variety of “publics” can be affected in different ways. 2. Competence of engineers – Ensuring professionals are only working in their areas of competence in an environment where engineering projects rely on the collaborative effort of interdisciplinary teams of engineers. 3. Communication - Ensuring honesty across various cultures with different languages and communication practices. 4. Avoidance of conflicts of interest or unfair competition – Ensuring that an engineer’s merit and judgment are not influenced by external factors that change the intentions of their professional duties, regardless of locally acceptable social practices. 5. Interpretation of confidentiality – Ensuring the explicit protection of
other scholarly journals. Canary is Co-principal In- vestigator for two inter-disciplinary projects of graduate ethics education, funded by the National Science Foundation. Her other research foci include organizational and family communication, particularly as those processes co-influence each other in contexts of disability, health, and public policies.Dr. Joseph R. Herkert, Arizona State University Joseph R. Herkert, D.Sc., P.E., is Lincoln Associate Professor of ethics and technology in the School of Letters and Sciences and the Consortium for Science, Policy & Outcomes at Arizona State University. He has taught engineering ethics and related courses for nearly 25 years. His work on engineering ethics has
AC 2012-5106: ON INTEGRATING APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY RE-SPONSIVE TO COMMUNITY CAPABILITIES: A CASE STUDY FROMHAITIDr. William Joseph Frey, University of Puerto Rico, Mayagez William Frey teaches business, computer, and engineering ethics at the University of Puerto Rico, Mayagez. For several years, he directed the university’s Center for Ethics in the Professions. His interests, besides practical and professional ethics, include moral pedagogy and moral psychology. He is active in the So- ciety for Ethics Across the Curriculum and the Association for Practical and Professional Ethics and has presented and participated in workshops at ASEE since 2000. He is also a Co-investigator on the project Graduate Research and
AC 2012-5580: WEB 2.0 ETHICS EDUCATION: PATENTS AND COPY-RIGHT FOR STEM STUDENTSDr. Christa Walck, Michigan Technological University Christa Walck, Ph.D., was Principal Investigator on the ethics education project funded by the National Science Foundation. She is Associate Provost at Michigan Technological University, where she also served as Dean of the School of Business and Economics and Interim Director of the Van Pelt and Opie Library. Her current interests include assessment of student learning and organizational change.Dr. Jacqueline E. Huntoon, Michigan Technological University Jacqueline Huntoon is Associate Provost and Dean of the Graduate School at Michigan Technological University. She served as the
AC 2012-5438: ETHICAL ISSUES AWARENESS FOR ENGINEERS INPRACTICEDr. A. Dean Fontenot, Texas Tech University A. Dean Fontenot directs a professional development center for K-12 teachers as part of the Texas STEM (T-STEM) initiative in order to bring about educational reform in secondary schools. The Texas Tech T-STEM Center focuses on project-based learning with the integration of the engineering design process. As Senior Director, she has brought together three Texas Tech professional development centers that have a history of training teachers, and built partnerships with five Educational Service centers as well as other organizational and industry partners who help implement the professional development training
engineering ethics education. Thus, we presentone possibility of how this challenge can be met. It is an educational approach that includesfour main components:1) Learning materials that describe a case from a multitude of perspectives2) A different set of learning materials that refer to technologies which are not yet available and that pose unique challenges, especially with regard to identifying and imagining, first of all, possibly involved stakeholders and affected populations3) An educational environment in which small groups of students collaborate on projects and present and discuss the results in class. This component is motivated by research that supports the effectiveness of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) and collaborative learning
engineering. MechanicalEngineering, in particular, is a discipline representing great potential in terms of advancingsustainable solutions to our global environmental problems. Yet, the majority of design projectsrely on fossil fuels and old technologies that will continue to add CO2 to the atmosphere. Thus,Mechanical Engineering offers a space for increased attention to sustainability.We surveyed sophomore Mechanical Engineering students in an energy systems design class togauge their views on sustainability and its importance to engineering. This represents thepreliminary phase of a multi-year project on organizational change in the MechanicalEngineering Department. Results from this study will help us develop a targeted, integratedcurriculum
possess the technical talent to compete in industry, government, and academia. Prior to joining Tuskegee, Burge was Dean at the Defense Systems Management College (DSMC), Vice Commander of Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corps (AFROTC), member of the Defense Secretary and Air staffs, Pentagon, Division Chief, National Security Agency (NSA), and Operations Officer for Secretary of the Air Force Special Projects. The Air Force held his services for 27 years, and retired Burge as Colonel (O-6) in 1999. He has served on the advisory board for the National Science Foundation (NSF) Engineering Di- rectorate, the Advisory Committee on Government Performance Assessment, Northwestern University McCormick School of
Education sets a high bar for engineering educators. It states 4:“…To educate students to cope with ethical problems, the first task of the teacher is to makestudents aware of ethical problems and help them learn to recognize them. A second task is tohelp students understand that their projects affect people for good or ill, and that, as “moralagents” they need to understand and anticipate these effects. A third task is to help students seethat, as moral agents, they are responsible for helping to develop solutions to the ethicalproblems they encounter…”These directives on inclusion of ethics in engineering education have garnered a great deal ofinterest in formulating exactly what elements of ethics belong in the engineer’s ethics
-authorship status. Fourth, the authorsanalyze the ethical issues governing status of authorship. Fifth, the authors propose a frameworkfor defining and refining co-authorship guidelines through analysis and evaluation.2. Types of AuthorshipWork to date has established types of co-author relationships that range from the classic exampleof partners in research such as Watson and Crick to department heads adding their name to allworks that originate in their departments.The Gift or Honorary AuthorshipIn this type of arrangement, those authors who have done the actual design, conduct, and writingof the research decide to bestow co-author status on someone who has had little or no affiliationwith the project [1]. This is a form of honorary authorship
infringements. Depending onthe seriousness the faculty member may give a zero on a question, test or project,or can award a failing grade for the course. If the faculty member feels that it iswarranted, a full review board may be asked to determine a more stringentresolution: including, suspension or dismissal. Likewise, the student can eitheragree on the resolution offered by the faculty member, or they can raise the issueto a review board where resolution can be any or all of those previously listed.These students agreed to take the failing grade. Subsequent integrity failuresresult in suspension or dismissal and are adjudicated at the Integrity Officer level. Page
AC 2012-2939: PLUMBERS AND PROFESSIONALISMDr. Marilyn A. Dyrud, Oregon Institute of Technology Marilyn Dyrud is a Full Professor in the Communication Department at Oregon Institute of Technology and regularly teaches classes in business and technical writing, public speaking, rhetoric, and ethics. She is part of the faculty team for the Civil Engineering Department’s integrated senior project. She is active in ASEE as a regular presenter, moderator, and paper reviewer; she has also served as her campus’ representative for 17 years, as Chair of the Pacific Northwest Section, and as section newsletter Editor. She was named an ASEE Fellow in 2008, and two years later received the McGraw Award. Currently, she is on
, network engi- neering, fiber optic communications, technology and society, and project management. He also advises students on their senior design projects. He is author of ”The Telecommunications Fact Book, 2E,” ”Nan- otechnology: Ethical and Social Implication,” and co-author of ”Technology and Society: Crossroads to the 21st Century,” ”Technology and Society: A Bridge to the 21st Century,” and ”Technology and Society: Issues for the 21st Century and Beyond.” He is a member of ASEE and a Senior Member of IEEE.Dr. Aram Agajanian, DeVry University, Chicago Aram Agajanian is a Senior Professor at DeVry University in Chicago. He holds a B.S. in electrical en- gineering from the University of Rochester, a M.S. in
development of novel materials for biomedical/biological applications and energy integration. Projects in her laboratory include thin film and nanofiber material growth and characterization for biocompatible RF and energy harvesting devices; nanolaminated materials for thermal energy storage; and nanofiber filters, sensors, and channels. Currently, she is advising four undergraduates, two M.S. students, and five Ph.D. students. Her expertise/laboratory capabilities include chemical vapor deposition (CVD); atomic layer deposition (ALD); electrospinning; material/film characterization: AFM, XRD, SEM, TEM, C-V measurements, and FTIR; and device fabrication: sensors, capacitors, inductors, filters, and detectors, working at
thatstudents can easily relate to. The example is built on a very simple question of whether thestudent would accept a job offer from a company under certain conditions.IntroductionEthics, social responsibility, and trust are critical issues for all professions in the builtenvironment including design, architecture, engineering and construction. Stakeholders ofbuilding construction projects recognize the importance of these issues through the creation ofthe codes of ethics and professional conduct. These codes are generally defined and enforcedthrough licensing organizations, professional societies or within individual companies or firms.For the built environment professions, the American Institute of Architect’s Code of Ethics andProfessional Conduct
, which compares general engineeringprograms in the United States [2]. Examples of universities in this category include HarveyMudd, Swarthmore, Smith College and ASU Polytechnic. Many of these programs try to imparta classical education to their graduates, in a more focused manner that by simply requiring thestudents to take a set of courses in the humanities.At ASU Polytechnic offers a multidisciplinary engineering degree, in which students take thesame coursework during the first two years, and from then on, the student begins to pursue theirchosen area of concentration. In addition, every semester, the students take a three- to 4-semester-hour project course, where they work in teams to design products and solve realisticengineering problems
in the 1930s tomanage river flows and control flooding. When water levels on the Ohio river were projected toexceed 61 feet above at the Cairo, Illinois river gauge, the US Army Corp of Engineers(USACE) ordered the detonation of explosives that would intentionally flood farms in BirdsPoint-New Madrid Floodway, but spare Cairo from sure destruction. The induced breach andflooding of the 53,824 ha of Missouri farmland resulted in the loss of 2011 crops (i.e., wheat,corn and soybeans) and caused damage to future soil productivity [9]. While the floodway was originally constructed in 1928, it had never been activated until2008, despite earlier extreme flood events. Taken in isolation, the floodway decision faced bythe USACE in 2011 has
Site) Hypothetical Case 8. Human Subjects (RCR Role Plays) (Web Page on this Site) Open-Ended Scenario 9. Hazardous Substances (RCR Role Plays) (Web Page on this Site) Open-Ended Scenario 10. Conflict of Interest (RCR Role Plays) (Web Page on this Site) Open-Ended Scenario 11. Whistleblowing - Professional Relationships (RCR Role Plays) (Web Page on this Site) Open-Ended Scenario 12. The Extended Project (Web Page on this Site) Hypothetical Case Page 25.836.14
way or another it should engage the studentin the perennial questions of philosophy. There are many ways of achieving this goal. There is aneed to bring together relevant practice, and there is a need to experiment. In terms of theorganization of the curriculum and the need for mixed learning communities the need fordivergent visioning is great.Acknowledgements.I am deeply indebted to Dr Alec Martin who introduced me to the works of John Macmurraywhen he was the responsible official in the UK Employment Department for our project on theanalysis of jobs done by engineers. I am very grateful to Dr‟s Alan A. Cheville and Mani Mina,and Ms Sarah Heywood for their perceptive comments on the draft of this textNotes and references[1] Koen, B. V (2003