Technology had on theparticipants’ career paths. Over the nine years, there have been 131 undergraduate students whoparticipated. Ninety nine (76%) of these students were supported via funding from the NationalScience Foundation Research Experiences for Undergraduates program. The other 32 (24%)were supported through institutional funds. More than half of the students (56.5%) were female,26.7% of the students were from underrepresented groups, and 52.7% students without previousresearch experience. The undergraduate research program understudy is a 10-week engineeringresearch project working in research laboratories at the University or a collaborating MedicalSchool. A tiered mentoring structure was developed within the participating laboratories
also been recognized for his dedication to teaching in the College of Engineering (Rose and Everitt awards) and he is routinely nominated to the list of teachers ranked excellent at Illinois.Dr. Marcia Pool, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Dr. Marcia Pool is a Lecturer in bioengineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. In her career, Marcia has been active in improving undergraduate education through developing problem based laboratories to enhance experimental design skills, developing a preliminary design course focused on problem identification and market space (based on an industry partner’s protocol), and mentoring and guiding student teams through the senior design capstone course
bioengineering curriculum design and student learning outcomes. Page 26.283.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Bioengineering Global Health: Design and Implementation of a Summer Day Camp for High School StudentsAbstractSummer camps present opportunities for students to expand their knowledge of science andengineering principles and applications, acquire hands-on experience in laboratory techniques,and increase interest in pursuing college degrees and careers in
understanding student learning, and make students responsible for own learning. Therewas a statistically significant improvement in students understanding their own learning frommid-semester to end-of-semester (p=0.028, nmid = 129 and nend = 162, error bars = standarddeviation).In terms of utility value, students viewed favorably the inquiry-guided laboratory’s ability to beof value after graduation (“Value”), be useful in their career or future career goals (“Career”),and help them see the relevance of the material to the real world (“RealWorld”) as shown inFigure 4 below. Further, there was a small but statistically significant increase in agreement thatthe inquiry-guided format allowed students to see the relevance of the material to the real world
six areas that should be taken intoconsideration when developing course goals: foundational knowledge, application, integration,human dimension, caring, and learning how to learn.6A consideration for our department was that we have several “pathways” or plans of study withinbioengineering, such as biomaterials, biomechanics, tissue engineering, etc. This introductoryBioE course needed to support the educational desires of all bioengineering students as well ashelp those students that were “undecided” or unsure as to which pathway best fit their longer-term career goals.With the redesign, the new goals for BIOE 2001 are: “At the end of the course, students will… I. Be more interested in the bioengineering field so that they can
involves faculty and students spanningthree academic units at our university - Biomedical Engineering, Biological Sciences, andAnimal Science. The goals of our program are to prepare students for careers in regenerativemedicine in both academia and industry by providing them with broad technical, critical thinking,and problem solving skills. This paper will discuss the evolution of the program and assessmentof the program and our students.The Regenerative Medicine Program is a two-year program that consists of three components -one year of coursework, a nine-month internship, and a three-month Master’s project.Coursework includes intensive lab work and focuses on principles of stem cell biology, cellculture, scaffold development, cell sodding
Appendix). Prior to their use, the surveyswere approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at Western New England University.The primary goal of the surveys was to measure student interest and attitudes toward the POCTfield. The surveys consisted of 5-choice Likert questions that were designed to obtain studentfeedback on their current knowledge of POCT, confidence in their ability to develop POCTdevices, level of interest in pursuing further studies/training/careers in the area of POCT, and thesuitability of POCT devices for solving problems in medicine and biology. Students alsocompleted a Likert-scale skills inventory that prompted them to rate their current level ofknowledge and confidence in their ability to develop and/or utilize the
thatdistinguish itself from the other ITL methods: (1) A relatively longer duration and amount oftime a student is involved in the research project; (2) A clearly defined research scope andobjective; and (3) Promotion of both teamwork and individual excellence. This paper describeshow I leveraged my own background and student interest to initiate the collaborative researchproject, how undergraduates participated in the research project through different avenues, andhow the experience enhanced their skills in critical analysis, problem-solving, communicationand teamwork, which positively impacts their career, regardless of whether they pursue anindustry job or an academic position after graduation.Some practices I have been promoting in undergraduate
two key skills that engineering students should develop to achievesuccess. Most commonly, students are exposed to training for these skills separately in the earlyyears of their collegiate coursework followed by their combination in the latter years of study,particularly in upper-level design courses. In fall of 2014, we introduced “Design forDisabilities: Engineering Design Principles for Minimizing Patient Limitations,” a new first-yearwriting intensive seminar (FWIS), in an attempt to expose students to engineering designprinciples and technical communication in the context of an experiential-learning project early intheir college careers. By doing this, we hoped to provide a strong foundation for the developmentof core competencies in our
, Engineering, and Math (S.T.E.M.) career fields, with hopes ofimproving the United States’ economic standing in the global economy1. At the same time, thereis a waning interest among students in STEM fields; significant research has been conductedlooking at ways to increase interest. Traditional education methods used in the past leave roomfor improvement when it comes to encouraging students to pursue science careers2. Educatorsare seeing students with considerably different characteristics than previous generations3.Today’s students are digitally literate, connected, immediate, experiential, social, prefer teams,achievement oriented, value engagement, value experience, visual and kinesthetic, and impactdriven. All of this suggests that a change is
Page 26.1099.5motivated them to do well in the course and 64% thought that it the muddiest point exercise wasan effective strategy to increase engagement and allow them to better understand their learning.67% felt that the muddiest points exercise increased their responsibility for their own learning. Interms of utility value, 92% felt that the material learned in the course will be of use after graduationand 93% thought that the material will be useful in their career. Lastly, 97% said that the materialin the course allowed them to see the relevance of statistics to the real world. In terms of cost,74% of the students thought that the muddiest point exercise did not require too much effort anddid not make them anxious or frustrated. 86% of
Science Foundation CAREER Award. He is grateful to have been awarded the Weidman Pro- fessorship in Leadership and to have recently been recognized with BYU’s Technology Transfer Award.Dr. Ruth Ochia P.E., Temple University Ruth S. Ochia received the B.S. degree in biomedical engineering from The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, in 1992 and the Ph.D. degree in bioengineering from the University of Washington, Seat- tle, WA, in 2000. From 2000 to 2002, she was a Post-doctoral Fellow in the Center of Locomotion Studies, at The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA. From 2002 to 2006, she was a Post- doctoral Fellow and then Assistant Professor at Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL. From 2006
and undergraduate courses. She received her B.S. (2006), M.S. (2012), and Ph.D. (2012) in the field of Biomedical Engineering from the University of Southern Califor- nia, focusing on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling during her graduate career. Page 26.263.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Assessment of performance and student feedback in the flipped classroom1. Background:The flipped classroom approach inverts the traditional “teaching/lecture – learning/homework”model by presenting the course content outside of classroom ahead of the traditional lectureperiod and