method to find survivors that have access to their phones and can connect to an automatedinternet source. Second, it's useful in hazardous situations like the Turkey earthquake, likementioned before. Third, it offers quick response to people, minimized lives blasting theaftermath.”Sub-theme 4: NoveltyThis sub-theme highlights participants acknowledging the novelty and uniqueness of their createdsolutions (e.g., how the product stands out).“Our project, Flowware, stands out by using ChatGPT API to offer smart, personalized financialmanagement while displaying your finances through react flow, creating a dynamic, real-timemap of your money.”Theme 2: Design and ApplicationThe design and application theme includes challenges, design considerations
mentees and randomly sorting each column independently to create a random butrepresentative set of mentees. The mentees were then manually paired to create the seeds formentoring groups. Sample student data was generated using a combination of generative AI(ChatGPT) and previous student data. Random student names were generated in ChatGPT byasking for a list of 100 random names from all ethnicities in the US with likely ethnicity and genderfor each name (ChatGPT only returned 98 entries). Gender was classified as Man or Woman with2% of the list being randomly classified with a gender of More to account for transgender and non-binary students. Sample student ethnicity was classified as one of: African American/Black, EastAsian/Asian American (e.g
required by employers. As more data and analytical methods becomeavailable, more aspects of the economy, society, and daily life will become dependent on data-driven decision-making. Recognizing this shift, the National Academies of Sciences (2018)emphasizes that academic institutions must prioritize developing "a basic understanding of datascience in all undergraduates" to prepare them for this new era [1]. This is particularly crucial forSTEM graduates, who must develop varying levels of expertise in working with data – the abilityto understand, interpret, and critically evaluate data, as well as to use data effectively to informdecisions. The recent emergence of large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT, which arebecoming increasingly
could focus on performing the jigsaw activities without thealumni present or the seminar series to see if the change in EM is similar and a larger sample sizeof students would benefit the study.AcknowledgmentsI would like to acknowledge the Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Family Foundation, Inc. and thetask force of leaders representing the Engineering Unleashed Faculty Development communitywho selected me for the KEEN Fellowship and provided the grant funds for the activities.Additionally, I would like to thank Dr. Douglas Hacker who performed the statistical analysesreported within. During the preparation of this work, I used ChatGPT in order to improve thereadability and concision of the document. After using ChatGPT, I reviewed and edited
Effects of Alcohol in Heat Transfer Fluid Flow and Heat Transfer Principles in ClimateIn addition to obtaining the “top-ranked” micromoments, we also examine the students’suggestions for future efforts. Examining the answers to question P5: What can be improved forfuture student-led micromoment presentations? and using AI (ChatGPT 4.0), five general themeswere obtained, including: “Alignment with class material, guidance and resources, timing andaccessibility, engagement and interaction, and open-ended creativity with practical constrains.” Ofsignificance in the alignment with class material, we found that presentations should connectdirectly with class topics to enhance understanding and relevance of the content. Also, studentsnoted that
for teaching 6th-grade Missouri math standards, incorporating project-based learning with LEGO Mindstorm cars and coordinate plane activities. These activities provide hands-on,engaging ways to connect coding with math standards, fostering both computational thinking and mastery ofgrade-level concepts. This provided a framework to implement advanced ML knowledge into STEM education bydeveloping practical methodologies to teach complex ML principles through easily accessible tools. For the high school students, an intentional choice was made to utilize Scratch, rather than Python for program-ming due to the influence of AI tools (such as ChatGPT) that can provide the entire Python code script. Scratchseemed a little more foolproof, as
ethical concerns, biases, andover-reliance on AI, which could undermine critical thinking and equitable access to education.E. Microlearning, AI-Driven Feedback, and Student EngagementAI-generated feedback has also emerged as a key enabler of personalized education. Escalantedemonstrated that AI tools provide concise, actionable guidance, aligning with the principles ofbite-sized learning [28]. Similarly, studies such as KOGI's application in programming educationand insights from ChatGPT in first-year engineering courses emphasize the value of modular,on-demand support in enhancing educational outcomes [29]. These works collectively reinforcethe importance of tailored educational resources, such as microlearning videos, in addressing thespecific
perceived growth and development of the student. In the latter case, manualcoding of the responses revealed which specific skills were acquired by the student and identifiedby the mentor but not by the student response, leading to a positive score discrepancy, or theareas which mentors identified as having room for improvement, leading to a negative scorediscrepancy.When considering the thematic content of all responses rather than focusing on those whichpresented with score discrepancies, coding and tallying of responses was complemented with theaid of the LLM ChatGPT (OpenAI, CA, USA). The use of LLMs in content analysis has beenpreviously shown to have good agreement with human results [12], [13]. In this study, ChatGPTwas prompted to identify
-5ct7-54du.[13] S. A. Athaluri, S. V. Manthena, V. S. R. K. M. Kesapragada, V. Yarlagadda, T. Dave, and R. T. S. Duddumpudi, “Exploring the Boundaries of Reality: Investigating the Phenomenon of Artificial Intelligence Hallucination in Scientific Writing Through ChatGPT References,” Cureus, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.7759/cureus.37432.[14] A. E. Greene, Writing Science in Plain English, Chicago, IL, USA: The University of Chicago Press, 2013.[15] G. R. Hess and E. N. Brooks, “The Class Poster Conference as a Teaching Tool,” Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 155–158, 1998, doi: 10.2134/jnrlse.1998.0155.[16] J. Schimel, Writing Science: How to Write Papers that Get Cited and Proposals
curriculum of our Computer Engineering program and require only basicknowledge of physics and calculus. For Arduino code, templates will be given and explained, soattendees can focus on the key concepts like A/D and D/A conversions, circuit modeling andperformance, feedback control, as well as Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) controller.The organizing faculty worked with the recruiting staff and started the preparation in latesummer of 2024. ChatGPT found a name for the workshop as ‘Circuit Breaker: Women inEngineering’; and Nov. 15 was chosen for this half-day hands-on free workshop from 12 to 4pm.We chose Nov. 15 since it was a Friday when community colleges in the area usually don’t offerclasses in the afternoon. Also, the Autumn quarter is
understanding and experience.Additionally, applying robust statistical methods is essential for tracking and analyzing studentperformance over time, ensuring that the effectiveness of the VR interventions can be measured andrefined for future improvement. IX. Suggested Survey QuestionsPlease rate your agreement with each statement using the following scale:*These questions were formatted and formulated with the help of ChatGPT: • 1 - Strongly Disagree • 2 - Disagree • 3 - Neutral • 4 - Agree • 5 - Strongly AgreeA. Learning and Understanding 1. The VR activities enhanced my understanding of complex mechanical concepts. 2. VR helped me visualize engineering problems better than traditional methods
allowed to use generative AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT) during anystage of the writing process or they could choose not to use them. If AI assistance was used,students were asked to include the following information in the Appendix of their reports: theprompt(s) used, and other details on how the AI-assisted content was incorporated or revised.This information was collected to ensure the accuracy of the report content and the authenticityof references.2.2 Instructor’s AssessmentA total of 48 draft reports (i.e., first submission) were evaluated for this study. Reports in whichstudents self-reported the Checklist were analyzed further for this study.3. Results and DiscussionAs mentioned earlier, the primary goal of this study was to evaluate the
question and wanted a simple answer. When that happened, they wanted to be able to turn off the AI temporarily or permanently. They coped by totally muting it. A better solution would be for the AI to have a feature like Alexa or Siri in which users can easily say “hey, stop”. That’s essential, according to students. • How the AI was responding to the surrounding speech. AI occasionally responded to not direct questions so if the student was talking through the lab as they completed the assignment, the AI would respond to a question that was not asked. • Students felt that the AI was trained on ChatGPT. Students were asking history questions to it, and it was answering with somewhat relevant
educators.By removing technical barriers while maintaining pedagogical quality, we aim to support moreefficient and effective assessment creation processes across engineering disciplines. Future workwill focus on measuring this impact through detailed evaluation of system adoption patterns andeducational outcomes.References[1] J. Hassell, "Best Practices for Using Generative AI to Create Quiz Content for the CanvasLMS," 2024 ASEE Midwest Section Conference, ASEE, 2024.[2] S. Willison, "Things we learned about LLMs in 2024," SimonWillison.net, Dec. 31, 2024.[Online]. Available: https://simonwillison.net/2024/Dec/31/llms-in-2024/.[3] J. Yang et al., "Harnessing the Power of LLMs in Practice: A Survey on ChatGPT andBeyond," ACM Transactions on Knowledge
limitation was that we used a general-purpose GPT-4 model without any fine-tunedhuman annotator. Fine-tuning GPT-4 with human-annotated LO evaluation based on theSMART criteria may improve the LLM's performance. The third limitation was that although weused the SMART criteria, its criteria needed to be refined and evaluated by educational experts.This process will help us to design better guidelines for evaluating learning objectives. Lastly,we only used 1 LLM model (i.e., GPT-4) to evaluate LOs. Therefore, exploring the efficacy ofother LLM models and comparing their ability to assess LOs is necessary.References:[1] E. Kasneci et al., “ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education,” Learn. Individ
. R. Adapa, and Y. E. V. P. K. Kuchi, “The Power of Generative AI: A Review of Requirements, Models, Input–Output Formats, Evaluation Metrics, and Challenges,” Future Internet, vol. 15, p. 260, 2023, doi: 10.3390/fi15080260.[15] A. K. Y. Chan and W. Hu, “Students’ voices on generative AI: perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education,” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 43, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s41239- 023-00411-8.[16] Tlili et al., “What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education,” Smart Learning Environments, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 15, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x.[17] M. S
CHATGPT prompt engineering method for automatic question generation in English education,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 11483–11515, Oct. 2023. doi:10.1007/s10639-023-12249-8[10] I. Coffee, “Anki FSRS Explained,” Anki-decks.com, 2024. https://anki-decks.com/blog/post/anki-fsrs-explained/ (accessed Apr. 29, 2025).[11] B. C. Figueras and R. Agerri, “Critical Questions Generation: Motivation and Challenges,” arXiv.org, 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.14335 (accessed Apr. 29, 2025).[12] S. Mucciaccia, T. Paixão, F. Mutz, A. De Souza, C. Badue, and T. Oliveira-Santos, “Automatic Multiple-Choice Question Generation and Evaluation Systems Based on LLM: A Study Case With University Resolutions
for educators and policymakers to enhance AI literacy among kindergarten teachers.IntroductionEducation, one of the industries most significantly impacted by rapid advancements in artificialintelligence (AI), is on the brink of a revolution. Since the introduction of generative AItechnologies in 2022, as demonstrated by ChatGPT and other platforms, the potential of thesetools to revolutionize a range of educational processes has come to light more and more [1]. AIenables a revolutionary change in education by utilizing its powers in data analysis, patternrecognition, and personalized feedback. In addition to improving teaching strategies, thistechnology is changing how students learn, encouraging participation and comprehension [2, 3
Metric Analysis of ‘The Future of Thinking Analysis of PBL Video (Part Two) Manifesto’ (Part One) AI Utilization The average AI-generated content of all AI tools were used to a lesser extent 15 students is about 80-85% generated for elaborating ideas and content using AI tools such as ChatGPT, primarily creation, complemented by for structuring, content creation and paraphrasing and incorporating research. The team relied heavily on class research papers. Around 30% of the content was AI-generated and later notes and ideas taught in class which were rephrased. As
., Kim, S.H., Lee, D. et al. Utilizing Generative AI for Instructional Design: Exploring Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats. TechTrends 68, 832–844 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-00967-w [4] Nikolic, S., Sandison, C., Haque, R., Daniel, S., Grundy, S., Belkina, M., … Neal, P. (2024). ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, SciSpace and Wolfram versus higher education assessments: an updated multi-institutional study of the academic integrity impacts of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) on assessment, teaching and learning in engineering. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 29(2), 126–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2024.2372154 [5] Subramanian, R., & Vidalis, S
, especially in individual project implementations. Group project work (maximum of two students per group) can help lower the required amount of interaction time. Moreover, hiring a Teaching Assistant (TA) can help lower the interaction time if hiring funds are available, which can be a challenge. Of course, finding a good TA for the job is also a challenge! Continuous creativity: To keep projects challenging and minimize cheating and copying past executed projects, creating new and varied project specifications can be challenging and time consuming. This issue is especially observed in courses that are offered frequently. Threat from AI: To ensure students are not using AI tools, such as ChatGPT, to find solutions for
. Lundberg, "An introduction to explainable AI with Shapley values," SHAP Documentation. [Online]. Available: https://shap.readthedocs.io/en/latest/example_notebooks/overviews/An%20introduction% 20to%20explainable%20AI%20with%20Shapley%20values.html [9] C. Piech et al., "Deep knowledge tracing," in Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., vol. 28, 2015. [10] A. M. Hasanein and A. E. E. Sobaih, "Drivers and consequences of ChatGPT use in higher education: Key stakeholder perspectives," Eur. J. Investig. Health Psychol. Educ., vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 2599–2614, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.3390/ejihpe13110181. [11] Y. Lu, D. Wang, P. Chen, and Z. Zhang, "Design and evaluation of trustworthy knowledge tracing model for intelligent tutoring
describe – all of whichare at the lowest two Bloom’s levels. Thus, it seems to be the case that the different standardsemphasize lower-order thinking skills.It is perhaps surprising given the recent expansion of AI technologies that the least paralleledCSTA standard concerns the implementation of AI algorithms. However, that expansion is sorecent – largely stemming from the November 2022 introduction of ChatGPT – that it has not yethad an impact on learning standards at scale. We anticipate that future iterations of state andCSTA standards will probably focus more on AI. Many states adopted their standards between2016 and 2022 – a narrow window in itself, with significant policy implications.Third, the most frequent difference between the state
processing, and transformer architectures and how they fit into larger systems • Generative adversarial networks and survey of AI methods (Bayesian reasoning, genetic algorithms, expert systems) and when they are used • Relationship with signal processing, pattern recognition, and data analytics • Open-source tools, data sourcing, licensing, and rights management • Data cleansing strategies and data cost estimation, including cost of data generation • LLMs, prompt engineering, ChatGPT, and organizational adoption and use • Multi-modal AI, agent-based models, and humanoid robotics • Computing infrastructure for AI, including compute requirements and platform selection • The disruptive impact of AI on the
efficacy.AcknowledgmentsWe utilized resources from Stanford University's "AI Playground" to explore and validate ourapproaches to incorporating AI tools into the feedback generation process. Through this portal,Anthropic's Claude.ai, version 3.5-Sonnet, helped automate the analysis of student reflectiveresponses by identifying general themes, common omissions, unique realizations, and evidenceof reflective practice. OpenAI's ChatGPT, version 4o, helped generate reflection scores forstudent responses, providing a quantitative measure of reflective practice. We thank thedevelopers of these tools which are available using the links below.https://aiplayground-prod.stanford.eduhttps://claude.aihttps://chat.openai.comReferences[1] T. Anderson and J. Shattuck, "Design
sampleBackground sections responding to the following problem statement: The McDonnell Douglas DC-10's outward-opening cargo door has a faulty locking mechanism that, upon failure, causes the door to open and the plane to explosively decompress. The project sponsor, a representative of McDonnell Douglas, has asked the design team to redesign the aft cargo door to prevent accidental opening during flight.Each background section was written with the aid of ChatGPT to simulate problems withrhetorical appropriateness and formatting and organization observed in students’ backgroundresearch sections in previous semesters. For example, the technical writing coordinator promptedChatGPT to write a background research section focused on types of cargo doors
like programming, where innovative methodologieshave outperformed traditional teaching methods [1], [2]. Adaptive learning technologies arecrucial for customizing educational experiences to meet diverse student needs, promotingflexibility and adaptability within VLEs. Implementing LLMs can enhance this adaptive learningby providing real-time feedback and support, fostering a more engaging educationalenvironment. Studies have shown that generative artificial intelligence tools, such as ChatGPT,can motivate students, increase participation, and offer individualized assistance, therebyimproving learning experiences[3], [4]. However, there are notable gaps in the practicalapplication of LLMs within VLEs, as many institutions struggle to integrate
Systematic Literature Review,” in Frontiers in Education 2024, Washington DC, Oct. 2024.[5] L. Labadze, M. Grigolia, and L. Machaidze, “Role of AI chatbots in education: systematic literature review,” Int J Educ Technol High Educ, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 56, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1186/s41239-023-00426-1.[6] B. Freeman and K. Aoki, “ChatGPT in education: A comparative study of media framing in Japan and Malaysia,” in Proceedings of the 2023 7th International Conference on Education and E-Learning, in ICEEL ’23. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, May 2024, pp. 26–32. doi: 10.1145/3637989.3638020.[7] S. Hadjerrouit, “Learning Management Systems Learnability: Requirements from Learning Theories,” presented at the