courses will benefit from revised courses that put greateremphasis on sustainable materials. Therefore, this on-going study utilized the Engineering forOne Planet (EOP) framework, a model that emphasizes living within Earth's limits whilebalancing environmental, social, and economic needs, for implementing sustainability conceptsin both courses.The integration process followed a systematic approach, involving the alignment of courseobjectives with key sustainability principles, followed by the incorporation of hands-on activitiesdesigned to apply these principles in a practical context. The modified curriculum was structuredaround six
Paper ID #48623ACE up your Sleeve: An Analysis of Student Generative AI Usage in anEngineering Statics CourseJacklyn Wyszynski, University of PittsburghDavid Adam DeFrancisis, University of PittsburghDavid Pabst, University of PittsburghMr. Lee Allen Dosse, University of Pittsburgh Lee A. Dosse is a PhD student working with the Engineering Education Research Center at the University of Pittsburgh.Dr. Matthew M. Barry, University of Pittsburgh Dr. Barry is a Visiting Associate Professor in the Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science department at the University of Pittsburgh. His research interests include space power
discussed as a critical area to integrate the operator 4.0/5.0 research space[7]. One way to advance such work is to improve decision support, communication and mutualunderstanding between operators and Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAM) users throughoutthe DED process.CAM user strategies, particularly for convergent DED, rely on operator input due to processcomplexity [8]. Operator experience leads to critical intuition with certain system constraints,design features and materials. For example, an operator might influence the decision at which pointin the process to transition from additive to subtractive processes, in order to maintain tool reachand access to unique or internal features [8]. Additionally, an operator might discuss situations
Paper ID #48136Hands-on Precalculus for Engineering: A Work in ProgressSeth Greendale, Whatcom Community CollegeProf. Eric Davishahl, Whatcom Community College Eric Davishahl serves as professor and engineering program coordinator at Whatcom Community College in northwest Washington state. His current project involves developing and piloting an integrated multidisciplinary learning community for first-year engineering. More general teaching and research interests include designing, implementing and assessing activities for first-year engineering, engineering mechanics, and scientific computing. Eric has been an active
Paper ID #47384[Work in progress: Intersection of Design and ”X” Research Papers] Globalmeans local too: Integrating anti-oppressive practice into community-basedcapstone design projects.Ms. Kerry Eller, Duke University Kerry Eller is a 4th year PhD Candidate in the Center for Global Women’s Health Technologies at Duke University’s Biomedical Engineering Department. Kerry is working to develop cervical cancer screening technologies that are more accessible for both patients and providers but is also excited about engineering education and design pedagogy.Dr. Megan Madonna, Duke University Megan Madonna is an Assistant
and instructors withdiverse teaching backgrounds. The program curriculum combined conceptual and technicalinstruction in AI, emphasizing experiential learning through project-based activities andreal-world applications. Spanning 4.5 weeks, the program utilized a structured schedule oflectures, workshops, and team-based projects, culminating in a capstone presentation.Research DesignThis study is an iteration of formative assessment in a more extensive design-based research anddevelopment project. In this iteration, we explore instructors' experiences within this uniqueeducational context during the first year of implementation. This design suits the researchquestions, allowing in-depth exploration of complex, real-world phenomena in a
integrated content in final-yearcapstone courses, earlier integration is frequently lacking. In 2020, Montana State University(MSU) embarked on a five-year NSF-funded Revolutionizing Engineering Departments (RED)project aimed at transforming its environmental engineering program. This initiative supportedthe development of new integrated and project-based courses to be implemented in the first andsecond year of the curriculum. All tenure-track faculty in the environmental engineering programparticipated in a collaborative, iterative process to design project-based courses for first- andsecond-year students. EENV 102, Introduction to Environmental Engineering Design andSustainability, introduces the field of environmental engineering, sustainability
and “…The purpose of this study, therefore, is threefold. The first [30]Mapping to Key Words in is to provide a linguistic crosswalk of terminology betweenABET Engineering SOs a – k and SOs 1 – 7. The second is to provide definitionsAccreditation Commission of key terminology used in SOs 1 – 7. The third is to provideStudent Outcomes 1 - 7 a framework for mapping embedded indicators within an environmental engineering curriculum to key words in SOs 1 – 7 for assessment and evaluation purposes…”Developing an Integrated “…This paper reviews the lessons learned from the process [31]Environmental Engineering
, astudio-based component or a series of projects or problems (problem-based learning), wherestudents work in teams.Problem-Based Learning (PBL)Problem-Based Learning (PBL) has become a fundamental approach in education, especiallywithin engineering and architecture disciplines, due to its emphasis on solving real-worldproblems through curriculum integration. The essence of PBL lies in its ability to bridge the gapbetween theoretical knowledge and its application, fostering an environment where studentsengage in meaningful projects that mirror professional practice. This educational approachemphasizes interdisciplinary collaboration, community engagement, and sustainability, whichare crucial for addressing today's complex global challenges [17
Paper ID #46167GIFTS: Designing Five OER Lessons for Integrating Design Thinking intoIntroductory Engineering Design CoursesProf. Rafe Steinhauer, Dartmouth College Rafe Steinhauer is an instructional assistant professor at Dartmouth College’s Thayer School of Engineering, specializing in the application of design thinking and human-centered design to improving education, from improving instructional design methods (higher education) to tackling wicked problems in systems of public education (K-12). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 GIFTS: Designing Five OER Lessons for
technologies, such as circuits, oscilloscopes, and coding, to reinforcemathematical principles through applications.The mathematical topics included in the course have great breadth. The curriculum starts withalgebra and progresses to advanced topics, including lines, quadratics, trigonometry, vectors,sinusoids, systems of equations, derivatives, integrals, and differential equations. Mathematicaltopics are always related to engineering related word problems. And in addition, lab data is oftenprocessed with MATLAB. Students are gaining an understanding of the interconnectionbetween classroom theory, laboratory measurement and numerical representation of theirengineering results [2].Innovative Component:In Fall of 2024, one of the professors teaching 3
Paper ID #46757Educating for DEI in Construction Engineering: Translating Findings onDisability Considerations on Worksites into Pedagogy and Course ContentProf. Sarah Jayne Hitt, New Model Institute for Technology and Engineering Dr. Sarah Jayne Hitt is the Lead for Transferable Skills at the Centre for Advanced Timber Technology and Founding Professor of Liberal Studies at the New Model Institute for Technology and Engineering in Hereford, UK. She specializes in curriculum development as well as integrating ethics, sustainability, and communication into engineering education, and serves as project manager for the Engineering
collected at multiple stages to assess the impact ofcollaborative activities within the framework of analyzing real construction cases. Thisdesign allows for examining changes over time within the same group of students.Participants and contextThe participants were 21 students enrolled in the "Final Construction Engineering PortfolioCourse" (an integrative course offered during the final semester of the career), of which 20were men and one was a woman. The students' ages ranged from 22 to 28 years, with themajority being between 23 and 25 years old. Our university's Construction Engineering (CE)program spans ten semesters and currently enrolls 181 students, with a 10% femaleparticipation rate.Final Construction Engineering Portfolio CourseThis
location.Many of these venues are open to all faculty, although we specifically recruited participants fromengineering and computer science disciplines to participate in the workshops.Workshop Development and MaterialsThe overall goals of the faculty development workshops are to 1) improve faculty engagement inundergraduate research experiences, and 2) integrate an entrepreneurial mindset (EM) intoresearch mentoring. To achieve these goals, we developed two main workshops addressing howto empower students with an entrepreneurial mindset in research [10]: How to InvolveUndergraduates in Research and Why Involve Undergrads in Research. Both workshops buildon the three principles of the entrepreneurial mindset - “curiosity”, “connections”, and
from the 20 students in a single class– the results speak to pros,cons, and directions that instructors can take as part of a continuous improvement process.4.4 Research objective 3: Ethical Dimensions and Practical ChallengesThe third research objective peels back the mystique of AI and looks at the ethical considerationsof using it as well as the practical challenges students face. This was not an emphasis area of thecourse as there are many topics related to the ethical use of AI including data privacy, fair accessby all users, biases in the data, and fair accounting of who produced the answers (i.e. academicintegrity). This latter aspect (academic integrity) was the primary ethical consideration in thisstudy. Many of these ethical areas
involving engineers of different disciplines [5], [6], [7] and others also involvingnon-engineers [8], [9]. These courses have a wide range of project types, amounts of projectscaffolding, and requirements. Often these studies include a separate course and structure forthose involved to facilitate these new projects.ABET requires that an accredited engineering curriculum include ‘a culminating majorengineering design experience that 1) incorporates appropriate engineering standards andmultiple constraints, and 2) is based on the knowledge and skills acquired in earlier course work’[10, p. 7]. At The Cooper Union, this takes the form of departmental capstone design courses.These courses allow the individual major departments to control the student
engineering job market. This studyunderscores the importance of integrating data mining techniques into physics analysis,offering an innovative approach to learning complex physical concepts.The use of data mining and tools like Orange in teaching Physics for Engineeringaddresses a growing demand in the job market for professionals who not only mastertraditional engineering concepts but also possess skills in computational thinking and dataanalysis. Modern industries increasingly value engineers capable of handling largevolumes of data, extracting insights, and applying this knowledge to optimize processes,innovate products, and solve complex problems.In this context, the incorporation of data mining into the Engineering curriculum is notmerely an
tool’ssuccessful adoption will depend on factors such as curriculum alignment, faculty acceptance, andinstitutional support. Integrating AI into existing courses poses challenges, including the risk ofresistance to automation and the need to train faculty on the tool’s pedagogical uses and limitations.Additionally, providing students with access too early in their learning process may lead tooverreliance on the model, potentially preventing them from developing foundational skills suchas determining thermodynamic properties or performing calculations independently.ReferencesAaron Parisi, Y. Z. (2022). Talm: Tool augmented language models. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2205.12255.Bacher, E. V., & Smith, C. (1985). Shear Flow Control. Conf. American
. Professor Azad has secured significant support for research and development projects and has published around 140 technical papers and five edited books. He holds leadership roles in various professional organizations and manages editorial responsibilities for several technical journals. Additionally, he reviews proposals for funding agencies in the US, Europe, and Australia and is actively involved in standardization initiatives for mobile robotics, the Internet of Things (IoT), and learning engineering. He has also served as a program evaluator for the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 An Examination of the
Paper ID #49295BOARD #106: Investigating Factors Influencing Performance in an IntroductoryProgramming CourseAmanda Nicole Smith, University of Florida Amanda is an undergraduate student pursuing a Bachelor of Science in Computer Science at the University of Florida, with an expected graduation in Spring 2025. Her research interests focus on computer science education, particularly how educators can use machine learning models to provide real time intervention strategies to optimize individual student outcomes. This paper is a reflection of her commitment to improving educational strategies and fostering an inclusive
Paper ID #45523Bridging Theory and Practice: Active Learning and Real-World Applicationsin Mathematical Analysis CourseDr. Djedjiga Belfadel, Fairfield University Dr. Djedjiga Belfadel is an Associate Professor and the Graduate Program Director for Electrical and Biomedical Engineering at Fairfield University, Connecticut. She earned her Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Connecticut in 2015. Dr. Belfadel is deeply committed to teaching, with a focus on innovative, hands-on learning approaches in STEM education. She has successfully integrated active learning strategies into her
. (2019). "Revisiting the Tinto's Theoretical Dropout Model." Higher Education Studies, vol. 9, no. 3, 2019, pp. 52-https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v9n3p52.[14] Lakhal, S., Mukamurera, J., Bédard, ME. et al. (2020). Features fostering academic and social integration in blended synchronous courses in graduate programs. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 17, 5 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-0180-z[15] Karp, Melinda Mechur, et al. (2010). "An Exploration of Tinto's Integration Framework for Community College Students." Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, vol. 12, no. 1, 2010, pp. 69–86, https://doi.org/10.2190/CS.12.1.e
technologies continue to evolve [27].Studies highlight a growing shift toward career adaptability, where engineers must continuouslyreskill and upskill to remain relevant in an AI-integrated job market [21]. This transitiondemands a holistic curriculum that integrates both technical and durable skills, ensuring thatgraduates can navigate automation, digital transformation, and AI-driven workplaces [27].Challenges in IntegrationTechnical and Pedagogical Limitations Educators exhibit varying attitudes toward the adoption of GenAI tools in the classroom.While some recognize their potential to enhance learning and problem-solving, others expressconcerns regarding accuracy, reliability, and ethical implications [2]. Leading universities havebegun
foundational courses requiresthoughtful curriculum design that highlights shared principles and interdisciplinary applications.For example, Schulz et al. [6] introduced interdisciplinary learning in design courses to meetsustainable development goals in design projects [7]. In some cases, it requires creating newcourses as Baker et al. did to promote an interconnected view of concepts [8]. Also, linkingtopics from different fields together is not restricted to a particular level as prior efforts show itseffectiveness in all levels [3-5].The problem is in many introductory programming courses the focus often remains on teachingsyntax, algorithmic thinking, and basic programming constructs. Although crucial for technicalcompetence, this narrow approach
of Cognitive and Learning Sciences (CLS). Prior to his tenure at MTU, Dr. Sticklen held the positions of Director of the Applied Engineering Sciences BSc major at Michigan State University and Director of the Center for Educational Research in the College of Engineering. During his tenure at MTU, Dr. Sticklen served as the Chair of the EF Department from 2014 to 2020, during which time he spearheaded a successful initiative to revamp the first-year engineering curriculum. Since 2020, Dr. Sticklen has dedicated his research efforts to student engagement from a Discipline-Based Educational Research (DBER) perspective. He has been an AI researcher and educator since 1983, transitioning to a DBER role in 2005. Dr
who are interested in the topic and relevant careers, aligning well with career readiness.While many students appreciate the ethical focus, some feedback suggests that an overemphasison ethics could detract from technical content. Thus, maintaining a balance throughincorporating ethics into hands-on technical activities becomes critical, allowing students tosimultaneously develop ethical awareness and technical expertise.Implications for Future ResearchThe new curriculum serves as a model for integrating cybersecurity and privacy into engineeringeducation and offers a framework adaptable to other disciplines, addressing security and privacyfrom diverse perspectives. Future research may further explore the role of SSI framework incyber-aerial
a graduate student in advanced computing at Morgan State University and a research assistant for the National Science Foundation.Raymond Deji Olamijulo, Morgan State University Mr Raymond Olamijulo is a graduate assistant in the Computer Science department at Morgan State University. With a research focus on experiment-centric pedagogy in engineering education, Mr. Olamijulo has contributed to advancing both theoretical and practical aspects of engineering education and technology integration in the curriculum. Mr Olamijulo holds a B.Sc. in Information and Communication Technology from Crawford University. He also holds a Masters degree in International MBA from Ulyanovsk State University. He has been a part