Asee peer logo
Displaying all 2 results
Conference Session
ChemE Potpourri
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
David L. Silverstein, University of Kentucky; Lisa G. Bullard, North Carolina State University; Margot A. Vigeant, Bucknell University
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
meeting. Welcome to the 2011 AIChE How We Teach survey. This year we will be seeking to develop a picture of how Material & Energy Balances (MEB) are taught across North America. There are 52 questions in this survey Part 0: Your information Before we begin, we ask that you please provide us with your current course syllabus and schedule. Please send these items to SilverDL@engr.uky.edu. We have a few questions about the person completing this survey and other personnel involved in the course. 1 [1-Respondant]What is your name? Please write your answer here: 2 [2-Email]What is your e-mail address? * Please write your answer here
Conference Session
New Classrooms, New Challenges II: Assessing Non-traditional Approaches
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Matthew Cooper, North Carolina State University; Lisa G. Bullard, North Carolina State University; Steven W. Peretti, North Carolina State University; David F. Ollis, North Carolina State University
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
may be suitable for identifying gross instances of plagiarism. A complicatingfactor is that during the semester plagiarism screening software was used, students wereinformed in the syllabus and on the first day of class that their papers were being screened forplagiarism prior to submission. This information likely provided additional encouragement forstudents to avoid malicious plagiarism in fear of penalty, which may in itself be a benefit of theuse of plagiarism screening software. Table 3. Number of instances of malicious and non-malicious plagiarism identified before and after using plagiarism screening software. Malicious instances of plagiarism Non-malicious instances of plagiarism Course