Paper ID #49389Development of Engineering Component Curiosity Challenges (ECCCs)Dr. Nathan Delson, University of California at San Diego Nathan Delson, Ph.D. is a Senior Teaching Professor at the University of California at San Diego. He received a PhD in Mechanical Engineering from MIT and his interests include robotics, biomedical devices, product design, engineering education, and maker spaces. In 1999 he co-founded Coactive Drive Corporation (currently General Vibration), a company that provides force feedback solutions. In 2016 Nate co-founded eGrove Education an educational software company focused on teaching sketching
outcomes of usingtwo versions of a virtual laboratory to teach thermodynamics concepts and report on theoutcomes in terms of student learning as well as percieved experience.MethodSoftware Development. ThermoLab was developed over several years and with the involvementof a community of thermodynamics instructors. The initial prototype was developed using asmall innovation grant provided by the researchers home university. The majority of this effortwas to demonstrate that a working implementation of the thermodynamic states of water couldbe created from the IAPWS-95 and IAPWS-97 equation of state and be performant within thelimited computational resources available in a consumer VR headset. This initial version of theproject was piloted with five
one week. After the in-class quiz, students complete online pre-lab quizzes to reinforce their understanding of practical and determinative power systemanalysis. During the lab session, students wire the three-phase circuit, measure voltage, current,and power, and participate in a post-lab quiz that examines the three-phase power's conceptualaspects. The final assessment stage evaluates three-phase systems by taking an exam and solvingthe engineering problem.This paper introduces a brief methodology for teaching three-phase systems. It provides analternative secure instructional laboratory approach for students to explore wiring a three-phasesystem comprising three-phase wye and delta load connected systems, with and withouttransmission line
through the post-pandemic. Due to changes in pandemic controlmeasures, each year’s course offering had a different teaching modality: in-person (2019),remote (2020), Hyflex (2021), and in-person / hybrid (2022). Assessment metrics used toidentify the most useful interventions included student surveys, faculty surveys, and directassessment of performance on graded events. The most useful interventions identified includednarrated slideshow presentations, recorded class presentations, and virtual laboratories and fieldtrips. Many of the practices introduced during the remote and Hyflex course offerings, such asthe ability to teach remotely, were beneficial for faculty members and will be carried forward forfuture course offerings. This study
organization at Morgan State University.Mr. Pelumi Olaitan Abiodun, Morgan State University Pelumi Abiodun is a current doctoral student and research assistant at the department of Civil Engineering, Morgan State University, Baltimore, Maryland. Pelumi got his BSc and MSc degree in Physics from Obafemi Awolowo University, where he also served as a research assistant at the Environmental Pollution Research unit, in Ile-Ife, Nigeria. As part of his contribution to science and engineering, Pelumi has taught as a teaching assistant both at Morgan State University and Obafemi Awolowo University. With passion to communicate research findings and gleaned from experts in the field as he advances his career, Olaitan has attended
standardized assessment frameworks complicatescomparisons across studies and hampers efforts to establish best practices in CEM education.While extensive research exists on pedagogical techniques in higher education, significant gapsremain in developing systematic, evidence-based approaches for teaching abstract concepts instructural engineering education. Current literature lacks comprehensive frameworks that guideinstitutions through the entire process of developing and implementing hands-on laboratories -from initial needs assessment through implementation and assessment. This study addressesthese gaps by providing both a systematic framework for laboratory development and a rigorousmethodology for assessing learning outcomes across multiple
, vol. 51, pp. 10–14,2022.[5] L. Williams and M. Reddish, “Integrating primary research into the teaching lab: benefits andimpacts of a one-semester cure for physical chemistry,” Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 95,pp. 928–938, 2018.[6] L. Haw, S. Sharif, and C. Han, “Predictors of student engagement in science learning: the roleof science laboratory learning environment and science learning motivation,” Asia PacificJournal of Educators and Education, vol. 37, pp. 225–245, 2022.[7] B. DeKorver and M. Towns, “General chemistry students’ goals for chemistry laboratorycoursework,” Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 92, pp. 2031–2037, 2015.[8] R. Felder, “Learning and teaching styles in engineering education,” Journal of EngineeringEducation
. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2024.[10] K. Walker, “Using genre theory to teach students engineering lab report writing: A collaborative approach,” IEEE Trans. Prof. Commun., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 12–19, 1999, doi: 10.1109/47.749363.[11] L. D. Feisel and A. J. Rosa, “The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate Engineering Education,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 121–130, Jan. 2005, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00833.x.[12] G. Boyd and M. F. Hassett, “Developing critical writing skills in engineering and technology students,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 89, no. 4, pp. 409–412, 2000, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2000.tb00544.x.[13] D. Rus, “Developing Technical Writing Skills to Engineering Students,” Procedia Technol., vol
areas of physics, such aselectromagnetics and modern physics, offering opportunities to design implementations tailoredto the specific needs of each course. The accessibility of free repositories with printable modelsreinforces the feasibility of this strategy to enrich experimental teaching in a sustainable andversatile way.Our findings align with existing concerns about the effectiveness of physics laboratories inpromoting conceptual understanding [1], [2] and [3]. While our results suggest that studentsperceive improvements in data acquisition, further research is needed to assess the impact ofmodel-based reasoning, as explored by others [4].Finally, although the survey revealed some initial difficulty in working with and analyzing thedata
Paper ID #48788BOARD # 21: Work in Progress: A Revised Biomedical Engineering Program:Building Student Engagement and Competency through Design, Aligned Courses,and Flexibility.Dr. Julian M Lippmann, University of Miami Julian Lippmann has been a Lecturer in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at the University of Miami for 4 years, where he teaches Biomedical Design, Biofluid Mechanics, and Solid Modeling with SolidWorks. Prior to this, he was an Assistant Teaching and Research Professor at the University at Buffalo, SUNY in the Department of Biomedical Engineering for 9 years. He holds a Ph.D., M.S., and B.S. in
system design. Although a number ofembedded systems learning and development tools are available [3-8], few fully meet bothacademic and industrial R&D needs. As an instructor in Electrical, Electronics, andMechatronics Engineering and Technology, my primary teaching focuses on embeddedengineering design and industrial automation. Since 2013, I have taught five embedded systemscourses at Texas A&M University (TAMU) and Northern Kentucky University (NKU). Tointegrate the latest microcontroller techniques and methodologies into the curriculum whileproviding hands-on laboratory experiences, I redesigned the curriculum and developed theModular Integrated Stackable Layer - Analog System Environment (MISL-ASE) board [9].Hands-on learning with
categories) [2]Theaccreditation standards define the students' expected mathematics and science preparation tosuccessfully complete the construction-specific teaching and learning objectives. Differentaccreditation agencies may prescribe different levels/types, but mathematics and science classesare always a requirement at the basic level.As a relatively young academic discipline, construction programs may show differences in their“origin” stories and their curricula are often influenced by their development and history.Programs that originated from architecture or engineering often carry a design-heavy structure,while programs with industrial technology backgrounds include more hands-on applications [3,4]. The industry's expectations also play an
equipment in vibrations and controls courses on student engineering identity, motivation, and mindset." International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education 53, no. 1 (2025): 3-28.9. Tran, Kevin, Britt Walker, Tris Utschig, and Ayse Tekes. "Using Low-Cost Hands-On Equipment and Virtual Lab for Teaching and Learning of Mechanical Vibrations." In ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, vol. 87653, p. V008T09A035. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2023.10. Liu, Yucheng, Francie Baker, Wenpei He, and Wei Lai. "Development, assessment, and evaluation of laboratory experimentation for a mechanical vibrations and controls course." International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education 47, no. 4
-resourced contexts. At UBC, he currently teaches at all levels of the undergraduate Chemical Engineering program, and is Co-Director of the Environmental Engineering program.Gina Sengeri, The University of British Columbia Gina Sengeri is an undergraduate student in the Chemical and Biological Engineering program at UBC. She supported curriculum coordination efforts in second-year courses, including content mapping and the development of a cross-course assignment connecting lab results to material balance calculations. She worked as a laboratory teaching assistant in UBC’s Vancouver Summer Program, leading students through chemical and microbiological experiments and assisting with data analysis using LabVIEW software
the Electrical and Computer Engineering programsthat most of the students did not gain strong troubleshooting skills by the time they graduated.To address this issue, several faculty members in the Electrical and Computer Engineeringprograms have developed an initiative aimed at helping students develop and/or improvetroubleshooting skills and, more importantly, build a solid foundation for successful professionalcareers in the future.In the initial phase of this project, a troubleshooting laboratory activity was designed andimplemented in Fall 2023 and Spring 2024 for Network Theory I, an introductory circuit courserequired for both Electrical and Computer Engineering students. During the troubleshootingactivity, students worked in teams to
knowledge and/or engagement. Such strategies include multiplerepresentations of complex concepts, participation in hands-on activities, learning and practicingwith computing tools (IBM Composer), and exposure to QIST role models and careers [7]-[20].The project is partly differentiated from previous works by the inclusion of mixed methodsresearch to assess outcomes for students and teachers.Student OutcomesQuEST employs two approaches. First, the program in quantum teaching laboratories, QuESTLab, educates high school students in school day and summer camp activities in classical andquantum physics and quantum computing. In its first two years, the program enrolled N=262secondary students at a research university (n=180) and an urban informal
, homeworkassignments, laboratory exercises, final student projects, and bonus-based teaching method.Section 4 discusses the results of student surveys and presents our lessons learned and experiencefrom the course. Finally, Section 5 concludes the paper. Figure 1: The IoT Security Laboratory where the labs are conducted.2 Related WorkIoT redefines how people perform their everyday tasks with its rich integration of variousfunctionalities 4,5 . IoT devices can be seen in various domains, from entertainment enhancementsuch as gaming, security of homes and properties to hospitality and healthcare 6,7,8,9 . Thesetechnologies has emerged as a key theme in combining theoretical aspects of computer sciencewith real-world applications, integrating
DIGITAL TWINS IN A CASE STUDY,” Proc. Des. Soc., vol. 3, pp. 2975–2984, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1017/pds.2023.298.[18] S. Deniz, U. C. Müller, I. Steiner, and T. Sergi, “Online (Remote) Teaching for Laboratory Based Courses Using ‘Digital Twins’ of the Experiments,” J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, vol. 144, no. 051016, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1115/1.4053323.[19] H. Johra, E. A. Petrova, L. Rohde, and M. Z. Pomianowski, “Digital Twins of Building Physics Experimental Laboratory Setups for Effective E-learning,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 2069, no. 1, p. 012190, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2069/1/012190.[20] L. A. Kartashova, A. M. Gurzhii, V. O. Zaichuk, and T. M. Sorochan, “Digital twin technology for blended
experiences in introductory STEM courses, student learning in the chemistry teaching laboratory, and faculty professional development related to teaching.Charles Ruggieri, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyCorey Ptak, Columbia University in the City of New YorkStacey Blackwell, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyGabriel Lopez Zenarosa, Stony Brook University Gabriel Zenarosa (he/him) is an Associate Professor of Practice at the College of Business at Stony Brook University. He has over seven years of higher-education teaching experience and holds an ACUE Certificate in the Effective Teaching Practice Framework. He also has over eight years of industry experience, working as a software quality assurance test
Chemical Society (ACS)guidelines for undergraduate chemistry programs which states that “A functioning NMR (orreliable access to a functioning NMR that students use)” is a critical requirement for approvedprograms [4]. With the increasing availability of affordable benchtop NMR spectrometers, NMRcan be much better utilized to teach valuable laboratory and research skills broadly across theundergraduate curriculum by being incorporated into more courses in chemistry, physics,medicine, and engineering. Integrating NMR into the undergraduate science and engineeringcurriculum would help build the STEM workforce of the future, where a basic understanding ofquantum physics will become a necessity in emerging 21st-century technologies.Project and
engineering concepts such asthermodynamics and mechanics who had cited that their methods of delivery are based onexperience and the general situation of student's receptiveness in learning. As Alfred noted,“Teaching thermodynamics is about understanding core principles; AI doesn’t change that.”Others in the Sciences fields have stated that with technological progression, AI image analysingsoftware and tools have been integrated for practical laboratory sessions, providing students witha better visualisation of their analysis. As Edward remarked, “For practical lab sessions, AI helpsstudents visualize their analysis better,” illustrating AI’s role in enhancing experimental learningexperiences. Non-STEM instructors were more open to AI’s role in
Research on Learning in Formal and Informal Learning. Dr. Hammack’s research focuses on the connection of local contexts to STEM interest and identity development in youth, particularly rural youth in elementary and middle grades, as well as how elementary teachers develop teaching efficacy and identity as STEM educators. Through her research, Dr. Hammack aims to advance understanding of how to enhance STEM education in rural schools and communities, providing opportunities to meet the unique needs of rural students.Dr. Nick Lux Lux, Montana State University Nick Lux is a Professor of Curriculum and Instruction in MSU’s Department of Education and is an affiliate of the Montana Engineering Education Research Center. He
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Making Space to Care: A Community Garden for Bioengineering LabsAbstractAs qualitative researchers embedded in a biomedical engineering department, we are currentlyattempting to create a space for conversation and action among a self-selecting group of faculty.Framed as a Community Garden, this initiative is focused on supporting discussions and activitiesaround “cultivating care” within labs in the department.In this paper, we focus on outlining the empirical and theoretical context for this initiative. TheCommunity Garden is part of a larger research project exploring the relationship between controland care in biological engineering. The laboratory
applications, material corrosion mechanisms, and electrochemical degradation. She is a strong advocate for integrating high-impact practices, such as problem-based learning, into lectures, laboratories, and outreach initiatives to enhance student and community engagement in STEM education.Dr. Kenya Crosson, University of Dayton Dr. Kenya Crosson serves as Associate Dean for Faculty and Staff Affairs and Research in the School of Engineering at the University of Dayton (UD), and she is an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Engineering Mechanics. A UD faculty member since 2007, Kenya teaches undergraduate and graduate courses; manages an environmental engineering research program
Paper ID #47213Lessons Learned From Microcontroller-Based Liquid Level ControlMr. Michael Charles Barkdull, University of Utah Michael C. Barkdull earned a combined BS/MS in Chemical Engineering at the University of Utah. As both a student and a teaching assistant, he has developed a passion for enhancing engineering education by integrating hands-on experiences with theoretical learning. In addition to academic achievements, Michael has gained practical experience during his internship at Idaho National Laboratory, where he developed and tested materials for real-world applications. He also contributed to undergraduate
history has shown, there has not been general agreement on theobjectives of engineering instructional laboratories nor any real efforts to define a comprehensive set untilnow” [6, p. 126]. While their claim may rely on a particular definition of “objectives” for a course, theGrinter Report does exactly what they say has not been done: The laboratory is the means of teaching the experimental method. It should give the student the opportunity to observe phenomena and seek explanations, to test theories and note contradictions, to devise experiments which will yield essential data, and to interpret results. Therefore, laboratories should be used where and only where these aims are being sought. The value of a set
Paper ID #47748Technical Writing as a Learning Objective: Implementation of A DiminishingScaffolding Model in a Lab-Based Biomaterials CourseDr. Sonia Bansal, Duke University Dr. Sonia Bansal is an Assistant Professor of the Practice for the Department of Biomedical Engineering at Duke University. She has been teaching for the department for 2 years and is researching best practices of curricular integration of technical skills such as writing, computing, and design. She graduated from the University of Pennsylvania with a Ph.D. in Bioengineering in 2020 from the McKay Orthopedic Research Laboratory under the guidance of
laboratory course and other STEM courses," Advances in biology laboratory education, vol. 41, p. 61, 2020.[7] L. Fingerson and A. B. Culley, "Collaborators in Teaching and Learning: Undergraduate Teaching Assistants in the Classroom," Teaching Sociology, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 299-315, 2001, doi: 10.2307/1319189.[8] K. A. Ritchey and S. and Smith, "Developing a Training Course for Undergraduate Teaching Assistants," College Teaching, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 50-57, 2019/01/02 2019, doi: 10.1080/87567555.2018.1518891.[9] R. M. Ryan and E. L. Deci, "Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being," American Psychologist, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 68-78
including lab kits and virtual lab simulations.Dr. Tris Utschig, Kennesaw State University Dr. Utschig is Director for Scholarly Teaching in the Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning (CETL) and Professor of Nuclear Engineering. Formerly, he was Assistant Director for CETL and the Office of Assessment at Georgia Tech, and Associate Professor of Engineering Physics at Lewis-Clark State College. He has extensive experience consulting with faculty about evidence-based approaches for teaching and learning and assessing their impact. He has over 100 peer-reviewed publications on teaching and learning and has facilitated or presented hundreds of times on this topic. He completed his PhD in Nuclear Engineering at the
Shayta Roy, Keino Davis, Abby Carbone, Galvin Brady, AllanBuyinza, Laura Madril, Magdalena Ravello, Pierce Pettit, and Hyonseon Choi for their supportin developing course content, leading course discussion sections, and consistently contributing toa positive class experience. I also thank Dr. Haoxue Yan for teaching a section of MatSci 160under this design and contributing data for this study.References [1] J. Kozminski, N. Beverly, D. Deardorff, R. Dietz, M. Eblen-Zayas, R. Hobbs, H. Lewandowski, S. Lindaas, A. Reagan, R. Tagg, J. Williams, and B. Zwickl, “AAPT recommendations for the undergraduate physics laboratory curriculum,” AAPT Committee on Laboratories, Nov. 10, 2014. [2] A Saterbak, B. Beason, K. Cox, J. Bordeaux