course content through essays and writtenpapers. The course serves several majors at the university and is either required or an elective inthose majors. These include construction science, engineering, engineering technology,mathematics, and physics. Additionally, the course serves as a social and behavioral core coursefor the university, so other majors may enroll in the course.Because the programs taught in the department are primarily undergraduate, there are not a largenumber of graduate students in a relatable field to help provide student feedback, so all gradingfor this class is handled by one professor. As with most written papers, the intent is to providerobust and timely feedback to students. Though the workload is a major concern
and engineering education. Since joining UIC, she has developed and taught various undergraduate courses, integrating innovative teaching methods and industry-relevant content to enhance student learning and engagement. Dr. Bilgin’s research focuses on engineering education, particularly in fostering professional identity among engineering students and integrating data science into the chemical engineering curriculum. She has received multiple awards for her contributions to teaching and mentoring, including the ASEE Ray Fahien Award and the UIC COE Harold Simon Award. Dr. Bilgin is also actively involved in professional service, currently serving as the Director of the Chemical Engineering Division for ASEE
growth over sustainability and equity. This emphasis on limitlessgrowth is what led to the climate crisis to begin with. Therefore, to prepare engineering studentsto be a part of the effort to address the climate crisis, civil engineering instructors need todevelop curricula that will ensure students acquire the necessary knowledge and skills, as well asan understanding of the far-reaching impacts their work will have.Many institutions of higher education have begun to prepare undergraduate students to serve aspart of this workforce by developing sustainability-focused coursework, concentrations, minors,and in some cases, majors. Such curriculum initiatives, while necessary, take years to develop.Institutions that do not yet offer similar
UniversityAbstractTexas State University received an NSF S-STEM award to support two cohorts of talented, low-income engineering majors, with the first cohort starting their freshman year in Fall 2024. Inaddition to the scholarships awarded, this program aims to increase students’ engineering designself-efficacy, engineering identity, and improve persistence to graduation. The program includesunique strategies for achieving these goals, emphasizing mentoring and building a sense ofcommunity among participants. The SEED scholars were paired with a faculty mentor in theirengineering major prior to their arrival on campus for their freshman year. This early contact wasintended to open lines of communication with a faculty member, so the students felt they had
selected items from each aresummarized in Table 1. Table 1. Instruments and example questions used in our survey. Instrument Scale Sample item Campus Climate 1 (strongly I feel comfortable sharing my own perspectives and Survey disagree)– experiences in class 5 (strongly agree) The professors in CPE try to make everyone in class feel welcome Science Identity 1 (strongly I have a strong sense of belonging in Computer Scale disagree)– Engineering community 5 (strongly agree) Academic Anxiety 1 (not
-oriented, context-rich recitation problems to inspire interest and improve retention inengineering.BackgroundThe PORP intervention introduced and evaluated in this study builds on prior work in first-yearengineering education and contextualization to enhance student engagement in ChemE.First-year engineering students often struggle with motivation and retention due to the abstractand rigorous nature of technical coursework, which can lack clear practical relevance [11] - [16].By embedding technical concepts within real-world contexts and linking course content toprofessional applications through contextualization, educators have found ways to increasestudent engagement and connection to the field [17] - [22]. I. First-Year Engineering
coupling [17]) has led to non-uniform first year experiences for students and has also posed challenges for instructors. Thisabsence of standardization means first-year engineering students are not exposed to similar FYSexperiences, and new instructors lacked access to minimum standard learning objectives andenduring content for the course. Recognizing these issues, the Penn State COE established a task force tocomprehensively review and redesign its FYS courses. The outcomes of this initiative, asdetailed in this paper, resulted in the development of a new FYS model structured around 12 keymodules organized into three core themes: identity, possibility, and community. Byimplementing this redesigned FYS model, the COE at Penn State seeks to
instruction; most recently the ASEE-MAS 2025 Distinguished Teaching Award, the Excellence in Lower Division Undergraduate Instruction, and the Saul K. Fenster Award for Innovation in Engineering Education. His research focuses on preparing the next generation STEM workforce through student academic enrichment and workforce development training programs. For this, he has received multiple federal, state, local, and foundation grants. He is the Founding Director of NJIT’s Grand Challenges Scholars Program. He also has worked on several research projects, programs, and initiatives to help students bridge the gap between high school and college, community college and university, as well as to prepare students for the
1st year students and transfer students coming into the field of engineering. She is working to advance the field of engineering education through accessibility while also researching, developing, and integrating practices to support students’ growth in teamwork, leadership, communication, and meaningful engagement in the community. Through this effort, she also works to advance ways to integrate emerging technologies as productive tools to support student learning and assessment.Dr. Benjamin J. Laugelli, University of Virginia Dr. Laugelli is an Assistant Professor of Engineering and Society at the University of Virginia. He teaches courses that explore social and ethical aspects of engineering design and practice
of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Trisha Patnaik, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Experiential Activities Demonstrating Mass Transfer in Porous Materials in an Introductory Bioengineering CourseAbstractThis Complete Evidence Based Practice paper describes how hands-on experiential learning canbe utilized in an introductory bioengineering course to teach complex topics and help studentsfeel a sense of identity and belonging to the field. Bioengineering encompasses manymultidisciplinary concepts, techniques, and applications from other disciplines; as such, studentscan feel underqualified or ‘othered’ compared to their peers. This is
views learning through self-regulated learning, constructivist, and embodied cognition lenses. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Paper ID #47640Tiffany Reyes-Denis, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Tiffany Reyes Denis is a PhD graduate student in the Cognitive Science of Teaching and Learning division at the University of Illinois Urbana Champaign. She earned a BA in Education from the Interamerican University of Puerto Rico, and a MS in Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience from the University of Granada, Spain. Informed by her years as a public-school teacher, her research
and contributing to the solution of a real problem in a community where theyalready belong. The new service-learning project is an example of learning through situatedlearning, a theory of instruction that states that learning and knowledge building are connected tothe real-world situation where learning occurs [11], [12], [13]. The meaningful project allowsstudents to learn while doing with a community of classmates [11] an essential component ofsituated learning.This research seeks to answer the following question related to students’ persistence andretention in Civil Engineering: How does a service-learning project on campus influencestudents perceived self-efficacy, interest in programming and the perceived utility ofprogramming in civil
engineering degree programs to Southern Polytechnic in 2007 and 2008. Crimm has been a professor at Southern Polytechnic since 1997, serving in a multitude of roles as he continually seeks to savor the joys of teaching and learning from faculty, staff, and students. Crimm earned his undergraduate and graduate degrees in Electrical Engineering from Georgia Institute of Technology and is also a registered Professional Engineer in the State of Georgia having been recognized by this GSPE organization in 2019 as the overall ”Engineer of the Year” among the several highly competitive categories such as Education, Private Practice, Industry, Government, etc.Charles Richard Kennedy, Kennesaw State University Charles (Richard
) isuseful in first-year engineering courses by helping students develop critical thinking and problem-solving skills while making the learning process more engaging [5]. PBL in this context has beenshown to improve student’s understanding of how their engineering education fits within theirworldview. Similarly, in another study [6], integrating hands-on activities with practicalapplications enhances learning and helps students build higher levels of self-efficacy. This helpsstudent’s sense of belonging to the profession, increasing their commitment to staying in theengineering program. Student retention is highly related to the level of engagement, both social and academic.Helping students obtain a sense of belonging within their academic
prep classes to the Department of Defense community. His research interests include topics in structural engineering and engineering education. He serves as the Chair of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Committee on Education Chair and the American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) Partners in Education Committee Vice Chair. Additionally, he serves as the Head Officer Representative for Men’s Basketball. He is a licensed Professional Engineer in Virginia and a Project Management Professional.Kevin Taylor Scruggs Major Kevin T. Scruggs is a Senior Instructor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the United State Military Academy, West Point, NY. He earned a B.S. in Civil
McCormick Teaching Excellence Institute Research Fellow. Her research focuses on how identity, among other affective factors, influences diverse groups of students to choose engineering and persist in engineering. She also studies how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering foster or hinder belonging, motivation, and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education. Her research earned her a National Science Foundation CAREER Award focused on characterizing latent diversity, which includes diverse attitudes, mindsets, and approaches to learning to understand engineering students’ identity
provide support and resources to develop these skills. The goal of thisintegration is to ensure graduates go into industry or graduate programs equipped tocommunicate effectively with the ability to work on teams to support projects and solveproblems. The need for these skills is reflected in ABET Outcomes and by what employersindicate graduates need to succeed [1-3]. Despite these efforts, employers indicate that recentgraduates may not possess the needed skills to communicate and collaborate effectively [4-5].Furthermore, graduates may struggle to transition from academic to workplace settings. Thesechallenges demonstrate the need to examine how engineering educators support professionalskill development, understand the factors that influence
communities at every level—from P–12 to post-graduate studies. Her work spans engineering identity and mindsets, global and entrepreneurial competencies, failure culture, first-year experiences in engineering, capstone design thinking, and the integration of service and authentic learning into the classroom and developing future faculty. In addition, she is committed to implementing innovative instructional methodologies and optimizing design through both traditional and non-traditional manufacturing techniques.Dr. Yashin Brijmohan, Utah State University Yashin Brijmohan is a registered professional engineer and Assistant Professor Engineering Education at Utah State University. He is also an Executive committee member of
], [12]. This may involve framing ethics education aroundreal-world dilemmas, engagement with communities, personal narratives, or the livedexperiences of professionals [13]-[20].This study builds on the concept of the ‘living library’, a method originally designed tochallenge stereotypes through face-to-face engagement with ‘human books,’ seeking totranslate it within engineering ethics education. The paper reports on the use of living librarysessions in a sociotechnical course on Decisions Under Risk and Uncertainty offered at aDutch technological university. The course featured four guest speakers, who took the role ofstory tellers, sharing their personal trajectories and professional experiences with ethicalengineering and ethical dilemmas
: Ecodesign your Life”“Humanity-Centered Design: Ecodesign your Life” is a fully collaborative, team-taught courseconceived in response to an initial desire to collaborate between faculty in Modern Languages(MLL) and Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE) and a shared interest in reading anddiscussing the book, Design for a Better World: Meaningful, Sustainable, Humanity Centered(2023) by Don Norman [13]. The course evolved through discussion to become a locally-sourcedand humanity-centered general education course, which enables all students to broaden theirunderstanding of design from multiple disciplines and diverse perspectives with a focus on ourown lives, experiences, and stories of people, communities, and ecosystems. Students are
Proceedings of the 16th LACCEI International Multi-Conference for Engineering, Education, and Technology, 2018. [8] Leila Zahedi, Jasmine Batten, Monique Ross, Geoff Potvin, Stephanie Damas, Peter Clarke, and Debra Davis. Gamification in education: A mixed-methods study of gender on computer science students’ academic performance and identity development. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 33:441–474, 2021. [9] David Kim and Michael G Solomon. Fundamentals of Information Systems Security. Jones & Bartlett Learning, 3rd edition, 2016.[10] Ingrid A. Buckley, Janusz Zalewski, and Peter J. Clarke. Introducing a cybersecurity mindset into software engineering undergraduate courses. International Journal of Advanced
professional guidelines could help overburdenedlibrarians to begin exploring UDL-based accessibility practices. Requiring coursework ininclusive pedagogy for accreditation in LIS programs would ensure that librarians are introducedto accessibility concepts before they step into the classroom. Communities of practice anddiscussion groups are excellent forums to share ideas around implementing inclusive practices inlibrary instruction, reference work, and individual research consultations. Librarians withexpertise can lead efforts to educate their colleagues and promote inclusive strategies in librarywork. And all libraries interested in being more accessible can investigate collaborative effortswith other UDL practitioners on their campuses or in their
recognized the value of group work and collaborative problemsolving as an effective way of learning engineering concepts that inherently prepare youngengineers for what they will experience as practicing professional engineers [6]. Mercier et al.highlight how collaborative learning differs from cooperative learning, or when team memberslearn cooperatively by dividing the task into different elements and then building upon eachother’s results to accomplish the overall task. In the Boodler’s Pizzeria Case Study, studentslearn through collaboration by developing knowledge through shared performance of thelearning activities. Mercier et al. emphasize the value of collaborative learning in engineeringeducation as it increases student engagement
working with two-year degree grantinginstitutions to support pathways and developed new understanding of best practices forsupporting successful transfer from two-year institutions to baccalaureate completion.Specifically, the current transfer system at the lead institution, Kansas State University (K-State),encourages students to transfer in at the time that is the best fit for the individual. Depending onthe discipline, the most applicable time to transfer may be after 1 year, 1.5 years, or 2 years andis fully dependent upon coursework that is available at their transfer institution. Kansas StateUniversity works individually with each community college alliance institution to ensure thetransferability of coursework that would apply to a
develop and implementparticipatory action research (PAR) projects in their classrooms and disseminate their findings.They will also receive training in leadership, the Next Generation Science Standards,student-centered science instruction, and professional learning community facilitation. Theprogram aims to address Michigan's critical teacher shortage and improve science learningoutcomes by developing teacher leaders who can mentor novice teachers and driveimprovements in STEM education.Over 90 applications were received for the 30 available spots. The program began in January2025, with amaster's-seeking cohort beginning online coursework and a master’s-holding cohortbeginning professional development activities. The project's impact on