13 (Q) / % 40 14 discrimination rQ P 30 4 6 73 8 10 5 20 2 11 12
client’s browser, the browser generates an http GET requestthat sends the name and value from the button to the web server. The following is the http requestsent from the client browser to the web server:-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------GET /?APPLIANCE1=2 HTTP/1.1Host: 10.0.0.20User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux i686; rv:18.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/18.0Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8Accept-Language: en-ZA,en-GB;q=0.8,en-US;q=0.5,en;q=0.3Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflateReferer: http://10.158.161.25/Connection: keep-alive
, together with data from the online forum, grade data, attendance, assignment submissions, and lab exercise scores, we will use the queue data to characterize successful students and their study habits, so we can prescribe behaviors that we believe will result in positive course outcomes.References1 : “NEMO-Q | Line Management Systems”, http://www.nemo-q.com2 : “Appointment Scheduling Software, Scheduling System | Q-nomy”,http://www.qnomy.com/Products/Queue-Management.aspx3 : “STEM Confidence Gap | Piazza Blog”, http://blog.piazza.com/stem-confidence-gap/4 : MacWilliam, Malan. “Scaling Office Hours: Managing Live Q&A in Large Courses.” Journal ofComputing Sciences in Colleges 28.3 (2013): 94-101
) critically evaluating the state of research andrecommending improvements, and (c) identifying neglected topics that require the attention ofresearchers. Our completed systematic review will contribute in each of these three areas.Bibliography1. Ma, W., Adesope, O. O., Nesbit, J. C., & Liu, Q. (2014). Intelligent tutoring systems and learning outcomes: A Page 26.1754.10 meta-analytic survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 901-918.2. Sabo, K. E., Atkinson, R. K., Barrus, A. L., Joseph, S. S., & Perez, R. S. (2013). Searching for the two sigma advantage: Evaluating algebra intelligent tutors. Computers in
, w2, T) 4. A function that plots a phase diagram (35 points) function PhaseDiagram(HA1, SA1, HB1, SB1, w1, HA2, SA2, HB2, SB2, w2, Tmin, Tmax)Project 2: Modeling HIV Response to Immune TherapyYour assignment is to write a computer program that will model the progress of the HIV infection in a patient that isbeing treated with a drug of a given effectiveness, Q. The HIV infected patient is assumed to start with a T-cellcount of T(0)=1, this being a healthy level, and having no infected T-cells, I(0)=0. We assume that infection occursat day 0 a viral load of V(0)=0.01. We will assume that if a drug is administered, therapy starts on the day ofinfection. In the model, if the HIV infected patient’s T-cell count, including
Peer Instruction: A Study of Four Computer Science Courses. Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education. ACM, 2013.[17] OpenDSA: Open Source Interactive Data Structures and Algorithms. http://algoviz.org/OpenDSA/. February 2015.[18] Open Learning Initiative at Carnegie Mellon University. http://oli.cmu.edu/. February 2015.[19] Senack, E. Fixing the Broken Textbook Market. U.S. Public Interest Research Group, Student PIRG, January 2014.[20] Simon, B., S. Esper, L. Porter, and Q. Cutts. Student Experience in a Student- Centered Peer Instruction Classroom. Proceedings of the ninth annual international
cloud landscape described, categorized, and compared - by Johan Den Haan. Retrieved February 1, 2015, from http://www.theenterprisearchitect.eu/blog/2013/10/12/the-cloud-landscape-described- categorized-and-compared/[5] Dong, B., Zheng, Q., Yang, J., Li, H., Qiao, M. 2009. An E-learning Ecosystem Based on Cloud Computing Infrastructure. Advanced Learning Technologies, 2009. ICALT 2009. Ninth IEEE International Conference on , vol., no., pp.125,127, 15-17.[6] Education Solutions. Retrieved February 2, 2015, from http://microsoft.com/education/en- us/solutions/Pages/cloud_computing.aspx[7] Guoli, Z., Wanjun, L. 2010. The applied research of cloud computing platform architecture in the E-Learning area. Computer and Automation
Exposition, Atlanta, GA, June 2013. Page 26.516.9 9. Bakrania, S., “Getting Students Involved in a Classroom with an iPhone App”, Proceedings of the 2012 ASEE Conference and Exposition, San Antonio, TX, June 2012.10. Kowalski, F. V., Kowalski, S. E., Gardner, T. Q., “Using Mixed Mobile Computing Devices for Real-Time Formative Assessment”, Proceedings of the 2013 ASEE Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, GA, June 2013.11. Hake, R. R., “Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses, American Journal of Physics, 66-74, 1998.12
theimpedance modulus and phase, as well as others parameters (C or L, Q) and plot the values onthe LCD display. Page 26.1775.6 Figure 3. Winning Project Europe Region - 2014USA RegionThe first Digital Design Competition was organized at Rose Hulman Institute of Technology, In,USA, starting in the academic year 2006-2007. The contest was very popular among students, anaverage of 10-15 students participating every year, despite a very busy schedule. Students whopresented their final projects received professional development credits. Starting in 2012, thecontest became national and the last three editions were organized as
Big Before Massive: Scaling Up Participatory Learning Analytics. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge (pp. 93–97). New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:10.1145/2567574.256762617 Steen, M. (2011). Tensions in human-centred design. CoDesign, 7(1), 45–60.18 Friesen, N. (2013). Learning Analytics: Readinessand Rewards. Canadian Journal of Learning & Technology, 39(4), 1–12.19 Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.20 Robson, C. (2011). Real world research. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.21 Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand
- 1308, 1998.[6] V. Ramakrishnan, Y. Zhuang, S. Z. Hu, J. P. Chen and K. C. Tan, "Development of a Web- Based Control Experiment for a Coupled Tank," Proceedings of the American Control Conference, vol. 6, pp. 4409 - 4413, 2000.[7] C. Batur, Q. Ma, K. Larson and N. Kettenbauer, "Remote Tuning of a PID Position Controller via Internet," Proceedings of the American Control Conference, pp. 4403 - 4406, 2000.[8] F. M. Schaf and C. E. Pereira, "PID Controller Remote Tuning Experiment with Learning Environment Integration," Proceedings of 12th IFAC Symp. on Information Control Problems in Manufacturing, pp. 261- 266, 2006.[9] K. P. Ayodele, O. Akinwale, L. O. Kehinde, O. Osasona, E. O. B. Ajayi and O. O. Akinwunmi, "Advanced
communications technologies for process automation—an experimental study," ISA transactions, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 461-470, 2012.[12] Y. H. Elawady and A. S. Tolba, "general framework for remote laboratory access: A standarization point of view," in 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology (ISSPIT), 2010.[13] A. Tekin, F. Ata and M. Gökbulut, "Remote control laboratory for DSP‐controlled induction motor drives," Computer Applications in Engineering Education, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 702-712, 2012.[14] S. Hong, X. Zheng, B. Dalage, V. Kristiansen, Ø. Strøm, M. S. Shur, T. A. Fjeldly, J.-Q. Lu and T. Ytterdal, "Conducting laboratory experiments over the Internet," IEEE Transactions on Education, vol
: A Description of CPR. 2007, (2003).15. Gehringer, E. F. Electronic Peer Review and Peer Grading in Computer-Science Courses. Thirty-second SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer Science Education (2001).16. Liu, E. Z., Lin, S. S. J., Yuan, S. & Chiu, C. Web-Based Peer Review: The Learner as Both Adapter and Reviewer. IEEE Trans. Educ. 44, 246–251 (2001).17. Moreira, D. A. & Silva, E. Q. A Method to Increase Student Interaction Using Student Groups and Peer Review over the Internet. Educ. Inf. Technol. 8, 47–54 (2003).18. Ngu, A. H. H., Shepherd, J. & Magin, D. Engineering the ‘Peers’ System: The Development of a Computer-Assisted Approach to Peer Assessment. in Research and Development in
this case asks the student to draw the vector vˆQ,guess as a guessto the true velocity direction vector vˆQ of point Q. The question will be graded ascorrect if the true velocity direction is within a certain tolerance δ, that is, if vˆQ − vˆQ,guess < δ. Other question formats within PrairieLearn include numericalanswers and multiple choice. On the right side of the question page, the student can seetheir current mastery score, as well as question-specific information including thecurrent recommendation level, the number of points that will be awarded if this questionis answered correctly, the number of points that will be deducted if this question isanswered incorrectly, and the number of times this question has already been attempted.The
Stone. Haptic feedback: A brief history from telepresence to virtual reality. In Haptic Human-Computer Interaction, pages 1–16. Springer, 2001.[21] OAJ Van der Meijden and MP Schijven. The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review. Surgical endoscopy, 23(6):1180–1190, 2009.[22] Richard Q Van der Linde, Piet Lammertse, Erwin Frederiksen, and B Ruiter. The hapticmaster, a new high-performance haptic interface. In Proc. Eurohaptics, pages 1–5, 2002.[23] N. Hungr, B. Roger, A.J. Hodgson, and C. Plaskos. Dynamic physical constraints: Emulating hard surfaces with high realism. Haptics, IEEE Transactions on, 5(1):48–57, Jan 2012.[24] R.Q. van
in the Laboratory: Comparison of industrially situated virtual laboratories to capstone physical laboratories. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(3) 540-573.8. Steadman, R. H.; Coates, W. C.; Huang, Y. M., et al (2006) Simulation-based training is superior to problem-based learning for acquisition of critical assessment and management skills. Critical Care Medicine, 34(1) 151-157.9. Curtin, L. B.; Finn, L. A.; Czosnowski, Q. A.; Whiman, C. B. and Cawley, M. J. (2011) Computer-based simulation training to improve learning outcomes in mannequin-based simulation exercises. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 75(6) 1-6.10. De Jong, T. & Van Joolingen, W. (1998) Scientific discovery learning with computer