embedded electromechanical systems. He has also led numerous student teams in grant-funded projects to design such systems for automation and sensing tasks.Dr. Christina R Scherrer, Kennesaw State University Christina Scherrer is a professor of Industrial and Systems Engineering and the Senior Associate Dean of the Southern Polytechnic College of Engineering at Kennesaw State University. Her research interests are in the application of operations research and economic decision analysis to public health, as well as in engineering education. Her research has been funded by NIH, NSF and the CDC. She has advised and published with more than two dozen undergraduate researchers and is committed to development of the STEM
setting.Additionally, CMI plans to document lessons learned and best practices to develop a roadmap forreplication at other institutions. Providing a step-by-step implementation guide, includingnecessary resources, funding models, and institutional partnerships, that would make it easier foruniversities and research centers to adopt this approach.Quantitatively capturing mentor impacts is also a key growth area for CMI. Business andmanagement disciplines have created ‘coachability’ measures that CMI looks to implement inmentor recruitment and post-program assessment protocols [11]. Key to CMI’s novel approach isstaff leadership, wherein embedded CMI staff guide and coach mentors through initial menteeproject meetings providing supplemental project planning
multitude of roles as he continually seeks to savor the joys of teaching and learning from faculty, staff, and students. Crimm earned his undergraduate and graduate degrees in Electrical Engineering from Georgia Institute of Technology and is also a registered Professional Engineer in the State of Georgia having been recognized by this GSPE organization in 2019 as the overall ”Engineer of the Year” among the several highly competitive categories such as Education, Private Practice, Industry, Government, etc. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Work-in-Progress: Seeking How to Best Enhance Engineering RPG Rates in a Post-Covid World: from alternative grading techniques to blended
programs and universityoffices dedicated to expose students to research opportunities and support their involvement inthese experiences [24]. Most notably, the Meyerhoff Scholars Program at the University ofMaryland Baltimore County prepares undergraduate students for graduate school throughresearch opportunities, mentoring, and community building programs [25]. This program alonehas produced hundreds of students who chose to pursue advanced degrees in a STEM graduateprogram [25], [26].While undergraduate research is an effective intervention and prepares students for a range offuture opportunities (not just graduate school), many students do not pursue researchopportunities until their junior or senior years. As a result, its impact on the
studied byDeslauriers, et. al., in [6] who held a somewhat contradictory view of the value of activelearning. Both [6] and Oakley, et. al., in [7] emphasize careful design and scaffolding foryounger students being introduced to active learning to reduce the occurrences of negativeresponses. In this study, students were “upper level” undergraduate and graduate students whosematurity may have contributed to their positive perception of the changes. However, we alsosuspect that the careful design of the questions and gradual release of the task to solve serves asscaffolding that might even work for younger students. 2. MethodsWe used active learning methods, especially the technique of in-class problem solving using thegradual release model to
existing modeling course, a modulewas developed leveraging a research project that employed community-engaged design to createthe world’s first parametric insurance product protecting the livelihoods and food security ofartisanal, small-, and medium-scale fishers in the Caribbean. In this article, we report details ofthe content of the module as well as assessments of student learning and feedback from studentswith regard to the value of the module to introduce concepts of community-engaged design. Inparticular, these results are discussed in the broader context of the United Nations SustainableDevelopment Goals, specifically the five Ps – partnerships, peace, people, prosperity, and planet.IntroductionThe criteria for accrediting engineering
building and testing the design andcomparing results to the initial goals and expectations. Finally, in Improve, we analyze testresults, identify the most impactful changes, and refine the design for better outcomes. Thisrefinement, or iterative process, occurs throughout the entire cycle. EDP engages learners inactive problem-solving and collaboration, emphasizing that learning and success come fromtesting, reflection, and adaptation.Example 1: NanobugsThe Nanobug Challenge was designed to highlight cyborg research at North Carolina StateUniversity. Researchers are exploring how far and fast cyborg cockroaches - or biobots - movewhen exploring new spaces. A cyborg is formed by the union of biology and technology9- in thiscase, cockroaches, which
level is defined bya person’s experiences, knowledge, and beliefs, and how these may impact their interactions andview of the world. Moving outward, the system levels explore differing aspects of thisindividual’s environment, starting with the microsystem. The microsystem is scoped to anindividual’s direct environment; this includes the various activities, roles, and interpersonalrelationships the individual may have. For a graduate student, this could include their roles incourses or research, or perhaps a prior experience with a course instructor. Following this is themesosystem, which includes connections across microsystems. For example, someone taking aclass related to a research project they are on with members of their research group
for Fall 2025 adopts a systematic approach to curriculumenhancement, following best practices in educational program development by Kumar and Smith[13]. Our proposed timeline consists of three distinct phases, each designed to minimize disruptionwhile maximizing educational impact. 5Phase 1: preparatory phase (Spring 2025)The initial phase focuses on foundational elements essential for successful implementation.Drawing from successful models in curriculum transformation by Liu and Watson [14], this phaseincludes the development of partnerships with industry professionals and local LEED-certifiedbuilding operators. Research by Martinez et al. [15] suggests that early engagement with
areenrolled in, for instance the interdisciplinary program used in this study was the Nanoscience andMicrosystems Engineering (NSME) program at UNM, which is a graduate program that spansmultiple schools (school of engineering, arts and sciences, health services, and school ofmanagement). The NSME program is designed to give graduate students diverse knowledge andexperience across various schools.It is common for MEMS or advanced microfabrication courses to combine theoretical teachingsthrough lectures which are supplemented with hands-on lab experience. The lab components areoften believed to be necessary to master the subject of nanofabrication as hands-on experiencehelps students gain experience and skills [10-12], which is highly desired by
behaviorsadopted by women leaders throughout the environmental design contest aligning with Rosener[21] and Eagly and colleagues’ [22] research. Authors in [21] and [22] pointed out how womenare usually better equipped for inviting collaboration, participation, and engagement. Alsoimportant is to be mindful of followers’ needs and motivation, so they achieve higher levels ofself-realization, which women tend to address better than men.Implications for Practice The following implications for practice include recommendations that institutional agentscould incorporate to improve engineering students’ education and achieve a more holisticeducational approach. Based on the findings of this study and the literature reviewed, theseimplications can leverage
demonstrate theachievement of the competencies required for the professional practice of an engineer? Toanswer this research question, we used factorial models to evaluate students’ ability to conductfinancial and cost analyses applied to the requirements of private and public institutions; andto model solutions in complex and open systems of industrial engineering, adhering totechnical, social, and ethical constraints. By following a design-based research approach, weaimed to support the improvement of the design of the ‘Project evaluation’ course, usinglearning outcome attainment for teaching staff reflection and course evaluation, allowingadjustments to optimize learning outcomes in future versions [11]. This research effort beganin the first
. Methodology This study employed a mixed methods approach to investigate the impact of the coursedesign and implementation strategies on student engagement, self-regulation, and self-efficacy ina novel online engineering course for high school students. The research design integrated bothqualitative and quantitative elements to provide a comprehensive understanding.Qualitative Data The comprehensive evaluation of the Summer 2024 program session, conducted byDiscover program staff, provided a multi-faceted assessment of the program's effectiveness andimpact. The evaluation process incorporated several key components such as enrollment dataanalysis allowing observation in trends in student registration, demographics, and courseselection
to pursue engineering by desires to help their communities andcreate social impact [11], [12]. This alignment between student motivations and program goalshas shown promise in some areas, with humanitarian design components demonstrating higherretention rates for underrepresented students [6] and organizations like Engineers WithoutBorders reporting increased gender diversity [13].However, HE programs continue to struggle with recruiting and retaining students from LMICsand communities of color [7], [14]. One key barrier is the persistence of colonial mindsets inhumanitarian engineering education. For instance, many HE graduate programs have experientiallearning components, where students work with marginalized communities in LMICs
Paper ID #46631Novice versus Experienced Near-Peer Mentors’ Facilitation of a Discussionwith a Student Avatar Facing Logistical Challenges on a Design TeamPamela S. Lottero-Perdue Ph.D., Towson University Pamela S. Lottero-Perdue, Ph.D., is Professor of Science and Engineering Education in the Department of Physics, Astronomy & Geosciences at Towson University. She has integrated engineering into courses for PreK-8 teacher candidates, developed and directed a graduate STEM program for PreK-6 teachers, and partnered with teachers to implement PreK-8 science-integrated engineering learning experiences. She has
cognitive legitimacy could be defined as an institution withextremely selective admission criteria, a long history of research excellence, and beacknowledged to be the best in its field. Universities claim cognitive legitimacy bycommunicating high-ranking scores, the rigor of their admission process, their researchachievements, or claiming excellence within a specific knowledge area or profession. Auniversity with high pragmatic legitimacy could be defined as an institution that providesstudents with a comprehensive education and prepares them well for the workforce. Universitiesclaim pragmatic legitimacy by highlighting their high post-graduate employment rate, theiradministration’s ability to provide students with good value for their tuition
. Paul, Minnesota. He completed his B.S. and M.S. in electrical and computer engineering at Iowa State University, with a focus on Computing and Networking Systems in his graduate program.Dr. Nicholas D. Fila, Iowa State University of Science and Technology Nicholas D. Fila is an assistant teaching professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Iowa State University. He earned a B.S. in Electrical Engineering and a M.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Illinois-Urbana-Champaign and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University. His research interests include empathy, ethics, design thinking, and course design.Dr. Henry Duwe, Iowa State University of Science and
Entrepreneurship Program. She is the former Interim Dean of the College of Business at Albany State University and served three years as Chair, Department of Accounting, Information Systems, and Marketing at the same university. Her research interests include design thinking, homeschooling, and mentoring girls in STEM.Monica Stephens Cooley, Spelman College Dr. Monica Stephens is an Associate Professor of Mathematics at Spelman College. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Understanding the Experiences of Black Women in STEM: A Framework for InterruptionAbstractEnhanced participation of Black women in science, technology engineering, and mathematics(STEM) is of
college to implement the reform, and the dramatic improvement in completing college-level math for community-college students. She consults with states and institutions to improve student success in college, particularly with Complete College America (CCA). At University of Colorado Boulder, Heidi is a Senior Research Associate in Ethnography & Evaluation Research, a center focused on STEM education. She recently was the project lead in transforming teaching evaluation practices in the College of Arts & Sciences and supports the College of Engineering and Applied Sciences and the Graduate School with special projects. A fourth-generation Coloradoan and educator, she lives in Denver with her husband, two college
, conference proceedings, and technical reports. He earned his Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from Auburn University, an M.S. in Civil Engineering from the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, an MBA from the University of Khartoum, and a Master of Science in Law (MSL) from Northwestern University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Pilot Study: From Curiosity to Career- The Influence of a Summer Camp on High School Students’ Interest in Transportation and STEM CareersAbstractThis study evaluates the impact of a summer camp designed to increase high school students'interest in transportation and related STEM fields. The camp, which spanned one and half weeks,included a variety of activities
], engineering remains a relatively new discipline in schools, andmany mathematics educators struggle to integrate engineering content meaningfully due to a lackof interdisciplinary guidance in the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics (CCSSM)[9].This research seeks to address the gap in the integration of engineering and mathematics byidentifying the types of mathematics and engineering problems that may best represent theengineering profession. Specifically, the study explores how high school mathematics teachers,engineering professors, and practicing engineers perceive the mathematics used in real-worldengineering problems. The primary research question is: How do current engineering problemsdesigned for high school mathematics students compare
important to consider in future projects,GEMS summer camps, and within their future workforce [1], [2]. Phelan says it best: “Programsthat engage high school students in unique STEM experiences will likely continue to play aprofound role in recruiting and retaining bright young minds in STEM fields” [4]. Although theGEMS organization is small, its impact on the students who attend is significant.The project that was completed by the students was also a small part of a larger project that theAVS Labs undergraduate and graduate researchers were currently working on. Despite theQuanser QArm being loaned temporarily, the binary detection that the students developed canstill be used and implemented in the other hardware that the lab was using for the
of study at the SOA at OSU? Figure 3 (b) • Architecture • Architectural design studies • Architectural Engineering 3. Which option did you choose for your independent study? Figure 3 (c) • Research report • Creative component 4. Do you feel that you have gained sufficient theoretical and practical knowledge Figure 3 (d) through the graduate certificate program offered at the SOA, including the independent study course? • Yes • No • Not sure 5. Following the completion of the GC program, have you pursued a graduate Figure 3 (e) degree (e.g. Masters/PhD) or are you planning to pursue a graduate degree in future
the college’s Director of Belonging. Aanya has worked across a wide range of design practices, including the industry-defining Pei Cobb Freed & Partners, the experience design firm Parc Office, and the coworking provider Industrious. She received her Master of Architecture from the Harvard University Graduate School of Design and has served as a guest critic at institutions including RISD, Columbia GSAPP and Harvard GSD. Issues of belonging and identity are a common thread throughout Aanya’s teaching and research. Having lived across various cities in the United States and India, she enjoys sharing her rich multi-cultural perspective with the College of Design community and beyond
outcomes.The success of these initiatives has broader implications for the construction industry. Byincreasing the representation of women and minority groups in CEM programs, universities arecontributing to the development of a more diverse workforce. Collaborative efforts betweenuniversities and industry partners have been particularly impactful. Industry stakeholders haveprovided internships, mentorship opportunities, and resources that bridge the gap betweenacademic learning and professional practice. Additionally, partnerships have facilitated theexchange of best practices, helping universities design industry-relevant curricula that preparestudents for diverse and inclusive workplaces.Despite these positive outcomes, challenges remain in fully
Urbana Champaign. In addition to a BS in Materials Science and Engineering, He earned his graduate degrees in Mechanical Engineering building origami robots and studying how design teams reach shared understanding. His current focuses on the theory behind engineering design and the integration of Human-Centered methods into existing engineering design paradigms.Mr. Saadeddine Shehab, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign I am currently the Associate Director of Assessment and Research team at the Siebel Center for Design (SCD) at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. I work with a group of wonderful and talented people at SCD’s Assessment and Research Laboratory to conduct research that informs and
continualadaptation to stay current with best practices.Two of the most recognized frameworks for disability inclusion are Universal Design (UD) andUniversal Design for Learning (UDL). UD, developed in the 1970s by architect Ron Mace andcolleagues at North Carolina State University's Center for Accessible Housing, focuses ondesigning physical environments that are accessible and inclusive of all users, including thosewith disabilities. It can be applied in homes, public areas, workspaces, and educational settings toensure comfort, safety, and functionality for a wide variety of people [53].Drawing on UD principles, UDL was developed by the Center for Applied Special Technology(CAST) to guide inclusive pedagogy and teaching practices. The UDL Guidelines help
OPUS College of Engineering at Marquette University and honorary Professor at the University of Los Andes (Venezuela). Homero is the leader of the Engineering Competencies, Learning, and Interdisciplinary Practices for Success (ECLIPS) Lab. His research focuses on developing engineering education practices that prepare graduate students and faculty members with the tools to promote effective and inclusive learning environments. Homero has been recognized as a Diggs Teaching Scholar, a Graduate Academy for Teaching Excellence Fellow, a Global Perspectives Fellow, a Diversity Scholar, a Fulbright Scholar, a recipient of the NSF CAREER award, and was inducted into the Bouchet Honor Society. Homero serves as the
participation in engineering graduate programs through her engineering education research. Prior to academia, Dr. Godwin worked for many Fortune 100 companies, including Intel Corporation.Dr. John K. Wagner, University of New Mexico Dr. John K. Wagner is a Postdoctoral Fellow for the Alliances for Graduate Education and the Professoriate (AGEP) joint project between the University of New Mexico, Arizona State University, and the University of Oregon. His research interests focus on improving equity in higher education, and the impacts of technology on public opinion and political psychology. Specifically, Dr. Wagner’s research explores how to improve equity and inclusion by measuring latent support for exclusionary practices
information, allowing strong predictions even before thebeginning of the learning period and leading to greater applicability in practice. Another benefitof this class of model is the explainability of the generated rule sets. When making predictionsthat will directly affect students, one must be able to explain why they were targeted foradditional learning resources or for possible remedial work. Explainability becomes more crucialwhen model predictions are expanded beyond grades.On the other hand, the Multi-Output or Multi-Label Classifier is a machine learning modelspecifically designed for multi-label or multi-output classification tasks, where each instance canbe linked to multiple labels or output variables. It is a machine learning model that