for Engineering Education, 2012Best Practices in Creating and Running Research Experience ProgramsAbstractResearch experience projects for undergraduates, teachers, community colleges, and K-12students have increased in recent years. The properly designed and executed projects have thepotential to not only expose the participants to the advanced research environment and provideengagement opportunities in exciting scientific activities, but also their positive impacts enhancethe project faculty and graduate assistant career developments.This paper describes various planning and management aspects of different research experienceprograms that target a wide spectrum of audiences from K-12 to undergraduate students. Theexperiences are described
graduate science content courses are being piloted for this program. Thesecourses were based on the AAAS’ Benchmarks for Science Literacy Clusters in the PhysicalSetting, the Designed World, and the Nature of Technology. Each of the five courses isintroduced through the perspective of a contemporary issue in which science and engineeringplay a paramount role, such as energy consumption and climate change. Scientific inquiry andthe engineering design process are embedded within each course as vehicles to promote 21stcentury skills, particularly critical thinking, problem-solving, innovation and creativity. Forinstance, as part of the Energy Production and Consumption Course, teachers created a plan forimproving the energy efficiency of their homes
,” which is building an online history of the development of the NSDL. She is also PI on ”Learning from the Best: How Award Winning Courseware has Impacted Engineering Education.” This research focuses on determining how high quality courseware is being disseminated and how it is impacting the culture of engineering education as measured by changes in student learning, teaching practices, and the careers of the authors of these materials.Prof. Joseph G. Tront, Virginia TechSarah Giersch, Broad-based Knowledge, LLC Sarah Giersch is a Consultant for Broad-based Knowledge, LLC (BbK), where she conducts quantita- tive and qualitative evaluations for BbK’s higher education clients. Giersch also consults in the areas of
for accessibility, and engineering design education.Dr. Olga Pierrakos, James Madison University Olga Pierrakos is an Associate Professor and founding faculty member in the School of Engineering, which is graduating its inaugural class May 2012, at James Madison University. Pierrakos holds a B.S. in engineering science and mechanics, an M.S. in engineering mechanics, and a Ph.D. in biomedical en- gineering from Virginia Tech. Her interests in engineering education research center around recruitment and retention, engineering design instruction and methodology, learning through service (NSF EFELTS project), understanding engineering students through the lens of identity theory (NSF BRIGE grant), advancing problem
AC 2012-3473: BIOMIMICRY INNOVATION AS A TOOL FOR DESIGNDr. Terri M. Lynch-Caris, Kettering University Terri Lynch-Caris, Ph.D., P.E., is an Associate Professor in the Industrial and Manufacturing Department at Kettering University and a registered Professional Engineer in the state of Michigan. She serves as the Director for the Center of Excellence in Teaching and Learning at Kettering. Her areas of interest in teaching and research include ergonomics and human modeling, statistics, work design and lean princi- ples, supply chain management, and environmental sustainability.Dr. Jonathan Weaver, University of Detroit MercyDr. Darrell K. Kleinke, University of Detroit Mercy Darrell Kleinke has more than 25 years of
establishing the revolutionary EDI/EFT payment system implemented by General Motors. He is a two-time award winner of the Best Paper in Cash Management awarded by the Bank Administration Institute.Mr. James Edwin Cawthorne Jr., Purdue University, West LafayetteMr. Benjamin Ahn, Purdue University, West Lafayette Benjamin Ahn is a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. His research interests relate to higher education reform, graduate teaching assistants’ roles in engineering classes, undergraduate engineering syllabus and curriculum development, and professional engineering practices in universities and industries.Dr. Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University, West Lafayette Matthew W. Ohland
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Integrating The Charrette Process into Engineering Education: A Case Study on a Civil Engineering Capstone CourseABSTRACTAs engineering educators rethink the structure and value of capstone courses, many have turnedto practical applications. In order to reflect the recent approaches within engineering, capstonecourses can be enhanced through the integration of charrettes. Charrettes are hands-on,collaborative sessions where stakeholders come to a design consensus. These sessions provideopportunities for students to improve communication, technical evaluation, teamwork, peerevaluation and professionalism skills. This research provides a framework for adapting thecharrette
AC 2012-4351: ENGINEERING FACULTY ENGAGEMENT IN LEARN-ING THROUGH SERVICE SUMMIT: BEST PRACTICES AND AFFINITYMAPPINGDr. Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Angela Bielefeldt has been a professor in the Department of Civil, Environmental, & Architectural Engi- neering at the University of Colorado, Boulder, since 1996. She has taught first-year introductory courses, senior capstone design, and specialty senior-level/graduate courses in environmental engineering. Her research interests in engineering education have focused on service learning, sustainability, and ethics.Prof. Kurt Paterson P.E., Michigan Technological University Kurt Paterson, Associate Professor of civil and environmental
sustainability were alsoconsidered. From the professional review, one practicing engineer wrote “best overall design,well thought out, all via a Skype connection to the client in Vermont.”One particularly challenging building project was a two-story restaurant with a wrap-arounddeck on top of a mountain at Sunday River ski center in Newry, Maine. The team had to learnbasic architecture, analyze the structure, design key structural members, design a water andwastewater system, analyze rock samples from the site location, and compare costs between thedifferent design options. In addition to the extreme structural loading aspects on top of amountain, the water and wastewater system designs were particularly daunting because of thelarge elevation
as an organization that works for the future of education has established some guidelines to be applied on the design of engineering programs.The guide lines are the result of researches as well experience designing and implementingengineering programs: • The programs should be flexible; • Have more practical activities; • Internships as a way to provide real experience in engineering; • International Experience. Page 25.542.7The formation of the engineer must consider above all: • the strong basis in basic sciences and basic sciences of engineering • the programs should also instigate the students the willing to develop
will bedeveloped from practicing innovation stage development projects and observing and recordingbest practices from successful outcomes.Rose-Hulman Ventures, a technology commercialization program, is described where corporatepartners bring concepts, research results, and intellectual property and teams of faculty, staff, andstudents develop designs, models, and prototypes as part of the commercialization process. Overten years of operation, the program has worked with hundreds of industrial clients in a broadrange of industry segments. These projects come after the research stage and fall in the criticalinnovation stage of development where technologies are prepared for success in the marketplace.Through these projects, several guiding
AC 2012-5293: EXAMINING THE EXPLANATORY VARIABLES THATIMPACT GRADUATE ENGINEERING STUDENT ENROLLMENTDr. Manoj K. Jha, Morgan State University Manoj K. Jha is professor and Founding Director of the Center for Advanced Transportation and Infras- tructure Engineering Research (CATIER) in the Department of Civil Engineering at the Morgan State University, Baltimore, Md., USA. He obtained a Ph.D. in civil engineering with transportation special- ization from the University of Maryland, College Park in 2000; a M.S. degree in mechanical engineering from the Old Dominion University in 1993; and a B.E. degree in mechanical engineering from the Na- tional Institute of Technology, Durgapur, India, in 1991. He also attended the
SMSor MMS sometimes have a difficult time sending a message for the first time, they rarely havedifficulty viewing a message that was sent to them.c. examples of current cell podium mobile multimedia outreach trial(s)Cell Podium was recently awarded a Small Business Innovation Research contract from theCenters for Disease Control (CDC) Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response todevelop and evaluate m-outreach tools for preparedness and response that supplement textmessaging with multimedia. In just a few months, CDC deployed Cell Podium’s m-outreachtechnology in two campaigns. In the first campaign, the CDC Emergency Operations Center ispushing videos to the cell phones of health care workers in Haiti that describe the guidelines
. Page 25.800.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Integrating Innovative Pedagogies into Engineering Economics CoursesAbstractIn this paper, we make a case for incorporating high-impact practices into the engineeringeconomics classroom as a way to increase student engagement, learning and performance.Wherever possible, we tie proposals to our own experiences. In some cases, the practices werefer to are extant in the education literature, but not ones that we have tried as yet; however, weplan to examine them in upcoming semesters and, possibly, incorporate them into our ownclassrooms. We also indicate how several of these practices help meet the requirements ofagencies that accredit engineering
the U.S. Military Academy, West Point, N.Y. He received his B.S. from the U.St. Military Academy, M.Phil. in engineering from the University of Cambridge, and M.S. in civil engineering from Stanford University. His research interests include sustainable design, construction, infrastructure systems, and engineering education.Lt. Col. Steven D. Hart, U.S. Military Academy Steve Hart is a Lieutenant Colonel in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers with more than 23 years of service in both command and staff positions in Iraq, Kuwait, Panama, Germany, Korea, and the United States. He is currently assigned as the ERDC Engineering Fellow and Director of Infrastructure Studies in the Center for Innovation and Engineering
Department of Mechanical Engineering at Northwestern University. Dr. McKenna’s research focuses on understanding the cognitive and social processes of design, design teaching and learning, the role of adaptive expertise in design and innovation, the impact and diffusion of education innovations, and teaching approaches of engineering faculty. Dr. McKenna received her B.S. and M.S. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Drexel University and Ph.D. from the University of California at Berkeley.Betty J Harper, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Betty Harper is the director of Student Affairs Research and Assessment at Penn State. Prior to assuming this role, Betty worked in Penn State’s Center for the Study of
1) and Outcome (See Table 2) or as “Not Cyberlearning”. Here is an example with the keypieces of information highlighted in red: The Society for Neuroscience is establishing ERIN, Educational Resources in Neuroscience, a Web-based portal that will enable faculty who teach neuroscience to list, review, and rate materials they use in their teaching. It will help faculty share information about resources that are effective in specific undergraduate courses, as well as create a community of practice in which faculty can exchange syllabi, lab exercises, and ideas about innovative approaches to teaching and learning. Materials will be peer reviewed for scientific validity and educational
AC 2012-5247: A NEW VISION FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN INSTRUC-TION: ON THE INNOVATIVE SIX COURSE DESIGN SEQUENCE OFJAMES MADISON UNIVERSITYDr. Olga Pierrakos, James Madison University Olga Pierrakos is an Associate Professor and founding faculty member in the School of Engineering, which is graduating its inaugural class May 2012, at James Madison University. Pierrakos holds a B.S. in engineering science and mechanics, an M.S. in engineering mechanics, and a Ph.D. in biomedical en- gineering from Virginia Tech. Her interests in engineering education research center around recruitment and retention, engineering design instruction and methodology, learning through service (NSF EFELTS project), understanding engineering
. Breakthrough: Stories and Strategiesof RadicalInnovation: MIT press.[18] Leifer, L. 2005. Center for Design Research at Stanford University, Design Process Improvement—A Review of Current Practice. Clarkson, P. Eckert, C. (Eds). 522-526.[19] Taylor, S. & Karanian, B. Working Connection: The Relational Art of Leadership. Aesthesis. 2008.[20] Karanian, B., Taylor, S. & Skogstad, P. 2008. Engineer as entrepreneurial leader: an artistic balancing act. National ASEE Meeting and Proceedings, Pittsburgh, PA.[21] Barry, M. Innovation as a Learning Process: Embedding Design Thinking. CA Mgt. Review, 2007[22] Karanian, B., & Kress, G. (2010). “Tell/Make/Engage: Actions for Innovation.” InProceedings of the 40th anniversary
AC 2012-3761: CAPSTONE DESIGN FACULTY MOTIVATION: MOTIVA-TIONAL FACTORS FOR TEACHING THE CAPSTONE DESIGN COURSEAND MOTIVATIONAL INFLUENCES ON TEACHING APPROACHESCory A. Hixson, Virginia Tech Cory A. Hixson is a graduate student in engineering education at Virginia Tech. Previous experience is in audio/visual engineering and K-12 math/science education. His research interests are in faculty motiva- tion, entrepreneurship, design education, K-12 engineering/STEM education, and research to practice in engineering educationDr. Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is an Associate Professor of engineering education at Virginia Tech, where she co-directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center
University of Ulster in Northern Ireland, M.Sc. (1995) in research methods in psychology from the University of Strathclyde in Scotland and a Ph.D. (2003) in psychology from South Bank University, London. She is currently Project Manager for the MemphiSTEP project at the University of Memphis,a project funded by the National Science Foundation, designed to increase the number of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics graduates. She is also a Co-PI on the Transforming a Civil Engineering curriculum through Geographic Information Systems Project at the University of Memphis, also funded by the National Sci- ence Foundation. Best has an extensive research background and served as lead researcher on a range of
mentors interactand develop their working relationship. For instance, at the University of Texas at Austin theGraduates Linked with Undergraduates in Engineering or GLUE program links 24undergraduates in their 2nd and 3rd years with graduate student research mentors each springsemester. GLUE is well known locally and is cited as the reason many GLUE alumni have foundsuccessful careers in engineering industry as well as academia, and is renowned for providingwomen and underrepresented minorities with valuable community-enriching experience [9].Despite the existence of GLUE and other undergraduate mentoring programs discussed here,there still remains a lack of peer-reviewed studies that describe the best practices and necessaryattributes for
added questions to explore issues of creativity,innovation, aesthetics, teaming and organizational approaches. The survey tool is shown infigure 8. Each survey issue was rated according to the ease and/or difficulty that the individual Page 25.162.6 Issue A little Somewhat A lot 1 2 3 4 5 Impact of R and D in generating successful design Opportunity for innovative concepts Role that aesthetics played in the design Utility of design documentation to construct
AC 2012-4640: ”WHAT COUNTS FACTORS”: PREPARING ENGINEER-ING STUDENTS TO INNOVATE THROUGH LEADERSHIP OF MULTI-FUNCTIONAL TEAMSDr. Mark Schar, Stanford University Mark Schar works in the Center for Design Research at Stanford University, he is a member of the Sym- biotic Project of Affective Neuroscience Lab at Stanford University, and he is a lecturer in the School of Engineering. Schar’s area of research is the intersection of design thinking and the neuroscience of choice where he has several research projects underway. He has a 30-year career in industry as a Vice President with the Procter & Gamble Company and Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer with Intuit in Silicon Valley. Schar has a B.S.S
. UTeachEngineering responded tothis charge by convening a course design team comprising engineering faculty, clinicalengineering faculty (professionals with experience as both practicing engineers and secondaryclassroom teachers), engineering research fellows, and learning sciences faculty. Incorporatingfeedback from high school teachers involved in an earlier pilot project, this team undertook arigorous, 18-month course design process.Defining the Target Student Audience for Engineer Your WorldThe target student audience for Engineer Your World was defined by the opportunity to whichthe UTeachEngineering project has responded: the approval of Engineering Design and ProblemSolving to be offered for fourth-year science credit to students in an academic track
response process validity of tests and instruments.Ms. Kirsten Susan Hochstedt, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Kirsten Hochstedt is a Graduate Assistant at the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education. She received her M.S. in educational psychology, with an emphasis in educational and psy- chological measurement, at Penn State and is currently a doctoral candidate in the same program. The primary focus of her research concerns assessing the response structure of test scores using item response theory methodology.Prof. Elizabeth C. Kisenwether, Pennsylvania State University, University Park
; Heggelund, M. (2008). Toward a global PhD? : forces and forms in doctoral education worldwide. Seattle: Center for Innovation and Research in Graduate Education, University of Washington : In association with University of Washington Press. 3. Nerad, M. (2004). The PhD in the US: Criticisms, Facts, and Remedies. Higher Education Policy, 17, 183- 199. 4. Golde, C. M. (2006). Preparing Stewards of the Discipline. In C. M. W. G. E. Golde (Ed.), Envisioning the future of doctoral education : preparing stewards of the discipline Carnegie essays on the doctorate (pp. p.450 cm.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, A Wiley Imprint. 5. Austin, A. E., Sorcinelli, M. D., & McDaniels, M. (2007). Understanding New
Engineering Research and Learning (INSPIRE). Page 25.680.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Graduate Teaching Assistant Written Feedback on Student Responses to Problem Identification Questions within an Authentic Engineering ProblemI. IntroductionGraduate Teaching Assistants (GTAs) have a considerable role in teaching and mentoringundergraduate students, especially in large enrollment programs. With the growinginterest in student-centered learning, GTAs are expected to co-teach these classes due tothe demanding role of full faculty in other academic
identifying the people and programs already bringing positive change around the world, we empower them to extend their reach, deepen their impact and fundamentally improve society.”8There are large efforts underway to systematically address the development of socialentrepreneurs, for example at Duke University’s Fuqua School of Business, they present aconcept that indicates that the social entrepreneur is a development of the traditionalentrepreneur by identifying the difference: “We should build our understanding of social entrepreneurship on this strong tradition of entrepreneurship theory and research. Social entrepreneurs are one species in the genus entrepreneur. They are entrepreneurs with a social mission. However
, wedecided to step up to the challenge of shaping courses and key experiences that would develophighly competent technical leaders.We created and delivered a series of leadership courses for graduate students in our School ofEngineering with excellent results, and have reported on these in several previous articles(Millam and Bennett 2004, 2011c,d), (Bennett and Millam 2011a,b) and a book (Bennett andMillam 2012). In the course of this work, we felt a strong need to find out what otherengineering schools and universities were doing to ensure their graduates were fluent in theirunderstanding and practice of leadership. Our research, utilizing a simple survey of deans ofengineering schools, was designed to determine how widespread the interest was in