course at UCSC wherein interdisciplinary teams of students work in an layered apprenticeship model with community mentors to design and implement sustainable solutions to water, energy, waste, transportation and social challenges using ”green technology”. Dr. Ball has worked as a research fellow with two NSF Centers for Learning and Teaching and most recently on several NSF projects that focus the integration of engineering and social science to support the advancement of experiential learning for sustainability in higher education.Dr. Michael S. Isaacson, University of California, Santa Cruz Michael Isaacson is the Narinder Singh Kapany Professor emeritus, professor of electrical engineering, Director of the Center
and professional development of engineering undergraduate students.Dr. Sandra G Luca, Loyola Marymount University Sandra Luca is the Director of Student Engagement for the Frank R. Seaver College of Science and Engineering. She earned her Ph.D. in Higher Education Administration from the University of Arizona in Tucson.Prof. Jeremy S Pal, Loyola Marymount UniversityDr. jose A saez Page 26.897.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Impacts of Service-Learning Projects on the Technical and Professional Engineering Confidence of First Year Engineering
Paper ID #13586Qualitative Analysis of Boundary Spanning Implications within Interviews ofEngagement StakeholdersDr. David A. Delaine, Universidade de S˜ao Paulo and IFEES David A. Delaine has a Ph.D. in electrical engineering from Drexel University, in Philadelphia, USA. He currently serves as an executive member of the International Federation of Engineering Education Societies (IFEES), as Vice President for Student Engagement, Diversity, and Inclusion. IFEES aims to strengthen engineering education practices around the world. He has recently completed his tenure as a Fulbright Scholar and is currently performing
the Civil War, shortly after the land-grant legislation was enacted, when the historically blackcollege system was established. The intentional choices made by Tuskegee and Howard collegesto offer classical humanities educational programs versus applied programs was done with theintent of providing a higher-intellectual set of opportunities for their graduates, in effect allowingthem to become doctors and lawyers and teachers as opposed to applied technologists (Carney).The comparable choice for tribally controlled colleges, currently being decided eitherintentionally or not, is the focus of this paper.The tribal college movement, largely born in the late 1960’s and early 1970’s, served twoimmediate demands on their respective reservations
. Yee, "How Service Learning Affects Students," Higher Education Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, 2000, p. 21.4. J. Eyler and D. E. Giles, Jr., Where's the Learning in Service-Learning?, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1999.5. I. S. Fisher, "Integrating Service-Learning Experiences into Postcollege Choices," in Service-Learning in Higher Education, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1996, p. 209.6. S. Krishnan and T. L. Nilsson, "Engineering Service Learning: Case Study on Preparing Students for the Global Community," in American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, San Antonio, 2012.7. B. Tempest, M. Pando, S. Loree and M. A. Hoff, "A Student
contact information with the team leader toallow follow-up.After the training event, teams are effectively empowered and dispatched to plan and organizetheir ambassador event(s) with minimal assistance from the Office of K-12 Outreach. Teamleaders contact their team members, school liaison and alumni and meet again with their teams tofinalize the event date(s) and venue. This autonomy and empowerment of the teams allows themto design their event to meet the particular needs of their hometown high school and leveragetheir own skillsets and experiences in putting together an effective outreach event. It also keepsthe central management and maintenance of the program to one of supporting and answering thequestions of the team leaders, as opposed to
research questions that guided this study.SD ModelingSD modeling allows for tangible systems thinking to take place through the building of modelsthat help the modeler(s) gain knowledge and understanding on potentially non-intuitive systemicoutcomes of a particular problem.10 A SD modeling exercise can take both qualitative andquantitative forms, where qualitative modeling (diagramming) typically precedes, and thenfacilitates, quantitative modeling (simulating);11 however, qualitative system dynamic modeling Page 26.1039.3often stands by itself as a useful way to teach systems thinking when the goal is to fosterproductive conversation about how
, disciplinary affiliation(s), gender, non-engineering degrees in background, additional administrative roles (Deans, Directors), and institutional characteristics. 2. How are the characteristics of LTS faculty different from other engineering faculty? a. It is hypothesized that LTS faculty might be different than other engineering faculty, since differences have been found among the students who engage in LTS; for example, women might be over-represented among LTS faculty compared to engineering faculty overall. b. The demographic characteristics for LTS faculty were identified to answer research question 1. The characteristics for engineering faculty overall were taken
could examine other ways to view studentvolunteerism and the potential effects that those experiences have on the attitudes of personaland professional social responsibility in engineering students.AcknowledgementsThis material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant#1158863. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.Bibliography1 A. W. Astin, L. J. Vogelgesang, E. K. Ikeda and J. A. Yee, How Service Learning Affects Students, Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute, 2000.2 J. S. Eyler, D. E. Giles, C. M. Stenson and C. J. Gray, "At a Glace: What We
Psychology, 30, pp. 157-197.2. Allen, T. D., Eby, L. T., 2003, “Relationship Effectiveness for Mentors: Factors Associated with Learning andQuality,” Journal of Management, 29, pp. 469-486. Page 26.523.103. Marra, R. M., Rodgers, K. A., Shen, D., Bogue, B., 2012, “Leaving Engineering: A Multi-Year Single InstitutionalStudy,” Journal of Engineering Education, 101, pp. 6-27.4. Bender, W. N., 2012, “Project-Based Learning: Differentiating Instruction for the 21st Century,” Corwin Press.5. Boss, S., Krauss, J., 2007, “Reinventing Project-Based Learning,” International Society for Technology inEducation, Eugene, OR.6. ABET, Engineering
stewardship of resources, reduction of energy use and materials, and social justice.172.1.4 Engineering and Citizens7Description: Viewing people as citizens recognizes all people as being complex individuals, withsocial and human rights. This includes the following characteristics:18 • There are complex and conflicting relationships, • Relationships are shaped by differences in power and privilege, • It is important to recognize alliances with a particular common purpose(s), and • Citizens have rights, including the power to decide, vote, call projects off, capacity to define problems and propose solutions, intellectual capital, etc.Listening Style: Listening to people as citizens requires contextual listening, while focusing
don't always think about the implications the work I am doing may have on other people. The experiential aspects of this course forced me to rethink how I learn in order to put human life into my thought process.”References: 1. Cohen, C. C. D., & Deterding, N. (2009). Widening the net: National estimates of gender disparities in engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(3), 211-226. 2. Brainard, S. G. and Carlin, L. (1998). A Six-Year Longitudinal Study of Undergraduate Women in Engineering and Science. Journal of Engineering Education, 87(4), 369–375. 3. Reichert, M. and Absher, M. (1997). Taking Another Look at Educating African American Engineers: The Importance of Undergraduate Retention
Paper ID #11208Development of the Whole Student through an Engineering Abroad ServiceLearning Program: Rainwater Catchment/Filtration System in GuatemalaJo-Ann Panzardi PE, Cabrillo College Jo-Ann Panzardi is a Professor and Chair of the Engineering Department at Cabrillo College, Aptos, California since August 1995. She is also the Program Director of a USDE Title III STEM grant and Project Investigator of a NSF EAGER grant and NSF S-STEM grant. She received her BS in Civil Engineering from Polytechnic Institute of New York and her MSCE in Geotechnical Engineering from University of Maryland. She is a registered civil
that they wanted to avoid keepinga design notebook, which is a requirement for the EPICS class. After discussions with the currentstudent leaders, it was determined that the actual differential of work between EWB-USA andEPICS is not that significant and the benefits of the additional accountability of being graded forcredit motivated the change in policy to limit the number of audits.The EPICS curricular and assessment processes aligned very well with the EWB-USA structureand philosophy. Both EPICS and EWB-USA promote and rely on strong student leaders. TheEPICS structure did not reduce the student leadership and it allowed the inclusion of theprofessional mentors. The relationship between the professional mentor(s) and the faculty
. 2007. Toward Cost-Effective Solar Energy Use. Science 315(5813): 798-801. DOI: 10.1126/science.1137014.[8] Gleick, P.H., et al. The World’s Water 2006-2007: Biennial Report on Freshwater Resources.Chicago: Island Press.[9] Hillie, T., et al. 2006. Nanotechnology, Water, and Development.Dillon, CO: MeridianInstitute.[10] United Nations Development Programme. 2006. Human Development Report 2006: BeyondScarcity: Power, Poverty and the Global Water Crisis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.[11] American Society of Civil Engineers. 2005. Report Card for America’s Infrastructure.http://www.asce.org/reportcard/2005/ page.cfm?id=203.[12] Zielinski, S. 2006. New Mobility: The Next Generation of Sustainable UrbanTransportation. The Bridge 36(Winter): 33-38
simply to non-technical audiences; leadership skills by presenting the engineeringdesign challenge in partnership with their co-facilitator(s); and creative problem-solving skills byassisting students and their families in iterating and persevering in the design challenge process.Employee Community Engagement and Corporate CitizenshipEmployee community engagement or corporate citizenship initiatives such as skills-basedvolunteerism programs can contribute to overall employee engagement and drive value for thebusiness. Companies are increasingly investing in employee engagement efforts in order torecruit, retain, and develop their workforce amidst high levels of disengagement, shiftingworkforce demographics, and a competitive marketplace for
Service Learning," in Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering EducationAnnual Conference & Exposition, 2004.5 Merriam-Webster..Defintion of multidisciplinary. http://www.merriam-webster.com accessed January 27, 2015.6 Merriam-Webster..Defintion of interdisciplinary. http://www.merriam-webster.com accessed January 27, 2015.7 K. K. Perkins, W. K. Adams, S. J. Pollock, N. D. Finkelstein and C. E. Wieman, “Correlating Student Beliefs WithStudent Learning Using The Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Surve,” in Proceedings of the 2004 PhysicsEducation Research Conference. 2004 Page 26.1758.12
help rectify this situation. In the process,it is believed that enthusiasm for engineering and science will increase among both adults andyoung people. Survey data indicates that demonstrating the underlying ingenuity behind nature,as exemplified above, has been moderately successful in accomplishing this goal.Thus far, as a part of this grant-funded project, 79 presentations have been made to communitygroups, churches and Christian schools with a total audience of 2,500 people. A diverse selectionof 23 of these groups was anonymously surveyed in an attempt to assess the impact of thepresentations and drive improvements for the future. The presentations typically close with livelyquestion and answer sessions between speaker(s) and audience. A
Page 26.349.12 global community”, 119th American Society of Engineering Education Conference, San Antonio, USA, June 20124. Davis, R., Krishnan, S., Nilsson, T., & Fylling Rimland, P., “IDEAS: Interdisciplinary Design Engineering and Service”, International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering, Humanitarian Engineering and Social Entrepreneurship, Special Issue: University Engineering Programs That Impact Communities: Critical Analyses and Reflection, January 2015, pp. 165-1795. Guadalupe River Park Conservancy, http://www.grpg.org/the-conservancy/mission6. City of San Jose’s Public Works Department, http://www.sanjoseca.gov/publicworks7. 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design, Department of Justice