- Conference Session
- NSF Grantees Poster Session II
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Nigel Berkeley Kaye, Clemson University; Lisa Benson, Clemson University; Evan Taylor, Clemson University; Makayla Headley, Clemson University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
., Ingram, E., Riley, D., Rover, D., Salzman, N., & Sweeney, J. (2017). Talking about a Revolution: Overview of NSF RED Projects. Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and exposition, Columbus, OH.Miller, R. B., & Brickman, S. J. (2004). A Model of Future-Oriented Motivation. Educational Psychology Review. 16(1), 9–33. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000012343.96370.39Min, T., Zhang, G., Long, R. A., Anderson, T. J., & Ohland, M. W. (2011). Nonparametric Survival Analysis of the Loss Rate of Undergraduate Engineering Students. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(2), 349–373.Steif, P.S. and Dantzler, J.A. (2005), A Statics Concept Inventory: Development and Psychometric Analysis. Journal of Engineering
- Conference Session
- NSF Grantees Poster Session II
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Kay Wille, University of Connecticut; Connie Syharat, University of Connecticut; Arash Esmaili Zaghi P.E., University of Connecticut; Sarira Motaref P.E., University of Connecticut; Marisa Chrysochoou, University of Missouri - Columbia
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
project has set the stage for lasting cultural transformation. Sustaining these gainswill require ongoing commitment despite leadership transitions and funding shifts. Futureresearch should examine long-term student outcomes and faculty engagement, while broaderadoption of this model could promote systemic change in engineering education.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1920761. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. References[1] S. M. Lord et al, "Talking about a revolution