- Conference Session
- Innovations in Teaching and Research in Physics or Engineering Physics III
- Collection
- 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Bert Pariser, Technical Career Institutes
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering Physics & Physics
AC 2012-4139: PHOTON MASSDr. Bert Pariser, Technical Career Institutes Bert Pariser is a faculty member in the Electronic Engineering Technology and the Computer Science Technology departments at Technical Career Institutes. His primary responsibility is developing curricu- lum and teaching methodology for physics, thermodynamics, electromagnetic field theory, computers, and databases. Pariser has prepared grant proposals to the National Science Foundation, which produced the funding for a Fiber Optics Laboratory. He served as Faculty Advisor to the IEEE and Tau Alpha Pi National Honor Society. Pariser was instrumental in merging Tau Alpha Pi National Honor Society into the ASEE. In addition, Pariser co-founded
- Conference Session
- Innovations in Teaching and Research in Physics or Engineering Physics II
- Collection
- 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Bert Pariser, Technical Career Institutes
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering Physics & Physics
AC 2012-5386: TEACHING COLLEGE PHYSICSDr. Bert Pariser, Technical Career Institutes Bert Pariser is a faculty member in the Electronic Engineering Technology and the Computer Science Technology departments at Technical Career Institutes. His primary responsibility is developing curricu- lum and teaching methodology for physics, thermodynamics, electromagnetic field theory, computers, and databases. Pariser has prepared grant proposals to the National Science Foundation, which produced the funding for a Fiber Optics Laboratory. He served as Faculty Advisor to the IEEE and Tau Alpha Pi National Honor Society. Pariser was instrumental in merging Tau Alpha Pi National Honor Society into the ASEE. In addition
- Conference Session
- Innovations in Teaching and Research in Physics or Engineering Physics I
- Collection
- 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Michael De Antonio, New Mexico State University
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering Physics & Physics
review cycle and forward.1 The definition previously stated that ProgramEducational Objectives are broad statements that describe the career and professionalaccomplishments that the program is preparing the graduate to achieve. This definition is nowchanged to Program Educational Objectives are broad statements that describe what graduatesare expected to attain within a few years of graduation.2 In light of these changes, ABETsuggests that programs reassess their Program Educational Objectives to fit the new criteriondefinition.BackgroundWorkshops and papers have addressed the previous definition of Educational Objectives. Locke3in his ABET workshop at the 2010 ASEE Midwest Section Conference states that some of themost common pitfalls when
- Conference Session
- Innovations in Teaching and Research in Physics or Engineering Physics III
- Collection
- 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Baha Jassemnejad, University of Central Oklahoma; Wei Siang Pee, University of Central Oklahoma; Kevin Rada, University of Central Oklahoma; Devon Kelley Keith, University of Central Oklahoma; Dylan Bradley Miller; Evan C. Lemley, University of Central Oklahoma; Adam Dorety, University of Central Oklahoma
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering Physics & Physics
required to complete such aproject will become more extensive as the research group develops, eventually incorporating many of theconcepts and techniques learned by the students in the engineering curriculum. Students at each academiclevel will be assigned design challenges compatible with their background. A program is envisioned inwhich students will continue with the research project throughout their academic career, applying theknowledge acquired through their coursework to an increasingly complex sequence of design challenges.This paper describes the experiences of the first freshman group involved in the ROV research. Thesestudents are the pioneers in this group, and as such had to produce a complete ROV, which future groupswill improve upon
- Conference Session
- Innovations in Teaching and Research in Physics or Engineering Physics I
- Collection
- 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Jia-Ling Lin, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities; Manuela Romero, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Jennifer Binzley, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Eman A. Zaki, University of Wisconsin, Madison
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering Physics & Physics
. All the learning associated with an exam is in the studying I do before it takes place. E23 A good understanding of physics is necessary for me to achieve my career goals. A good grade in this course is not enough. E24 It is possible to pass this course (get "C" or better) without understanding physics very well. While we are pleased to learn that SI students have defined their learning goals and masteredbasic study skills, we are also troubled by some of their responses. Table (III) displays thequestions that produced a relatively higher percentage of “undesirable answers”. See Figure 2.Specifically, we are surprised that students seemed to respond to certain groups of questionsinconsistently.3,8 For