0 focus group 6 interviews 8 interviews Table 1: Summary of study data collected to dateWhat is the process of developing engineering identity in doctoral students (primarily,researcher identity)? (RQ1)Analysis of the Rounds 1 and 2 journey mapping data7-8 revealed that, early in their programs,the doctoral students in the study relied primarily on formal, curricular structure, includingcourse-based research projects, to establish their researcher identity (see RQ3 below).Preliminary results also suggested that doctoral student identification of and engagement with afaculty advisor in early doctoral program semesters promotes researcher identity development.When the combination of code frequency and
operationalized them for theengineering design context. While not intended to be exhaustive, these categories, listed below,served as a framework for guiding both the intervention and analysis. Their primary aim was toencourage students to examine several ways in which unconscious processes influence and biasdecision-making. 1. The Views of the People Around Us: How people may be influenced by their social environment and how it may be difficult to not conform to majority views. 2. Human Error and the Limits of Our Perception: The impact of “blind spots” in our perception due to limitations around what we are allowed or able to observe. 3. Internal Beliefs and Biases: This includes heuristics, quick assumptions our mind makes
adaptation process progressed, we systematically aligned the COMM-FLOWS tool itemswith both the theoretical framework guiding the study and the lived communication experiencesof graduate students. This alignment was essential to ensure that the tool accurately captured therealities of communication in graduate education while remaining grounded in Self-Determination Theory (SDT). To achieve this, we conducted an item-construct mapping toconfirm SDT alignment, cross-checked items against graduate student communicationexperiences, and revised or eliminated items that did not fit theoretical expectations or practicalapplications. This process ensured that the COMM-FLOWS tool authentically reflected thevoices of graduate students while maintaining its
Paso Jennifer Ramos-Chavez, Ph.D., is a Postdoctoral Researcher at the University of Texas at El Paso where she studies the intersection between the environment, energy and education. Specifically, her research focuses on community-based participatory research and community-centered outreach. She is interested in understanding how student perceptions and behaviors are influenced by immersive environmental and engineering education programming. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Developing and Piloting a High School Engineering Design Course with Environmental Justice and Geospatial Visualization (Evaluation)AbstractThis paper describes the
be a difficult journey that is characterized by trial and error, moments of confusion,and periods of frustration. Computer science educators often resort to assignments andexamination scores to assess students’ level of understanding, which often results in late 1and untimely intervention that could prevent early dropouts and high failure rates. Earlyidentification of when and why students are struggling during the process of coding is essentialfor both timely intervention and effective teaching. This is particularly important for largeclasses, where individualized attention is practically impossible.To address this problem, we develop and evaluate an analytical tool that leverages keystrokedata
engineering from Case Western Reserve University, a M.S.E in mechanical engineering from Temple University, and a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Drexel University. She completed a post-doctoral fellow in orthopedic biomechanics at the Mayo Clinic. Dr. Ringleb conducts research in the area of musculoskeletal biomechanics in vivo, in vitro, and in silica, human factors, and engineering education. She also serves as the Associate Dean of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Access in the Batten College of Engineering and Technology.Dr. Orlando M Ayala, Old Dominion University Dr. Ayala received his BS in Mechanical Engineering with honors (Cum Laude) from Universidad de Oriente (Venezuela) in 1995, MS in Mechanical
science and human considerations. The National Academyof Engineering (NAE) frequently emphasizes the complexity of modern engineering challenges,such as in their report Grand Challenges for Engineering [1]. As engineering challenges becomeincreasingly complex, there’s been a notable rise in interest in engineering education research.More and more engineering education programs have been developed in the US, which havedeveloped dedicated programs to focus on engineering education research. The number ofgraduate and doctoral degrees awarded in the U.S. has risen since the early 21st century [2], andwhile engineering and education have long produced PhDs, recent technological advancementshave significantly reshaped the PhD process [3]. The
Paper ID #46808Engaging your Industrial Advisory Board to promote Industrial Connectionsfor Student EngagementDr. Kauser Jahan, Rowan University Kauser Jahan, is Professor and Head of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Rowan University. Kauser received her B.S.C.E. from the Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, an MSCE from the University of Arkansas, Fayetteville and a Ph.D. from the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. Kauser is a leader and innovator in the area of curriculum development. This is evidenced by her high teaching scores, excellent student evaluations, teaching awards, publications on
. His research interests focus on robotics, XR, and other emerging technologies in education. Dr. Fegely has served as a co-chair of the X Realities and Learning SIG for the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education (SITE).Dr. George W Hitt, Coastal Carolina University George Wesley Hitt received the Ph.D. degree from Michigan State University with a concentration in nuclear physics. His dissertation research was on charged-particle spectroscopy for measuring astrophysically important properties of radioactive nuclei. Following his Ph.D., he was a Post-Doctoral Scholar with the National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory and was later part of the founding faculty of the Khalifa University of
Paper ID #47854Snackable Study: Boosting Micro-learning with Bite-Size VideosSri Krishna Chaitanya Velamakanni, Pennsylvania State University Sri Krishna Chaitanya is a Software Engineer at Walmart, where he focuses on enterprise backend payment applications. He holds a Master’s degree in Computer Science from The Pennsylvania State University. His research interests lie at the intersection of Natural Language Processing (NLP), financial technology (fintech), and the applications of Large Language Models (LLMs).Suman Saha, Pennsylvania State University Suman Saha received a Ph.D. degree in computer science from Pierre and