Conference Session

Architectural Engineering Division (ARCHE) Technical Session 1

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tristan Lee Charles, Kansas State University; Kyle Larson, Kansas State University; Andrew Sneed, Kansas State University

Tagged Divisions

Architectural Engineering Division (ARCHE)

achieve net zeroembodied carbon in buildings by the year 2050. Their strategies include planning for a net zerobuilding sector, implementing more sustainable design, and sharing knowledge so everyone cancreate a more sustainable industry.With a growing concern about reducing carbon emissions, looking at buildings from a lifecycleor carbon footprint standpoint is essential. Measuring the carbon footprint will allow the industryto identify the most emission-intensive materials and systems, resulting in finding solutions toreduce emissions. To deliver net zero carbon emissions, engineers must reduce the embodiedcarbon implied by designs and identify means for offsetting the balance of carbon impactsthrough operational carbon content. Applying

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division (SWED) Technical Session 2

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Xiangxiong Kong, California State University, Fresno; Alex Fegely, Coastal Carolina University; George W Hitt, Coastal Carolina University; Dominique Nunez Garcia, California State University, Fresno; Kaleb Glenn Montgomery, Coastal Carolina University; Deify Law, California State University, Fresno

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Division (SWED)

sunlight to achieve the desired visual effect.To achieve an optimal sunlight direction, we simulated three different scenarios, as shown inFigure 7a. Scenario 1 represents the sunlight directed vertically downward; Scenario 2 illustratesinward sunlight, perpendicular to the cliff plane (shown as the yellow dashed line in Figure 7a);while Scenario 3 refers to outward sunlight, also perpendicular to the cliff plane. Using a virtualcamera positioned perpendicular to the cliff plane, we rendered images for each scenario, shownin Figure 7b to d. The results indicate that Scenario 3 (Figure 7d) leads to a darkened cliff façadedue to insufficient sunlight. Scenario 2 (Figure 7c) improves brightness on the cliff plan butcreates shadows on the backside of

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE) Technical Session 2

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Todd M. Fernandez, Georgia Institute of Technology; Alexandra Werth, Cornell University

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE)

Conference Session

ELOS Technical Session 6: BYOE (Bring Your Own Experiment): Engaging Students with Creative Hands-on Laboratory Experiences

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chidiebere Akudigwe, Oral Roberts University; Mark Baumruk, Oral Roberts University; Glory Hansel, Oral Roberts University; Grant Kaste, Oral Roberts University; Jonathan Ophus, Oral Roberts University; John E Matsson, Oral Roberts University

Tagged Divisions

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division (DELOS)

material choices and layout plans. This collaboration encouraged peer-to-peer learning and critical thinking. • Each student had the opportunity to operate the hydraulic press. They adjusted the v-die setup, experimented with different order of bending, and observed firsthand how variations in pressure affected the metal’s deformation. • As challenges arose—such as ensuring uniform bends and preventing metal warping— students experimented with adjustments to machine settings and die positions, fostering an iterative approach to problem solving.The taco holder project was more than a fabrication exercise; it was a lesson in the principles ofsheet metal bending: • Students learned how the v-die’s geometry

Conference Session

Persistence, Outcomes and Barriers for Women in Engineering

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gail Baura, Loyola University Chicago; Matthew J Miller, Loyola University Chicago; Leanne Kallemeyn, Loyola University Chicago; Andrea Hércules, Loyola University Chicago; Erika Esmeralda de la Riva, Loyola University Chicago

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering Division (WIED)

Conference Session

Engaging and Empowering K-12 Students through Collaborative STEM Projects and Inclusive Outreach

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christine H. McDonnell, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Emily M. Haluschak, Purdue University – West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Morgan M Hynes, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Siddika Selcen Guzey, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PWL) (COE); Mary K. Pilotte, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Kristina Maruyama Tank, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Greg J Strimel, Purdue Polytechnic Institute, Purdue University – West Lafayette; Tamara J Moore, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PWL) (COE)

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division (MFG) Technical Session 4

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Israa Azzam, Purdue University at West Lafayette; Khalid Bello, University of Louisville; Farid Breidi, Purdue Polytechnic Institute, Purdue University – West Lafayette; Faisal Aqlan, University of Louisville

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing Division (MFG)

] and Microsoft HoloLens [32], whichenables holographic MR experiences by projecting virtual content directly into the user’s field ofview. This technology is valuable for teaching complex manufacturing tasks such as assemblyprocedures, design validation, and collaborative production planning. It allows educators toprovide their learners with advanced training environments that mirror the complexities ofmodern manufacturing, preparing them for future industry-specific roles.Therefore, the features of both VR and MR offer significant advantages over AR, particularly formanufacturing training. Both technologies provide a higher level of immersion compared to AR,which has been proven to enhance information retention and skill acquisition [33